I watched the ABC-News interview with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris on Sunday and I have to admit I was disappointed at the lack of research shown by David Muir and Southeastern Louisiana University alumnus, Robin Roberts who lobbed softball after softball at the Democratic nominees.
Muir, for example, asked Biden to respond to Trump charges that Biden, if elected, would “defund” police departments, a claim that Biden naturally denied on its face.
He was being truthful, of course. His record in the Senate underscores that in spades.
In 1981, for example, the General Accounting Office released a report commissioned by Biden which called for more extensive use of the use of CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE, a provision that law enforcement agencies across the country have abused well beyond its intended use, Jefferson Davis Parish being a prime example of such abuse. Read more HERE.
Under that law, if you so much as lend your vehicle to a friend who then uses it to transport or even possess a small quantity of marijuana, you can lose your car to the local law enforcement agency which can use it in undercover raids or sell it outright. The same goes for your residence, should your teenager be caught with an illegal drug in your home.
In one instance in northern California, a family owned several hundred acres of prime forest land. Unbeknownst to the owners, a small, remote corner of their property was used to grow marijuana by trespassers. They lost their entire property to asset forfeiture when the growers were busted because the burden of proof is on the property owner to show that he was not part of the ongoing drug operation/possession. In other words, the innocent until proven guilty concept is turned on its head.
Radley Balko, an award-winning investigative reporter, in his 2014 book Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America’s Police Forces, writes that in 1989, when President G.H.W Bush pushed his Byrne grant program, which infused federal cash into local police programs, many Democrats, including Biden, said the bill didn’t go far enough.
Biden, who then chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee, told Associated Press that Bush’s bill, “quite frankly, is not tough enough, bold enough, or imaginative enough to meet the crisis at hand.”
Among other things that both the Reagan and first Bush administrations advocated was defunding….not the police, but treatment centers for addicts. Treatment centers, they claimed, just did not work. And the Biden-led Democrats agreed. That issue should have come up Sunday night.
Thus, was born the SWAT assault teams that, originating in Los Angeles, proliferated to the remote corners of the country, found in virtually every municipal and county law enforcement agency – with or without the proper training.
Originally intended for riots and dealing with hostage situations, the use of SWAT teams became so commonplace that Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio employed one in a raid that rendered embarrassing results. With ramrod attached, an urban assault vehicle with none other than actor Steven Seagal at the controls, knocked down a residence in order to bust an apparent community-threatening cockfighting operation. Seagal justified his participation by saying he didn’t like animal abuse. The chickens seized in the raid were euthanized. Problem solved. Euthanizing chickens: how humiliating.
None of these examples were addressed in Sunday night’s so-called tough interview. I would have liked to have Biden explain that as well as his verbal abuse of Anita Hill in the Clarence Thomas Supreme Court confirmation hearings back in 1991.
For the reasons above, I would have preferred a stronger (and yes, younger – we’re the same age) candidate like Corey Booker or Mayor Pete, but I’m forced to go with the hand I was dealt.
So, even with those negatives – and they certainly are that – I can still see no way out of the mess we’re in today other than supporting his candidacy over a pretender, a shop-worn failure such as Donald Trump.
There is an online service (I suppose one could call it a service) called Quora which fields questions from readers on a multitude of subjects, the most popular ones being about The Beatles and Donald Trump, mixed in with the deeply personal ones involving sexual encounters, overcoming bullies, etc.
One that caught my eye as recently as last Friday was this: “Why is Donald Trump criticized so mercilessly? Is he really that bad?”
I cite this particular one not because of the question, but because of the responses provided by several readers. There are several good explanations but the first one is by far, the best.
You can read all of them HERE.
It’s worth your time to read them all.
Read Full Post »