Editor’s note: In August 2016, widespread flooding in south Louisiana was particularly devastating to Livingston Parish. Many residents simply abandoned flooded homes and never returned after losing all their possessions and receiving little in the way of recovery efforts from FEMA.
Melissa Thies of St. Tammany, who describes herself as a “taxpayer in the know,” has made a series of public records requests from the St. Tammany Parish School Board which, coincidentally, rather than devote its efforts to reopening schools on schedule following the coronavirus outbreak, did take the time to revise its public records policy by doubling the cost of records from the statewide standard of 25 cents per page to 50 cents.
A number of interesting discoveries was made through her efforts, all of which are supported by official school board records. Today’s story, written by her and posted previously on Facebook, is reprinted here:
By Melissa Thies
Let’s revisit that devastating fall day in 2016……
Livingston Parish was one of the hardest hit areas of a flood. Thirteen people lost their lives, and property damage was never really able to be solidly calculated, but estimates of $10 – 15 billion have been thrown around. Hard times for our neighbors down Highway 12, right? Or an opportunity to grow a school board general fund by several thousand bucks and win an award in the process?
St Tammany Parish School Administration went into full-on fundraising mode, raising over $330,000 in money, gift cards and school supplies for victims. The media claimed this to be the “most successful fundraiser ever held by the St Tammany Parish Public School System.” The then-superintendent even “earns” Superintendent of the Year touting this as a major accomplishment. But wait, isn’t this type of activity by a political subdivision against the Louisiana State Constitution? There seems to be some confusion within the Louisiana Legislative Auditor agency regarding the constitutionality of this, but it is a valid question. Does it even make sense for this to be legal to use taxpayer resources (such as the accounting staff of the local school board) to manage such an activity? Our state laws must protect us somehow against the risk of misappropriation of funds from this type of activity, right?
Review of the school board general ledger indicates that by September 13, 2016, a total of almost $113,000 was deposited into a liability account and deposits were marked “DONATIONS FLOODING STPCARES”. For those non-accountants, this means the money was put into the bank account and general fund, but was marked as being owed to someone else. Shortly after, the money starts to be disbursed, with funds going to the “St Helena Parish SB”, “Tangipahoa Parish SB”, “Livingston Parish SB” and many checks directly to individuals. There were no other disbursements of the cash after October 14, 2016 – that is until January 19, 2017.
Several things happened on January 19, 2017. Since October 14, 2016, the general ledger had indicated a credit balance in the liability account of $7,753.76. This means that not all of the donations that had been collected were disbursed, leaving $7,753.76 in the general fund and in cash available in the bank. (Remember that number; it will be significant a little later.) Review of the visitor log on January 19, 2017, just might confirm that on this day investigators with Louisiana Legislative Auditor arrived at 321 N. Theard early that morning.
Also, on this date, there is a journal entry numbered 1267 that indicates the amount of $7,753,76 was transferred out of the liability account and the transaction was described as “Correction Move to Donations”. This left a $0 balance in the liability account – as if to show all of the money collected had been given out. Then, later in the day as indicated by journal entry number 3981, a transfer back into the liability account for the same amount was made. Within a short period of time after January 19, 2017, the remaining $7,753.76 was then disbursed to “Livingston Parish SB” and “St Helena Parish SB”. I will let you draw your own conclusions about what possibly transpired throughout the day on January 19, 2017, to encourage the administration to disburse the remainder of the funds that had been collected.
What would have happened to the funds if Legislative Auditor had not shown up? If the overage would have remained in the general fund, what would the overage have been used to cover? I have been told to stay in my lane and not ask any questions, but you should be asking these questions and more at this point, especially if you occupied a seat on the St Tammany Parish School Board during this time period. Taxpayers, especially those who gave so generously to this activity certainly deserve answers.
You might be asking what is significant about the figure, $7,753.76, that remained in the general fund until the day Legislative Auditor showed up. Well, let me not keep you in suspense…..
Just FACTS – Let’s visit the proposed general fund budgets from fiscal years 2016 and 2017. There is a line item in these budgets with an account number “2321-511100 Salary – Superintendent”. The budget for FY 2016 indicates an amount of $202,732 for this line item, while the budget for FY 2017 indicates a proposed amount of $210,385. These amounts were the base salary the Superintendent received for FY 2016 and what was being proposed at the time for FY 2017. The difference between these two would seemingly indicate the “raise” that the superintendent would be getting, $7,653.
In addition, in a recent response to a public record request, I received this copy of the check that the then-Superintendent donated to the flood fundraiser personally.
I am not sure that you need to be an accountant, auditor, investigator, investigative reporter, Inspector General, Legislative Auditor, or Attorney General to know what is coming next. The increase in the base salary ($7,653) plus the personal DONATION to the fundraiser ($100) is…..
Did you guess it correctly? $7,753!
Voila! And that is how we roll at the St Tammany Parish School Board, but taxpayers can’t have an Inspector General in the parish, much less one internal auditor that doesn’t report to or is directed by the people they are auditing. It really is a shame, or a sham, not sure which. Lots more to come on this same topic and many, many other issues. Ms. Rester’s history lessons are much more interesting than mine. I invite you to contact her (email above) or any school board member for her lessons.
Leave a Reply