Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for March, 2019

Dr. Arnold Feldman may be perplexed as to why House Health and Welfare Committee Chairman Rep. Frank Hoffman and other committee members have been unresponsive to his email inquiries, but I can give him 377,000 reasons, or in Hoffman’s individual case, 34,000 reasons.

Last April 10, the Senate voted 36-0, with three members absent, to approve Senate Bill 286, the so-called Physicians’ Bill of Rights.

But on May 2, Hoffman’s Committee, on the motion of Rep. Dustin Miller (D-Opelousas), involuntarily deferred the bill, thus killing it before it could reach the House floor.

Rep. J. Rogers Pope (R-Denham Springs) offered a motion that the committee move forward (meaning that the committee would vote to approve the bill) but when Miller made his substitute motion to involuntarily defer, there were no objections.

The BILL, by Sen. John Milkovich (D-Shreveport), would have provided a number of protections to physicians subjected to complaints to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners.

That’s because the board of medical examiners, like the Louisiana State Board of Dentistry, has been shown to be autocratic and more than willing to abuse its broad investigative and regulatory powers to shakedown physicians of exorbitant fines for sometimes minor or even non-existent infractions.

Both the dentistry and medical examiners boards’ autocratic practices—Dr. Feldman recently received a letter from the medical examiners informing him of a fine of nearly half-a-million dollars—have been called into question by legislators.

Not only do the boards slap doctors and dentists with enormous fines—the sole source of income for both boards—but there also appears to be a less-known arrangement with the PHYSICIANS HEALTH FOUNDATION for the referral of penalized doctors to rehabilitation facilities at even more budget-busting costs to the physicians.

Meanwhile, Dr. Feldman is unable to get an answer from Hoffman or any other members whom he has contacted.

Last week, Feldman sent the following email to Hoffman (R-West Monroe):

From: Arnold Feldman MD
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 8:23 AM
To: hoffmannf@legis.la.gov
Subject: Medical Board

Dear Representative Hoffman,

As you may recall I testified at a May 2 2018, Louisiana Health and welfare committee that you Chaired. My testimony was 100 percent accurate and truthful. 

Despite this Senator Milkovich, who spoke truthfully had his bill involuntarily deferred, yet it passed the Senate almost unanimously.

I have written to you and other members multiple times but I have received no response.

What can be Done? The Medical Board is corrupt and operates as a racketeering enterprise. Responsibility for physician suicide was heard. The culprit Cecilia Mouton was demoted but given a 220,000 dollar job for no work. Action is necessary.

I deserve at least a response.

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

It’s really not difficult to understand the breakdown in communications—$377,000 has a way of doing that.

That’s how much Hoffman and the other 12 committee members received in campaign contributions from the medical community over the past five years.

Rep. Julie Stokes led the way with $84,000, but to be fair, she recently ran a campaign for Secretary of State, a statewide campaign in which the maximum allowable contributions was $5,000, twice that for legislative offices.

But Rep. Katrina Jackson (D-Monroe) had no statewide race but still raked in $70,000 from medical interests.

Others included, in order of amount received:

  • Rep. Dodie Horton (R-Haughton): $43,600;
  • Pope: $36,150;
  • Hoffman: $34,000;
  • Rep. Robert Johnson (D-Marksville): $22,350;
  • Rep. Joseph Stagni (R-Kenner) and Rep. Miller: $17,500 each;
  • Rep. Larry Bagley (R-Stonewall): $17,000;
  • Rep. H. Bernard LeBas (D-Ville Platte): $15,400;
  • Rep. Charles R. Chaney (R-Rayville): $12,600;
  • Rep. Kenny R. Cox (D-Natchitoches): $5,000;
  • Rep. Jerome “Dee” Richard (I-Thibodaux): $2,000.

So now maybe Dr. Feldman understands that $377,000 can buy a lot of silence.

But if you’re one of those ponying up some of that $377,000, it’s a good bet you’d get an immediate response to your inquiry. Can I get any takers on that bet?

I can almost hear the crickets chirping.

Read Full Post »

LouisianaVoice is going to be devoting considerable attention to campaign money in the coming months.

Your help is needed so that we can continue to give you stories like on waste, mismanagement, malfeasance, misappropriations, harassment, sweetheart contracts, backroom deals, preferential treatment in the awarding of contracts by circumventing bid laws, power plays by boards and commissions, appointments to those boards and commissions on the basis not of qualifications but of campaign contributions, investigative audits, and like the story below this post on our lieutenant governor attempting to corral members of Louisiana’s various retirement systems to retain the services of a specified private law firm in a mass mailing on state letterhead.

Please contribute by clicking on the yellow DONATE button to the right of this post and give by credit card or by mailing your check to LouisianaVoice, P.O. Box 922, Denham Springs, LA. 70727.

This site has consistently focused on money in politics but it’s more important than ever in 2019 because there’s a statewide election this year. Voters will choose not only a governor, but lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, insurance commissioner, agriculture commissioner, sheriffs, police jurors and parish commissioners, district attorneys, and 144 state legislators–105 representatives and 39 senators.

And those 144 legislators will have the responsibility redrawing congressional district lines to comply with the 2020 census. If you take a good look at the gerrymandering done by the legislature for the 2010 census, you’ll get a feel for just how important the legislative elections are.

While in the world would Rep. Ralph Abraham (green on the above map), for instance, represent a district that abuts the state’s northeast boundary with southeast Arkansas all the way down to the Felicianas and Tangipahoa, Washington and St. Tammany parishes’ northern borders with southwest Mississippi? Neither does it make sense for Rep. Mike Johnson (yellow) to represent a district that runs from the state’s northwest boundary with southwest Arkansas all the way down the western part of Louisiana into Cajun country. I mean, north Louisiana has about as much in common with Cajun country as Hank Williams does with Tupac.

And as much as it defies logic for Rep. Steve Scalise (brown) to represent a district split in half by Rep. Cedric Richmond (red), it’s no less illogical for Richmond’s district to run all the way from New Orleans to Baton Rouge where Rep. Garret Graves’ (blue) district looks as though it’s trying to swallow Richmond’s like some sort of Pac-Man caricature.

Pac-Man - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre

The only Louisiana congressional district where some semblance of sanity seems to have prevailed is that of Rep. Clay Higgins (gold), in southwest Louisiana (the term sanity being applied only to the district lines in this case).

It would have made far more sense for Districts 4 (Johnson) and 5 (Abraham) to have been divided with one district extended across north Louisiana from the Mississippi River to the Texas border and the other to be comprised of central Louisiana. The districts represented by Graves, Richmond and Scalise could also be re-drawn to more representative of their respective geographic areas.

Of course, money is poured into political campaigns for one reason and one reason only: to buy influence. If you believe for one nano-second that contributions are made in the interest of civic-minded responsibility, you’re only fooling yourself. When contributions are made by financial institutions, big business, labor, oil and gas, chemicals, prisons, pharmaceutical companies, nursing homes, health institutions, transportation, or any other special interest, it’s for the purpose of influencing votes.

One might think it’s never occurred to these donors that their money, directed toward education, infrastructure, and health care could do so much more good than buying a legislator. That’s not it. It’s just that they’d rather lock down legislative votes in order to continue to shore up their own bottom line than use the money for greater good.

To call attention to that sorry state of affairs is the reason—the only reason—for LouisianaVoice and it’s the reason I’m asking for—and sincerely appreciate—your continued help.

 

Read Full Post »

Just when you think things can’t possibly get any weirder in state government, they invariably do.

That’s the one constant in Louisiana politics.

Take Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser, for example.

The man just doesn’t know how to not be the court jester.

And he certainly doesn’t grasp just what the duties of his office entail. Or it could be he just doesn’t give a rat’s patootie.

How else to explain that, with there being more than half-a-dozen Louisiana LAW FIRMS and no telling how many attorneys in those firms qualified to represent clients in pension and investment fraud, why Nungesser would solicit clients for a specific law firm to represent them in cases of potential fraud.

A letter on state letterhead, no less—the lieutenant governor’s office letterhead and over his signature.

The letter, dated March 6 and received by someone identifying himself only as “a representative of a public retirement system,” was forwarded to LouisianaVoice with the recipient’s name and address redacted.

The first paragraph introduces the firm Kahn Swick & Foti (KSF) “whose primary practice involves representing state and local pension and municipal funds in shareholder lawsuits that seen to recover money lost from stock and fraud and other corporate malfeasance.”

It then notes that Charles C. Foti, Jr., “the 28-year sheriff of Orleans Parish and the former Attorney General of Louisiana (2004-2008) is a named partner in this firm.”

Nungesser’s letter somehow neglected to mention that while he served as Orleans Parish sheriff, Foti was hit by a $10 million fine by a federal court which found that the sheriff’s department under his administration had illegally strip-searched and conducted body-cavity searches on more than sixty thousand minor-offense arrestees.

In the third paragraph, Nungesser says, “I would like to discuss the opportunity for your fund to meet with the principals of KSF so that they can explain how your system can benefit (by) retaining a Louisiana-based firm with a national reputation to provide services to your system and help to safeguard your assets.”

Finally, he says, “Please call me at 225-342-7009 if you have any questions about the firm or if you would like any additional information…”

That’s the state telephone number for the Lieutenant Governor’s office.

Attached with his letter was a brochure from the KSF firm that touted its credentials and which went to great lengths to point out that, “Since 1998, pension funds in Louisiana have served as lead plaintiff in securities fraud class actions that have produced almost $10 billion in recoveries and (which) have produced legal fees in excess of $1.3 billion. However, of the over $1 billion in legal fees paid out, almost nothing was paid into the state treasury in the form of Louisiana state taxes.”

That’s because nearly all of the law firms that represented Louisiana pension and retirement funds were out-of-state firms “that maintain either no presence or only a very nominal presence in our state,” the brochure says.

Don’t forget to click the ‘DONATE’ button and support LouisianaVoice.

On the flip side of the brochure is a list of 26 class-action cases that resulted in settlements totaling $8.1 billion, not the “almost $10 billion” the brochure claimed.

A list of Louisiana public retirement systems was at the bottom of that page. They included the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS), Louisiana Sheriffs’ Pension and Relief Fund (LSPRF), New Orleans Employees’ Retirement System (NOERS), Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System (LAMPERS), the Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana (TRS), and Louisiana School Employees Retirement System (LSERS).

It’s understandable—and even commendable—that Nungesser would encourage the retention of in-state law firms in general terms but to single out a specific firm is over the top, according to a New Orleans attorney with a competing firm who specializes in investment fraud cases. “It’s a really brazen letter,” he said, adding that he would take the issue up with his partners.

Nungesser cannot have a legal ethics charge filed against him since he is not an attorney but he can have charges filed with the Louisiana State Board of Ethics for misuse of his office, although such a complaint seems remote.

KSF, however, could be subject to a legal ethics charge if it can be shown that principals in the firm knew of Nungesser’s letter and condoned it. It is a legal ethics violation to have non-attorneys soliciting business for a legal firm or attorney.

It is not known if KSF provided the brochure to Nungesser for the express purpose of inclusion in his letter. LouisianaVoice attempted to call Nungesser but he was said to be unavailable.

Six different spokespersons for Nungesser’s office were emailed with a request for an explanation of the letter. They included Chief of Staff Julie Samson, Nungesser’s Executive Assistant Penny Bouquet, Director of Scheduling Jasmine Tregre, Communications Director Julio Guichard, and Director of Public Affairs Betsy Barnes.

A return receipt indicated that Guichard opened the email from LouisianaVoice, but no one from Nungesser’s office responded to our inquiry.

In following the mantra “follow the money,” LouisianaVoice ran a search of campaign contributions to Nungesser by KSF but came up empty except for firm partner Larry Joseph Palestina’s $3,500 in campaign contributions to Nungesser in 2015, 2016, and 2018.

That’s not to say that KSF was inactive in the political arena. The firm, along with two sister firms, Kahn & Swick Real Estate and Kahn & Swick Ventures, made $58,000 in campaign contributions from 2014-2018, including $35,000 to Foti, all in 2014.

The law firm and Kahn & Swick Real Estate also combined to contribute $10,000 to Attorney General Jeff Landry in 2015 and the law firm gave $5,000 to State Treasurer John Schroder in 2018. The law firm may also have violated state campaign contribution limits in 2015 when it gave $5,000 to Jefferson Parish Councilman Christopher Roberts. Statewide officers are limited to $5,000 but all other officers are limited to $2,500 in contributions.

[Contribution limits could also present something of a sticky wicket for Nungesser. On November 10, 2015, Burnside Plantation of New Orleans made two contributions to Nungesser, one for the statutory maximum $5,000 and another for $10,000. There was no indication in Nungesser’s campaign expense report that he refunded any of the $10,000.]

The KSF endorsement letter is not the first time that Nungesser has tried to prove stand up comic Ron White’s assertion that “you can’t fix stupid.”

In April 2016, he fell for a really transparent phishing SCAM in which he and State Republican Chairman Robert Villere tried to do an end run around Gov. John Bel Edwards only to end up with mostly rotten egg on their faces.

Of course, his escapades pre-date his election as lieutenant governor, as a 2010 PERFORMANCE AUDIT by the Legislative Auditor’s office showed.

Taken together, all these embarrassing public misadventures prove beyond the slightest doubt that Billy Nungesser is eminently qualified to hold political office in Louisiana.

You can also mail contributions to

LouisianaVoice, P.O. Box 922, Denham Springs, LA 70727

Read Full Post »

The March fundraiser for LouisianaVoice continues and your help is both needed and appreciated.

We’re working on some pretty intriguing stories at LouisianaVoice, one of which is about campaign contributions by special interests for this year’s elections of statewide officials and legislators.

Like any reporting enterprise, sometimes we run into dead-ends (non-stories) and sometimes we break really significant stories, stories that other news organizations either ignored completely or literally took years to jump on board, like:

  • The series of Louisiana State Police stories under the administration of former Superintendent Mike Edmonson;
  • The story about Superintendent of Education John White’s plotting in an email to “take some air out of the room” during misleading testimony before a legislative committee, a story that a north Louisiana daily newspaper tried (incorrectly) to take credit for breaking;
  • About White’s plans to provide personal student data to a company controlled by RUPERT MURDOCH;
  • Our series of stories about widespread abuses by the Louisiana Board of Dentistry and the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners;
  • Several stories about campaign contributions from special interests and how those contributions take precedent over what’s best for the people of Louisiana;
  • Stories about how campaign funds are misused for personal purposes like paying personal income taxes, purchasing season tickets to Saints, Pelicans and LSU games;
  • Abuses of power by certain sheriffs in Louisiana, notably Terrebonne Parish’s Jerry Larpenter and Iberia Parish’s Louis Ackal;
  • Critical investigative audits of state and local agencies that negatively impact the manner in which our hard-earned taxpayer dollars are misused, misappropriated, and at times, embezzled
  • The Jindal administration’s attempt at steamrolling a state agency head because he wouldn’t compromise state regulations for a major Jindal campaign contributor;
  • How major Jindal contributors appeared to have “bought” positions on powerful state boards and commissions.

I’m told that some legislators make faces and utter profanities at the mere mention of my name.

Thank you.

There are also countless stories that you will never know about because, well, they turned out to be dead-ends. But we nevertheless were forced to spend considerable time chasing down those blind leads and those efforts took time—and money.

That’s why LouisianaVoice needs your help. If you appreciate these stories, please do what you can to support our efforts.

I even invite those of you who disagreed with or were offended by certain stories. That’s certain to happen because no two people think alike on every single issue. There were be differences of opinion but I would hope my readers are open-minded enough to understand that what I do with LouisianaVoice, I do in the interest of transparency and accountability. If those two factors are removed from reporting, then democracy and freedom die. So, even if you take umbrage at what I write, I have at least laid the issue on the table for consideration and discussion.

So please. Do what you can by clicking on the yellow DONATE button in the upper part of the column to the right of this post or mail your check to:

LouisianaVoice

P.O. Box 922

Denham Springs, Louisiana 70727

Read Full Post »

Editor’s note: Last year, LouisianaVoice published a couple of stories about the indictment of Iberia Parish Clerk of Court MIKE THIBODEAUX and the political circus that seems to be the norm for Iberia Parish. The 14-count indictment followed a 2016 investigative AUDIT by the Legislative Auditor’s office. Coming two years after the audit, the indictment would appear to be politically motivated by Thibodeaux’s FIRING of parish Assessor Ricky Huval’s son, Ryan Huval. Ricky Huval’s daughter, Rachael, it turns out, is employed by District Attorney Bofill Duhé, who brought the indictment against Thibodeaux. The excessive bail set by the presiding judge would, in itself, indicate the extent to which favoritism and cheap political theater are very much in play in Iberia Parish.

Bob Mhoon, a native New Iberian now living in Arlington, Texas, penned a letter to the editor of the local newspaper. But the Daily Iberian has appeared somewhat reluctant to publish his letter, so LouisianaVoice is doing so here.

In June of 2018 the headline was “Thibodeaux indicted.” “charges include racketeering, theft, malfeasance in office.”

Most everyone knows Mike Thibodeaux and, for the most part, they are happy with his exemplary accomplishments during twenty-two years in office. I’ve read the charges and studied the detailed audit upon which they are based. The audit and the Clerk of Court’s response to detailed findings were presented to the parish council and accepted without concern.

One of the major responsibilities of the Clerk of Court and his Chief Deputy Clerk of Court is to continually update their knowledge of all applicable laws and policies, including the periodic changes that must be added to internal policy manuals.  Interestingly, all past audits and corrective responses to items flagged were satisfactory.

What happened next? The state auditor requested a State Police investigation and that report was forwarded to the district attorney. His decision was to present to the grand jury which found charges were appropriate and Mike was formally charged.

What was the impetus for criminal charges? According to Louisiana State Auditor records, a formal complaint was made to their office by the ex-Chief Deputy Clerk of Court; someone equally responsible for managing the department during past audits. Retribution?

Not a single penny of parish money was misappropriated by the Clerk of Court or his office. True, funds were moved between accounts; simply because that was how it was always done. These oversights were quickly corrected before the charges were initiated.

The Clerk of Court was shocked when he was indicted and the judge set bail at $200,000. In setting bail the court considers; severity of charges, the likelihood of jail, and defendant’s community ties. The last factor alone should have negated all others. The likelihood of him fleeing charges is infinitesimal.  His entire life has been in New Iberia with a loving family, and a lengthy, exemplary, career in local government. The bond was excessive!

How does favoritism come into play? I reviewed a number of Louisiana Legislative Auditor cases involving functions of the governor’s office. No one involved in these oversights was charged with any crimes!

Here is clear evidence of unfairness and favoritism. Homeland Security Finding. We identified 81 reimbursement requests where $3,309,036 (31.89%) worth of expenses were not supported by sufficient documentation. March 31, 2008, through December 31, 2016, we analyzed expense reimbursements totaling $925,837,580. We noted exceptions totaling $250,074,672 (27.01%). Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness worked with the subgrantees to resolve $134,830,335 (53.92%) of the exception amount. Louisiana Department of Health; did not deposit approximately $2.8 million into the Fraud Fund between fiscal years 2012 and 2017 in accordance with state law. (Amount: $2,797,768), LDH incorrectly deposited $323,570 into the Medicaid Fraud Fund in fiscal year 2012 that should have been deposited into the Nursing Home Residents’ Trust Fund. (Amount: $323,570). Lastly, LDH spent $642,593 from the Medicaid Fraud Fund in fiscal year 2012 on software that could not be implemented due to system compatibility issues. (Amount: $642,593) There are hundreds more similar discrepancies available on the LLA website.

Mike has steadfastly supported the community and now desperately needs your help.  Make a quick phone call to the DA, expressing support for Mike. After seeing the Governor’s disorganization and auditor favoritism, Bo Duhe needs to exercise compassion and immediately drop the charges to free Mike from the unfair burden. Having to defend himself against unwarranted charges while paying an attorney large sums of money is simply wrong.

Why is the governor’s organization exempt from the law?

Bob Mhoon

Arlington, TX

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »