Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July, 2022

In an unabashed, brazen effort to generate a little interest in my books, I’m going to start doing what the Baton Rouge Advocate is doing with an LSU football book written by one of its reporters: I’m going to start publishing excerpts of a few of my books in the hopes a few of you will read the sample chapters and feel compelled to order them. (How’s that for sheer audacity and shameful pandering? Well, if Frump can be his own shill for his picture book, I can hawk mine, so there.)

Following is a sample chapter from my book It’s All TheIRS. It’s a book about a man who is erroneously hit with major taxes, penalty and interest that he’s convinced he doesn’t owe. He decides to fight back. I won’t tell you the ending but I will say that I have researched IRS abuse and have documented each of the cases I cite in the book (with the exception of the protagonist’s assessment, which is fiction. But all the others really happened to American citizens, earning the IRS the label of America’s only legalized terrorist organization.).

You may order your copy by clicking on the yellow DONATE button in the column to the right of this post to pay $25, which includes mailing, or you may sent a check for $25 to:

Tom Aswell, P.O. Box 922, Denham Springs, Louisiana 70727.

BE SURE TO INCLUDE YOUR MAILING ADDRESS IN EITHER CASE.

Enjoy:

“I’ve invested twenty years of my life with the IRS,” Fletcher said as they walked. “I was hired right out of college and it’s the only job I’ve ever had. I loved the work at first but then I started to see what was occurring and I guess you could say I developed a conscience. I tried to talk to my superiors about the hard line being taken, creating additional hardships where it wasn’t necessary. I saw businesses padlocked and closed down rather than giving the owners a chance to negotiate settlements of tax liabilities. It didn’t make sense to me. By closing them down, they were making sure the individual wouldn’t ever be able to pay his taxes, plus they were cutting off the potential for future taxes. It was a lose-lose situation.

“I asked why it was done this way and I got some pretty interesting answers.”

“Such as?” Ken asked when Fletcher paused and looked around.

“Such as the collections manager didn’t like this person, or they were going to make an example of that person. But more often than not, it was done for statistical purposes, to close a case. Performance evaluations were done on the basis of the number of cases closed. If a taxpayer was allowed to set up a repayment schedule or to negotiate, that necessarily meant the file had to remain open and that just couldn’t be tolerated.”

He paused to pick over some fresh vegetables. “We’ve got company,” he said without looking up. “FBI would be my guess, but don’t look. There’re two of them, about thirty yards behind us.”

Danny veered off to the right and, taking his time to check out surrounding tourists as casually as he could, he circled around until he was about fifteen feet behind the two dark-suited men. As he walked, he raised his camera and began clicking away. He’d taken about a dozen shots when one of the men looked back and saw him. Both men turned and approached the photographer as Tom and Ken started toward them from the other direction.

“Who are you and why’re you taking pictures?” one of the men demanded. Danny kept shooting and one of the men reached for the camera.

“I wouldn’t do that if I were you,” said a voice behind them. It was Ken, once again mustering his most authoritative bluster.

Forgetting Danny for the moment, they turned toward the voice. “What?”

“I said I wouldn’t do that.”

“Who’re you?”

“I just happen to be an attorney who knows the Bill of Rights like the back of my hand and you’re in serious danger of violating three or four of that man’s basic rights as an American citizen. But I’m sure I don’t have to explain that to you.”

Tom scribbled at a furious pace and Danny kept taking pictures to the obvious discomfort – and displeasure – of the two men who, like the three in the Café Du Monde earlier, suddenly realized they had business elsewhere and left without another word.

When they rejoined Fletcher, he was still looking at the produce.

“We had one case,” he said, picking up where he left off before the interruption, “where this young guy had just received his MBA and had gone to work for a computer company. He had three kids, one of whom had cancer, so he and his wife were thrilled that he got what looked like such a great job with benefits. He moved up in the organization and was soon given check signing responsibilities for the office’s day-to-day needs like utilities, rent, and supplies. He was one of several employees with signatory authority at the bank but he had no responsibility for payroll and tax obligations. That was reserved for the owners.”

Fletcher reached the end of one row and made two right turns and started back down the other side as the others trailed alongside and behind. Tom took notes and Danny, through taking pictures for the time being, watched for other unwelcome visitors.

“Then the company began to experience financial problems. Unbeknownst to our boy – I’ll call him John – the company’s owners had a past history of tax problems and they had already started setting up operations in another state. They did this by raking off cash and by transferring inventory and corporate assets to the new location without John’s or anyone else’s knowledge. They let John manage his office but told him payroll and taxes were being paid from the new office. He was still getting his paychecks, so it never occurred to him they were lying.

“One day an IRS collections officer – I won’t tell you his name, but his initials were Norwell Fletcher – dropped by John’s office. He was the senior ranking employee available to meet with me. I informed him that the company was delinquent in its payroll and withholding taxes. I had my marching orders, so I had no choice but to demand immediate payment or I would have to close down the office. The poor kid didn’t know what had hit him. He just went slack-jawed on me. He called the owners and they assured him there had been a mistake and that they’d straighten everything out.

“Well, they didn’t and a few days later they informed John that the company was folding and that he’d have to find employment elsewhere. He did. Got a great job with a big contracting firm with full benefits and a good salary. He landed on his feet without ever missing a beat.”

“What happened with the IRS?” Scott asked.

Fletcher dropped his eyes, smiled, and shook his head. “Well, it wasn’t pretty.”

“Like I said, he was in his new job, doing great, but then one day an IRS collections officer – not me – and a representative of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division were waiting for him when he got to his office. They told him he was under suspicion of diverting corporate assets and other actions that they said frustrated the collection of employment and withholding taxes. He was advised to get an attorney. His company immediately placed him on administrative leave, pending the outcome of the investigation.

John’s attorney and the collections officer met a week or so later and the collections officer told his attorney that John wasn’t the focus of the investigation, that they were after his former employer who had a history of tax evasion. He said the IRS wanted to prosecute John’s former employers on criminal charges and if he cooperated, the IRS would recommend leniency for any liability he may have had in the matter. John agreed to cooperate and insisted that his duties were only on the day-to-day business affairs of the local office. His attorney explained to him that anyone who is responsible for payroll tax compliance can be personally liable if he willfully failed to collect and remit the taxes.

“John reiterated his claim that he was not the one in the company who was responsible for payroll tax compliance. That duty belonged to the owners, who had assured him that the matter was being taken care of.”

By now, they were back at the Café Du Monde and after waiting several minutes, they managed to get a table in the open-air part of the café. They sat down and ordered more coffee.

“The IRS disagreed. They said since his signature was on file at the bank and he had the power to sign checks to pay for everyday operations of his office, he was as much a target as the owners. The leniency offer was suddenly forgotten as soon as he agreed to cooperate and he received an assessment of $750,000. In all my years with the agency, I’d never seen anything so blatantly unfair,” he said, turning to Scott. “Until your case came across my desk.”

“What happened with John’s case?” Scott asked. No one else had spoken since Fletcher had started telling his story.

“His attorney tried to reason with the agency. He told them the assessment was unreasonable and impossible to collect from the young family, that it would ruin them financially. He explained that his client’s youngest child was suffering from cancer. He reminded them they’d promised leniency and that his client had cooperated fully. The IRS turned a deaf ear. John and his wife made an offer in compromise that would have been difficult, but not impossible, to repay. It was rejected out of hand. The IRS was totally unreasonable.

“Then, a few years ago, the IRS tried to prosecute John for the tax deficiency, which by then had ballooned to over a million dollars. The presiding judge was aghast, but his hands were tied from a legal standpoint. The law dictated that John be held liable, even though the judge said the law was unjust and a travesty. ‘This man has been stripped of his assets and now is facing an un-dischargeable debt of more than a million dollars. My advice, not from a legal standpoint, but from a humanitarian standpoint, is for John and his family to leave for some more civilized country and try to start life all over again.’

“And that’s what he did,” Fletcher said. “He was forced to leave his own country by his own government for actions over which he had no control. The last I heard he was somewhere up in Canada.” He fell into silence and stirred his coffee absently as the others sat unspeaking.

“I fought ‘em,” he said finally. “I tried and tried to get ‘em to pull in their horns on this boy, but they wouldn’t listen. John’s case became an obsession with the IRS. They were determined to make an example of him and they did.

“Then you came along,” he said, looking up at Scott. “They were still drunk with power when your case came up and it was similar in some respects to John’s so they figured they had another slam-dunk. I argued with ‘em again, but they wouldn’t listen. They sent you and Ms. Kennedy those letters over a fake signature. Those were facsimile signatures; I hope you know that – that’s their tactic – to send out letters with fake signatures.”

“We’re familiar with them,” Ken said.

“When they sent them, they placed a copy in your files. I saw them and went ballistic. So now here I am, exiled to New Orleans where I can’t embarrass anyone in the agency.”

“O.k., now this is important to us,” Ken said. “Why did you fight them so hard on Scott and Lisa’s cases?”

“Because we knew where Kennedy was. There was no reason on earth not to go after him, but they wanted to get the two of you instead. I can’t explain why they did it the way they did, but I do know that they were fully aware of the whereabouts of Drew Kennedy all the time. They sure as hell don’t want me talking to you. That’s apparent from the presence of our five visitors today. They’re very upset with me and they don’t know what to do with me.”

“They’re gonna really be upset when they see the story,” Ken said.

“I hope so. You run the story; every word of what I’ve told you is true and I have nothing to hide. They can’t hurt me and they can’t hurt you if you don’t let them.”

“I think I have the next installment for my web page,” Scott said. Think I’ll run a couple of the photos of the feds, too.” Then he remembered something from his first encounter with the Atlanta IRS office. “By the way, why doesn’t James Pierson take phone calls?

Fletcher burst out laughing. “What’s so funny?” Scott asked. My letter was signed by James Pierson and I was given a telephone number to call. When I called it, I was told James Pierson doesn’t take phone calls.”

“He doesn’t.”

“Why not?”

“He doesn’t exist,” Fletcher said. “The IRS sends out deficiency letters to individuals and businesses over a facsimile signature of a fictitious name. It’s a code they use. When you call and ask for the person whose name is on the letter, they automatically know why you’re calling and how to route your call.”

“That’s subterfuge!” Scott said. “It shouldn’t be allowed. They should be required to sign a real person’s name on those letters. We’re entitled to that much. I’m really pissed.”

“That’s why I called you,” Fletcher said, smiling.

They listened to Fletcher for another hour as he told them what they could expect in the way of retaliatory actions from the IRS in the coming weeks.

“The first thing they did was to put a three-digit code on your IRS master file. The code can be either the number ‘148’ or ‘168,’” he said.

“What’s that mean?” asked Scott.

“It’s a special code that designates you as a tax malcontent,” Ken said.

“More specifically, a ‘148’ designates you as an illegal tax protestor,” Fletcher said. “It’s for anyone who’s suspected of taking part in tax evasion schemes or inciting tax rebellion. That designation virtually guarantees that you’ll be placed under intense scrutiny by the IRS. ‘Priority consideration’ will be assigned to your returns which means all your future tax returns will be flagged and screened by special auditors and agents. It also means, in practice, that you lose your taxpayer rights, including the opportunity to appeal.”

“Jesus, that’s sounds pretty serious. You think I’m a ‘148,’ then?” Scott asked.

“If you’re lucky. You could be a ‘168.’ That means you would be considered a ‘potentially dangerous taxpayer. Once you get that tag, there is no due process, no grievance procedure. A maximum-security prisoner would have more rights, more avenues of redress.”

“That would be pretty tough to hang on someone, wouldn’t it?”

“Mr. Tanner, any agent can convince a manager that a taxpayer is dangerous. I’ve seen taxpayers get a ‘168’ stamped on their file for just getting emotionally upset. Others have gotten the designation for simply attending meetings of tax protest groups when they were seen by agents who monitor meetings of such organizations.”

“They monitor tax protest groups? Isn’t that against the law or something?”

“Mr. Tanner, nothing is against the law where the IRS is concerned, even profiling. They operate with impunity. Once you’re labeled a ‘148’ or ‘168,’ there is no procedure for expunging the code from your master file. And from that point forward, when you deal with a revenue officer, he will have an armed escort.”

Scott was silent, stunned that a law-abiding citizen of a country founded on the principal of tax protests could be subjected to such treatment. What the hell happened to free speech?

“If an IRS employee sees a ‘148’ or a ‘168’ on your master file it means you will never get the benefit of the doubt. You’ll get no breaks and even years of good behavior won’t get you off the hook. And most of the time, you’ll never even know you’ve had your file designated.”

Scott and Ken looked at each other. It was Lisa who broke the silence. “Do you think there’s a chance we’ll have a ‘148’ or ‘168’ put on our files?”

“Oh, I don’t think there’s any doubt you already have, probably a ‘168,’” Fletcher said.

“That’s so damned unfair,” Sydney said. “The IRS tags us with a tax bill that’s not ours and we get labeled as dangerous tax protestors. Where the hell do they get off doing this to us?”

“That’s just for starters,” Fletcher said. “They’re gonna be watching your every move. You’ve already seen evidence of that today. They’ll be following you everywhere you go. They’ll try to shut your business down, put you out of business, and they’ll start levying penalties and interest like you could never believe. You owe $600,000 now. Before you can ask them their interest rate, it’ll jump to $750,000, then a million, and they’ll never offer you an explanation, a financial breakdown.

“They’re going to monitor your private telephone calls – your residence and business lines, so be damned careful what you say. They’ll open your private mail and if they get desperate enough, they’ll even burglarize your home and offices. Be extra careful of walk-in volunteers or customers; they may be plants, undercover agents, and they’ll be wired. If they can drive a wedge between you and Mrs. Kennedy or even between you and your wife or Mr. Bates, they’ll do it to get you to testify against each other.

“They’ll lie, misrepresent themselves, threaten, and even entrap you. If they do use informants, you won’t get the chance to confront them, question them, or cross examine them. They’ll seize property and money held by others but owed to you. They’ll even seize the property of third parties who owe the IRS nothing but who may be holding something for you. For example, if you have equipment stored in a warehouse, they can not only seize the equipment, but the warehouse as well. And they’ll do it.”

“You’re just trying to cheer us up, right?” Scott said.

“Let me tell you some stories,” Fletcher said, taking a bite from his beignet and washing it down with a gulp of coffee.

“I know of a case where they slapped a $16,000 delinquency on this poor guy. He set up a repayment plan where he would pay the IRS $250 per month. Eight years later, he’s paid them $24,000 and his balance is now $18,600. He’s trapped for life. Unless he wins the lottery, he’ll probably never be able to pay them back. If you get hit with a big assessment, you’d be insane to enter into a repayment plan with them, given the interest and penalties they impose. Hell, no one even knows what their interest rate is; it’s whatever they want it to be. Same with penalties.”

“What’re the options?” Scott asked.

“A bank. Borrow the money from the bank. They won’t charge anywhere near the interest rates the IRS does, and they don’t have penalties. Of course, with some people, it would be impossible to get the bank to lend them the money, so that would compound the problem.

“Another story. Three clothing stores in Colorado were audited. The auditor asked some questions about the stores that revealed his ignorance of retail accounting procedures. The stores’ owner told the auditor that based on what she could see of his accounting skills, he’d ‘be better off dishing up chicken-fried steak in an interstate diner in Texas.’ Beautiful quote, but ill-advised. Three weeks later IRS agents raided the stores, froze the bank accounts, and seized the entire inventory. Word was the IRS agents told customers that the owner was a drug dealer. They hit her with a $325,000 assessment, the equivalent of a financial death penalty, and even tried to seize her mother’s home. She demanded a fresh audit that subsequently showed she actually owed only $3400, but the IRS wouldn’t return her assets to her unless she signed a waiver guaranteeing she would not sue over the violations of her rights. Did I mention that the IRS will also try to blackmail you? She refused their ‘offer’ and she did sue over the wrongful disclosure of tax return information to the TV program Inside Edition. The clothing stores’ summer clothes were finally returned – just in time for Christmas. A federal judge eventually found the IRS liable for $325,000 in compensatory and punitive damages, plus attorney’s fees.”

He took another long drink of coffee and set the cup down. “I wanted this meeting so I could tell you all this. I wanted you to know what could happen if you continue to pursue the course you’ve laid out. “I also wanted to tell you face to face how important it is that you stay the course. What you’re doing is important and the stakes are extremely high. If you back down, the IRS will come out of this stronger and meaner than ever. You’re already marked with a three-digit code, so you may as well hunker down for a long fight.”

“Would you excuse us just a minute?” Ken asked.

“Sure. Take your time. I’ll be right here.”

Scott, Sydney, Ken and Lisa walked outside and stood in the hot summer sunshine talking back and forth for several minutes. Tom and Danny were not asked to join them. Fletcher watched their animated conversation. Finally, they returned to Fletcher’s table and stood in a circle around the IRS agent.

“What?” said Fletcher, looking up at the four smiling faces.

“Mr. Fletcher,” Ken said, “do you know anything about running a non-profit legal defense fund?”

Read Full Post »

Well, it’s official.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has bestowed upon the right-wing lobbyist group the Family Research Council (FRC) the official status of a CHURCH and Tony Perkins (not the late actor, but the former Louisiana legislator from Greenwell Springs) as its religious leader, or pastor, as it were.

A church.

The agenda of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who says it is a MISCONCEPTION that the founding fathers wanted the separation of church and state, notwithstanding, there can be no earthly way to see FRC in any light other than as an association established – and functioning – as a lobbying organization.

That FRC actively lobbies against abortion and LGBTQ rights and in favor of exemptions to civil rights laws should prohibit it from either being designated as a church or in participating in partisan politics.

And it doesn’t – or shouldn’t – matter which side of a given issue it advocates. If it promoted abortion or LGBTQ rights or took a hard line on the enforcement of civil rights laws across the board, it still should not be designated as a church.

To do so makes a mockery of the Constitution.

Just to be clear for the trolls out there who will attempt to pick this post to pieces, I will repeat: It does not matter which side of an issue you happen to espouse. If you are involved in ANY politcally-charged issue, no matter which side you advocate, you should not call yourself a church.

To be clear, I have no issue with its status as a non-profit organization. The American Civil Liberties Union (ALCU) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are non-profits.

But they are not churches.

FRC, it should be noted, is also against gender-affirming (transgender) SURGERY – in other words, changing one gender designation to another. But it has not seen fit to take a public stance against the slaughter of school children other than for Perkins to blame the shootings on RECKLESS RHETORIC.”

Sometimes silence can be deafening.

But calling a multimillion-dollar organization established for the sole purpose of lobbying Congress and state legislatures on any politically-volatile issue a church?

C’mon, folks. Let’s use a little common sense here.

We may as well designate the New Orleans Saints a church. I mean, look at some of the people in the stands during a Saints home game. If that isn’t worship, I don’t know what you’d call it.

How about the gas pumps at Sam’s Club? The rush to those pumps during the recent spike in gas prices resembled some religious tent revival services I’ve seen. And Waffle House. Those poor overworked wait staff employees are louder than any preacher and the hungry crowds are just as fervent as any amen corner.

Might as well make them churches, too. And don’t forget the Tiger Athletic Foundation out at LSU. The influence they have over the hiring and firing of coaches has to be divinely-inspired. And they’re as skilled at fund-raising as any televangelist

And of course, there’s the most obvious of all: Mar A Largo, a Mecca-like destination for the Frump devotees. And he’s exhibited something of a huckster’s skill at raising funds.

I probably shouldn’t have suggested that last one because some reader may actually get that suggestion to him.

But back to FRC and its president, Tony Perkins.

In 1996, then-State Rep. Woody Jenkins was waging a spirited campaign for the US Senate. His campaign manager was Perkins. Perkins signed off on a check for $82,000 for the purchase of a robocall campaign from a guy named David Duke. The money to be paid to the former KKK leader was routed through another firm in order to conceal the Duke connection.

Perkins explained to the Baton Rouge Advocate: “We didn’t want any appearance that we had any connection to Duke.”

No s**t? You didn’t want an appearance that you were in bed with the KKK?

While Perkins insisted to The Advocate that the campaign had complied with federal election law, the Federal Elections Commission felt otherwise and fined the Duke campaign $3000 for illegally concealing the deal with Duke.

On another occasion, Perkins, who at the time was a reserve Baton Rouge police officer, learned in advance of the potential of violence at a scheduled protest against a Baton Rouge abortion clinic. Because he also worked as a reporter for Jenkins’s weak-signal television station, “Woody Vision,” he neglected to inform his superiors at BRPD. Instead, with a camera crew in tow, he waited in hopes of getting the anticipated melee on film. There were many arrests but fortunately, no one was seriously injured. Perkins, though, was suspended from by the department for violating his oath of office and subsequently resigned.

The SPLC in 2010 designated FRC as a HATE GROUP because of its trashing of LGBTQ people and for spreading “harmful pseudoscience about them.”

Rather than embracing the Christian doctrine of love and acceptance, FRC has instead advocated the criminalization of homosexual conduct, an official position that certainly seems to validate its hate group status.

But a church?

Read Full Post »

If you drive along I-10 between Baton Rouge and Lafayette on a regular basis, you’ve most likely experienced the frustration of being caught in one of those exasperating traffic snarls caused by a wreck, usually on the notorious 18-mile stretch over Henderson Lake, a stretch with no exits – or bathrooms.

Well, take heart. State authorities have finally, at long last, realized there’s a problem along that stretch and they’re cracking down on speeders who zip along while ignoring the 60-mph speed limit.

Unless your name is Lamar Davis, of course. The enforcement by Louisiana State Police, which can carry fines of up to $1,000, does not apply to Lamar Davis.

Oh, Lamar Davis, by the way, goes by the title of Colonel and he’s the superintendent of Louisiana State Police. As in head honcho, the boss, Louisiana’s Top Cop.

It seems that Col. Davis, who was appointed to straighten out a rogue outfit that had seemed to have lost its moral compass, was running a little late for a 3 p.m. meeting in Lake Charles on June 28.

He was clocked at 91 mph in that 60mph speed zone along that infamous 18-mile stretch at 2:11 p.m. (he’s not going to make that 3 o’clock).

He was pulled over by a (ahem) state trooper whose identity was not immediately available but rest assured, he was already in over his head, severely outranked as he was.

Dash cam footage didn’t pick up any audio but the meeting was quite brief, probably just long enough for Davis to ask, “Do you know who I am?” to which the trooper most likely answered, “Gulp.”

“Yes, Sir. You have a good day now, Sir.”

Davis activated his own emergency lights (those blue ones that strike dread in your heart when you see them in your rear view mirror) in an apparent attempt to discourage the trooper who probably – mistakenly – thought he might be making a major bust only to discover that he’d pulled over his commander.

Speeding at a rate of 25 mph or more in excess of the posted speed limit is what is known by police as a 14:99 i.e., reckless operation, punishable by fines up to $200 and/or 90 days in jail.

A spokesman for LSP wrote to LouisianaVoice, “The Trooper utilized his discretion and did not issue a citation.”

If ever there was an understatement in invoking the word “discretion,” that would certainly qualify.

But it’s good to know troopers are free to use their “discretion” in matters such as this. If ever I get pulled over for speeding (which has not occurred since 1969 in Little Rock, Arkansas), I’ll be sure to ask the trooper if he can use his “discretion” and let me go with a warning – which I’ll bet he didn’t even do with Davis. I mean, would you “warn” your boss, especially when you couldn’t pull a 16-penny nail out of your butt with a John Deere tractor.

Read Full Post »

Seven dead in Buffalo; 21 killed in Uvalde, 7 more fatalities at Highland Park. The killing, it seems, never stops, never slows, as America more and more becomes an angry nation with its citizens harboring personal demons and innocent bystanders caught in the middle.

It makes no sense. It’s insanity. It’s some sort of fetish for assault weapons on the part of serious demented individuals.

Yet, with all the mass killings elsewhere, Louisiana has the SECOND-HIGHEST gun death rate in the US, according to a story in the Louisiana Illuminator, the only publication I’ve seen that published the grim statistics.

Let that sink in. We’re killing each other at an alarming rate, in random acts of one-on-one slaughter. Enough that our murder rate of 26.3 per 100,000 population ranks only behind that of Mississippi’s 28.6 per 100,000.

That’s Mississippi, the state that also boasts the highest infant mortality rate, the nation’s highest poverty rate, the nation’s worst nutrition, that ranks AMONG THE WORST in the nation in pre-natal care and where the governor recently declared June 2022 as SANCTITY OF LIFE MONTH.”

But let’s get back to Louisiana and that Illuminator story, written by Wes Muller.

Muller correctly points out that while some states have attempted to enact stricter gun control laws, Louisiana’s moribund legislators have seen fit to do little other than approve a resolution to study the pros and cons of arming school employees (the biggest and overriding con that I can come up with is children being caught in the crossfire of a Dodge City shootout between a panicky teacher and a deranged killer who doesn’t give a damn about his own life.)

And I won’t even get into a discussion about the macho hillbilly Green Beret wannabe who wrote in to assure me that he would have my back in such a scenario.

In order, the top five (or should that be the bottom five) in gun-related death rates are: Mississippi, Louisiana, Wyoming, Missouri, and Alabama.

There you have it. Five states with the most lax gun laws in America and three are from the Deep South where they things like “You kin have mah gun when you pry it from mah cold, dead hands,” and “Praise John Wayne and pass the ammo.”

But not to worry. Baton Rouge just happens to boast the single largest weapons distributor in the nation, though it’s not known if any of the weapons used in Buffalo, Uvalde, or Highland Park were sold here.

Lipsey’s, located in Baton Rouge, bills itself as “one of the largest independently-owned shooting sports distributors in the country offering a full catalog of firearms.” That “full catalog” includes companies like Daniel Defense, Century Arms, Wilson Combat, Colt, H&K, and Barrett, all of which offer AR-15s like those used in recent mass shootings.

Five 18-wheeler truck-size cargo bays off I-10 in the Industriplex allow for the loading and dumping of more civilian assault weapons into our country than any other private enterprise.

The founder of Lipsey’s is Richard Lipsey, who formerly sat as chair of the Louisiana Board of Regents for Higher Education. His daughter Laura Lipsey Aronson is now the Chairwoman and CEO of the family business and like her father before her, serves on the LSU BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.

A caller on the local NPR affiliate radio talk show asked Mr. Lipsey two important and concise questions. (1) “Would you support a ban on military assault weapons? “(2) Would you assess a small fee on the price of guns at the distributor level to fund mental health initiatives?”

He answered “no” to the ban on assault weapons while launching into a nostalgic history of military weaponry, citing AR-15s converted into “modern sporting rifles.” His dismissive response to the second question was that he was absolutely against “taxing our gun owners” for mental health funding, wryly suggesting instead that maybe we could “tax toothbrushes or milk.”

An organization called 10,000 Women Louisiana recently sent the following letter to Laurie Lipsey Aronson asking that Lipsey’s cease distribution of the AR-15 weapon:

Dear Ms. Aronson:

We are asking for your help. We recognize that you hold an important leadership role as the Chairwoman and CEO of Lipsey’s LLC., the largest firearm distributor in America. Your actions can set the standard for other gun distributors, retailers and elected officials.

Given the recent traumatic AR-15 gun violence tragedies around the country, we ask you to consider what you can do as a mother, a community leader and as a recognized philanthropic business leader.

We ask Lipsey’s to stop the distribution of automatic and semi-automatic (assault-style) weapons created for the military. You personally can change whether civilians can acquire these weapons, magazines and ammunition that are being used for the murder of innocent children and adults. We understand that Lipsey’s also distributes or sells to government and law enforcement entities, both domestic and foreign. Our intent is to ban access to the weapons, magazines and ammunition to the general population.

Your swift action could decisively change the national availability of these weapons. You alone could have a profound effect on the safety of our communities. Additionally, your role as the President of the Board of the National Association of Sporting Goods Wholesalers (NASGW) and the Board of Governors of the National Shooting Sports Foundation gives you a unique opportunity to shift the narrative for this industry. In your role on the LSU Board of Supervisors, we ask that you consider the issue of gun safety for educational institutions.

We the undersigned friends, neighbors, community leaders, advocates and citizens implore you to take action barring access to military-style weapons for purchase by the general public. Please make a public statement about how Lipsey’s can help address the gun violence epidemic.

Read Full Post »

Like the other 1.1 million Louisiana captive subjects of the marriage between electric utilities and the Louisiana Public Service Commission, I received my monthly Entergy bill the other day that included a fee of $18.76 cryptically notated as “Storm Restoration Charge.”

So, why am I upset over a charge of $18.76? For several reasons:

  • My $18.76 was probably on the low side because my home is well insulated and we don’t set the thermostat very low. One reader said her charge this month was $51.13 (despite Entergy’s initial promise that the fees would run between $5 and $15 per month). Because the fee is presumably determined by usage, and considering there are 12,000 industrial and 142,000 commercial customers, I would guess that $50 would probably be a low average, meaning Entergy would be raking in at least $50 million per month for storm restoration.
  • Why are the customers of Entergy being asked forced to pay for Entergy’s failure to plan for natural disasters when the company should have been placing its lines underground decades ago instead of leaving them suspended on poles and vulnerable to hurricane-force winds?
  • Locked in for 15 years, Entergy projects it will collect $3.2 billion for storm restoration over that time. Who’s to say there won’t be more storms in those 15 years that will necessitate additional “storm restoration” fees? What are the odds of that and where does it end?
  • What is the fate of that $450 million federal grant for which Entergy recently applied to make its power grid more reliable? Looks like double-dipping to me.
  • Does Entergy not have sufficient business acumen as to have excess-coverage insurance policies in place to cover natural disasters? There’s a conglomerate of companies calling themselves Lloyd’s of London that is in business to write just such coverage. Hell, they even insured actress Betty Grable’s legs for a cool million bucks way back in the 1940s. But no, Entergy instead has gone the self-insured route and now is getting bailed out on the backs of its customers.
  • Why did the Louisiana Public Service Commission (along with its counterparts in Texas, Mississippi, and Arkansas) roll over for Entergy when the company requested approval of the special fee? Why didn’t members see fit to protect the interests of Louisiana citizens? The only one of the five PSC members to vote against approval was Foster Campbell of Shreveport, who tossed out some pretty pointed barbs Entergy’s way.

Which brings me to Campbell’s major STICKING POINTS raised when the PSC initially approved the surcharge back in February:

First of all, he felt it unfair to penalize customers in north Louisiana who didn’t feel the brunt of hurricanes, Ida, Laura, Delta, Zeta and winter storm Uri (I didn’t even know about that one) in 2020 and 2021.

Second, it kinda stuck in Campbell’s craw (and mine as well) to learn that Entergy, while suffering the economic impact of the storms, managed to find an additional $4 million in compensation for its CEO, Leo Denault, who pulls down a cool $16 million per annum.

And he was justifiably pissed when Entergy, in its news release, inplied that the PSC vote was unanimous. It wasn’t. The vote was 4-1, with Campbell casting the lone negative vote. He asked Entergy to clarify its news release but the company politely ignored his request.

Nor was Campbell overjoyed to know that Entergy, while in the throes of economic ruin, doled out $1.2 billion in dividends to shareholders. Would it not have been prudent to not declare dividends during this time of hardship and dedicate that $1.2 billion to storm recovery? “I’m just troubled by your company’s arrogance,” Campbell said, directing his criticism to Denault. “Absolute arrogance.”

Let’s say I owned a business, a retail store, that was damaged by a storm. Because I was self-insured, I thought it would be a great idea to simply impose a surcharge on my goods to pay for the damage. My customer base would shrivel and disappear and I’d be out of business in a week. That’s the way it is in a competitive world but not, apparently, with a monopoly like Entergy.

Oh, and my rhetorical question about investing that $1.2 billion in storm recovery was actually addressed by an Entergy spokesperson way back in 2006 who said, “It would not be prudent to invest shareholder money into the utility if there’s no chance of recouping the money.” Well, I thought investment brochures all carried the disclaimer that investing is a risk with no guarantees.

A lot of folks, mainly Repugnantcans, are preaching the gospel of self-sufficiency for the unfortunate among us while turning a blind eye to corporate welfare – like Commissioner ERIC SKRMETTA of Metairie describing Entergy’s handling of the storm as “impressive” and saying if the rate surcharge was not approved, it would make the state less attractive to corporate investment.

Less attractive than pulling Louisiana out of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), a nonprofit association that manages the POWER GRID for 42 million people in 15 states and Manitoba Province in Canada? That was Skrmetta’s brainchild last November as he apparently forgot what happened in Texas – that precipitated Ted Cruz’s abrupt departure for Cancun.

Entergy, headquartered in New Orleans, boasts revenues of $12 billion and is the only Fortune 500 company left in Louisiana.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »