Louisiana Voice

By Paul Spillman

The headlines are all about the Senate recess and Trump’s desire to see the SAVE Act passed, possibly the most inaccurately devised acronym for a piece of legislation ever to come out of Congress. But while Trump is determined to turn the “world’s greatest deliberative body” into a rubber stamp for his agenda, the SAVE Act isn’t the only bill attempting to advance.

After first saying it was unlikely the Protect College Sports Act (PCSA) would come up for a vote before the August recess Senate Majority Leader John Thune then huddled with the legislation’s sponsors and sent out a revised bill to the commissioner of the Big Ten, Tony Petitti, and the commissioner of the SEC, Greg Sankey, with a deadline of 9:00 a.m. today to respond.

Both conferences let the deadline pass without issuing a statement. But both conferences also have been in constant communication with each other, and have meetings scheduled with university presidents and administrators that will likely continue until some agreement on position is reached.

The sponsors of the bill conceded to many of the conferences’ demands, but did not address all their concerns. It did agree to make the pooling of media rights strictly voluntary regardless of how the majority voted, and without penalty or punishment – a necessary concession if Senators had any hope of getting buy-in from the Big Ten and SEC.

The revised bill also permits a fund for retaining athletic rosters above the agreed upon revenue sharing cap and prevents venture capitalists and the like from buying media rights and creating a “super-league,” both sticking points for the conferences.

But they didn’t get everything they wanted and much of the revision sent to the conferences were still in draft form. Also, a third section has been added addressing historically black colleges and universities (HBCU) but was left completely blank in copies sent out.

The Big Ten is in the midst of its annual Media Days event. Pettiti addressed the media and was asked about the revised bill. He said, more than once, the Big Ten wanted to see the final legislation before committing one way or the other. Sankey issued an almost identical statement. Whether the two conferences will speak publicly on it or not they are obviously aligned and in agreement on what reform is acceptable and what options might be considered.

Senate watchers say missing today’s deadline almost eliminates the chance the bill can come up for a vote before the Senate recess on August 7. That may have been the intent of both Pettiti and Sankey. Petitti said when addressing the media, “When you ask for help, you don’t always get the help you ask for.” No truer words were ever spoken about Congress.

Remember Brendan Sorsby, the Texas Tech quarterback who earlier this summer won an injunction against the NCAA to continue playing even though he had been ruled ineligible for gambling? Immediately following that ruling grandstanding Texas Senate candidate and current Texas AG Ken Paxton threatened the Big XII will legal action if they did not allow Sorsby to play. In return the Big XII conference filed a federal lawsuit against Paxton claiming that as a conference with membership in agreement it could enforce its own rules. Well, Sorsby withdrew from college and dropped his lawsuit. But the Big XII did not drop its lawsuit against Paxton. It is still seeking a ruling it can enforce its own rules.

If the Big XII continues this suit and gets a favorable ruling the SEC and the Big Ten will almost assuredly make plans to leave the NCAA, no longer needing Congress for an antitrust exemption. But whatever legislation gets signed into law will bind those schools nonetheless. The SEC and the Big Ten would love to know how the Big XII lawsuit plays out before committing to any legislation, or even committing to the need for legislation. Currently no date has been scheduled to hear that case.

There are no quick fixes or easy answers. Congress is hellbent on forcing one for obvious reasons – college athletics is racing towards out-of-control and Congress is desperate for something it can hang its hat on. It may yet vote on this bill before it goes on recess. But consider how many Senators represent SEC and Big Ten states. Without the support of both conferences the chances of passage are slim at best. And that doesn’t even take into account the stated opposition of the Congressional Black Caucus, opposed to any legislation – especially impacting athletes at southern universities – in protest of recent Supreme Court rulings on voting rights.

LSU coach Lane Kiffin had his last scheduled public appearance today in Baton Rouge before fall practice starts. LSU players report next week. It might not happen before players report, or games begin, or even this season. But something is going to happen in college athletics and it’s going to bring change. A lot of change. On that, at least, there’s no debate.

Someone always playing
Corporation games
Who cares they’re always changing
Corporation names

Starship, 1985, written by Peter Wolf

The song We Built This City was recorded more than 40 years ago and even that far back the growing trend of monopoly control was abundantly evident.

Those who have studied American history (not the version espoused by TACO Bonespurs, but real history) know that it was Teddy Roosevelt who was known as the “trust buster,” but his successor, William Howard Taft was even more aggressive in his use of the Sherman Act, launching more antitrust cases in his four years than Roosevelt did in his seven-plus years.

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is a federal law banning monopolies, cartels and trusts in order to protect free competition in the marketplace. The act gave the government the authority to halt unfair business combinations that hurt trads but with the growing trend of takeovers, mergers and buy-outs, the original intention of the act appears to have been forgotten completely.

The spate of CORPORATE DEALS that have transpired in recent decades can only mean les competition which in turn, result in fewer choices and higher prices to the consumer.

One of the more alarming trends is the takeover of media by those with an agenda. David Ellison assumed control of Paramount which in turn owned CBS, Showtime and Paramount Pictures (Paramount Skydance had earlier purchased Warner Bros Discovery for $111 billion). The result has been a shakeup of CBS News, including the literal gutting of its showcase, 60 Minutes after Bari Weiss was named Editor-in-Chief. CBS News today is a mere shadow of its former self. Walter Cronkite must be spinning.

Likewise, The Walt Disney Company acquired ABC network way back in 1996. Disney also owns ESPN, Hulu and Disney+. NBC? That network is owned by Comcast through its subsidiary NBCUniversal.

And Disney? Well, Comcast, one of the more active corporations in the buy-out sweepstakes, tried to purchase Disney in 2004 for $66 billion ($112.5 billion in today’s dollars) but the deal tanked after both investor and Disney couldn’t agree on the acquisition.

But Comcast did not meet with failure on all attempts. Here are some of its purchases with purchase amounts at the time and today’s dollars in parenthesis:

• 2001—AT&T Broadband, $72 billion ($130.9 billion);
• 2009—General Electric (NBC Universal), $72 billion ($130.9 billion);
• 2014—Time-Warner Cable ($45.2 billion ($61.5 billion);
• 2018—21^st Century Fox, $65 billion ($83.3 billion);
• 2018—Sky pk., $34 billion ($43.6 billion)

Following the acquisitions involving Time, Inc., is a dizzying exercise in itself.

In 1989, Warner Communications purchased Time for $15.2 billion ($39.5 billion in today’s dollars) only to see AOL purchase the newly-named corporation Time-Warner in 2000 for $182 billion ($340.3). But then in 2014 Fox attempted unsuccessfully to purchase Time-Warner for the Blue Light Special price of $80 billion ($108.8 billion) but got stiffed by the Time-Warner Board chose not to engage with Fox honchos.

No matter. That same year, Comcast purchased Time-Warner Cable for $45.2 billion ($81.5 billion.  A year later, Charter Communications purchased Time-Warner Cable for $78.7 billion ($105.9 billion). Then in 2016, AT&T acquired Time-Warner for $85.4 billion ($114.6 billion).

It’s almost impossible to follow which corporation controls which corporation. In 1955, for instance, Monsanto bought Lion Oil for a paltry $550 million and in 1999, spent 50 times that much when it acquired Pharmacia & Upjohn for $26.5 billion ($51.2 billion).

But wait. A year earlier, in 1998, American Home Products failed in its attempted purchase of Monsanto for $34.4 billion ($68 billion). But in 2015, another failed attempt. This time Monsanto dropped his hostile bid for Syngenta for $46.5 billion ($63.2 billion) only to have Bayer, more famous for its aspirin, purchase Monsanto tor $54.5 billion ($73.1 billion).

The first recorded merger was in 1874 when Honeybrook Coal purchased Wilkesbarre Col and Iron for a mere pittance of $10,000 ($720 million in today’s dollars—talk about inflation!). Of course, it didn’t take long for the prices to begin escalating. The first six-figure acquisition occurred just five years later, in 1899, when American Spirits Manufacturing purchased Kentucky Distilleries and Warehouse Co. for $125,000 which would equate to $4.8 billion today.

The first seven-figure sale came in 1928 when Consolidated Gas Co. of New York purchased Brooklyn Edison for exactly $1 billion ($18.8 billion today).

It wasn’t until 1989, when Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, an investment firm, purchased RJR Nabisco for $31 billion ($80.5 billion) just four years after R.J. Reynolds had purchased Nabisco Brands for $4.9 billion ($14.7 billion).

But the Great Recession o 2008 appears to have really opened the floodgates. That’s when all those nice Wall Street banks went belly-up because of relaxation of regulations by Ronald Reagan. Here are the bailout amounts by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the amounts taxpayers had to contributed in 2008 in actual and (today’s) dollars:

• Citigroup, $45 billion ($67.3 billion;
• Bank of America, $45 billion ($67.2 billion);
• JP Morgan Chase, $25 billion ($37 billion);
• Wells Fargo $25, billion ($37 billion);
• AIG, $67 billion ($101.4 billion);

That’s a cool $207 billion ($310 billion), although the government was eventually repaid.

Then there was the General Motors bailout in 2009 which cost American taxpayers $49.5 billion ($74.3 billion). Unlike Ford’s $5.9 billion loan which was repaid, GM did not fully repay that $49.5 billion. Instead, the government converted most of the funds into a 61% stake and ultimately recouped approximately $39 billion.

The late Illinois Sen. Everett Dirkson is famous for once having said, “A billion here and a billion there and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.”

Dirkson didn’t live to see the really real money tossed around like beads in a Mardi Gras parade. Earlier this year xAI was purchased by Elon Musk’s SpaceX for $250 billion (with a combined entity valuation of $1.25 trillion).

Vodafone purchased Mannesmann in 1999 for $183 billion ($353.7 billion) and AOL’s 2000 purchase of Time-Warner for $182 billion ($340.3) rank among the largest acquisitions.

All of which should set off all kinds of alarms as we see more and more of America’s economy being cornered by a few conglomerates to the detriment of smaller, independent businesses struggling against the behemoths to keep the doors open.

Once those smaller enterprises are choked out—and they most assuredly will be—there will no longer be any incentive whatsoever to be competitive or to respond to the concerns of captive clientele.

It’s far past time for the new trust-busters to get busy.

Now’s your golden opportunity, you Yosemite Sam wannabe…

…to be reunited with Foghorn Leghorn

But be sure to bring your own mask. You’ll need it to insure anonymity because down deep, you’re all cowards.

It can no longer be ignored, denied or otherwise justified by any interpretation or defense of the Trump administration’s actions:

America is now officially a police state.

Take your time. Let the gravity of those seven words sink in and you will realize the dreadful accuracy of that assertion.

How else could you possibly explain masked men with no official law enforcement credentials (The “POLICE ICE” stenciled on the backs of their bullet-proof vests do not constitute fully-trained officers of the law) arresting 10,000 persons over a five-day period in June? ICE arrests 10,000 in 5 days | AP News

How else can you explain the wanton killings of nearly three dozen unarmed, innocent people by these Gestapo agents who all too often either do not even have or fail to activate body cams and who are not held accountable for the murders they commit?

(…And the list of fatalities above isn’t even complete…)

Take ICE thug David Brouillette, the man who gunned down 25-year-old Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero near the victim’s home in coastal Maine. Brouillette, it turns out, is an Army veteran with a history of struggling with serious mental health issues since childhood, according to his own relatives. Family members TOLD ASSOCIATED PRESS that Brouillette had a history of terrifying and violent behavior. He was said to be abusive of women, telling one in a voicemail that someone should slit her throat. His ex-wife said he once threw boiling water at her while holding their daughter. Yet, he was an official ICE agent, charged with protecting American citizens. Do you feel protected by this thug?

Only days earlier, an ICE agent shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston. Agents claimed the victim tried to run them down in his vehicle. Of course, that’s the same claim agents make in these cases—like that of Renee Nicole Good. That claim was disputed by witnesses, and, of course, there was no body cam video to back up that claim of “weaponization” of his vehicle. His son, Ronaldo Salgado, sad he learned of his father’s death not from official sources, but from a social media video taken from a passing auto.

The day following Brouillette’s killing of Joan Sebastian Guerrero in Maine, an unidentified man in Florida was struck and killed by a tractor-trailer truck as he was being pursued by ICE.

On July 14, following the Maine shooting, ICE announced it would temporarily end traffic stops

But guess what? Donald Trump did what he does best: shoot from the lip. Taking to Truth Social, he countermanded that order, directing ICE agents, who he said were “doing a GREAT job,” to continue doing traffic stops.

Trump Orders ICE to Not Change a Thing After Third Killing in a Week | The New Republic

Borrowing a phrase LBJ used to describe his predecessor’s Caribbean policies, Trump is running “a damned Murder, Inc.” through ICE. And one of its biggest branch offices is right here in Louisiana.

Inside-the-Black-Hole_Systemic-Human-Rights-Abuses-Against-Immigrants-Detained.pdf.

Louisiana has surged to the FOREFRONT OF NOTORIETY in the treatment of detainees, mostly by private prison companies like LaSalle Enterprises of Ruston and GEO Corp. of Boca Raton, Florida.

When searching online for ICE detention centers in Louisiana, it’s difficult to find anything positive about them. Plagued by inhuman conditions, reports abound about isolation, withholding of medical care that is often inadequate when received, stabbings, beatings and deprivation of civil and legal rights, story after story relates horrific treatment of immigrants and citizens alike.

Louisiana ICE Detention Centers Face Worsening Conditions – VisaVerge

Conditions at Louisiana ICE lockup worsen as detainees increase, immigrant rights advocates say • Louisiana Illuminator

Conditions are such that publications and organizations as diverse as The Washington Times, the Robert and Ethel Kennedy Human Rights Center and Physicians for Human Rights have found it necessary to feature Bayou State ICE facilities in a negative light.

Federal watchdog flags use-of-force violations at Louisiana’s largest ICE facility

End Louisiana Immigration Detention – Robert & Ethel Kennedy Human Rights Center

“Endless Nightmare”: Torture and Inhuman Treatment in Solitary Confinement in U.S. Immigration Detention – PHR

Even the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General’s office reported “horrifying” use-of-force violations at Winn Correctional Center in Winnfield operated by LaSalle.

DHS watchdog reveals ICE agents’ horrifying use-of-force violations

A Louisiana judge earlier this month ordered the ICE facility in Basile in Evangeline Parish to RELEASE A WOMAN only months after she had given birth when ICE ignored its own rules on detaining pregnant and postpartum women.

But that order notwithstanding, ICE, a rogue gang of vigilantes who are unable to conform in a civilized society, routinely defies or otherwise ignores judges’ orders to release detainees.

 How ICE defies judges’ orders to release detainees, step by step – POLITICO

And why not? Those private prisons like LaSalle are paid by the occupied bed, so it’s critical that as many beds as possible be occupied to generate top dollar for the private prison. And because they contribute generously to Republicans like Trump and Jeff Landry, it’s a dead certainty that the orders are going to come down from the Justice Department to DHA and to ICE to keep the facilities as full as possible at all times.

It was only a matter of time before Gov. Jeff Landry, with the blessings of DHS and Trump, would decide to open a detention facility in America’s deadliest prison, the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola. The decision to house asylum seekers in a place intended for hardened criminals tells you a lot about the mindset of the decision makers and their complete lack of human compassion.

The Notorious Prison Chosen As Latest ICE Facility – Newsweek

What can you do about it? Plenty.

Here is a list of corporations who bankroll the biggest ICE supporters in Congress and the contributions they’ve made for those members who, in turn, lead the efforts to fund ICE so that it can continue to terrorize innocent people with zero accountability:

One individual’s boycott of these corporations won’t mean a thing to them. But collectively, if thousands or tens-of-thousands suddenly were to cease support all at once, the message would be heard loud and clear.

Folks, this may get me in a world of trouble, but these damned ICE agents are nothing more than domestic terrorists masquerading as guardians of the universe as if they were Storm Troopers in a George Lucas movie. My question is, if they’re legitimate, why do they wear masks? Why do they drive unmarked vehicles? Why are local law enforcement agencies so eager to work with these criminals? Why do we allow it?