When I was a boy, my grandfather kept feed for his livestock in what we referred to as the corn crib in our barn. Naturally, rats, attracted to the grain, were a major problem.
One day, I moved a 55-gallon metal barrel into the crib. I put a couple of handsful of grain in the bottom of the barrel and propped a wooden plank outside the barrel against the open top. That night, about half-a-dozen not-so-smart rats climbed up the board and jumped into the barrel to get the grain. Too late they found they couldn’t get out.
I killed the rats and repeated the process each night, thereby eliminating quite a large number of the vermin because they too dumb to comprehend the peril of leaping before then looked.
The Senate passage (87-12) Tuesday of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM BILL has put Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry in a metaphorically similar barrel and it’s going to be interesting to see if he can climb out or if he learns from it.
Landry, you see, has spent the duration of his term of office either attacking every initiative of Gov. John Bel Edwards or praising every action of his acknowledged hero, Donald Trump.
He has been especially critical of the governor’s Criminal Justice Reform Program designed to relieve the state of its dubious title as the world’s incarceration center. Until passage of the Criminal Justice Reform Program, Louisiana had the highest rate of incarceration in a nation that had the highest incarceration rate in the civilized world.
No one would try to say there wouldn’t be repeat offenders. That goes with any prison system anywhere but Landry was quick to jump into the fray back in August when he issued a blistering PRESS RELEASE and newspaper OP-EDS proclaiming to anyone who would listen that nearly 25 percent of inmates released under the program had reoffended.
In an especially self-righteous display of sanctimony designed to garner sympathy, he called upon Edwards to apologize to the victims.
A noble but, coming from Landry, a somewhat empty sentiment intended to curry favor while having little to do with any real concern for anyone other than his own political capital. Consider this remark in his press release:
“The governor’s reckless approach to empty our jails simply so he can take credit for a smaller prison population remains a threat to Louisiana citizens. It further highlights the need for truth in sentencing.”
Well, first of all, there was never any intent to “empty our jails.” That’s almost laughable, ranking right up there with some of Trump’s wildly exaggerated claims. As for “truth in sentencing,” I bring to the stand the innumerable investigative audits conducted by the Louisiana Legislative Auditor’s Office that were simply filed away somewhere with no action taken against those responsible for mismanagement, malfeasance and embezzlement.
A statewide elected official can let state taxpayers pay his fine for sexual harassment and move on with his life but let some kid from the ghetto get busted for an ounce of pot and all hell breaks loose. Authorities swoop down on him, hustle him off to jail where he is most probably raped as he awaits his trial and sentencing to hard time. How’s that for “truth in sentencing,” Jeff?
It must have kept Landry awake last night just knowing that his hero (Trump) and his nemesis (Edwards) actually worked together in coming up with the criminal justice reform bill, a bill favored by Trump and for which First Son-in-law Jared Kushner actually lobbied.
It must have also upset the folks over at The Hayride after their EDITORIAL last August in which they called for Republican supporters of the Edwards prison reforms “to step away quietly…”
Basically, this is what the criminal justice reform bill does:
- Sends up to 4,000 prisoners home by increasing the amount of time inmates can cut off of their sentences due to good behavior.
- Allow more male and female inmates to serve time in house arrest or halfway facilities instead of prison cells, with exceptions for high-risk inmates.
- Require that prisoners be placed within 500 miles of family.
- Outlaw shackling during child birth.
- Mandate the provision of sanitary napkins and tampons to female inmates.
- Reduce the mandatory penalty from life to 25 years for a third conviction of certain drug offenses, and from 25 to 15 years for a second conviction.
- Prohibit the doubling up, or “stacking,” of mandatory sentences for certain gun and drug offenses.
- Give judges more discretion in giving less than the mandatory minimum for certain low-level crimes.
- Make the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act retroactive, which changed sentencing guidelines to treat offenses involving crack and powder cocaine equally. This could impact nearly 2,600 federal inmates.
The bill would only impact the 180,789 incarcerated in federal prisons, but many of the changes reflect reforms already implemented in many states.
It now goes back to the House, where it is expected to pass with equal ease.
At least one Louisiana politician remained true to his beliefs, however self-serving they may be.
U.S. Sen. JOHN KENNEDY was one of only 12 Republicans in the Senate and the only one from Louisiana to vote against the bill, calling it a “violation of American public safety. He sniffed last August that Edwards “calls it prison reform, I call it prison release.”
Never one to abandon a snippy sound bite if it gets him on camera, he repeated an eerily similar CLAIM last Friday: “This is not a criminal justice bill. It is a prisoner release bill.”
It’s a pity neither is running for governor. It would have been a darn interesting election from an entertainment perspective.
Kennedy: It’s all about that camera, ’bout that camera.
Criminal Justice Reform you say…
That’s pretty simple.
Number One ONLY violent felony offenders should be incarcerated and then to HARD time 7 days a week.
All other offenders convicted of or pleading guilty to a non-violent crime should be forced to do community service hours equal to what their sentence would be in days or years in a trade of their choosing so they can learn something useful. They should also be responsible for absolute restitution to their victims.
This is where public housing and assistance could be used if needed based on the time to learn and apprentice to be hired. Corrections could then use money saved on incarceration to employ transport to and from these jobs if needed and supervise these jobs. A portion of this earned not given money would automatically be used for the restitution.
If a job pays 25$ an hour and you’re regulating that to say 15$ an hour on a benefit card with the balance going to restitution and fines. Now once they finish the program offenders could make the whole 25$ an hour; it gives them something to look forward to. If they’re offended while in this program then sentence them to straight road work. I’m sure the sorry state of asphalt in this state could keep them busy for years to come.
I mean think about it you imprison people you’re paying for everything they need anyway. Prison teaches non-violent offenders to become violent offenders based on survival. Most Criminals I know of either became criminals through illicit drug use or they were youngsters who had nothing else to look forward to and were caught up in the game early and their records kept them from becoming better people because they just didn’t have to will to survive the system.
In many cases crimes are committed based on the manufacture of, trafficking of or the use of narcotics. Asset forfeiture of drug dealers and traffickers could be used for the purchase of some of the tools and needs of trades taught.
Sentence people to a life of work and learning to be productive.
Signed: 20 years of proactive Law Enforcement and Court Room Time.
Very interesting proposals.
I wonder how J. N. Kennedy and Jeff Landry would respond to your ideas?
For heaven’s sake, even the Koch Brothers are on board for basic prison reform. Frankly, that’s why all of this is happening so quickly now. How tone deaf & out of touch can John Kennedy & Jeff Landry possibly be?
How about completely?
Amen! So true. They think that people don’t want affordable health insurance either!
Am I the only one thinking that those who make money in the private prison industry are against letting the punishment fit the crime?