It was nearly 53 years ago that Richard Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire special prosecutor Archibold Cox. Richardson refused and resigned, effective immediately. Nixon then ordered Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshous to give Cox the ax. Ruckelshaus likewise refused and like Richardson, resigned in protest.
Thus was lit the fuse that burned through the Watergate coverup which led in turn to Nixon’s own eventual resignation. Known as the Saturday Night Massacre, it sparked public outrage that Nixon was never able to overcome.
Now we have the firing of federal prosecutor Maurene Comey in Trump’s own seemingly desperate attempt to keep from the public information contained in the Epstein files that Attorney General Pam Bondi insists don’t exist after saying just a couple of months ago that the files were on her desk.
I may be getting nostalgic in my old age, but I can’t help but feel that the firing of Comey bears a striking resemblence to what occurred half-a-century ago. The question then is this: are we about to witness a similar erosion of trust that took nearly two years to finally bring Nixon down now begin a slow but certain march to a similar fate for Donald Trump?
Nixon was a master politician but even he couldn’t survive the “cancer on the presidency,” as John Dean described it to Nixon at one point. Trump, too, is a survivor, a master at turning certain defeat into victory but can he dodge yet another bullet when even his own MAGA base seems to be turning on him over this issue? They are convinced there’s something in those Epstein files that “don’t exist” and they’re equally convinced, as are a lot of Democrats, that Epstein did not commit suicide in that jail cell. Trump calls those people stupid. That might not wear well with the Maghats.
If Trump is not on those files or client list or whatever it may be, it would seem reasonable that he would want the information out there. After all, he campaigned with that as one of his central issues. But if his name is somewhere in that “non-existent” information, he certainly would have every reason to want it kept from the public.
It’s only right that people are demanding straight answers.




