High school civics classes taught us about the checks and balances of government. You know, the three branches: the executive, the judiciary, and the legislative, each of which is supposed to serve as a safeguard against abuses by the other two.
In addition to those, at the state level at least, we have the Office of Inspector General, the Legislative Auditor, and the Attorney General—except that the Constitutional Convention of 1974, thanks to the muscle-flexing of the district attorneys, hamstrung the attorney general from intruding on the turf of the DA’s unless specifically invited to do so.
Another little-known fact about the attorney general is that the office is set up to defend, not prosecute, state agency heads who run afoul of the law. That’s why you see enormous expenditures on the part of the Louisiana Office of Risk Management when an agency head is sued for, say, failure to provide public records when requested or even when an agency head is accused of criminal wrongdoing. ORM, the state’s insurance agency, pays defense attorneys who are contracted by the attorney general’s office. Thus, as long as someone else is footing the bill, the incentive is for the public official to duke it out in court.
So, with all these safeguards in place, how is it that a quiet amendment was sneaked through the legislature 11 years ago that gives legislators control over the expenditure of tens of millions of dollars most folks, including the Legislative Auditor’s Office and those whose job it was to draft bill amendments, didn’t even know existed?
Well, we gave you the answer when we said “sneaked.” These types of bills are done very quietly, with zero fanfare but with laser-like efficiency.
Here’s the wording of that amendment:
R.S. 24:39(D) is amended and reenacted to expand the uses of the monies in the Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund to include supporting all other operations and activities consistent with the authorized mission of the Legislative Budgetary Control Council. This provision is effective June 7, 2012.” (Emphasis ours.)
The Legislative Capitol WHAT fund?!!!?
Legislative Budgetary Control Council?!!?
What is the Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund and who are the members of this Legislative Budgetary Control Council?
The members of the Budgetary Control Council are:
- Sen. John Alario, Co-chair;
- Rep. Taylor Barras, Co-chair;
- Rep. Michael Danahay;
- Rep. Cameron Henry;
- Rep. Walt Leger, III;
- Rep. Gregory Miller;
- Sen. Eric LaFleur;
- Sen. Gerald Long;
- Sen. Karen Carter Peterson;
- Sen. Gregory Tarver.
We also found the 2008 act that created the Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund which gives legislators a helluva lot of discretion over funds no one knew existed—especially with the slipping in of that 2012 amendment that gives them carte blanche control over a helluva lot of money.
Here is the wording of R.S. 24:39, including the key Section D:
RS 24:39
Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund
- There is hereby created in the state treasury, as a special fund, the Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund, hereinafter referred to as the “fund”.
- The state treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to transfer ten million dollars from the state general fund to the Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund on June 30, 2008, and on July first of each fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009. The legislature may appropriate, allocate, or transfer additional monies to the fund if it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of the fund.
- Monies in the fund shall be invested by the treasurer in the same manner as monies in the state general fund and any interest earned on the investment of monies in the fund shall be credited to the fund. All unexpended and unencumbered monies in the fund at the end of the fiscal year shall remain in the fund.
- Monies in the fund shall be available for appropriation to and use by the Legislative Budgetary Control Council, hereinafter referred to as the “council”. Such appropriations shall be used by the council solely to fund construction, improvements, maintenance, renovations, repairs, and necessary additions to the House chamber, Senate chamber, legislative committee meeting rooms, and other legislative rooms, offices, and areas in the Capitol Complex for audio-visual upgrades and technology enhancements and for supporting all other operations and activities consistent with the authorized mission of the council.
In 2010, Clifford Williams, who said he worked as a legislative staffer in the Legislature’s Amendment Room where his job was to draft amendments to bills, said, “I was not even aware of this provision until I was asked to do an amendment involving this provision one day.”
He said a legislator came in that day and requested the transfer of $5 million to some other long-forgotten project. “To tell the truth, I not only don’t remember what he said he wanted the money for, I don’t even recall the legislator’s name. But this was the first time I ever heard of this fund, which is nothing more than a slush fund for legislators’ use with virtually no oversight. It’s money that exists outside the regular legislative budget,” he said.
In 2012, just four short years after the initial $10 million appropriation, the fund had a balance of more than $32 million. Here is an analysis of the fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012:
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The Council’s net assets increased by $20,161,763. This resulted primarily from significant increases in appropriations in the current year for the Legislative Capitol Technology Enhancement Fund and the State Capitol HVAC Replacement and Renovations project, as well as decreases in expenditures due to the completion of various projects.
The general revenues of the Council were $32,749,917, which is an increase of $16,741,476 from the prior year. The significant increase is a result of additional appropriations received in the current year for projects and renovations. Prior year revenues did not include appropriations for the Technology Enhancement projects and Capitol renovations.
The total expenditures/expenses of the Council were $11,577,183, which is a decrease of $7,173,036 from the prior year. The decrease is a result of capital outlay expenditures for the Technology Enhancement projects and Capitol renovations decreasing due to project completions in the current year.
The other financing uses of the Council were $1,010,971, which is an increase of $283,007.
So, as the state struggles with budgetary shortfalls, looming deficits and near-certain budget cutbacks, it’s comforting to know the Legislature has solidified its financial future through legislation sneaked through the process with such skill that even Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera was caught unaware Monday when asked about the fund.
Just another way, folks, that your legislators continue to look out for their own interests (parties, fine dining, campaign cash) while leaving you and your concerns choking in the dust.
As the late C.B. Forgotston would’ve said, you can’t make this stuff up.
And the party goes on.
In accordance with Title 24 of the L.R.S., the members of the council are:
§38. Legislative Budgetary Control Council; budgetary controls; legislature; legislative agencies; legislative committees; budget unit statements; fiscal notes
A.(1) There is hereby created the Legislative Budgetary Control Council. The members shall be:
(a) The president of the Senate.
(b) The president pro tempore of the Senate.
(c) The speaker of the House of Representatives.
(d) The speaker pro tempore of the House of Representatives.
(e) The chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.
(f) The chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.
(g) The chairman of the Senate and Governmental Affairs Committee.
(h) The chairman of the House and Governmental Affairs Committee.
(i) One member of the Senate and Governmental Affairs Committee appointed by the chairman thereof.
(j) One member of the House and Governmental Affairs Committee appointed by the chairman thereof.
(k) Ex officio, the clerk of the House and the secretary of the Senate, both of whom shall not have the right to vote.
(2) The president of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives shall serve as co-chairmen of the council.
(3) The council shall meet as necessary in the performance of its duties hereinafter enumerated. A meeting may be called by the president of the Senate, or the speaker of the House of Representatives, individually, or by any three voting members of the council collectively.
Hmmm, Bobby Jindal (R) was governor in 2008. Not surprising that they would push something like this through. Another reason I have my home up for sale and plan to move from Louisiana. Its entire government is the arm-pit of the U.S. I lived in Baton Rouge and taught at LSU from 1976-1988. Left and decided to retire and come back in 2008. What a mistake. I thought it might have changed in 20 years, but it didn’t. I think it got worse. I have lived in 7 different states and there is no possibility for this state to catch up with most of the U.S. as long as its state and federal governing officials are elected the way they are. The Republicans have managed to gain control and dominate the state through gerrymandering and until that is undone the state is doomed to mediocrity or less. The majority of the people in Louisiana are too ignorant to understand or know how the present day world functions and what it takes to compete in the world/U.S. today, including many of its legislators. It is a different culture and system and virtually no one within the state knows what will take to move it into the present and future.
Great sleuthing, Tom! Kudos to you for exposing our self-serving leges. Perhaps the Speaker and Senate President will come forth to explain their slush fund. But I wouldn’t hold my breath.
Don’t be evil – Stop re-electing leges!
We the citizens get screwed by elected officials again.
Amen to that one.
I think no matter what we do, we still get shafted, after all, they are the ones who set it up that way.
We pay, they play!
Wasn’t this about the time Krispy Kreme Nichols started trying to change the retirement system and little bobby started proclaiming there was not enough money for merit increases?
Sent from my iPhone
>
Actually this act pre-dated both Nichols and her immediate predecessor, Paul Rainwater. This came about when Angelle Davis was Commissioner of Administration. But in their defense, the legislature did this very quietly and it was probably sneaked past an administration already mapping out Bobby’s presidential aspirations.
I know you all know this, but it is important to stress the fact that, of the 3 branches of government, the legislature is, far and away, the most powerful. The only thing that really dilutes its power is the in-fighting that occurs among its members.
How can you possibly have greater power than that of MAKING THE LAW and what greater law-making power exists than that of appropriating money? And, the legislature has the sole power of appropriation over the other 2 ostensibly co-equal branches – and itself. Oh, sure, the executive branch has veto power, but how often is it exercised, particularly since executives know a legislature with its act together can OVERRIDE vetoes should it so choose.
Watch legislative deliberations on budgets and appropriations. Note how the legislature lords its power over executive branch agencies and goes through the motions of holding them accountable, often to the point of humiliation. Then note how the judicial branch appropriations are treated with a great deal more deference, agreements having usually been reached solely behind the scenes. Then, finally, note how public deliberations over appropriations to itself are practically nonexistent.
BOTTOM-LINE: The legislature has largely free rein and is only truly accountable to its diverse constituents and most of them simply ignore the way it does its business. So, from a practical standpoint, it can do pretty much whatever it wants as long as nobody in the general public is paying attention and the special interests on which campaign financing is dependent are satisfied. That certainly doesn’t excuse us from trying, though and we should all take inspiration from LouisianaVoice.
John Alario has been known to say, hate the game but not the player. He should know, he’s played them all.
Well said Steve. Unfortunately, the fourth branch – the voters, who should be able to control it all, have very little power except their vote. Even though the legislatures say they are carrying out the will of the people. Money and political parties control who gets to run for office and what they will or won’t do when they get there.
Great job Tom, Mr. Winham and Jon TB! 78% of Republicans 7% Democrats and a ton of elitist independents (republicans) support Trump/Putin. To hell with building the wall, build Trump Tower in Moscow and send the alt right Jindal Perkins and Teeple over there. Jindal started out lying (gotta do ethics reform that will get us more industry and jobs referencing an LSU study 2005?, which of course listed ethics reform nearly last in its analysis) We may never get over Jindal and his brilliance, but we must…..love always ron thompson