The most recent audit (August 2017) of the Foster Care Program of the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) found that:
- DCFS did not conduct proper criminal background checks on non-certified foster care providers;
- DCFS allowed nine certified providers with prior cases of abuse or neglect to care for foster children during fiscal years 2012-2016 without obtaining required waivers.
- DCFS does not have a formal process to ensure that caseworkers actually assessed the safety of children placed with 68 non-certified providers.
- DCFS did not always ensure that children in foster care received services to address physical and behavioral health needs.
- State regulations require DCFS to expunge certain cases of abuse or neglect from the State Central Registry, which means those records are not available for caseworkers to consider prior to placing children with providers.
(See the DCFS audit summary HERE.)
So, the question now is this: What steps will the state take to protect these children now that the Legislative Auditor has pointed out these serious deficiencies?
If the results of a 2012 audit of the Louisiana Department of Economic Development’s Enterprise Zone Program is any indication, then the answer is nothing.
Under state statute, Louisiana’s Enterprise Zone (EZ) program is designed to award incentives to businesses and industries that locate in areas of high unemployment as a means of encouraging job growth. (The summary of that audit can be viewed HERE.)
That audit found that:
- Approximately 68 percent of the 930 businesses that received EZ program incentives from the state were located outside of a designated enterprise zone. These businesses received nearly $124 million (61 percent) of the $203 million in total EZ program incentives during calendar years 2008 through 2010.
- Approximately $3.9 billion (60 percent) of the $6.5 billion in capital investment by businesses receiving EZ incentives was located outside a designated enterprise zone.
- Approximately 12,570 (75 percent) of the 16,760 net new jobs created by businesses granted EZ incentives were located outside an enterprise zone.
- Four other states with which Louisiana was compared exclude retail businesses from EZ incentives. Louisiana does not, allowing such businesses as Walmart to take advantage of the incentives.
- None of the four neighboring states allows businesses to count part-time employees among the new jobs created. Louisiana does.
- Louisiana state law prohibits disclosure of the amount of incentives received by businesses.
Little, if anything, has been done to rectify these deficiencies in the oversight of the EZ program.
There has been precious little reaction from this year’s audit of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries which found that thousands of dollars in equipment had been stolen, a story LouisianaVoice called attention to last year. Go HERE for a summary of that audit report or HERE for our story.
Some remedial steps have been made in addressing a multitude of problems exposed in a 2016 audit of the Department of Veterans Affairs (See audit summary HERE).
Yet, we can’t help but wonder where the oversight was before a critical audit necessitated changes. Among those findings:
- Payment of $44,000 to a company for improperly documented work without the required contract.
- The use of $27,500 in federal funds specifically earmarked for the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Cemetery in Slidell for the purchase of a Ford Expedition for the exclusive use of headquarters staff.
- The failure to disclose information of potential crimes involving veteran residents at several War Veteran homes.
- The possible falsifying of former Secretary David Alan LaCerte’s military service as posted on the LDVA website.
- LaCerte’s engaging in questionable organizational, hiring, and pay practices that led in turn to a lack of accountability.
Likewise, some positive steps have been taken in shaping up the Department of Corrections’ (DOC) trusty oversight programs but that resulted as much from a thorough investigative report by Baton Rouge Advocate reporters as a 2016 audit (see HERE) that found:
Because the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola’s trusty policy, 1,547 (an astounding 91 percent) trusties at Angola were not eligible for the program and even after the policy was revised, 400 (24 percent) of 1705 trusties were ineligible. All 400 were considered by DOC to be eligible as a result of having an undocumented, implicit waiver for a sex offense or time served less than 10 years.
Equally troubling, the audit found that 14 of 151 (9 percent) of trusties assigned to work in state buildings in Baton Rouge were not eligible because of crimes of violence, including aggravated battery, manslaughter, and aggravated assault with a firearm. The report further found that if those 151 were required to comply with the requirements in place for Level 1 trusties, 49 (32 percent) would be ineligible.
Indicative of the monumental waste brought about by the proliferation of boards and commissions in state government, a 2017 audit (see HERE) of “Boards, Commissions, and Like Entities) noted that the number of boards and commissions had been reduced from the 492 in 2012 to “only” 458 in 2016. Texas, by comparison, has 173, Mississippi about 200. The appointment of members of those boards and commissions take up a lot of time as the governor’s office supposedly vets each new member.
Four boards did not respond to the auditor’s request for data in 2017 and 2016.
There were 11 inactive boards which were not fulfilling established functions, five of which were also inactive the previous year.
Some of these boards, as illustrated on numerous occasions by LouisianaVoice, often go rogue and there seems to be no one to rein them in. These include the Louisiana State Police Commission, The Louisiana Board of Dentistry, the Auctioneer Licensing Board, the State Board of Cosmetology, and the State Board of Medical Examiners, to name but a few.
Take, for example, the 2016 audit of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission (see HERE):
- The commission did not have adequate controls over financial reporting to ensure accuracy.
- The commission did not comply with state procurement laws requiring contracts for personal, professional and consulting services, failing to obtain approval for contracts for two vendors totaling $80,000.
The point of this exercise is to call attention to the one office in state government which, with little fanfare and even less credit, goes about its job each day in attempting to maintain some semblance of order in the manner in which the myriad of state agencies protects the public fisc.
The Legislative Auditor’s Office, headed by Daryl Purpera, performs a Herculean, but thankless job of poring over receipts, contracts, bids, and everything related to expenditures to ensure that the agencies are toeing the line and are in accordance with established requirements and laws regarding the expenditure of public funds.
Thousands of audits have been performed. We pulled up only a few random examples: there are others, like the Recovery School District, the Department of Education, Grambling State University (only because it has so many audits with repeated findings), levee districts and local school boards and parish governments. Untold numbers of irregularities have been uncovered—only to be largely ignored by those in positions to take action against agency heads, who, because of political ambitions, allow attention to be diverted from their responsibilities of running a tight ship.
In cases of egregious findings, the media will jump on the story, only to allow it to fade away and things soon return to normal with no disciplinary action taken against those responsible.
If all elected officials and members of the governor’s cabinet were held accountable for their sloppy work or the outright dishonesty of their agency heads, it would send a message throughout state government and this state might well save hundreds of millions of dollars in wasted expenditures and theft.
It calls to mind the lyrics of a 1958 Johnny Cash song, Big River, recorded when he was still with Sun Records:
“She raised a few eyebrows
And then she went on down alone”
Through it all, Purpera and his staff trudge ever-onward, raising a few eyebrows and then continuing (alone) to do their jobs even as those above them do not.
They—and the taxpayers of Louisiana—deserve better.
ABSOLUTELY!!!!! Excellent column and long overdue. This should be required reading for every citizen of this state!!! If just JBE, himself, would spend a few minutes reading it, it could be a great help.
Technically this is such a simple problem to fix. Culturally it is nigh on an impossibility. When appointment to a Board is nothing more than a political contribution (MONEY) payback, then the position is considered (unjustly) a means to have the contribution (MONEY) reimbursed/recovered with lagniappe. And the avowed purpose of the Board becomes an afterthought.
Tom
Daryl Purpera is a great public servant and the right man for that job. I have some ideas as to answer your question of how we can get the rest of government to respond and correct the shortcomings he finds, but one of them is not the Inspector General. Thank you Mr Purpera for what you do.
Mr. Purpera and his Staff conduct first class investigations and accurately Report their findings. Then that is usually where things stop because of politics. Mr. Purpera’s Agency is not a law enforcement agency and although his findings indicate criminal wrong doing, nothing happens. Bottom Line, the ball gets Dropped!
Unfortunately Agencies like the AG and OIG ( Agencies with Law Enforcement Authority) are not working directly with the Legislative Auditors Office to pick up the Ball for the tax payers.
Louisiana Deserves Better!
Many of the Legislative Auditors findings are criminal in nature, but all he can do is refer his reports to the IG and the local DA for prosecution. Because the IG’s budget is dependent on approval of the Legislature and ultimately the Governor (who have both threatened to eliminate the IG’s office recently) politics definitely comes into play and dictate the IG’s prosecutorial decisions. The IG should be completely independent and legislation was introduced this past session to provide dedicated funding for the IG’s office. Of course it was not approved because this would take away the legislature and the Gov leverage to target their political enemies and reward their political allies. For their part, DA’s are also political creatures who use the same political discretion in who they choose to prosecute. Most of the higher profile cases end up in the 19th JDC where Hillar Moore serves as DA. Mr. Moore has never been one to aggressively prosecute high profile cases especially ones that would create political enemies for him. He prefers to dedicate all of his offices resources to things like alleged murders involving rappers which he can’t even win convictions. Rappers don’t write campaign checks, but unfortunately high profile politicians do. Best immunity money can buy.
Tom, in 2007, we welcomed 59 new members to the House. This group of members was the first group elected as a result of term limits. There was a consensus among staff that these new members “ran against Baton Rouge”. By that, I mean, they saw the old guard, including members and staff, as the problem in Baton Rouge. About two terms later, eight years, the staff consensus was that they were no different than the members they replaced. The point I am trying to make is that until there are enough elected members of the legislature who are more concerned about improving the state of life in this state and improving the manner in which state government delivers services to the people of this state, instead of getting reelected, the work of Mr. Purpera will always be for naught.