Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Ethics’ Category

It looks as though Bobby Jindal’s former commissioner of administration Kristy Nichols will finally have to comply with state regulations. Or maybe not.

The Louisiana Board of Ethics, in typical fashion first put the kibosh on any effort by Kristy Kreme to lobby state government on behalf of her new employer—and then promptly withdrew the opinion.

The board was essentially neutered by Jindal during his rush for ethics “reform” in his first days in office back in 2008. Because of those “reforms,” the board lost considerable steam and all its enforcement powers and it now appears it is missing a spine.

And one has to wonder if the Jindalistas had any influence on the decision to withdraw the unfavorable opinion.

Nichols served as Jindal’s commissioner of administration for three years, from October 2012 to October 2015. Those years were marked by consistent budgetary shortfalls, cuts to higher education and health care, the contentious revamping of premiums and benefits for state employees, retirees and dependents through the Office of Group Benefits and the equally controversial privatization of the state charity hospital system.

She also was sued twice by LouisianaVoice over her failure to produce public records in a timely manner. It was in that area that she enjoyed her greatest success by breaking even. She prevailed in the first lawsuit but lost the second one. She still owes a judgment of $800, plus attorney fees and court costs. She chose to spend even more state money in appealing the decision to the First Circuit Court of Appeal.

She announced in September that she would be going to work for Ochsner Health System as a lobbyist. Well, technically, her new title is vice president of government and corporate affairs. While state law precludes her lobbying the legislative or executive branches for two years, there appears to be no prohibition to her lobbying local governments (parishes and municipalities) on the part of Ochsner.

She contacted the ethics board on Nov. 5 through attorney Kimberly Robinson of the Baton Rouge law firm Jones Walker.

Robinson was recently named by Gov-elect John Bel Edwards to be the new secretary of the Department of Revenue and Taxation.

The board last Thursday (Dec. 17) addressed six specific areas about which Robinson sought opinions. The board shot down four of those and took no position on the remaining two because of what it termed insufficient information, according to Walter Pierce of the INDReporter Web site. http://theind.com/article-22377-Ethics-Board-blocks-Nichols.html

A spokesman for the ethics board, however, told LouisianaVoice on Monday that the opinion has been “withdrawn” and the entire matter re-scheduled for the board’s Feb. 19, 2016, meeting.

The opinion initially would have barred Nichols for two years from:

  • Direct transactions or communications with the Division of Administration;
  • Participating in any transaction, researching or preparing materials for use in or in support of a direct act or communication with a legislator;
  • Communicating or having a transaction with the Department of Health and Hospitals, and
  • Assisting Ochsner in communications or transactions with LSU. The LSU Board of Supervisors currently oversees the public-private partnerships between the state-run hospitals and private health care providers.

There was no immediate explanation of what the remaining two questions from Robinson concerned.

There are several areas of concern in allowing Nichols to lobby state government on behalf of Ochsner, not the least of which is the agreement between the state and Ochsner during her term that allowed Ochsner to partner with the state in running the Leonard J. Chabert Medical Center in Houma.

In 2013, the LSU Board of Supervisors signed off on the contract containing 50 blank pages. That contract handed over operation of state-owned hospitals in Lake Charles, Houma, Shreveport and Monroe. The blank pages were supposed to have contained lease terms. Instead, the LSU board left those details to the Jindal administration (read Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols).

Eventually details emerged about the contracts, including that of the Leonard J. Chabert Medical Center in Houma. And, thanks to the Louisiana Public Affairs Research Council, the picture began to come into focus.

Leonard Chabert Medical Center was opened in 1978 as a 96-bed facility with 802 employees but by the time it was privatized, it was down to 63 beds.

In 2008, a hospital-based accredited Internal Medicine residency program was begun. In 2011, the hospital’s revenue was 47 percent uncompensated care for the uninsured, 29.5 percent Medicaid, 13 percent Medicare, 5.5 percent state general fund and 6 percent interagency transfer from other departments with only 1 percent being self-generated.

When the Jindal administration moved to unload state hospitals, Chabert was partnered with Southern Regional Medical Corp., a nonprofit entity whose only member is Terrebonne General Medical Center (TGMC).

TGMC is slated to manage Chabert with assistance from a company affiliated with Ochsner Health System, Louisiana’s largest private not-for-profit health system with eight hospitals and forty health centers statewide. Terms of the agreement call for a five-year lease with an automatic renewal after the first year in one-year increments to create a rolling five-year term.

Though Southern Regional is not required to pay rent under terms of the agreement, the Terrebonne Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 is required to make annual intergovernmental transfers of $17.6 million to the Medicaid program for Southern Regional and its affiliates.

The cooperative endeavor agreement (CEA) calls for supplemental payments of $31 million to Ochsner. Small wonder then that the Houma Daily Courier described the deal as “a valuable asset to Ochsner’s network of hospitals” and that the deal expands Ochsner’s business profile.

Between 2009 and 2013, Ochsner’s revenue doubled from $900 million to $1.8 billion and the deal would mean more revenue for Ochsner, the Daily Courier said. http://www.houmatoday.com/article/20140325/articles/140329692?p=3&tc=pg

There has never been a reasonable explanation as to why the LSU Board signed off on a blank contract that the Jindal administration would fill in after the fact. Was it just by chance that Nichols, as Commissioner of Administration, was responsible for that task? And was it just happenstance that two years after Ochsner received that $31 million, it saw the need to bring Nichols aboard just as her employment with the Jindal administration was winding down?

LSU Board of Supervisors handed over University Medical Center in Shreveport and E.A. Conway Medical Center in Monroe to the Biomedical Research Foundation (BRF) even though the CEO of BRF was a sitting member of the LSU board at the time.

Within two years, that deal fell apart and the board and BRF are now involved in complicated litigation.

Meanwhile, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services has yet to approve the Jindal/Nichols privatization plan.

 

Read Full Post »

To say we were disappointed in John Bel Edwards’s decision to reappoint State Police Superintendent Mike Edmonson would be an understatement. What LouisianaVoice has learned—and published—about problems throughout LSP, particularly in Troop D, should be reason enough to turn Edmonson away.

Edwards made two major mistakes in arriving at his decision. First, he listened to the Louisiana Sheriffs Association and Louisiana Police Chiefs Association. Second, he did not listen to the voices of state troopers whose morale has hit rock bottom and who have made their feelings known, albeit anonymously, in the comment sections of our posts. Realistically, they have no voice to compete with the sheriffs and chiefs.

The sheriffs association had its reasons for wanting Edmonson reappointed.

Edmonson, after all, has hired numerous officers whose only qualifications are that they are related in some way to some sheriff or police chief. Together, they are quite powerful and their endorsement, coming as it did when the outcome of the governor’s election was still in question, was an important coup for Edwards. At the time, Edwards’s opponent, U.S. Sen. David Vitter was hammering Edwards with a withering barrage of TV ads claiming that Edwards wanted to turn thousands of dangerous convicts loose on a helpless citizenry. And it’s difficult for a candidate to win a given parish, especially against those kinds of attacks, without the local sheriff’s support.

One would think, however, that Edwards, when first approached by the sheriffs and chiefs would have been more circumspect. It was Edwards, after all who in 2014 called for an investigation of the manner in which that retirement boost for Edmonson of $30,000 to $50,000 (the numbers vary) was sneaked through in the closing hours of the 2014 legislative session. https://louisianavoice.com/2014/07/19/reps-john-bel-edwards-and-kevin-pearson-will-request-investigation-of-edmonson-retirement-amendment-source/

Edmonson, of course, initially denied any hand in the bill amendment offered up by State Sen. Neil Riser. But as events unfolded, it became clear that Edmonson was behind the effort from the beginning.

Unfortunately, in the world of hard ball politics, crucial endorsements have a way of overriding good judgment.

On Oct. 27, three days after the first primary, I sent an e-mail to Edwards in which I asked him his intentions regarding an Edmonson reappointment. He wrote back that he had no intentions either way and I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Here is that e-mail exchange:

On Oct 27, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Tom Aswell wrote:

Please tell me your intentions as to the re-appointment of Mike Edmonson.

Tom Aswell

LouisianaVoice

 

From: John Bel Edwards  Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:50 PM To: Tom Aswell  Subject: Re: QUESTION

I don’t intend one way or the other

 

We won’t go so far as to say Edwards misled us, but we do know how backroom political tradeoffs are made and even back then we were hearing that the deal had already been cut.

We will leave this with a word of advice for Edwards that he may or may not chose to take to heart: You would be very wise to keep Edmonson on a short leash. Take any complaints you may hear about him seriously even though no state trooper in his right mind would dare come forward with a public beef for genuine fear of reprisals.

Short leash, Governor.

Read Full Post »

LouisianaVoice has learned of new developments in the ongoing saga of the State Police Internal Affairs investigation at Troop D.

We first learned that Troop D Commander Capt. Chris Guillory has filed an appeal of an undetermined disciplinary action for unknown actions. We now know what that discipline was as well as what the alleged infraction was, and it substantiates what we wrote about back in August.

The stark reality of Jindal administration’s double standards found in discipline of State Trooper for text, phone threats

It was also brought to our attention that certain retired state troopers are no longer welcome at meetings of affiliate members of the Louisiana State Troopers Association (LSTA), especially those retirees who might question the wisdom of the LSTA’s making campaign contributions to political candidates.

Pursuant to a public records request made to the State Police Commission which hears all disciplinary appeals by state troopers, we learned that Guillory has retained Baton Rouge attorney Jill Craft to handle his appeal. That appeal is scheduled to be heard on Feb. 11. (Belated editor’s note: our public records request to the State Police Commission was for appeal records for Chris Ivey, Ryan Roberts, Ronald Picou and Brett McCloud. Our records on the Chris Guillory appeal were obtained through separate but confidential sources.)

The letter of reprimand was signed by Lt. Col. Charles Dupuy who serves as Assistant Superintendent of State Police under Superintendent Mike Edmonson.

Here is Dupuy’s letter (click on images to enlarge):

REPRIMAND LETTER 1REPRIMAND LETTER 2

REPRIMAND LETTER 3In his letter, Dupuy referred to allegations first addressed by LouisianaVoice that Trooper Jimmy Rogers was allowed to work LACE overtime and off-duty escort details—all “while serving a disciplinary action in the form of a reduction in pay which spanned from December 27, 2010, to February 5, 2012.”

LACE, which stands for Local Area Compensated Enforcement Program, is a program by which state troopers are paid by local jurisdictions for extra traffic enforcement (read: quotas).

Rogers was disciplined by letter of Nov. 19, 2010, by Edmonson to a 240-hour reduction in pay (a 10 percent reduction for 30 pay periods, or 60 weeks. That represented a total penalty of more than $4,800 but LouisianaVoice said in August that there was speculation that he more than made up for that reduction by being allowed to work overtime on LACE and off-duty escorts of oversized loads.

“A review of his (Rogers’s) biweekly timesheets confirmed that Trooper Rogers worked LACE overtime and off-duty escorts/details while serving the reduction in pay,” Dupuy said in his letter of November 13. “An Internal Affairs investigation was conducted to determine why he was allowed to work overtime.

“On September 22, 2010, you were promoted to the rank of captain to serve as commander of Troop D. As the Captain of Troop D, on November 29, 2010, you personally delivered the above described disciplinary letter to Trooper Jimmy Rogers and had knowledge of the reduction in pay imposed on him,” Dupuy wrote.

Dupuy said that from January 6, 2011, to August 9, 2011, “Trooper Rogers worked 16 LACE overtime details in violation of (policy) in effect at that time. From January 16, 2012, to January 26, 2012, Trooper Rogers worked four off-duty escorts.”

Guillory told Internal Affairs investigators he was unaware of the policy, according to Dupuy’s letter, and that he failed to inform Rogers’s immediate supervisor that Rogers was serving a disciplinary action.

That, said Dupuy, placed Guillory in violation of the State Police Procedure Order which constituted unsatisfactory performance, which says in part:

  • A commissioned officer shall maintain a competency level sufficient to properly perform his duties and assume the responsibilities of his position.

Craft, in her Nov. 24 letter, put the State Police Commission on notice of appeal. Here is her letter:

JILL CRAFT LETTER 1JILL CRAFT LETTER 2

She said in that letter that Guillory’s reprimand “is not warranted,” based not on his violation of procedures, but on a couple of technicalities.

She said that during the time period in question, LSP issued several paychecks to Rogers. “At no time did LSP take any timely action regarding its payment to Trooper Rogers of the overtime pay. Indeed, not until over 4 years later did the agency acknowledge any error on its part.”

Craft also said LSP did not impose its discipline within the prescribed 60-day time limit from the beginning of its investigation to announcement of the punishment. LSP can request an extension of time, however, and one source said it was believed that such extension was requested in a timely manner.

“The investigation began on August 12, 2015, and…October 20, 2015, was the deadline for the imposition of disciplinary action,” she wrote. Pursuant to state statute, she said, the disciplinary action imposed on November 13 “is untimely and thus null and void as a matter of law.”

In another matter, it would appear the LSTA hierarchy are beginning to circle the wagons in defense of growing criticism from within over the board’s recently revealed campaign contributions. An attempt was made by LSTA incoming President James “Jay” O’Quinn to turn retired state trooper Carl Bennett away from a meeting of LSTA affiliate Troop L on Monday night in Mandeville.

“I was there a whole two minutes when Jay O’Quinn asked me to step outside and informed me the meeting was for dues paying members and I wasn’t a member and had to leave,” Bennett said. “I told him that I was there to find out some information about this back dues business to re-join and that I intended to act as a guest and not participate in the discussion or the meeting. He told me I had to leave anyway. I made it clear to him that I…had to go there (to the meeting) because our retiree representative doesn’t respond to us. Retiree David Brabham then stood up and told the whole bunch of them that if I had to leave, he was leaving, too but (that) they hadn’t heard the last from him.”

Bennett said “It sort of hurts to be ejected from the Troop building that you spent the biggest part of your life in—especially when the ones who didn’t want me there were either not even born or toddlers when I was a trooper there.”

Retired trooper Jerry Patrick said he was an affiliate president for six years “and I never turned a retiree away.”

 

Read Full Post »

Devall and Poe Investigations Compared

Poe Brothers Investigation

Jason and Brandon Poe are brothers who were both Louisiana State Troopers. They were on a hunting trip together on their land in Tensas Parish. They saw what they perceived to be a crime in progress (trespassing and illegal hunting).

They were in a secluded area knowing there was no way they could call for local law enforcement before the subjects left the area. They decided to investigate. They had problems with trespassers and poaching in the past with the two subjects who were suspected of trespassing and illegal hunting. One of the subjects ran away after one of the Poe brothers flagged down the vehicle while he was on foot.

The subjects ended up complaining to someone about the Poe brothers although they never actually filed a complaint form with LSP. LouisianaVoice obtained the documents which indicated Colonel Edmonson was making calls about the incident the following day. Sources indicate Edmonson’s early involvement is not normal.

The Poe brothers ended up being cleared of the allegations made but were still punished with a formal letter of reprimand. A letter of reprimand is a permanent disciplinary action. The reprimand was for violating two internal state police policies; failing to report being involved in an altercation and taking police action while off duty. The subjects in the investigation refused to cooperate with internal affairs. The investigation into the Poe brothers by internal affairs was at the behest of Edmonson. Sources indicate the two subjects were related to the sheriff.

LouisianaVoice received the following reports on the Poe brothers investigation from Louisiana State Police.

CAUTION: ALL THREE REPORTS CONTAIN STRONG LANGUAGE.

(CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE):

WILLIAM JASON POE PAGE 1

JASON POE PAGE 2JASON POE PAGE 3JASON POE PAGE 4BRANDON POE PAGE 1BRANDON POE PAGE 2BRANDON POE PAGE 3BRANDON POE PAGE 4

Devall Investigation

Captain Kevin Devall is a different story. Mr. Michael Gahagan filed a formal complaint against Devall after an incident at a hunting camp. LouisianaVoice covered this complaint in a previous story. Gahagan alleged he was stopped, assaulted, illegally detained, disarmed, transported against his wishes, and patted down by Devall. LouisianaVoice received the investigation file in this case as well.

Gahagan made allegations that information was leaked by internal affairs to the effect that they were going to cover for Devall. The investigation file indicated there would be a follow up in reference to the leak but none was documented in the files. The allegation of covering for Devall was confirmed by the investigation file itself after speaking to experienced investigators who reported this was a one sided investigation that failed to cover the elements of the alleged offenses. Devall was asked three questions in a polygraph. They were:

    1. Did you participate in the illegal touching of that man? Answer: No. The documents did not show he was asked if he touched the man. Legality is relative to each person involved.
  • Did you illegally touch that man? Answer: No. Again, legality is relative to each person involved. You do not go to a bank robber and ask him if he illegally robbed the bank. You ask if he robbed the bank, if he had a gun, if he pointed the gun, what he said, etc.
  • Did you force that man to ride with you on your ATV? Answer: No. They did not ask if he actually rode with him. Being forced is also relative to the person.

 

The documentation did not show Devall was asked about pertinent aspects of the allegations such as:

  1. Did you touch Mr. Gahagan? If so, explain.
  2. Did you identify yourself as a law enforcement officer?
  3. Did you disarm Mr. Gahagan? If so, explain.
  4. Did you transport Mr. Gahagan anywhere? If so, explain.

These are very important factors in determining an illegal detention. Even with the lack of evidence supporting a thorough investigation, Devall admitted to disturbing conduct. Devall admitted he blocked the only exit with his truck to prevent Gahagan from being able to leave. Devall reported Gahagan parked his truck near his stand and, “inconvenienced me where I couldn’t hunt.” While it may be annoying, it is not a crime. When Gahagan confronted Devall about moving his truck so he could leave, Devall admitted calling him a stupid m—-f—-r “at least 20 times,” according to the Internal Affairs investigative report. Gahagan reported Devall identified himself as a State Trooper. This combined with his truck being blocked in and being called a m—–f—-r at least 20 times would lead a reasonable person to believe they were not free to leave which is the legal standard for establishing a detention. If there was no crime suspected by Devall, this detention was illegal.

Even though this investigation was one sided, it was established blocking Gahagan with his truck and calling him a stupid m—–f—-r at least 20 times was not deserving of any permanent record. Devall was given a letter of counseling which is not a permanent record.

A letter of reprimand can be taken into account with considering promotions; a letter of counseling may not. In fact, a letter of counseling may not be appealed because it is not a permanent record and it may be removed from the personnel file.

Devall is the son of long time Hammond Police Chief Roddy Devall.

Here are excerpts from the Kevin Duvall investigation:

DEVALL PAGE 4DEVALL PAGE 5

KEVIN DEVALLDEVALL PAGE 2DEVALL PAGE 3

Comparing Punishment

The Poe brothers took legal action when they suspected a crime was being committed and were permanently punished. Devall took apparent illegal, unprofessional, and discourteous action in response to being inconvenienced and was not permanently punished. This is an obvious disparity. The common denominator is the relationship to politically connected individuals. No wonder Edmonson is able to get the endorsement of Police Chiefs and the Sheriffs Association.

Read Full Post »

Just as there are many deserving nominees for Boob of the Year, so are there those who deserve to be recognized for their work to bring the actions of those boobs to public light. Their efforts have helped to expose corruption in lieu of an ineffective State Ethics Board that Jindal gutted as his first action upon becoming governor.

And for those who think we’re too negative, here is our chance to put some positive spin on state politics. Unlike our Boob of the Year nominees, few of our nominees for the John Copes Beacon of Light award are public officials, though it would be unfair to say that no elected official is worthy.

Copes, a Louisiana Tech graduate, was one of the very first political bloggers in Louisiana, launching his website The Deduct Box in 1999. A resident of Mandeville, he died in October of 2006 at a time when his blog was getting about 10,000 hits per day.

Because any such list is subjective, some deserving candidates will be left out by oversight as occurred with our Boob of the Year nominees. Accordingly, you are free to make your own nominations.

So, with that in mind, here we go:

  • Former State Sen. Butch Gautreaux: All he did was to bust a gut in trying to save the Office of Group Benefits from certain corruption and mismanagement. He failed, of course, because Bobby Jindal wanted to privatize the agency and indirectly raid OGB’s reserve fund. Now the fund has been depleted, premiums have risen and benefits have been cut and Sen. Gautreaux has been proven correct.
  • State Sen. Dan Claitor: Claitor filed a lawsuit to nullify the illegal retirement increase of some $50,000 for State Police Superintendent Mike Edmonson. He won that suit and then filed a bill to make certain there were no more backdoor deals for Edmonson. He also objected to the administration’s less than ethical ruse to delay payment of Medicaid claims by two months, thus kicking the final two months’ problems into the next fiscal year—long after Jindal and his fraudulent cohorts will be gone. Sadly, Claitor’s objections to the move were ignored by the administration—and his fellow legislators who once again, allowed Jindal to have his way with them.
  • Lame duck BESE members Carolyn Hill and Lottie Beebe: Both stood up to State Superintendent of Education John White and both paid the price. Out of state money poured in for their opponents and both Hill and Beebe were defeated for re-election.
  • John Bel Edwards: It may be too early to call him a Beacon of Light. That will depend on what he does as governor. But he did fight Bobby Jindal for eight years and overcame mind boggling odds against a Democrat with little name recognition outside Tangipahoa Parish upsetting powerful (as in $10 million worth of power) U.S. Sen. David Vitter. While Jindal held onto his congressional salary right up to the time he took the oath as governor, Edwards has resigned from the Louisiana Legislature.
  • Tommy and Melody Teague: She was fired from her job (but won it back on appeal) for daring to testify before Jindal’s governmental streamlining committee; he for the audacity of taking over an agency (OGB) with a deficit of some $200 million and take it to a surplus of $500 million and then not falling all over himself to support Jindal’s proposed privatization of OGB. Jindal prevailed of course, and the surplus (reserve fund) was depleted, premiums increased, benefits reduced and many retirees now living out of state have lost their medical benefits altogether. At least Tommy Teague saw the danger way before the smartest man in the room.
  • Murphy Painter: As director of the Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control (ATC), he refused to allow FOB (friends of Bobby) short circuit the regulations for an alcohol permit for Champion’s Square across from the Superdome. For insisting that the applicant comply with ATC regulations, he was fired and indicted on made up criminal charges. Rather than bene over and grease up, he fought back, was acquitted at trial and stuck the state with his legal bills of nearly $300,000.
  • Whistleblower Jeff Mercer: The Mangham, Louisiana contractor was harassed, coerced and intimidated when he refused to comply with a DOTD inspector’s demand that he give the inspector money and/or equipment (a generator). When he complained about the extortion attempt, more pressure was applied in the form of harsh inspections, delayed and denied payments for work performed. He went bankrupt as a result of the DOTD actions but determined to fight back, he sued and won a $20 million judgment from the state. A pity since the governor’s office was made aware of the inspector’s actions but chose to do nothing to avert the eventual courtroom battle.
  • Whistleblower Dan Collins: The Baton Rouge professional landman complained about things he observed in the Atchafalaya Basin Program and promptly got frozen out of future state contracts. Undaunted, he and his one attorney went up against the Department of Natural Resources and its four corporate attorneys and on Friday (Dec. 11, 2015) won treble damages totaling $750,000—all after complaints to the governor’s office had been ignored, leaving us with the unavoidable conclusion that the Jindalites would rather pay hefty lawsuit judgments than correct obvious problems early on. To paraphrase the title of Hilary Clinton’s book, sometimes It Takes a Pissed off Citizen….
  • Lamar White: This Alexandria native, along with Bob Mann, has been a persistent thorn in the side of our absentee governor, a couple of congressmen, and anyone else he sees tampering with governmental ethics. But more than merely badgering, Lamar thoroughly documents everything he writes. If any official has anything to hide, he will be outed by Lamar. He is the one who dug up the story about U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise’s close connections to David Duke. That story, said Baton Rouge Advocate reporter Billy Gunn, “exemplifies the power of the pen and its ability to challenge the mighty.” High praise for someone another blogger once ridiculed for his cerebral palsy affliction which makes it difficult for him to walk. “But there’s nothing wrong with his mind,” Gunn said. “He writes on subjects ranging from the rights of the disabled to racial inequity.” Walter Pierce, editor of the Lafayette news site The Ind.com, said, “He has a sort of selfless bravery.”
  • Bob Mann: Journalist/author/political historian Bob Mann holds the Manship Chair in journalism at LSU and has unflinchingly taken on the powers that be, including his bosses on the LSU Board of Supervisors. Mann, who writes a column for Nola.com and Salon.com, has become such an irritant that one LSU Board member, Rolfe McCollister, has even advocated Mann’s firing for his saying that the LSU Board was more loyal to Jindal than to the students at LSU. This is the same Rolfe McCollister, by the way, who publishes the Baton Rouge Business Report. So much for his defense of the First Amendment. McCollister quoted a “former seasoned journalist” as saying “Every good journalist knows that you cannot ethically cover the institution that pays your salary and the people who supervise the work you do for that salary.” So much for his defense of the First Amendment. But Rolfe, how about “ethically” serving higher education that your boss has tried to starve to death with repeated budgetary cuts that resulted in higher and higher tuition for students? How is that you’re able to “ethically” look out for the interests of students and faculty of LSU while giving $17,000 to Jindal’s campaign, serving as treasurer of his campaign, and treasurer of Believe Again, the Super PAC created to promote Jindal’s presidential campaign. I guess the question really comes down to who has the higher ethical standard, you or Bob Mann. We go with the Mann. Every time.
  • C.B. Forgotston: What can we say about this former legal counsel for the Louisiana House? C.B. has a political blog but he doesn’t post often. And when he does post, the dispatches are usually short. But what he lacks in verbiage, he more than makes up with impact. He is terse, to the point, and quite often vicious in his critique of anyone he sees in office who he believes is wasting time or state dollars. Most people who know him would rather be on the receiving end of volumes of criticism from Jindal and his minions than a single sentence of disapproval from C.B.
  • Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne: for having the courage to cross party lines and endorse Democrat John Bel Edwards over Diaper Boy Dave Vitter. Dardenne took a lot of heat for that but who could blame him after Vitter’s carpet bombing of him and fellow Republican Scott Angelle in the first primary? Some will say his appointment as incoming Commissioner of Administration was the payoff. Perhaps so, but if anyone can come up with a better person for the job, we’re listening.
  • State Treasurer John Kennedy: His ill-advised endorsement of Vitter aside, Kennedy has been tenacious in his guarding of the state treasury, taking on Jindal and Commissioner of Administration Kristy Kreme Nichols time after time when they tried to play funny with the money. He would have easily walked in as Attorney General after the first primary had he chosen to run for that seat, which we encouraged him to do. Instead, he has chosen to remain as Treasurer—at least for the time being. Remember there is Vitter’s U.S. Senate seat that opens up next year and Kennedy would like that job. Whatever his motives for endorsing Vitter (many speculate had Vitter won, he would have appointed Kennedy to fill the remaining year, thus giving him the advantage of incumbency), no one can deny that he has been a splendid foil for the Jindalites for eight years.
  • Louisiana Trooper Underground: This unknown author or authors undoubtedly has/have reliable links deep within the upper echelons of the Louisiana State Police command in Baton Rouge. A relatively new entry into social media, this a Facebook page that posts the latest developments in the unfolding saga involving various troop commands and LSP headquarters itself.
  • Finally, all the others who have been Teagued: Tommy and Melody were the inspiration for the term but they are in good company with a long list of those who attempted to do the right thing and were either fired or demoted by a vengeful Jindal. Despite the obvious reprisals that lay ahead, each of them stood up for what was right and paid the price. They’re the silent heroes.

There are our nominees. You are free to write in your own favorite’s name. It is our sincere hope that the response to this will be as gratifying as that of the Boob of the Year.

Go.

Vote.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »