When you peruse some of the recent news stories around the country, it was inevitable that Gov. Jeff Landry, never one to be accused of coming up with an original idea, would fall in line with other red states in attempting to slam the door on public access to “public” records.
Just look at some of the actual headlines:
Worries over secrecy grow as state officials shield records from the public
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders proposes carve-out of Arkansas public records law during tax cut session
DeSantis is squeezing the sunshine out of Florida’s public records law, critics say
Attorney fees proposal could hurt access to Florida public records, watchdogs say
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott suspends part of open-meetings law
Arizona’s GOP legislators vote to shield themselves from public records laws
More secrecy than sunshine: Lawmakers push for exemptions to public records, open meetings laws
Senate advances bill that could chill access to public records
NORTH CAROLINA GOP HIDES REDISTRICTING PROCESS FROM STATE PUBLIC RECORDS LAW
NEWS ROUNDUP: ATTACKS ON PUBLIC RECORDS ACCESS IN THE STATES
And just to acknowledge that these efforts are exclusive to Republicans, there’s this from decidedly blue New Jersey:
New Jersey Democrats Attack the Public’s Right to Government Records
Unwilling to take a back seat to any other state in the sweepstakes to conceal actions from public view, we have this in the gret stet of Louisiana:
Jeff Landry pushes bill that would block public from viewing government records
Long time readers of this blog know by now that LouisianaVoice has found it necessary to file lawsuits on several occasions in order to obtain records that are clearly public. We also filed suit, along with four former SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY professors when we were barred from a hearing on their dismissals. State law (currently) provides that a public employee may request that his or her hearing be held in public as opposed to closed-door, or executive session.
All four of the professors requested an open hearing but Southern’s committee which hears professors’ claims decided otherwise – without a vote to go into executive session, which also is illegal (for now). We sued and won a judgment of $1,000 for each of the five plaintiffs but Southern has yet to pay up some five years later.
I use the words “currently” and “for now” because now, like the red states of Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Arizona, Ohio and Texas, Louisiana’s governor is chomping at the bit to exempt public officials from the public records laws.
Landry also wants to disqualify any out-of-state resident from seeking public records.
Wonder why? What on earth could Republican legislators and the governor be contemplating hiding? Surely, they are planning to do something that citizens might object to. Well, let’s see:
- Several top DEQ employees have abruptly quit over differences with Landry’s policies.
- Legislators are taking aim at public libraries, ostensibly over something called “inappropriate content.”
- Landry is determined to make it impossible for those wrongly convicted of crimes to get a new look at evidence – even though there have been no fewer than 97 documented cases in which people have been wrongly convicted of murders, robberies, rapes, and other crimes who have since been exonerated. There certainly are others.
- Our Huey Long wannabe governor wants to remove the job requirement stipulation for approval of industrial tax exemptions because, he says, the industrial tax exemption program “is not about job creating; it’s about capital investment.” That means it’s immaterial if an industry wants to locate in Louisiana or if an existing company wants to expand, even if all the work is to be done by robots while eliminating a few thousand jobs because it ain’t about jobs, it’s about capital improvements.
- Landry has voiced his intentions to hold a constitutional convention to re-write the Louisiana Constitution – over a two-week period. The last constitutional convention took more than a year to craft and Landry wants to do it in two weeks? C’mon! Just try to imagine how much special-interest matters would be shoved through with no time for public comment.
- And Landry showed his colors early when, while he was attorney general, he sued a reporter who had the temerity to request public records.
So, now maybe you have a little better handle on why the guv is dead-set on closing the books on public records. The fact is, he and his Republican legislature don’t want you to see what they’re doing.
It’s only a matter of time before there is an effort to conduct closed-door legislative committee hearings on bills and that the online video coverage goes black.
These people are insidiously untrustworthy, folks, and you’d better wake up to the fact that they’re not your friends.
It’s no wonder that the Washington Post carries this slogan beneath its Page One masthead:
Deocracy Dies in Darkness
Or that LouisianaVoice has chosen to go with this one:
It is understandable when a child is afraid of the dark
but unforgivable when a man fears the light



Thanks Mr. Tom
Also can be seen!!
https://www.soundoffla.com/gov-landrys-contempt-for-louisiana-citizens-on-public-records-serves-as-abject-lesson-for-need-for-lemon-law-for-governors-and-its-time-to-return-him-to-the-lot-as-being-severely-defective/
The voters of Louisiana will get what they voted for and pay the price. But maybe that’s what they want. It’s clearly spelled out in the Republican manifesto Project 2025.
It should come as no surprise that Landry, who swept into office with a whopping 18 percent of the vote, is a would-be tyrant who is attempting to gain absolute power (and we all know what absolute power does, right? Corrupts, absolutely, for anyone unfamiliar with that old saying)
It should further come as no surprise that republicans want to seize power so they can rule by inflicting cruelty, powered by greed and corruption, on as many people as possible.
Maybe voters will get sick of being the victims of republican misrule, like they finally did after bobby jindal, come to their senses and vote for people who will actually legislate in the best interest of the largest number of people.
Until then, welcome to the Third World.
Landry’s effort to shield meetings and records from public view, like Bobby Jindal’s “gold standard of ethics” before him, is simply a manifestation of the most common trait among modern “Republicans” – arrogant self-righteousness. Because while it may seem as if Landry wants to hide the workings of government from the public it would be closer to the truth to say Landry – like Jindal before him- believes all his words, acts, thoughts, and desires are above reproach. And more than that, Landry and his ilk believe they are entitled as “conservative” white Americans to the flawless perfection of their self-righteousness. Open meeting or public record laws, therefore, are just tools used by liberal/Marxist/socialist/commie freedom-haters and other Democratic troublemakers to fuel discontent. It’s not that they are trying hide their corruption; it’s that they believe they are not now, nor ever have been, nor ever will be corrupted.