Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for September, 2015

Furtive plans by some agency heads to move certain unclassified employees into Civil Service classified positions before Bobby Jindal leaves office could be thwarted by Civil Service rules designed expressly to prevent such maneuvers.

LouisianaVoice received reports on Wednesday (Sept. 23) of plans to move some of Jindal’s appointees from unclassified to classified positions as a means of protecting them from potential termination by the new governor when he takes office on Jan. 11.

“Since the clock is ticking on the Jindal administration,” wrote one state employee, “his department heads are converting…unclassified folks into classified positions. Only trouble is, those positions don’t pay that well. [I] overheard a conversation by some HR (Human Resources) folks that they don’t know how to make the slip switch and include a $30,000 add-on to the classified position.”

But former Civil Service Director Shannon Templet, in one of her last actions before accepting the position of director of human resources for the Louisiana House of Representatives, may have put the kibosh on any such plans—or at least made any such attempt considerably more difficult.

General Circular 2015-033, issued to heads of state agencies and human resource directors on Sept. 1, addresses that very scenario although there still may be a small window of opportunity to circumvent a prohibition against converting appointees to unclassified positions. CIVIL SERVICE CIRCULAR 2015-033

The circular alluded to Civil Service Rule 22.2 which says all appointing authorities shall obtain the Civil Service Director’s approval before making a permanent appointment to any job at specified pay grades.

But the policy governing such appointments is applicable only between the date of any election for a statewide elected office (Oct. 24, 2015) through Inauguration Day (Jan. 11, 2016).

There appear to be no restrictions to such transfers between now and Oct. 24, which is nearly a full month away and some movement may have already occurred.

“Unless the director grants permission, vacancies covered under this rule cannot be filled on a permanent basis through a probationary or permanent appointment into a regular ongoing position,” the circular says. “This also applies to promotions and transfers into an agency while on permanent status.

“The process will be handled as follows:

  • Vacancies affected by this rule shall not be announced without obtaining prior approval of the director by means of a letter which includes justification explaining why the vacancy needs to be filled.
  • Agencies are to send letters requesting approval to fill to the Staffing Division.
  • Agencies will be notified via email of the director’s decision.
  • Verification of approval must be attached to the exam plan…for audit purposes.

Even if an appointive (non-classified) position should be converted to a classified one, the additional task of adjusting the position’s salary poses yet another problem—unless the appointee would agree to a major pay cut.

Because Civil Service classifications govern pay scales for every classified position in state government—as opposed to unclassified positions, which have no such restrictions—appointive posts generally pay much higher salaries than civil service jobs. Converting from unclassified to classified necessarily would dictate significant reductions in pay.

But even if that wrinkle could somehow be worked out, there is one more deterrent to such an underhanded tactic. Any transfer, lateral or otherwise, or new appointment generally carries with it a six-month (180 days) probationary period during which the employee may be terminated without cause.

As of today (Sept. 23), there are exactly 110 days until a new governor takes office.

Read Full Post »

“If you can find me a Muslim candidate who is a Republican, who will fight hard to protect religious liberty, who will respect the Judeo-Christian heritage of America, who will be committed to destroying ISIS and radical Islam, who will condemn cultures that treat women as second class citizens and who will place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution, then yes, I will be happy to consider voting for him or her.”

—Bobby Jindal, in perhaps his most absurd utterance yet, in responding hypothetically to the question put to Dr. Ben Carson on whether or not he would vote for an Islamic candidate for president.

Read Full Post »

Bobby Jindal, shut out of the big boy pants Republican stupid party debates, may have found just the ticket to catapult him past “none of the above” in the GOP presidential nomination mash-up: hold—or at least issue the challenge to hold—one-on-one debates with a pre-selected opponent.

It is the boldest of a series of stupid bold tactics employed recently by Jindal, who has languished somewhere around 238th among candidates and non-candidates from all recognized and unrecognized political parties.

It’s a lead pipe cinch to give him instant street creds in the bare knuckles food fight into which the Republican dialog has descended.

And as his ace in the hole, he also has reached out to the Islamic community for support by being the first—and only—candidate of any stripe to openly admit he would vote for a Muslim candidate for president….provided he or she is a Christian.

Here is what he actually said in response to the question posed to neurosurgeon Ben Carson on whether or not he would vote for a Muslim presidential candidate:

“If you can find me a Muslim candidate who is a Republican, who will fight hard to protect religious liberty, who will respect the Judeo-Christian heritage of America, who will be committed to destroying ISIS and radical Islam, who will condemn cultures that treat women as second class citizens and who will place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution, then yes, I will be happy to consider voting for him or her.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bobby-jindal-vote-for-muslim_56002233e4b00310edf7c308

Cristian Farias, writing for The Huffington Post, wrote “It’s not clear exactly what the governor means by ‘respecting the Judeo-Christian heritage of America,’ especially since the framers of the Constitution specifically declined to establish a national religion. But between that and the Bible thing, Jindal’s ideal Muslim candidate kind of sounds like … a Christian, basically.”

Of course Jindal, always covering his bases, offered what he considered to be an alternative to finding a good Christian Muslim candidate. “If you can’t (find a candidate like that), I’ll settle for voting for a Christian Governor from Louisiana,” he said.

Next, according to information leaked to LouisianaVoice from his campaign headquarters in downtown Shongaloo, he will make the same offer to any potential candidate from the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) community….provided he or she subscribes to the one-man, one-woman marriage covenant—and so long as none attempt to apply for a marriage license in Rowan County, Kentucky.

There has been no word yet of whether he intends to extend a similar offer to the hordes of illegal immigrants invading the U.S. who refuse to assimilate and go to work.

But we digress. Back to the debates.

His debate ploy has already worked in thinning out the ranks of presidential wannabes.

It was on Aug. 22 that Jindal laid down the gauntlet in challenging Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker to appear with him on stage “anywhere, anytime” to debate the pair’s respective alternatives to the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare.

And apparently Jindal’s latest ploy also serves to send out the message that old alliances mean nothing in the dog-eat-dog arena of presidential politics. You may remember that Jindal spent considerable time in 2011 and 2012 cavorting around Wisconsin in support of Walker in the latter’s successful efforts to fight a recall effort. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/declared-winner-wisconsin-recall-gov-scott-walker/story?id=16502469

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-scott-walker-hypothesis-faces-a-test-in-wisconsin/

http://wtvr.com/2012/06/06/walker-survives-recall-effort-in-wisconsin-cnn-projects/

“I have the backbone, the experience, and the bandwidth (bandwidth?) to get this job done,” Jindal said with all the confidence of a master debater. “I can’t speak for Scott (they’re on a first name basis, you know). Maybe he’s intimidated, maybe he’s not ready to debate, but we are.”

Apparently it was the backbone part (or perhaps that reference to the dreaded bandwidth) that intimidated Walker. Whatever, it appeared to work.

On Monday (September 21), as the summer of 2015 finally came to an official end, Walker dropped out of the Republican presidential sweepstakes, obviously choosing not to take on his one-time political ally in a mano a mano showdown. http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/21/politics/scott-walker-drops-out-2016-election/

One down.

Which raises the immediate question: can Hillary be far behind Walker?

Not content to thin out the Republican herd, Jindal on Monday saw an opportunity to destroy yet another opponent, Hillary Clinton, who just happened to be in Baton Rouge in a campaign stopover.

“Secretary Clinton’s first stop on her socialized medicine tour is in Louisiana, where Governor Bobby Jindal has rejected the expansion of Obamacare in the state because it would put more people on a poorly-run government healthcare system, take away freedom from people, and bust the budget,” trumpeted the Web page dedicated to Jindal’s election to the presidency. https://www.bobbyjindal.com/jindal-challenges-secretary-clinton-to-healthcare-debate/

The Web page, which just happens to have a convenient “donate” button, then went on to quote Bobby:

“I have a plan that repeals Obamacare and replaces it with something that preserves freedom, empowers patients, lowers costs and reduces the role of both the federal government and insurance company bureaucrats,” he said, being careful at the same time not to tip his hand as to just what his “plan” entails.

“Instead of battling through press releases though, I have an idea for Hillary Clinton. Let’s have a debate about healthcare. Instead of the carefully controlled campaign events that Secretary Clinton prefers,” said the pot to the kettle, “let’s give the American people a real live discussion.”

Anyone see a trend here?

Surely Hillary, seeing the handwriting on the wall, will wither under Jindal’s bandwidth and experience and in a few days will be announcing her withdrawal from the race and Jindal can then turn his attention to Dr. Ben Carson and challenge him to a debate on brain surgery.

After that the next step will be obvious: perform an exorcism on Donald Trump.

Read Full Post »

Two separate directives, one from State Police Internal Affairs and the other from the Louisiana State Troopers Association (LSTA), have been sent to state troopers from State Police Troop D in Lake Charles relative to a multi-pronged investigation of reports of a series of irregularities in the troop.

A two-page memorandum from the Louisiana State Troopers Association (LSTA) was sent to Troop D state troopers in Lake Charles informing them that “eight or so” Troop D members have received letters indicating they are the targets of an Internal Affairs administrative investigation.

While the investigation was classified as administrative, it was made clear that the probe could become a criminal investigation.

The main thrust of the investigation appears to be related to time reported in driving to and from Baton Rouge to participate in firearms transition training. In that matter, some troopers reportedly charged more time than others for the same trip to qualify for firing of new weapons earlier this year. LouisianaVoice requested time sheets for those officers but state police attorneys denied our request because the matter was part of an official investigation—an investigation that was not initiated until we made our public records request.

Earlier, a single page communication from State Police Internal Affairs (IA) warning Troop D members to cooperate with the investigation either as witnesses or as targets.

LouisianaVoice was provided a copy of both letters, but is complying with requests that neither be reproduced here for fear that State Police investigators have some method of tracing the source of the leak because of special coloring or encoding on each copy sent out.

LouisianaVoice has learned that troopers in Troop D have been warned not to talk to anyone about the investigation, including LouisianaVoice. “They have put out a directive to intimidate the guys at Troop D so they won’t talk to you,” one source informed us on Saturday.

While neither memo mention LouisianaVoice by name, troopers were warned in the IA memorandum that all aspects of the probe are considered confidential and are to be discussed with no one.

The IA letter said, “As a Louisiana State Trooper, you are hereby advised of your rights related to an administrative investigation…

This administrative investigation is of potential violations of LSP and/or DPS policies and procedures including, but not limited to, irregularities regarding accrual of time, overtime, LACE details, escorts and other details, involving employees currently or formerly assigned to Troop D.

LACE, or Local Area Compensated Enforcement, is a program which is run by some district attorneys in the state to pay for traffic enforcement, including DWIs. District attorneys are willing to pay overtime to have state troopers monitor local traffic when there is insufficient local law enforcement. It became part of state law enforcement in the 1980s after state police suffered from a lack of state funding in an effort to put more troops on the roads when the state could not.

LACE was run sporadically in southwest Louisiana since its inception but has been a full time program only since 2008.

“…Your responsibility in this investigation is to cooperate fully with the investigation and to keep the substance of the investigation and the fact thereof confidential as outlined below.

  • Internal Affairs investigators or designated Administrative Investigators shall receive the full cooperation of any employee of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Public Safety Services, during the course of an administrative investigation. Employees shall obey any lawful order or directive given by the investigator during the investigation.
  • Ongoing administrative investigations are considered confidential and as such, officers shall not violate that confidentiality. Those in violation are subject to disciplinary action.
  • You are hereby ordered to refrain from destroying anything which might constitute evidence relevant to this investigation, including, but not limited to, department documents, electronic documents, electronic data, email communications, text message communications, communications on your MDT (mobile data terminals), radio logs, timesheets, and mobile video recordings.

The second, two-page communique from LSTA also said that “virtually other members of Troop D received letters notifying them that they are potential witnesses to one or more ongoing investigations.”

The LSTA memorandum was written in the first person and while the author is not identified, it appears to have originated from LSTA administrative offices.

Besides the time charged for firearms qualifying in Baton Rouge last spring, it specified six areas as possible subjects of investigation, including five previously cited by LouisianaVoice in its recent series of stories about Troop D. Those include:

  • Overtime/decline overtime;
  • Gift cards/ticket quotas;
  • Escort payments;
  • Payroll abuse;
  • Time off for DWI arrest;
  • LACE.

Of the six, only the LACE program was not reported on previously by LouisianaVoice, although allegations of irregularities in the program have recently come to our attention.

LouisianaVoice made public records requests for documents pertaining to overtime charged by certain troopers, excessive escort payments that were allegedly charged by a Troop D trooper, for radio logs and time sheets of yet another trooper, all of which were denied by LSP attorneys because the records were part of “ongoing investigations.”

And while no requests were made for public records involving gift cards, ticket quotas, or time off given troopers for DWI arrests, LouisianaVoice did publish a story about the practices in an earlier post. https://louisianavoice.com/2015/09/11/gift-cards-for-tickets-payroll-chicanery-quotas-short-shifts-the-norm-in-troop-d-troopers-express-dismay-at-problems/

Among other things, the LSTA memorandum said:

  • Troopers have a right to counsel and a right to consult with their LSTA representative provided the representative is not involved in the same investigation;
  • Eight or so Troop D members have received Target Letters indicating they are the subject of an investigation;
  • Virtually all members of Troop D have received letters notifying them that they are potential witnesses to one or more ongoing investigations;
  • Other troopers could become targets as the various investigations progress;
  • The stated purposed of the investigation relates to the “accrual and/or reporting” of time concerning the 2015 firearm transition training;
  • Other potential areas of investigation are ongoing, although few specifics were provided to LSTA;
  • All members of Troop D are required to cooperate fully in all investigations;
  • Some aspects of the ongoing investigations could have criminal ramifications but so far, the investigation is only an “administrative investigation.”
  • The confidentiality warning troopers received separately does not include troopers’ conferring with legal counsel;
  • Those cited as the subject of an IA interrogation and those who may be witnesses in an IA interview were cautioned to tell the truth;
  • Anyone interviewed is entitled to a copy of the interview upon request;
  • Likewise, those who are targets of the investigation are entitled to a copy of any written complaint leading to an interrogation upon request;
  • Anyone interviewed or interrogated is obligated to answer question but not obligated to engage in lengthy discussions, i.e. “tell us what you know. IA can ask a question. You should answer the question as directly and concisely as possible (and) then wait for the next question. Do not engage in a friendly conversation.”
  • Interview subjects were instructed to answer “I don’t know” to questions they do not know the answer to. “Do not speculate. Do not estimate. Do not just talk—answer the question directly and shut up while waiting for the next question.”
  • Interview subjects were told the most important thing they can do “is listen to the question carefully, answer the question as directly and concisely as possible and wait for the next question.”
  • Finally, they were told, “Remember, you have a right to counsel and a representative if you feel it necessary.”

The LSTA memorandum’s author said, “If I have learned anything over the last 7-8 years under the Edmonson administration, it is that the Colonel reacts badly if he believes a trooper lies or tries to obstruct an investigation.”

LouisianaVoice currently has additional public records requests pending that involve state troopers in other parts of the state.

Read Full Post »

The next time you see a couple of state troopers escorting Les Miles or Nick Saban at an LSU or Alabama football game, don’t get angry that the coach, surrounded by about 100 beefy football players, feels the need for additional protection from fans. It turns out they’re not there to protect the coaches; they’re there to carry their bulging wallets.

Of the highest paid public employees in each state, 40 are college football and basketball coaches who combined, pull in an eye-popping $129.1 million, according to 24/7 Wall Street, a service that provides research in several areas of business, education, economics and politics.

That’s an average of $3.225 million per year.

The remaining 10 highest paid were mostly in academics, including four college presidents, three state medical school professionals, a nursing supervisor, a commissioner of higher education and an associate professor.

Of the 40 coaches, only six—four football coaches and two basketball coaches—are paid less than $1 million a year and one of those, University of Massachusetts basketball coach Derek Kellogg, receives $994,500 per year.

The 28 football coaches make a combined $95.6 million, an average of $3.41 million per year in salary while the 12 basketball coaches combined to make $33.5 million, an average of $2.79 million annually.

The University of Alabama’s Nick Saban had been the highest-paid football coach at $6.95 million but the University of Michigan is paying first-year coach Jim Harbaugh a whopping $7 million a year. LSU’s Les Miles is paid $4.3 million a year.

For the most part, of course, their salaries are not primarily funded by taxpayers. Generally, their paychecks are underwritten by foundations supported by ticket sales and advertising deals. Harbaugh, for example, receives only $500,000 of his $7 million package from the school.

Still, the disparity in the salaries of coaches and typical state employees is enough to rankle some state employees. At Boise State University, for example, both the football and basketball coaches make a more modest salary of $500,000 but that is still more than 10 times the $40,000 or less earned by more than a third of Idaho state employees.

To counter criticism of the high salaries, some college athletic programs point out that successful coaches can bring a university tens of millions of dollars in revenue. Saban is an example of that. Before he was named head coach at ‘Bama, the school’s athletic program brought in $68 million. In 2013-2014, revenue was $153 million.

Still, critics say that athletic programs at the top tier schools like Alabama, constitute a business and coaches should not receive a cent of public funds in salary.

Which may have prompted the fable of a coach’s retort (and we paraphrase here): “I never saw anyone pay to watch a chemistry class.”

Here is the list of each state’s highest paid public employee:

ALABAMA:                NICK SABAN                FOOTBALL COACH              $6.95 M

ALASKA:                    JAMES JOHNSEN      COLLEGE PRES.                    $325,000

ARIZONA:                  SEAN MILLER            BASKETBALLCOACH          $3.07 M

ARKANSAS                BRET BIELEMA         FOOTBALL COACH              $4 M

CALIFORNIA             JAMES MORA            FOOTBALL COACH              $3.35 M

COLORADO               MIKE MacINTYRE     FOOTBALL COACH              $2.01 M

CONNECTICUT          KEVIN OLLIE             BASKETBALL COACH         $3 M

DELAWARE               EKEOMA WOGU       NURSING SUPERVISOR      $236,156

FLORIDA                    JIMBO FISHER          FOOTBALL COACH              $5 M

GEORGIA                   MARK RICHT             FOOTBALL COACH              $4 M

HAWAII                      NORM CHOW             FOOTBALL COACH              $550,000

IDAHO                        BRYAN HARSIN         FOOTBALL COACH              $800,000

ILLINOIS                    JOHN GROCE             BASKETBALL COACH          $1.7 M

INDIANA                    TOM CREAN              BASKETBALL COACH          $3.05 M

IOWA                          KIRK FERENTZ          FOOTBALL COACH              $4.08 M

KANSAS                     BILL SELF                    BASKETBALL COACH          $4.75 M

KENTUCKY               JOHN CALIPARI        BASKETBALL COACH          $6.01 M

LOUISIANA                LES MILES                  FOOTBALL COACH              $4.3 M

MAINE                        SUSAN HUNTER        COLLEGE PRESIDENT        $250,000

MARYLAND              MARK TURGEON        BASKETBALL COACH          $2.248 M

MASSACHUSETTS     DEREK KELLOGG     BASKETBALL COACH        $994,500

MICHIGAN                 JIM HARBAUGH        FOOTBALL COACH              $7 M

MINNESOTA              JERRY KILL                  FOOTBALL COACH              $2.5 M

MISSISSIPPI                HUGH FREEZE           FOOTBALL COACH           $4.3 M

MISSOURI                  GERY PINKEL               FOOTBALL COACH           $4.02 M

MONTANA                 CLAY CHRISTIAN     COMM. HIGHER ED              $351,000

NEBRASKA                MIKE RILEY               FOOTBALL COACH              $2.7 M

NEVADA                     KAYVAN KHIABANI   ASSOC. PROFESSOR          $981,475

NEW HAMPSHIRE   MARK HUDDLESTON   COLLEGE PRES.             $333,658

NEW JERSEY             KYLE FLOOD             FOOTBALL COACH              $1.25 M

NEW MEXICO            BOB DAVIE                FOOTBALL COACH              $772,690

NEW YORK                SHASHIKANT LELE  MED SCH. DEPT. CHAIR    $551,000

NORTH CAROLINA MARK GOTTFRIED   BASKETBALL COACH          $2.06 M

NORTH DAKOTA ROBERT STICCA       UNIV. SURGERY CHAIR      $758,000

OHIO                           URBAN MEYER         FOOTBALL COACH              $5.8 M

OKLAHOMA              BOB STOOPS              FOOTBALL COACH              $5.25 M

OREGON                    MARK HELFRICH      FOOTBALL COACH              $3.15 M

PENNSYLVANIA       JAMES FRANKLIN    FOOTBALL COACH              $4.1 M

RHODE ISLAND        DAN HURLEY            BASKETBALL COACH          $627,500

SOUTH CAROLINA  STEVE SPURRIER     FOOTBALL COACH              $4 M

SOUTH DAKOTA     MARY NETTLEMAN MED. SCHOOL DEAN           $500,000

TENNESSEE               BUTCH JONES           FOOTBALL COACH              $2.96 M

TEXAS                         CHARLIE STRONG    FOOTBALL COACH              $5.1 M

UTAH              KYLE WHITTINGHAM          FOOTBALL COACH              $2.6 M

VERMONT                  TOM SULLIVAN        COLLEGE PRES.                    $429,093

VIRGINIA                   FRANK BEAMER       FOOTBALL COACH              $2.42 M

WASHINGTON           MIKE LEACH             FOOTBALL COACH              $2.75 M

WEST VIRGINIA        BOB HUGGINS       BASKETBALL COACH          $3.25 M

WISCONSIN               BO RYAN                   BASKETBALL COACH          $2.75 M

WYOMING                 CRAIG BOHL             FOOTBALL COACH              $832,000

28 FOOTBALL COACHES:             $95.6 MILLION ($3.41 MILLION AVERAGE)

12 BASKETBALL COACHES:         $33.5 MILLION ($2.79 MILLION AVERAGE)

50 TOTAL COACHES:                     $129.1 MILLION ($3.225 MILLION AVERAGE)

10 ACADEMIC, OTHER:                 $4.72 MILLION ($472,000 AVERAGE)

TOTAL:                                              $133.73 MILLION ($2.67 MILLION)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »