It’s just plain fun to see how far some candidates for political office are willing to go to get elected.
It’s also pretty disgusting.
It’s not disgusting because of any personal feelings I have for either candidate for 21st Judicial District Court Judge; I don’t know either candidate, Colt Fore or his opponent, William Scott Dykes. In fact, I never even heard of them before this election.
When I saw their signs start popping up out here in Livingston Parish yards, I just wondered why so many homes were suddenly on the market and being listed with those particular realtors. (That’s a joke, son. You’ll get it later.)
And I’m not trying to defend Fore. He is an attorney, after all, with a firm with whom I had a brief difference a few years back over the right of a Baton Rouge television station to tape proceedings of a controversial city council meeting (the city’s legal counsel, a member of that firm, said since the law did not specifically mention television cameras in allowing the photographing of meetings, it was within the city council’s authority to ban them, which was a patently abusive overreach on his part).
But today, I received in my mailbox a flyer, a political cheap shot, really, that proudly pointed out that Fore “gave thousands of dollars to Democrat Hillary Clinton for President.”
And while it’s true that federal campaign finance reports reflect that Fore, in fact, CONTRIBUTED $2,700 to Clinton in 2016, it conveniently neglects to add that he contributed $850 to Trump this year.
God knows, I’m no fan of Hillary Clinton, but when it came down to making a choice between her and Trump four years ago, it was a no-brainer for me: I voted for Hillary because I simply could not stomach the idea of Donald Trump as leader of the free world.
It turns out my instincts then were correct. The man has been nothing short of an unmitigated disaster, an embarrassment. I don’t know what kind of president Hillary would have made – probably a bad one – but nothing she could have done could ever have approached the train wreck this country has witnessed for the past four years.
But I digress. This rant is not about Trump or Hillary or Biden. It’s about electing judges.
And my question is this: why the hell should a judge’s election revolve around candidates’ personal political philosophies? And why do political parties even enter into the equation?
Judges’ races should be about the letter of the law, not about the 2nd Amendment, stricter sentences for offenses, abortion or who a particular candidate supports for president.
No candidate for a judgeship should enter a race or be considered for nomination to a judicial appointment on the basis of his or her preconceived notion on any ideology whatsoever. A judge’s job is to hear arguments on cases coming before the court without personal feelings entering into the discussion and to render a ruling based on the law, not some hackneyed political viewpoint or on the basis of which attorney contributed to the judge’s campaign.
The flyer I received said, “Colt Fore says he is a Republican now…but when he is not running for office, Colt Fore knows he’s with her (Hillary).”
The flyer’s disclaimer said it was paid for by Louisiana Law, Order and Justice of 7350 Jefferson Highway, Suite 485, Baton Rouge.
Corporate records on file with the Louisiana Secretary of State indicate that one Chadwick Melder is the agent and only officer listed for Louisiana Law, Order and Justice.
Melder is also the agent and only officer of CAMCO CONSULTING, a political communications and public affairs concern which has the same mailing address as Louisiana Law, Order and Justice but which is domiciled in Woodworth, in Rapides Parish.
What confuses me about the flyer, however, is the rest of that disclaimer that says Louisiana Law, Order and Justice is “not affiliated with any candidate or committee.”
If that’s the case, why does it claim to be the one that paid for the flyer when it’s obvious it was paid for either by or on behalf of Dykes.
But if you take a peek at Dykes’ campaign expenditures of $1,000 or more, you see payments to such entities as Capital Business Services ($11,425.50 and $2,500), Tangi Graphics ($4,828.70, $3,685.88, and $1,570), Lamar Advertising ($4,075 and $1,800), and a few lesser expenditures in Tangipahoa and St. Tammany parishes.
The only ones in Baton Rouge are Capital Business Services and Lamar Advertising and since the $11,425.50 payment to Capital Business Services was on Sept. 22, it’s quite likely that was the check written to pay for the flyer with Louisiana Law, Order and Justice’s payment coming out of that payment.
So, even though the Louisiana Ethics Commission requires the reporting of campaign contributions and expenses, there are clever ways to conceal the sources of both.
All in the name of democracy and maintaining the integrity of our courts, of course.


