
The AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL (ALEC) is pushing hard to ban it and obedient state legislators across the American landscape are obligingly introducing ALEC-written bills to outlaw the teaching of so-called CRITICAL RACE THEORY, aka the plain, unvarnished American history.
Louisiana is no exception, thanks to the efforts of State Reps. Raymond “Slavery Wasn’t All Bad” Garofalo (R-Chalmette) and Mark “Let’s Study It to Death” Wright (R-Covington). I will return to them in due course.
But first, for those who still believe that “in 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue” and “Remember the Alamo” are all we need to impart upon our students as representative of all they need to know in learning what this country is all about, there are a few inconvenient facts that seem to have been lost along the way.
In the 100-year period dating from the Revolutionary War to the years following the Civil War, there were approximately 370 TREATIES signed between the United States government and the various Native American tribes.
The United States government broke every single one of those treaties. Let me say it another way: Without exception, the U.S. government broke its promises to Native Americans 368 times as westward expansion demanded more and more concessions from the indigenous Americans who were relegated to barren lands with little promise. The Black Hills of Dakota, considered useless to the whites, was ceded to the American Indians in the Treaty of Fort Laramie in 1868. But when gold was discovered, it was decided the land was pretty good after all, and the natives were again pushed aside.
Before that, in 1830, there was President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act that resulted in the infamous Trail of Tears which an estimated 10 to 25 percent of Cherokee Tribe members would die during the 1,200-mile journal from 50 million acres in the American Southeast (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky and North Carolina) to Oklahoma.
But ALEC, Garofalo and presumably Wright would prefer that part of American history not be taught in our classrooms because it might be considered racially “divisive.”
It’s not clear how ALEC and its like-minded legislators would have schools teach about the Civil War. I suppose they could revert to the old War of Northern Aggression and omit any reference to slavery – even those so-called good aspects alluded to by Garofalo.
But it’s pretty much a given that other significant events will never see the light of day in a history class if they have their way. Even without their proposed restrictions, little has ever been taught about two such events right here in Louisiana or the real origins of private prisons which can be traced directly to the Bayou State.
Thousands of African-Americans were killed by outlaw outfits like the Ku Klux Klan during Reconstruction immediately following the Civil War. One of the worst such incidents occurred in central Louisiana in the little town of Colfax.
In 1872, Louisiana had a disputed election for governor. When President Grant intervened by dispatching troops to Louisiana to support the Republican candidate, an armed contingent calling itself the ”WHITE LEAGUE” was formed and began attacking blacks and white Republicans across the state.
Grant Parish was carved out of sections of Rapides and Winn parishes and named for President Ulysses Grant. The parish seat of Colfax was named for his Vice President, Schuyler Colfax.
When an all-black militia took control of the local courthouse in April 1873, a similar group of more than 150 White League and KKK members and former Confederate soldiers surrounded the courthouse. Following a brief battle, the blacks surrendered but were cut down as they exited the courthouse. Those who weren’t shot were hanged. Estimates of from 60 to 150 African-Americans died at the hands of the local vigilantes. Three whites also died in the fighting.
Historian ERIC FONER called it “the bloodiest single instance of racial carnage in the Reconstruction era.”
But that would never be taught in history classes in Louisiana – or anywhere else – if ALEC and Repugnantcan legislators across the country have their way.
But the Louisiana Department of Commerce and Industry made sure that its take on events would be remembered when it erected a historic marker that says, “On this site occurred the Colfax Riot in which three white men and 150 negroes (lower cased) were slain. This event on April 13, 1873 marked the end of carpetbag misrule in the South.”
Richard Robin, writing in THE ATLANTIC, said he had studied the Civil War and Reconstruction “quite extensively,” but had never heard of the Colfax Riot. “Neither had the half-dozen history professors and the dozen Louisianans from New Orleans, Baton Rouge and Alexandria I’d asked about it since I’d first read that marker.”
And there are those who would like to keep it that way. And, ironically, they are the ones raising all manner of hell over Democrats’ so-called “cancel culture.”
But I digress.
Just a few years later, on Nov. 23, 1887, and 212 miles southeast of Colfax, a mass shooting of African-American farm workers would become known as the THIBODAUX MASSACRE and would prompt local planter Mary Pugh to write, “I think this will settle the question of who is to rule – the nigger or the white man for the next fifty years.”
Their sin? They were attempted to form a union in order to gain higher wages for harvesting sugar cane. With no land or own or even rent, workers were forced to live in former slave cabins and to harvest cane for as little as 42 cents per day for 12-hour shifts.
When workers banded together to demand wages of $1.25 per day or $1 per day if meals were included, growers refused. Republican Gov. William Pitt Kellogg, under pressure from the Louisiana White League, backed the growers.
In October, the union again sent demands of $1.25 per day to growers who retaliated by firing the union members. One of the planters was Edward Douglass White who ordered workers off his land and directed that any who stayed be arrested. White would go on to serve as the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
As the cane ripened, growers asked Samuel D. McEnery, Democratic governor and former planter, to compel the Blacks to harvest the cane. McEnery, who had succeeded Kellogg, called on several all-white Louisiana militias under the command of ex-Confederate General P. G. T. Beauregard. A hand-cranked .45 caliber Gatling gun machine gun was parked it in front of the Thibodaux courthouse and an army cannon was set up in front of the jail.
Martial law was declared by Lafourche Parish Judge Taylor Beattie who, despite being a Republican, was a White Leage member and a former Confederate soldier. When two white guards were wounded by gunshots that came from a cornfield, the response was a massacre.
Mobs of whites roamed the streets “night and day shooting colored men who took part in the strike,” said Thibodaux minister Rev. T. Jefferson Rhodes. At least 35 Blacks who offered no resistance were killed outright, including young and old, men and women. Survivors hid in the woods and swamps as the killings continued on plantations. Bodies were dumped into a site that became a landfill.
Whites cheered the Jim Crow victory as workers returned to the fields. The New Orleans Daily Picayune blamed the violence on the black unionizers as their killers went unpunished. Union efforts throughout the South died with the strikers just as the industrial age was emerging.
But don’t look for this ugly chapter in our history of ALEC, Garofalo, et al have their way.
Garofalo introduced House Bill 564 which would have banned the teaching of anything that might be considered racially divisive. Fortunately, the bill was voluntarily deferred by Garofalo when it became evident that it would never get out of the House Education Committee.
Wright, with his House Study Request 3 just wants the Education Committee to “study” critical race theory.
Had Garofalo’s bill passed and been signed into law (Gov. John Bel Edwards likely would have vetoed it), it would have crippled the curriculum for elementary and high school history classes by simply deleting important events in the history of this country and state – things like the racial killings in Colfax and Thibodaux.
Nor will your kids ever learn about the real origins of the private prison industry that warehouses people for profit.
The first prison was privatized in LOUISIANA in 1844. The prison used inmates to manufacture cheap clothing for slaves.
Following the Civil War stricter laws were enacted that were weighted against Blacks. Nathan Bedford Forrest, the first Grand Wizard of the KKK, for a while controlled all convicts in Mississippi, leasing them out to private companies for cheap labor. In Tennessee, Thomas O’Conner forced convicts to work in mines and when they died from exhaustion or disease, he would sell their bodies to a medical school in Nashville for students to practice on.
Companies preferred using convicts because, unlike free workers, they could be “inspired” by torture technique that included “watering” in which a prisoner was strapped down, a funnel forced into his mouth, and water poured in. The action would distend the stomach and put pressure on the heart, making the prisoner feel that he was going to die. Another punishment was “stringing up” which involved wrapping a cord around the men’s thumbs. The cord would then be flung over a tree limb, and tightened until the men hung suspended, sometimes for hours. Whipping was common. An Alabama government inspection showed that in a two-week period in 1889, 165 prisoners were flogged. Arkansas didn’t abolish the lash until 1967.
To ensure the continuance of private prisons, lessees gave a cut of the profits to the states. Between 1880 and 1904, profits from leasing convicts comprised up to 10 percent of Alabama’s state budget. A federal report revealed that revenues from leasing out inmate labor were nearly four times the cost of running prisons.
It took 100 years for the Tulsa massacre to penetrate the American conscience and by next week it will be forgotten just as we have either forgotten or ignored altogether the East St. Louis race riots of 1917, the Chicago race riot of 1919, the Birmingham church bombing in 1963, Bloody Sunday in 1965 Selma, the shooting by a white supremacist at Charleston’s Emanual African Methodist Episcopal Church or even the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King.
And if ALEC and the Raymond Garofalos of the world have their way, that’s the way it will remain.
When one reads this eloquent discussion of the terrible injustices heaped upon the minorities of this nation, it becomes more clear why the descendants of those so mistreated want the truth to be not only known but told. It is long past time that we white descendants of the oppressors make amends for the transgressions of our forbearers. Acknowledging our guilt and encouraging the teaching and telling of our sins is the least we can do toward making those amends. In so doing maybe, just maybe, we can start to bridge the gap of racial divide and return to our effort to truly becoming The UNITED States of America.
Tom,
This is Jerry Pye.
I don’t know if you are aware, but Tom Kelly died Saturday around lunch time.
Gwen ask me for a copy of the article that was in the Piney Woods Journal when he was honored by the LPA for 50 years in the business. By any chance do you have a copy of the article? I never saw the article.
Thanks
Jerry
>
So what exactly is your point. I think we need to concentrate more on the truth than on some CRT teaching their own agenda and theories.
I think you summed it up when you advocated teaching the truth. That kinda coincides with what I was saying.
You argue for the teaching of CRT in our schools. Well, I suppose I am opposed to teaching of CRT as it is pushed by BLM, a Marxist organization with the goal of making millions of “White” people feel guilty about being of European descent. I have watched a lot of “white guilt” proponents on television and frankly,
I disagree with this approach for a multitude of reasons. I have never owned anyone. I do not know anyone who has owned anyone. I do not know anyone who was owned. Nor do you. And I do not owe one penny to anyone whose feelings are hurt by institution of slavery. Fact is, there is no one alive who could tell us about those times .I am only second generation American on my mother’s side and 1st generation on my fathers side, so our family was not even here; why should I pay reparation or feel guilt ? How about slavery around the world (even today); Do you think Italian children are taught about the evils of the Roman Empire, and are taught guilt and empathy for all the countries that the Romans extracted slaves and subdued populations? There are those who would argue that Rome actually improved civilization despite their cruelty: similar to Garofalo saying things were not so bad for slaves. He was not one.
Should we be educated about those times through the lens of time? What purpose is served by revising history (exposing the bad side) ? There were bad things occurring on both sides involving Indians and settlers who “invaded” Indian territory? Will we teach how Indians murdered each other over territory and slaves? . Will we teach children how slaves were obtained and sold to Arab slave traders by their fellow Africans ? That Indians owned slaves as well, will we teach that ? Spaniards enslaved Indians. Should we expose modern slavery as well ? Lots of guilt to go around.
Civil War for example. Would there even had been a war had Lincoln not invaded the South ? Did people die over institution of slavery or did they die defending their homes from invasion ? If war was about slavery, why did Lincoln not free the slaves ? If north was invading south to free slaves, why is it that Robert E Lee freed his own slaves before war but U S Grant did not until law required him to do so ? I can tell you, neither of us were taught that in school. I was taught that Abe Lincoln was our greatest President because he kept our nation together, not that he was a tyrant or killer of Indians on massive scales.
Truth of this all is that “In all revolutions the vanquished are the ones who are guilty of treason, even by the historians,” Vest said, “for history is written by the victors and framed according to the prejudices and bias existing on their side” (Missouri Senator) hence, the Civil War was later justified to be about slavery (a moral issue) rather than wealth of south.
Was slavery bad. Yes. Were Indians treated fairly ? Of course not. Could the Indians co-habit with white settlers who wanted to farm and ranch . No chance, as the lifestyles were in total contradiction (nomad versus settler). How will CRT remedy any of this ? It will not. Who decides which facts to include or omit ? Sure cannot trust the government to decide. What is the ultimate goal of CRT ? It will be difficult to select which facts to omit and which to include as there is plenty of bad to go around on both sides. That, we can all agree. Is our ultimate goal to undermine the foundation of the USA (Constitution), which I believe to be the best system, in spite of our warts ?
Excuse me, Zoe, but I don’t believe I ever mentioned the word “reparations” in my post. And of course you never owned a slave, nor did I. Exactly what was your point in saying that? And just when did I attempt to paint Grant as some sort of saint? You resorted to some pretty trite arguments but my post was addressing the insistence by elements in our society that the teaching of certain historical events be no longer allowed. That’s censorship in every sense of the word. Lincoln invaded the South? I thought Confederate soldiers fired on Fort Sumpter to ignite the war. But truth be told, that old slaveowner himself, Andrew Jackson, had stifled an effort by South Carolina to secede long before Lincoln came along. Jackson was a slave owner, but he helped keep the country together, albeit temporarily. But I was never taught that in school. I had to read it later when I purchased a biography of Jackson. The same book that gave him credit for preserving the Union for a few more years also pointed out his role in the Trail of Tears and told how he hated and mistreated the American Indians. That’s history as it should be told – the complete story. That was my point.
You, on the other hand, don’t seem to have a real point; you prefer to deal in worn-out arguments about a subject I never even mentioned in my post.
Duuumb
@zoe of course
Zoe….the remedy is that after learning of the horrendous things that were done….we should ALL work to make sure that we live in a nation that NEVER does these kinds of things again. The sheer humanity of fighting such evil should be something ALL Americans can agree on. It can’t be fixed and things can’t be changed unless we understand the why, how and who of every evil thing that was done. Surely, you can agree with this…and, BTW, the Bible is full of terrible things that humans did to one another and the scriptures use this to teach that God is not pleased and what to do to please him. The more we know….the more we know and this isn’t an original thought…
I appreciate your covering these overlooked horrible stains on our history. It’s outrageous that very little of this was covered when I was in school.
It’s also outrageous that so many people are trying to keep these tragedies censored from the school curricula. The last few years in particular have shown that we have many truly horrible people in the legislature.
Wow, Zoe, you drank all the kool-aid and took in well the lessons we were taught in school, which totally excluded anything that was not flattering to whites. Who says there is a “curriculum” that is being pushed? For pity’s sake, leave it to the history teachers and quit trying to micromanage the classrooms. Some will do a good job of teaching all sides and some will not – thus was it ever so. We need to teach ALL history, and not cherrypick what we want to believe. But quit looking behind the chairs for some BLM bogeyman for pity’s sake!
Critical Race Theory is much more complex than most imagine. Many never even heard of it until recently, nor will they bother to investigate it. It has been around for about 50 years and has become broader with time.
In my opinion, the fact Critical Race Theory can be divisive has to be acknowledged. On the other hand, the very first cartoon above should reflect how history is taught (the whole story) and requires no knowledge of Critical Race Theory at all. History should tell the truth and should not omit critical events under any circumstances even if revealing them casts a negative light on venerated historical figures and earlier societies (earlier can be any past time including this morning, yesterday, last week, etc., without limit). The key is that it be true and verifiable and not promote exceptionalism or any other ideology.
Should we forget history? Ignore it? Not no, but hell no! There are people in our own country who are trying to rewrite history that occurred a mere 5 months ago – an event that should have shaken every person who has any interest in preserving the United States of America to the core and should have led to an awakening to the real potential for a new civil war. Will sweeping it under the rug or, worse, rewriting it as a narrative of a peaceful group of tourists who just happened to support the 45th President visiting their nation’s capitol building? If it was just that, it wouldn’t even be a footnote.
We have to accept today’s and yesterday’s realities. We can’t enter a time machine and return to some mythical day in the past when we can rewrite the future. But, if we just will, we can learn from our mistakes and do better in the future. Will we?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opelousas_massacre
Great article and thanks to you and Mr. Winham. I am confident we will get over the hate, but it won’t go away. Educated people figured out how to destroy the planet, educated people will save the future. So let’s keep learning and keep loving. and never give up ron thompson