Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Higher Education’ Category

It is long past the time when the Louisiana Tech Athletic Department, particularly the football program, should have given up on its delusions of mediocrity.

It’s not just about the won-loss record as Tech moves into its 10th year in the Western Athletic Conference, though that, too, is hard to ignore. There are also the economics that are dragging down not only the once proud football program, but academics as well. We’ll get to the economics later.

Take the Bulldogs’ inauspicious record since entering the WAC in 2001. The 49-64 overall record is less than inspiring and not particularly alluring to prospective recruits. Since 2001, Tech has had exactly three winning records and starting this year at 1-4 doesn’t look too promising. True, they got everyone’s attention that first year, going 7-1 in the WAC, but 7-5 overall, meaning they didn’t win a game outside the conference. The four non-conference losses were to Clemson, Kansas State, Auburn, and Oklahoma State.

Sadly, that’s the last time they’ve been competitive, even in the WAC. Oh, sure, they went 7-4 overall and 6-2 in the WAC in 2005 and 8-5 overall (5-3 in conference) in 2008, including a bowl win over Mississippi State. But records of 4-8, 3-10, 4-7, and three separate 5-7 season records take the luster off the few sporadic winning campaigns.

It’s bad enough that Tech is forced to compete in a conference spread out over seven states, the nearest of which is New Mexico State, but how can you build a rivalry with teams half a continent away? The logistics just aren’t there.

Back in the day when the folks who call the shots were more realistic, Tech had small ball but a great following. Tech and Northeast (ULM) was a guaranteed sellout. Likewise, the annual State Fair affair with NSU. And the rivalries were intense—and fun. Sure, the gate guarantee wasn’t comparable to what the ‘Dogs get from an Alabama, an Auburn, or Penn State. But neither was the guarantee of an embarrassing butt-whipping particularly appealing.

I love Tech. It gave me a chance to pursue a dream and for that, I’ll always be grateful. I will also be eternally grateful for having had the opportunity to see Terry Bradshaw heave that game-winning pass to Ken Liberto as the clock ticked off the final seconds on the State Fair Stadium scoreboard in 1968. I’ll never forget Terry’s touchdown pass to Larry Brewer in the Grantland Rice Bowl with four Akron Zips hanging all over him that same year. And Denny Duron’s winning touchdown pass to Roger Carr in the Division II national championship game against Boise State with less than a minute to go is forever etched in my mind.

But today? Can anyone even name Tech’s quarterback of 10 years ago? Five?

The Bulldogs don’t even have a winning record in their own conference.

Counting last Saturday’s blowout at the hands of Hawaii, they are 36-37 since entering the WAC.

For more than a decade now, Tech has insisted on trying to swim with the big fishes and the big fishes are simply devouring them. Oh, there is the occasional win over Alabama or Oklahoma State or Michigan State but those are so very few and very far between. And there were those games they acquitted themselves well in losing to Alabama and Nebraska (and LSU last year) while playing those teams to a virtual standstill. Again, though, those are rarities to be savored until the next shellacking at the hands of Auburn or Penn State or Miami.

Here are some samples of how the meek shall inherit the earth:

Kansas 34, Tech 14; Florida 41, Tech 3; LSU 49, Tech 10; LSU 58, Tech 10; LSU 24, Tech 16; Texas A&M 48, Tech 16; Navy 32, Tech 14; Auburn 37, Tech 13; Army 14, Tech 7; Kansas 29, Tech 0; Ole Miss 24, Tech 0; California 42, Tech 12; Miami 48, Tech 9; Texas A&M 31, Tech 3; Penn State 49, Tech 17; Clemson 49, Tech 24; Kansas State 40, Tech 7; Auburn 48, Tech 41; Oklahoma State 30, Tech 23.

Those scores certainly get me pumped for Homecoming in this the 40th anniversary of my graduation from Tech where my great-great uncle served as the school’s third president (as Casey Stengel would say, you can look it up).

For the bean counters, there are many more reasons to reign in the runaway money pit that is the WAC and big time football.

In fact, there appears to be more than 4.6 million reasons.

Tech spent nearly $11.9 million on its athletic program during the 2009-2010 school year. Almost 40 percent of that total, or $4.65 million, had to be made up in transfers from unrestricted funds and from other activities in order to balance the budget.

Football ticket sales last year were $730,000 and game guarantees accounted for $1.5 million more. Transfers from unrestricted funds totaled another $1,518,347 for total revenue of $3,748,347 for football.

Travel expenses for the football program totaled $887,330 and game guarantees paid by Tech were $120,000. Salaries, athletic scholarships, operating services and other costs ran the expense total for the football program to $4,057,805, an operating deficit of $309,458. Men’s basketball resulted in an additional deficit of $519,000 while women’s athletics ran a deficit of $1,367,484.

ULM, a member of the more regional Sun Belt Conference, had game guarantees totaling $2,675,000 in football last year. With ticket sales of $340,000, the Warhawks’ football program had revenues of $3,015,000 against expenses of $2,741,492, a surplus of $273,508. Women’s athletics, however, had expenses of $1,992,940 against revenues of only $161,000. ULM, like Tech, found it necessary to transfer $2,828,031 from unrestricted funds to balance the athletic budget of more than $7.9 million.

Grambling also operated at an overall deficit for its football program. With ticket sales and game guarantees totaling $1,570,000 against expenses of $1,730,433 and women’s athletic expenses of $1,424,971 against revenues of only $153,250, GSU found it necessary to transfer $1,611,598 to balance its $5,423,584 athletic budget.

In short, the bloated athletic programs of the three schools are becoming a serious drain on academics. With anticipated budget cuts mandated by Governor Jindal, it’s time the three universities take a critical look at their respective priorities. More cuts are coming and it’s going to hurt. It’s already hurting. There is simply no way the academic programs can withstand further transfers of millions of dollars to prop up reeling, stumbling, faltering athletic programs.

Tech will never be a big time football team. The Bulldogs will never attract enough fans to justify trying to play on the same field with perennial Top 10 powerhouses; the program will never generate sufficient revenue to justify remaining in a conference where the nearest member team is 800 miles away and the furthest a staggering 4,000 miles from home. It’s just bad economics to believe otherwise.

It’s time to downsize. The expectations of moving up to compete with football’s elite were unrealistic. They still are.

The continued practice of transferring funds to athletics—funds needed more than ever for academics—is equally unrealistic. And unfair. It’s time for sanity to prevail.

Do the math.

Read Full Post »

Louisiana’s Superintendent of Education doesn’t seem to be very smart. But don’t worry, he appears to have plenty company.

Paul Pastorek, originally appointed by Gov. Kathleen Blanco and retained by Bobby Jindal, is quick to blame the teachers of any school or school system that is shown to be failing.

But when test scores improve, guess who takes full credit? Okay, that was too easy.

But to repeat, he doesn’t seem to be very smart, especially for a lawyer, the occupational genus from which he was plucked to save Louisiana public education.

Taking the typical legal approach, Pastorek, without ever admitting actual culpability, earlier this month said he would repay the state $4,185 for dozens of private trips taken in a state vehicle by Paul Vallas, head the department’s Recovery School District. Both Pastorek and Vallas have insisted they were unaware that it was improper to take the Dodge Durango out of state on personal business, including several trips to visit family in Chicago. It was on one of the Chicago trips that Vallas wrecked the state car, the incident that led to the discovery of its out-of-state use.

What part of “improper use” don’t they understand?

In June, Higher Education Commissioner Sally Clausen resigned after it became public that she had furtively retired in August of 2009 without informing the Board of Regents, her bosses, only to be rehired after missing exactly one day of work. While entirely legal, the resulting flak caused her to become, in her own words, a “constant distraction.” The retire-rehire move netted her a $90,000 payout for unused sick leave and vacation time and entitled her to an annual pension of $146,400 on top of her regular salary.

It is still not certain as to who was responsible for “re-hiring” her. The Board of Regents is the hiring authority for the commissioner’s position and no member of the board has ever acknowledged knowing of her move in advance or indeed, for a full nine months after the fact. And she couldn’t very well re-hire herself, given the fact that she had resigned her position.

For questionable actions that may not necessarily be illegal but which have raised eyebrows for their apparent indiscretion, one need only pick a year. Take 2005, for example. In March of that year, Commissioner of Insurance Robert Wooley apparently felt his department needed a $40,000 special Harley-Davidson edition Ford truck, complete with heated seats, a camper package, diesel engine, red flames painted on the side, and a CD changer.

Wooley said he saw the vehicle on a car lot and wanted it so he traded in a year-old Eddie Bauer-designer edition Ford Expedition with only 30,000 miles on it. “I ain’t going to jail,” Wooley sniffed. “I sleep well every night.”

Edwin Edwards went to jail. So did former Commissioner of Elections Jerry Fowler and Commissioners of Insurance Sherman Bernard and Doug Green. Likewise Agriculture Commissioner Gil Dozier, three consecutive sheriffs in St. Helena Parish, and several judges in Orleans and Jefferson parishes. Former Congressman William Jefferson appears headed for jail for corruption and Federal Judge Thomas Porteous just underwent a rigorous impeachment trial with the U.S. Senate expected to render its verdict by Thanksgiving. Insurance Commissioner Jim Brown also went to jail but on the flimsiest of charges, that of lying to the FBI in an informal interview.

Senator David Vitter and former Congressman Bob Livingston both became involved in extra-marital affairs. Vitter’s was with a prostitute and Livingston’s affair was revealed at the same time he was calling for Bill Clinton’s resignation over the president’s Monica Lewinsky scandal. Livingston subsequently resigned from Congress only to emerge as a major player among the K Street lobbyists in Washington.

Vitter was considered vulnerable until Chet Traylor, a former Louisiana Supreme Court justice, decided to run against him and in so doing ended up making Vitter look good by comparison. Not only did Traylor have an affair with a Winnsboro legislator’s wife, but after they married and she later died, he began an affair with his stepson’s ex-wife. Traylor, who initially was considered a viable candidate, ended up with about 7 percent of the vote in the Republican primary.

In August, a federal jury in Shreveport convicted former State Senator Charles Jones of Monroe of tax evasion.

Just last week New Orleans Deputy Mayor Greg St. Etienne resigned. Hired by Mayor Mitch Landrieu to supervise the city’s chief financial office, he is accused of misuse of $500,000 in federal loans at a nonprofit organization he once ran.

Then there is Eddie Jordan, the man who put Edwin Edwards away.

Jordan, who succeeded Harry Connick as Orleans Parish district attorney, became embroiled in controversy almost from the day he took office. He summarily fired all his white assistant district attorneys who promptly filed suit. A jury found in favor of the fired workers and awarded them $3.7 million.

Jordan also came under heavy criticism for releasing suspects in high profile murder cases and in one instance, a suspect sought by police fled to Jordan’s home. In 2007, he released a suspect in the murders of five teenagers, saying that his office was unable to locate a key witness in the case. The New Orleans Police Department promptly produced the witness, who was in their custody all along. Later that same year, Jordan resigned.

But those are the high-profile cases. It’s those lawmakers and agency heads who try to fly just below the radar who sometimes are exposed as guilty of at least questionable behavior.

Whether it’s a legislator voting in favor of a bill that would benefit him financially or a pair of legislators swapping out Tulane scholarships in order to circumvent the prohibition against awarding the scholarships to family members, there are numerous conflicts of interest that often go unreported. Many public officials simply ignored that stipulation and put entire families through Tulane with the scholarships. (The families of former Crowley Judge Edmund Reggie and former New Orleans Mayor Moon Landrieu come to mind.)

But what could any more of a conflict than a legislator’s making it a common practice to sue the state? It would be akin to a member of the board of Wal-Mart, IBM, or Exxon suing their companies on behalf of clients who walk in off the street.

It’s assumed that legislators take an oath to protect the state fisc, or treasury, but that almost seems mythical these days. But don’t try to tell State Sen. Rob Marionneaux (D-Livonia) that. Not only does he sue the state on a regular basis, but he recently found himself in hot water when he attempted to negotiate a settlement between LSU and his client, Bernhard Mechanical. The State Board of Ethics said Marionneaux told LSU representatives that Bernard would accept $7.1 million from LSU and that he would secure a legislative appropriation of an additional $5.5 million.

The board further said that Marionneaux violated the law by not notifying the board that he was representing Bernard Mechanical. Marionneaux countered by saying he was not required to do so. He elaborated by saying the reporting requirement does not apply to lawyers who are legislators.

In June, however, even as the ethics board was investigating him, Marionneaux attempted to slip language into a bill that would eliminate requirements that he disclose his representation of Bernard to the board. The bill failed.

Perhaps then, it should be no surprise that Pastorek, who said he gave permission to Vallas to use the vehicle on the trips, said of the repayment, “I don’t think legally, technically, I have to, but my feeling is we need to get this behind us and move forward.”

A legislative auditor’s report said Vallas, who doesn’t fly, used the state-owned SUV for dozens of visits to family in Illinois and along the Gulf Coast from the time he was hired in July 2007 through April 2009. Vallas admitted to auditors that 31 of his 41 trips out of Louisiana were not work-related.

Vallas no longer has a state vehicle. Instead, he has been given a $2,200 per month car allowance in addition to his $252,689 yearly salary.

Considering the number of trips taken and time away from the office for Vallas, plus repairs to the Durango, Pastorek may have gotten off light with paying $4,185 (gasoline alone should have exceeded that amount).

If that’s not sufficiently magnanimous of Pastorek, a week later he graciously declined a pay raise after receiving a favorable review of his job performance by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education but not before making it clear that he had earned the increase had he opted to take it.

It may have come as a surprise that he was even eligible for a pay increase when state classified workers were denied raises by the governor earlier this year. Pastorek, as a political appointee, is unclassified or non-civil service. His salary is $287,907, plus a housing allowance of $57,240 and a car allowance of $31,800. A 6 percent raise would have meant an additional $22,616 in annual compensation for Pastorek.

All things considered, it’s probably no surprise that a writer for the Chicago Tribune rated Louisiana worse than Illinois in public corruption.

Maybe new Southern University President Ronald Mason Jr. knew what he was doing when he brought his own lawyer onto the Southern payroll even as the university was laying off 50 employees.

Mason came to Southern from Jackson State University in Mississippi and brought both his Chief of Staff Evola Bates ($150,000 per year) and Executive Counsel Byron Williams ($120,000).

Read Full Post »

When it comes to recession-proof employment, the best job in north Louisiana would appear to be a teaching position at one of Lincoln Parish’s two universities.

Between the two institutions, Tech and Grambling have over 200 teaching and support personnel knocking down $90,000 per year or more, according to information contained in the schools’ proposed budgets for 2010-2011.

Tech has 138 and GSU had 20 with salaries of $100,000 or more. Tech had 35 and GSU added eight more with salaries of between $90,000 and $100,000. Those numbers are exclusive of athletic department personnel, who added a few more to the totals at each school.

Over to the east, the University of Louisiana-Monroe had 40 positions listed in excess of $100,000 per year and 35 more between $90,000 and $100,000, the bulk of those in the School of Pharmacy.

Dan Reneau led the three university presidents with a salary of $350,000 and a car allowance of $7200 per year. Frank Pogue will be paid $200,000 at Grambling while his executive assistant will get $96,000. Reneau’s executive assistant is paid $113,220.

Stephen Richters, who assumed the presidency of ULM on Aug. 1, will draw a pro-rated salary of $166,267 based on a yearly salary of $252,886.

Enrollment figures for the three schools won’t be released until sometime in January, so overall budget requests, which are based in large part on enrollment and tuition, are speculative at best.

Tech’s total budget request is for $186.2 million, which is nearly $12 million more than last year’s budget of $174.5 million. Gov. Bobby Jindal has placed state universities on notice to prepare for further budget cuts of up to 35 percent.

Of the total budget request for Tech, nearly $41.1 million would be in state funds and another $45.7 would be in the form of student fees, including registration and tuition. The balance would come from interagency transfers and from self-generated revenue that would include endowments, grants, and non-resident fees.

Grambling is seeking a total budget of nearly $89.2 million, which would be about $270,000 less than last year. Of that amount, $18.2 million would be in state appropriations, $30.6 million in student fees, and $28.1 million in self-generated revenue.

As might be expected, Tech, with its quarter system, is the most expensive of the three schools but still far below the Southern and national averages in costs.

Tuition and registration at Tech is $1,213.25 per quarter for the fall, winter and spring quarters, for a total of $5,544 per year if a student does not attend summer school. University and student-assessed fees add another $634.75 for a total resident fee of $1,848 per quarter, not counting housing, meals and books.

ULM’s total resident fee is $2,317.65 per semester, or $4,635.30 total for the fall and spring semesters, while GSU’s resident fee is $2,214 per semester, or $4,428 for fall and spring semesters. Tuition and fees for all three schools is based on 12 or more semester credit hours (SCR).

Just in case you might be interested in what you’re paying for, here are the fees assessed by the university:

• Speech and Forensics Fee (Are they teaching how to speak CSI?);
• Alumni Support Fee (Shouldn’t alumni be supporting themselves, especially the Wyly brothers?);
• Student Center Fee;
• Student Newspaper Fee;
• Student Assistance Fee (Okay, so then if I need assistance, I have to pay?);
• Music Fee;
• Concert Fee (These aren’t the same?);
• Intramurals Fee;
• Academic Service Fee (I thought that was what tuition was);
• Assessment Fee (What?);
• Student Service Fee (I’d like an explanation, please);
• Student Government Fee;
• Student Union Board Fee (Someone please explain the difference between Student Government and Student Union Board);
• Student Recreation Facility Fee (Wouldn’t that be the same as Intramurals Fee?);
• Student Radio Station Fee;
• Student Library Fee;
• Student Accident Insurance;
• Technology Fee;
• Energy Surcharge;
Total University-assessed fee: $545.25 (based on 12 or more SCR);

• Student-assessed fees:
• Sports Club Fee (Again, wouldn’t that be the Intramurals Fee?);
• Health Fee (I’m just sayin’….);
• Parking/Campus Enhancement Fee (Parking? Are you kidding me?);
• Spirit Group Fee (What, pray tell, would this be?);
• Organization Development Fee (You’re putting me on, right?);
• Athletic Fee (So we can watch the Bulldogs get their teeth kicked in by Alabama, Auburn, Texas A&M, LSU, et al?).

Total Student-Assessed Fees: $89.50 (based on 12 or more SCR).

Total fees (based on 12 or more SCR): $634.75 per quarter ($1,904.25 per year).

When I was a student at Tech, which admittedly was more than 40 years ago, I could go to school for an entire year on just one of today’s $634.75 quarterly fee assessments.

….And my first new car, right off the showroom floor, was $1600; gasoline was 30 cents per gallon, and I paid a whopping $11,000 for my first home–on a half-acre lot.

Read Full Post »

Apparently too much time has passed for the state to bother prosecuting those responsible for the illegal use of $2.6 million in Grambling State University facility support funds to invest in the stock market. The investments, according to a state audit of GSU, resulted in a loss of about $1 million.

Even though the audit report said the use of facility support funds for stock investments was clearly in violation of the law, Louisiana Inspector General Stephen Street has decided not to open a formal investigation.

“….(I)t appears that these stock purchases occurred between 2002 and 2004,” said Greg Lindsey, state audit director for the IG’s office. “Inspector General Street felt that these violations are too stale-dated and that full development as a criminal matter would be restricted by state and federal prescription periods. Therefore, after careful consideration, we have decided not to open a formal investigation.”

“We noted that various corrective actions were implemented by GSU, including transferring the stock instruments to a custody account,” Lindsey added in his letter to Louisiana Voice.

Taking into consideration GSU’s track record of repetitive financial accounting shortcomings over the past 40 years, we’re going to take a wait-and-see approach to those “corrective actions.”

Read Full Post »

            Seventy-one years ago, LSU President James Monroe Smith revealed to then-Gov. Richard Leche that he had illegally invested—and lost—more than half a million dollars of university funds in the stock market. For that transgression, and others, Smith was carted off to federal prison.

            Thirty-three years ago Josh Bursh who, at the time was the odds-on favorite to succeed Ralph Jones as president of Grambling State University, was convicted of misappropriating $26,000 in GSU Foundation funds and spent two years in prison.

            More recently, a state audit revealed that GSU officials lost $1 million investing in the stock market. By investing $2.6 million of funds that legally could only be used for university facilities—physical plant—GSU violated two state laws, the audit report says.

            For the third consecutive year the university failed to compile an accurate annual fiscal report and overstated or understated cash flows by as much as $89 million. The audit also cited continuing problems with athletic department contracts and for movable property accountability.

            But the real revelation was when Tom Cole, director of financial audits for the Legislative Auditor’s Office, said, “None of this was serious enough for use to send for prosecution.” Perhaps not, but Daarel Burnette left his position as Vice President of Finance and Administration on July 21. There was no immediate word if he resigned voluntarily or under pressure, or was simply fired. Leon Sanders, who served as Burnette’s assistant, has been named as his interim replacement.

            GSU President Frank G. Pogue concurred with virtually all the audit’s findings, which, among other things, said the university failed to correct poor accounting practices, including being unable to account for movable property and for not signing game contracts with all athletic opponents, shortcomings also noted in prior year audits.

            Even as area media were saying that Pogue was unavailable for comment, the GSU president was releasing an “open letter to the campus community” that addressed news reports on the latest poor audit. While acknowledging that GSU “ is undergoing major financial challenges, however, not to the extent that we are negligent in being good stewards of the public’s trust.”

            Pogue said that while the audit was for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, “the stocks were purchased by the university between 2000 and 2004.” Pogue became GSU’s eighth president only last month. He had been serving as interim president since last December. Horace Judson, who left last October, was GSU president during the time period covered by the audit.

            “It is my belief that the corrective actions submitted in response to the legislative auditor’s findings are appropriate and that they ensure the fiscal operations at Grambling State University are consistent with the law,” Pogue said in his June 30 letter.

            “Our priority is to move Grambling State University forward and that includes ensuring that this university makes fiscally sound decisions in spending and investing public resources. We have established an inclusive strategic planning process to assist us with these efforts. We are committed to holding ourselves and this institution to a higher standard of moral and ethical accountability while ensuring that we are good stewards of the public’s trust.

            “It is the goal of this administration to maintain a spirit of transparency and open communication with the campus community, especially when faced with potentially damaging news,” he said.

            Cole said the improper stock investment, made with $2.6 million in plant funds that can legally be used only on university facilities, “was through an oversight and not properly monitoring their investments.” Pogue, in his letter, did not address the question why funds clearly earmarked for campus physical plant were used for stock market investment.

            “They are making efforts to improve the control structure at Grambling,” he said.

            Grambling has been “making efforts” to correct glaring audit deficiencies for more than 40 years, mostly to no avail. The legislative auditor’s office, on the heels of the Josh Bursh debacle, was so desperate to clean up the fiscal mess at the university that it installed one of its own auditors on the campus to oversee financial operations. That effort, however, failed as GSU continued to pile up negative audit reports year after year.

            Stay tuned for annual updates.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »