Call it what you will—strong-armed politics, intimidation, extortion, blackmail or bribery—the result is the same: the fix appears to be in on the administration’s claim of a $178.5 million budget surplus developed by a “new and improved” accounting procedure.
Except the numbers don’t seem to add up to a surplus, but rather the possibility of an even greater deficit that first indicated by State Treasurer John Kennedy.
LouisianaVoice has learned that the $320 million in mystery money suddenly discovered by the administration and trumpeted by Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols may actually be $500 million or more. But even that may be suspect in the way it affects whether or not there is an actual surplus or in reality, a deficit.
As an indication that the administration was taking care of business, LouisianaVoice also learned that members of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget (JLCB) had been called in by the governor’s office in groups of two and three over the past several days for “come to Jesus” meetings in order to dissipate opposition to the administration before it can develop.
In those meetings, committee members supposedly were not-so-subtly reminded of pending capital outlay projects in their respective districts that could sudden be placed in peril should the wrong questions get asked in committee.
But hey, folks, if you think the Jindal administration is the gold standard of ethics and wouldn’t really do that, you are so very wrong. Nothing that has taken place over the past six-plus years that would invalidate a comparison to Huey and Earl Long.
The circling of the wagons even went so far as JLCB Chairman Jim Fannin’s (R-Jonesboro) refusal of an otherwise routine request by one committee member to allow a fellow House member represent him as a proxy at today’s (Friday, Oct. 17) meeting in order to ensure there would be no surprises at the meeting.
Committee chairmen must approve a request from any committee member to have a non-member of that committee sit in as his or her proxy.
Even the meeting itself appeared to be a sham. When the committee convened at 9 a.m. Friday, Fannin announced he would not take up the issue over the budget surplus/deficit until the legislative auditor could provide a report on the financial picture.
It is extremely rare for a committee chairman to deny a request for a proxy, but when Rep. James Armes (D-Leesville) asked that Rep. Kenny Havard (R-Jackson) be allowed to sit as his proxy, Fannin refused. Efforts by LouisianaVoice to reach Havard for a comment were unsuccessful.
But if you watched any of the proceedings of the House Appropriations Committee on Sept. 25 which met to hear testimony about the proposed changes to the state’s group benefits plan, it’s easy to understand Fannin’s actions.
Fannin also chairs the Appropriations Committee and during that Sept. 25 meeting, Havard asked some pretty tough questions of Nichols and OGB CEO Susan West.
Havard probably represents more state employees as constituents in East and West Feliciana parishes than any other representative outside Baton Rouge because of the presence of the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola and the Louisiana War Veterans Home and East Louisiana State Hospital in Jackson. So naturally, he would be concerned about the hardship the OGB changes are going to impose on state employees and retirees.
Accordingly, it was only natural that Fannin would not want any surprises during the committee hearing which turned out to be no hearing at all so Armes’ otherwise routine proxy request was rejected out of hand.
Fannin, who several months ago, switched from Democrat to Republican and is firmly ensconced in the Jindal camp (though it’s difficult to understand why anyone would throw his lot in with this governor whose popularity in Louisiana rivals only that of President Obama—other than his apparent desperation to hang onto his chairmanship), so it’s understandable, in a quirky sort of way, that he would do the administration’s bidding.
In fact, LouisianaVoice has also learned that Fannin has a report from the administration that contains a year-by-year breakdown as to where the mystery dollars came from to make up the surprise surplus.
That report is not public and Fannin is supposedly the only legislator who is privy to its existence and its contents.
The numbers, we are told, go all the way back to 1998, during the latter part of the Mike Foster administration, instead of to 2002 as originally reported, and the money consists of self-generated funds the Foster, Blanco and Jindal administrations never recognized for appropriations.
So, when Jindal faced a real deficit at the end of the fiscal year just ended on June 30, he scraped the bottom of the barrel, figurative and literally, to come up with the funds and voila! The amount was more in the neighborhood of $500 million instead of the $360 first reported.
The problem is, however, the $500 million may have already been spent and if so, it would create an actual deficit of some $360 million instead of the $141 million initially claimed by Kennedy. And it certainly would not create a surplus.
And taking the scenario to its logical conclusion in this Alice in Wonderland world of Louisiana politics, State Treasurer John Kennedy, the one person who should be the one kept abreast of all budgetary developments, the one person responsible for accounting for every dollar spent, is being kept in the dark along with other legislators who would like to have some answers.
Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols, instead of sitting at her desk and sniping at Kennedy for questioning her numbers, could just as easily pick up the phone and call Kennedy to invite him over, or even offer to walk across Third Street, take the elevator up to the third floor of the State Capitol, and sit down with the Treasurer and explain how the administration arrived at its numbers.
A truly transparent, ethical and accountable administration owes the citizens of this state that much at a minimum.
But don’t hold your breath.



Seven hundred million dollars in cuts to higher education over the last six years. Why, if much of that money was available? Answer us that, Jindal, Nichols, and Fannin.
Secret financial reports for one set of eyes only, threats and intimidation, secret accounts and slushfunds, sleazy/greasy bad guy with a bland, blonde operative, sounds like the plot of the perfect spy thriller. File this one under non-fiction entitled Louisiana Gone Banana.
All we need now is a coup, the army mobilized by the bad guy in response and a getaway jet filled with bags of cash revving on the tarmac with the black SUV closing in. Bad dream?????
Wow! Jindal was actually in Baton Rouge the past couple of days. Must be serious. Does this guy have something to hide or what? Why else would he be strong-arming elected officials? Is he afraid something might come out that will hurt his chances for the Republican presidential nomination? As if. He’s already about to cross over to the other side of zero in the polls, the negative side, at the rate he is going.
Great reporting, and God bless your sources.
Oh my God. This is not good at all. This is really bad. Very, very bad. Excellent reporting, but OMG!
The people were waiting. The legislators should have been prepared to be there and ask the appropriate questions. The “administration” should have been ready. We, the people, were hoping/praying for the surplus. Hoping that the surplus would go back into the OGB stolen fund. And we have been let down.
I have never been this disillusioned before. Why do we pay these legislators on the JLCB? Why do we, the taxpayers, pay these people when they are obviously bought and paid for already? Why should we add to the money they are already getting?
And for the life of me I will never know why these legislators (JLCB) submit to Jindal. Who is this man, Jindal? How did he get THIS much power over these people. Oh yeah, Koch Brothers.
When will our legislators grow some balls? They are the ones in control, but it’s now obvious that money has bought them as well. It has bought their souls.
So sad. So very sad for this state and the people who love this state.
Regrettably, KP, it’s becoming more than apparent the governor and all but a handful of legislators are sworn members of the same fraternity, QUID PRO QUO. And as you point out, they answer to the same masters, not the citizens who elected them.
I worked at the state budget office for 21 years, for 12 of those years as its chief official. We went through some very hard times. Every commissioner of administration I ever worked for always asked the same question their first day: “Where is the hidden money and how can we get to it?” My answer was always the same: “The hidden pile(s) of money is a myth. There may have been hidden pockets of money before modern accounting and information technology, but it is impossible to hide money in the state treasury today.”
If what Ms. Nichols contends is true, she has made a stone liar out of me.
This has to be the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen happen with regard to the state’s financial condition and its reputation. How can $500 million simply have been hiding in the state treasury? Do Ms. Nichols and others have any idea how her contention totally undermines the integrity of our financial system? It makes a mockery of our accounting system and our annual Comprehensive Financial Reports for the past 16 years, if not longer and of our state itself. People already routinely suspected the numbers they were given. Now there is no reason to believe anything.
I cannot overstate how horrible this is.
After 21 years in state service as either a Medical Director or Hospital CEO, I have to fully agree with Stephen. And even if there is the existence of this so called “accumulated surplus”, it is ONE TIME MONEY. That means it will not be available to balance next years budget, but Jindal will be out of office halfway through next Fiscal Year’s budget cycle and it will be the responsibility of the new governor to decide what state services will have to be discontinued due to a catastrophic mid-year budget deficit.