More than a century ago, in 1912, Theodore Roosevelt, after a break with his friend and successor to the presidency, sought a then-unprecedented third term after a four-year absence from the political arena. In the process, he challenged Republican William Howard Taft’s re-election. Both men would ultimately lose to Woodrow Wilson.
But it was something that Roosevelt said in seeking to wrest the Republican nomination from Taft before breaking away to form the short-lived Bull Moose Party that resonates as clearly today as it did 105 years ago.
Doris Kearns Goodwin’s 750-page book The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Gold Age of Journalism is a great read and was a Pulitzer Prize-winning book that chronicles the close friendship between the two men, the exposés of several top magazine writers of the day, and the eventual split between Roosevelt and Taft.
Roosevelt who earned the title of trustbuster during his seven years in office (he succeeded William McKinley, who was assassinated in his first year in office), took on the meat packing industry, big oil, the railroads, and Wall Street banks in an effort to stem what he considered an alarming trend toward consolidation, mergers and monopolistic practices. He railed against the grossly unsanitary meat packing plants as exposed in Upton Sinclair’s novel, The Jungle, and he championed the economic plight of the working poor.
He also opposed child labor and fought for an eight-hour work day for women, for women’s right to vote, for worker protection, and for worker retirement benefits—ideas considered radical in his day but accepted today as the norm.
In 1912, he continued his onslaught, Kearns-Goodwin wrote, again taking on the special interests when while acknowledging that “every special interest is entitled to justice,” he said “not one is entitled to a vote in Congress, to a voice on the bench, or to representation in any public office.”
He advocated driving the “special interests out of politics” by enacting laws to forbid corporations from directly funding political objectives.
Does any of this sound vaguely familiar? Does it sound as though he might have opposed the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision?
Fast forward to 2017 and the State Capitol in Baton Rouge.
Baton Rouge Advocate reporter Tyler Bridges did a masterful job in a Wednesday STORY that illustrated just how the tail wags the dog when it comes down to attempts to come up with a revenue plan that makes sense when the interests of big business and industry are pitted against those of the citizens of this state.
In his story, Bridges reported how the Republican-dominated legislature was so overtly beholden to the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI) that even one of its own, Republican State Rep. Kenny Havard of St. Francisville, was appalled and embarrassed—and said so.
Please understand that I am in no way defending or condemning the tax plan put forth by Gov. John Bel Edwards but suffice it to say the business-oriented mindset of lawmakers were going to see to it that nothing that cost business a red nickel was going to pass even if it meant Louisiana households were going to be saddled with higher taxes—and because of the actions of the House Ways and Means Committee, they now will be.
Bridges did one of the best jobs ever in revealing how legislators simply lack the courage, principles, integrity, honesty and, yes, the stones, to turn their backs on campaign contributions and other perks in order to do the right thing.
Too weak-willed to resist the temptation when the think no one is looking, they would rather accept campaign contributions and expensive dinners than to say, “No thanks, I would rather look out for the interests of my constituents.”
Those campaign contributions come from various corporate entities and from corporate officers of countless corporations from both within and outside the state and they are poured into the campaigns of lawmakers for one reason: to buy votes. To claim otherwise would be to be disingenuous, deceptive, and hypocritical.
And just to make sure they get the message, hordes of lobbyists descend on the Capitol like so many swarms of locusts every spring. They are there to remind representatives and senators, lest they have momentary memory lapses, how to vote on any number of bills where there might be a conflict between responsible legislation and the status quo of political favoritism. That’s why on any given night during the legislative session, you can find lawmakers dining at Baton Rouge’s finest restaurants, courtesy of the hundreds of lobbyists who, in turn, feast on the carcasses of bloated legislators. If not restaurant fare, there are always the crawfish boils in the parking lot of the Pentagon Barracks across the street from the Capitol.
The committee not only rejected Edwards’ tax plan but also that of a special blue-ribbon that examined the state’s tax code last year and made recommendations based on its findings.
Bridges quoted Havard, who said, ““If we don’t have the courage to do it now, for God’s sakes… let’s just keep what we’ve been doing for the past 20 years. Isn’t that the definition of insanity—keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results? We’re not going to get different results. The only mistake I made was thinking you could make change … The whole system is set up against change.”
So now, Louisiana businesses and industries will continue to enjoy the same tax breaks, exemptions and credits perpetuated for years and ramped up by Bobby Jindal. Meanwhile, the burden, as always, will fall onto the backs of middle class Louisianans.
And the legislature will continue its annual struggle with the budget and the state will keep right on lurching down the road trying to contend with midyear cutbacks as revenue shortfalls continue and roads and bridges and physical facilities at colleges and universities fall farther and farther behind on desperately needed maintenance and as governmental services to the developmentally disadvantaged and the mentally ill continue to be cut—all so business and industry may never be called upon to help shoulder its share of the burden—and so the legislative perks may continue unabated.
Abraham Lincoln’s Secretary of War Simon Cameron would love Louisiana politics. It was Cameron who said, “An honest politician is one who, when bought, stays bought.”
Well, you can rest easy tonight in the knowledge that, by that measure, we have one of the most honest legislatures in the nation. They stayed bought and they will continue to reap campaign contributions and they will continue to shove expensive food and liquor down their gullets, courtesy of the special interests, namely LABI and its members.
Voting in favor of the bill by Rep. Rob Shadoin, R-Ruston, were Reps. Chris Broadwater, R-Hammond; Joseph Bouie, D-New Orleans; Jimmy Harris, D-New Orleans; Robert Johnson, D-Marksville; Marcus Hunter, D-Monroe; Ted James, D-Baton Rouge; and Major Thibaut, D-New Roads.
And, oh, in the interest of full disclosure, here are the names of those who killed Shadoin’s bill in order to keep corporate taxes down and your taxes high (and to allow themselves to continue receiving corporate campaign funds and to keep eating at Ruth’s Chris and Sullivan’s Restaurants, compliments of the lobbyist at the end of the table) were:
- Alan Seabaugh, R-Shreveport (seabaugha@legis.la.gov);
- Barry Ivey, R-Central (iveyb@legis.la.gov);
- John “Jay” Morris, R-Monroe (morrisjc@legis.la.gov);
- Jim Morris, R-Oil City (larep001@legis.la.gov);
- Dodie Horton, R-Haughton (hortond@legis.la.gov);
- Paula Davis, R-Baton Rouge davisp@legis.la.gov);
- Clay Schexnayder, R-Gonzalez (schexnayderc@legis.la.gov);
- Phillip DeVillier, R-Eunice (devillierp@legis.la.gov);
- Stephen Dwight, R-Lake Charles (dwights@legis.la.gov);
- Mike Huval, R-Breaux Bridge (huvalm@legis.la.gov);
- Julie Stokes, R-Kenner, candidate for State Treasurer (stokesj@legis.la.gov).



This article is very enlightening. Where I live, any and all taxes are the direct responsibility of those “tax and spend Democrats”. These folks that believe this never even entertain the idea that outside lobbying, especially the LABI, has a thing to do with it and that Republicans are in charge. Although, I am sure that just about all elected officials belly up to the money bar. Now, what is the answer to this?
Well, since, as was pointed out, the problem has existed since at least Teddy Roosevelt’s time, there doesn’t really seem to be an answer.
Well said, Edith.
I sent Kenny Havard a thank you note this morning. He is my state representative and I am proud of him.
Who really wants to pay more taxes? Practically nobody.
Even if they have an intellectual understanding of the needs of the state, too many citizens have swallowed Senator John Kennedy’s line, “we don’t have a revenue problem. We have a spending problem.” Why is easy and perfectly understandable..
To business and its lobbyists, and far too many of our politicians, this is really just a game. The object is to win at all costs – and, it is, to borrow a James Comey phrase, “mildly nauseating” to see them slapping each other on the back as they win against any and every attempt to increase business taxes even when they know that over 85% of corporations in this state pay NO corporate income taxes right now.
They also know the very infrastructure and education systems businesses need are crumbling with each passing year. They rarely think about you and me and how we might benefit from improvements in our basic services.
The goal is to ignore any benefits taxes might bring (to them or us) and not pay a “red” nickel [Tom. I would think a red nickel could be quite valuable as a collectors item 🙂 ] more in taxes. Why? Because they don’t want to. They have plenty of money for lobbying, though, and that’s the difference between them and us. We don’t.
So, who represents you and me – the very rare elected official like Kenny Havard who is willing to go against the grain and clearly state reality.
Who represents business interests? Their highly paid lobbyists and MOST of our elected officials beholden to them.
So, what is the answer? Elect people like Kenny Havard and push for further limits on lobbying expenditures and campaign contributions by big business. Both difficult, but not impossible.
As usual, well said Stephen.
And, it’s not just direct taxation. The ADVOCATE did a whole series of articles on this issue last week. Is this the result”
http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/legislature/article_352a90f8-35a3-11e7-b6b4-bf79cf99257b.html
The Legislature appoints a Blue Ribbon Tax Advisory Committee and then totally disregards the recommendations made? And they fault the various State Departments for using so many consultants? Hmmm. Seems a tad contradictory.
I’m from Ruston and proud that Rob Shadoin represents us in the Legislature.
Because their numbers are legion in comparison, we read and hear much more about the self-serving members of our legislature than about the good ones. Those of us lucky enough to have good elected officials need to give them the support and praise they deserve. Since they are small in number, maybe Tom can do a “Legislative Heroes” column some time – It wouldn’t be an overly long column and the good ones need the recognition. Maybe LouisianaVoice readers could nominate people.
God knows we need some positive news..Tom spoke at our local LSU-OLLI Chapter this week, focusing on his LOUISIANA ROCKS! book. It was refreshing to see people laugh and have a good time momentarily forgetting our many troubles as a state and a nation..
Interesting that even in the 1860s,150 years ago, corruption in government was so blatant and widespread that astute observations were being made and voiced about it.
May I add another big special interest group winner to this week’s tally: nursing home owners. LA ranks 47th in the nation in care for the elderly and we just keep funding empty beds in nursing facilities and substandard care when most people would much rather be at home getting much better care. The House W&M killed HB152 at the behest of the political contributions of the nursing home industry. http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/legislature/article_352a90f8-35a3-11e7-b6b4-bf79cf99257b.html
Yep, that’s the same story I linked to above. There are clearly people who need 24-7 care that can only be provided in nursing homes, but we clearly do not encourage the options that exist for others who could make it with less expensive in-home support and the article does a good job explaining why.
Kenny Havard is my favorite Republican and dear friend. I can disagree with him and not want to punch him, Love the history lesson and we must keep learning or relearning, We, We not replublicans nor democrats, we the people can fix our problems. love always ron thompson
I agree with John Sachs…at least Rob Shadoin tried!!