“Under that law, the officer who transformed a short traffic stop into an almost two-hour, life-altering ordeal is entitled to qualified immunity. But let us not be fooled by legal jargon. Immunity is not exoneration. And the harm in this case to one man sheds light on the harm done to the nation by this manufactured doctrine. Just as the Supreme Court swept away the doctrine of ‘separate but equal,’ so too should it eliminate the doctrine of qualified immunity,”
–U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves, in dismissing the lawsuit of a Black man detained for nearly two hours while his Mercedes was torn apart by a White Mississippi police officer who subsequently found nothing in his vehicle. [Driving black in a white Mercedes in Mississippi….Damn, man, what were you thinking?!]
“This man’s life sentence for a failed attempt to steal a set of hedge clippers is grossly out of proportion to the crime and serves no legitimate penal purpose.”
— Chief Justice Bernette Johnson, in her dissent after the Louisiana Supreme Court denied a request to review the case of a Black man who received a life sentence for stealing a set of hedge clippers 23 years ago. [Meanwhile, Clay Higgins is allowed to fall behind in his child support payments by $100,000 – and he’s elected to congress. A former Louisiana State Penitentiary official was sentenced to five years’ probation in 2017 for stealing nearly $116,000 from a nonprofit committee that provided recreational opportunities for prison employees. A former state senator received four years’ probation earlier this year for making false statements in order to receive money from the US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development. What’s wrong with this picture? (Of course, Gov. Edwards could do the right thing and commute this man’s sentence.)]
How to approach our justice system: Don’t.
^^^^ this. After reading more and learning that Mr. Bryant received his sentence under the habitual offender law, I remembered that the devil is in the details. And the details are not in that headline.
I do not disagree and, having seen similar cases, I believe the habitual offenders laws need to be changed to allow for 3rd (or, whatever) minor offenses to be assessed for gravity and not automatically triggering maximum sentences – in other words allow some judicial discretion, but draw the line at an appropriate point.
Well, since today’s Louisiana Voice deals with absurdities, let me add one more. The article deals with the fine that Boeing just received, basically the same as a bag of peanuts for gross negligence. And on top of that, remember that the CEO got a severance package of 26.5 million dollars.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/faa-proposes-125-million-fine-for-boeing-alleging-managers-pressured-employees-to-rush-inspections/2020/08/06/da2eb108-d800-11ea-9c3b-dfc394c03988_story.html?hpid=hp_business-1_boeing-725a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans