Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2015

 

Some clown from Washington, D.C. who calls himself a political writer traveled to Oklahoma City last week to cover the Southern Republican Leadership Conference and ended up insulting Louisiana Cajuns in a way they have never been insulted.

Never mind all those Boudreaux and Thibodeaux stories that rival Texas Aggie jokes in their ability to make their subjects look a little dumb. Shoot, the Cajuns laugh at those themselves and some Cajun humorists like Justin Wilson, Bud Fletcher, Ralph Begnaud and Dave Petitjean were more than a little successful at making Cajuns laugh at themselves.

One Cajun joke making the rounds right now has Boudreaux deciding to launch a nutria farm because “Dem womens use dat nutriagena on dere faces and ereybody puts dem nutria sweet in dey coffee and iced tea. But dat ain’t where de money is. De real money is wit dat Defensive Department what builds all dem nutria powered submarines.”

That one is courtesy of my associate pastor Tommy Bergeron who tells some of the best stories.

Here is my all-time favorite, also courtesy of Tommy Bergeron:

Boudreaux, him go huntin’ and kill hisself a loon. On de way home he stop over to Thibodeaux’s house an’ call him out, sayin’ “Thibodeaux, look what I done shot me.”

“You shoot a lake loon?!!!” Thibodeaux say, almos’ screamin’. Man, dat’s agains’ de law. Dey gon’ put you unner de jail. Dat’s a protected bird! It’s endanger! Man, dey put bands on dey legs and track ‘em by dem computer machines to study dey matin’ habitats an’ stuff.”

“Aiy-EEE!” say Boudreaux. “I did not know dat. What am I gon’ do, Thibodeaux? I don’ wanna go to no jail.”

“Man, you got to get rid of dem evidence,” say Thibodeaux. “You take dat bird home, dress it, cook it an’ eat it rat away.”

So Boudreaux did dat but he start feeling guilty and de nex’ day he do hisself down to Wildlife an’ Fisheries an’ say to de man at de desk, “My name is Boudreaux an’ I’m here to turn myself in, Cher.”

“Turn yourself in for what?” asked de agent in charge.

“Cher, me, I shoot a loon.”

“What?!!! You shot a loon?!!”

“I know, Cher, it’s a dangered bird but I did not know dat until Thibodeaux tol’ me after I shoot it. But I feel real bad about dat and I’m here to take my punishments.”

De agent, he lean back in his swiveled chair and he tink awhile on it. Finally, he say, “Well, you didn’t know and you are trying to do the right thing and accept the consequences. Tell you what, we’re gonna give you a pass this time. Go on home and forget about it but don’t do it again.”

“Oh, Cher, tank you so much fo’ dat. I ‘preciate it. I won’t never shoot no more loons.”

“No problem,” say de agent. “By the way, what’d you do with it?”

“Oh, Cher, me, I dress it, cook it and eat it.”

“You ate a loon, really? What’d it taste like?”

Boudreaux, he stroke the whiskers on his chin and he tinks a bit an’ he finely say, “Oh, Cher, I don’ know me. I guess a cross tween a bald eagle and a whooping crane.”

My butchered dialect notwithstanding, is there anyone out there who believes for a nanosecond that Bobby Jindal could ever tell a Cajun joke, let alone pass himself off as Cajun?

Well, apparently, from the story he wrote, one Ryan Lovelace (there’s probably a joke in that name, but we won’t go there), believes Jindal is a Cajun.

Lovelace is described as a campaign reporter for the Washington Examiner, an online newspaper and a weekly magazine that is a sister publication to the conservative opinion magazine The Weekly Standard and the San Francisco Examiner newspaper.

That would appear to be a very loose description.

And yes, we are well aware that writers are not always (in fact, seldom are) responsible for the headlines that are slapped onto their stories but for his story to appear under the headline “Bobby Jindal, Cajun crusader” just shoots his credibility all to hell and back. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/bobby-jindal-cajun-crusader/article/2564957

The headline could have called Jindal anything else and it would have been more accurate than Cajun. Even governor would have been more appropriate, as far-fetched as that title has become. I mean, even as big a stretch as political leader would have been a little closer to the truth, though not by much. About the only description that would have been further off the mark than Cajun would be something like, oh, say…Republican presidential nomination contender.

Describing Jindal as a Cajun is about as accurate as calling him a sportsman and that Christmas card depicting the entire Jindal clan decked out in full cammo pretty much laid sportsman to rest. CHRISTMAS CARD

(CLICK ON PHOTO TO ENLARGE)

Since that ill-advised PR stunt, we now have a tweet from Jindal showing him in his ill-fitting black suit, holding a shotgun. https://twitter.com/BobbyJindal/status/601829269954818048/photo/1

Wow.

But still….

Cajun crusader? Sorry, but that’s just way over the top and reader Gregory DuCote of Baton Rouge just couldn’t let Lovelace’s faux pas slide by so easily. DuCote, justifiably indignant, fired off the following note to Lovelace:

Mr. Lovelace:

 I just finished reading your article about Bobby Jindal, variously referred to here in Louisiana as Booby, Mr. Jingles, etc. and his recent visit and speaking engagement in the great state of Oklahoma. 

 With all due respect sir, you owe a serious apology to all Louisianians who would consider themselves Acadian, i.e. of descent form those brave men and women forced out of Nova Scotia several hundred years ago, commonly referred to as Cajuns. Your reference to Bobby Jindal as a Cajun crusader evinces either a significant lack of understanding of “Cajunism,” a very poor choice of words while wanting to try and be cute and relate to Louisiana, or a really bad joke.

 Bobby Jindal is the joke. A really bad one at that.

Couldn’t have said it better myself, Cher.

 

Read Full Post »

We found this link online, which we feel says all that needs to be said about this subject and the roster of pretenders calling themselves candidates for the Republican nomination for leader of the free world.

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/here_s_josh_duggar_with_almost_every_gop_presidential_candidate_who_thinks_gays_are_child_molestors

We also found this photo of Bobby, Josh, and Rush Limbaugh’s little brother, David. Duggar’s tweet with this photo referred to Bobby Jindal and David Limbaugh as “two great Americans.” BOBBY, JOSH AND RUSH’S LITTLE BROTHER

We feel no further comments are necessary. After all, some pictures really are worth a thousand words.

In case some of you have been out of touch lately, this should fill in the blanks.

http://defamer.gawker.com/the-web-has-known-about-josh-duggar-for-years-when-did-1706258269

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/23/josh-duggars-record-destroyed-police_n_7428762.html

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/05/22/3661999/frc-josh-duggar/

5 Times That Confessed Child Molester Josh Duggar Asked People to Think of the Children

 

Read Full Post »

That hateful, smugly, self-serving Executive Order 15-8 signed by Grovernor Jindal on Tuesday could ultimately blow up in his face, although his tenure as grovernor will be long over by the time the courts get around to ruling on his license to openly discriminate against gays.

In case you’ve been living in a cave these past few months, Jindal signed the executive order this week, in effect enacting the Louisiana Marriage and Conscience Act only hours after House Bill 707 by freshman Rep. Mike Johnson (R-Bossier City) was rejected in a 10-2 vote by the House Civil Law Committee.

Similar bills were passed by state legislatures in Indiana and Arkansas earlier this year.

Standing beside Jindal as he made the announcement of the executive order was Johnson but that ceremony could well be as close to a victory for the bill as the two tools of Gene Mills, Tony Perkins and Grover Norquist will get.

That’s because a challenge to a previous executive order, BJ 2012-16 (that would be the 16th executive order of year 2012) was upheld by the First Circuit Court of Appeal in Baton Rouge back in December and last month the Louisiana Supreme Court declined to hear the matter.

Janice Clark, 19th District Court Judge in Baton Rouge had approved the state’s motion to dismiss the case brought by the Louisiana Hospital Association (LHA) and the Louisiana State Medical Society against the Department of Insurance over Jindal’s executive order. The case will now be tried on its merits in state district court as a result of the higher court’s reversal.

Though far from over, observers will be watching the LHA closely case as it unfolds so as to gauge the effect it has on the governor’s powers to issue executive orders such as the one he handed down on Tuesday relative to the so-called marriage and conscience act which opponents see as little more than an effort to legally deny services by retail establishments, schools and medical facilities to gay couples.

The decision by the First Circuit, throwing the challenge to Jindal’s 2012 executive order back into state district court could impact his latest executive decision as well—long after a new governor has moved into the Capitol’s fourth floor. https://casetext.com/case/la-hosp-assn-la-state-med-socy-v-state

That 2012 order, creating Rule 26, suspended existing laws and granted far-reaching powers to Commissioner of Insurance Jim Donelon in the wake of Hurricane Isaac in August of 2012. The order’s justification was that Donelon could “be hindered in the proper performance of his duties and responsibilities…without the authority to suspend certain statutes in the Louisiana Insurance Code and the rules and regulations that implement the Louisiana Insurance Code including, but not limited to, cancellation, nonrenewal, reinstatement, premium payment and claim filings with regard to any and all types of insurance subject to the Louisiana Insurance Code.”

Accordingly, Jindal made the suspension of rules applicable to all insurance lines, including health maintenance organizations (HMOs), health and accident insurance, as well as property and casualty lines. Read the entire Rule 26 HERE.

LHA and the State Medical Society immediately filed their joint petition seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive and declaratory relief against the Department of Insurance, challenging the constitutionality of the rule.

Along with several other specific challenges, they claimed that the state statute does not grant the governor the authority to make “substantive, affirmative law.”

But it is the challenge to the governor’s authority to make “substantive, affirmative law” that should attract the attention of opponents of this week’s executive order.

It’s not likely that a ruling will be made on the 2012 executive order and the accompanying Rule 26 before Jindal leaves office and even it a ruling does come down, it’s likely to be appealed. But should a ruling adverse to his 2012 order, especially on the point of the governor’s ability to make law, result, it would obviously bolster the courage of opponents of the latest order creating the marriage and conscience act that specifically singles out gays on religious grounds but which could conceivably be expanded to other target groups.

No matter which direction the legal winds ultimately blow, the resulting publicity will be used by Jindal to continue to project himself onto the national stage, an invitation that has thus far eluded him.

If he wins, he will crow that justice has prevailed because his policy was on the same page with God. Should he lose, obviously, the judiciary will have come under left-wing, liberal influence.

Read Full Post »

 

b4ac09e9355fe66141a07e0ff68bc8e0_ebrf[1](CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE)

The metaphorical ink wasn’t even dry on the Baton Rouge Advocate web page story (yeah, we know, there’s no ink—or paper—on the internet) about Grovernor (as in Grover Norquist) Jindal’s decision to issue an executive order to do what the Legislature, in a rare flash of clarity, refused to do—approve House Bill 707 by State Rep. Mike Johnson (R-Bossier City)—when outraged comments from irate readers began appearing.

The House Civil Law Committee voted 10-2 to return Johnson’s silly yet dangerous Louisiana Marriage and Conscience Act bill to the calendar, a move that effectively kills the bill this session.

The grovernor immediately went on the attack by issuing his executive order to accomplish what legislators wisely would not—put in place the necessary protection for businesses to discriminate against gays. http://theadvocate.com/news/12415408-123/house-panel-effectively-kills-religious

“It’s not about discrimination,” Grovernor Jindal insisted. “It’s about protecting rights.” JINDAL EXECUTIVE ORDER

Whose rights? Certainly not those of gays and if the law is taken to more extreme measures, as some will almost certainly attempt to do, against blacks, against Islamics, against Jews, against Hispanics, perhaps even against Asians, including Indians.

This is about anything but protecting a business owner who has deep-seated religious beliefs from catering to same sex marriages. What if that business owner has equally deep-seated religious beliefs against Little League baseball players playing a Sunday afternoon makeup of an earlier rained-out game? Of if he is offended because Jews don’t observe their Sabbath (Saturday) on the same day of the week (Sunday) as Christians?

There have already been stories about how just about any one of us is condemned to hellfire and damnation by laws and dictates of the Old Testament. Robert Mann had a dandy that ran in the New Orleans Times-Picayune that illustrates the sheer idiocy of Johnson’s bill and those like it passed in Indiana and Arkansas. http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2015/04/louisiana_religious_freedom_ga.html

And thorough as Mann’s story was, there was no mention of Leviticus 20:13: “If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death.”

So there you have it: could Jindal’s real agenda be an executive order as the first step toward capital punishment for gays? It is in the Bible, after, and Jindal’s agenda is by his own admission, faith-driven. It’s only logical, to quote Star Trek‘s Mr. Spock.

As one Advocate reader so aptly observed, Jindal is the non-candidate running all over the country bitching about overreach in government but who apparently had no problem handing down his own edicts that control millions of people’s lives when it happens to be political expedient to him.

Another reader was quick to pounce on Jindal with his own words in an earlier attack on President Obama. He wrote, “Here is what Jindal had to say about President Obama’s Executive Order on Immigration: ‘If the President wants to make the case that the law should be changed, he should go make the case to Congress and our people. This is an arrogant, cynical political move by the President, and it’s why so many Americans no longer trust this President to solve the problems we face.’ Substitute the word ‘Governor’ for ‘President’ and what’s the difference?” he asked, perhaps not so rhetorically, of Jindal’s hypocrisy.

If Jindal’s latest actions, taken in context with the above statement, do not represent a double standard, then there never has been and never will be a double standard by any definition.

At the same time, it represents yet more legal fees for Jimmy Faircloth or whoever is called upon to defend the state when the lawsuits start flying and U.S. Supreme Court rulings come down.

A reader named Beatrice said that Jindal should begin waving one of those giant foam fingers people wear at athletic events, “except make it a middle finger, pointed at Louisiana.”

Our favorite, from Joe: “You’ve been bested, old man. Can you believe it? We have a genuine psychotic tyrant on the loose in the governor’s mansion.”

Finally, one reader attempted to steer the dialog back to the real issue. “The legislature just showed that you can’t be a bigot and get away with it here. There is finally hope for this state. Now maybe the legislature can get back to important things – like finding $1.6 Billion to et rid of next year’s deficit without destroying education and health care. You know—the thing that really matters in the day-to-day lives of Louisiana citizens.”

Not that any of those comments will matter to Jindal who with each passing day more and more frequently exhibits psychopathic patterns of behavior.

No, we’re not doctors, analysts, counselors or social workers, but some of the symptoms are right up front for all to see. Which of the below symptoms might apply to Jindal?

  • A disregard for laws and social mores;
  • A disregard for the rights of others;
  • A failure to feel remorse or guilt;
  • The inability to form emotional attachments or feel empathy with others (though they often can mimic emotions and fool those closest to them, even family members);
  • The ability to manipulate people and to easily gain others’ trust;
  • They generally are well-educated and able to hold steady jobs;
  • They are cool, calm and meticulous, planning out every detail in advance;
  • All the above.

Intelligent psychopaths make excellent white-collar criminals and con artists, thanks to their calm and charismatic natures. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wicked-deeds/201401/how-tell-sociopath-psychopath

But none of those traits come close to describing Jindal, of course. Not this grovernor. No siree. Grovernor Jindal is sincere, understanding, compassionate, reverent and most of all, ambitious.

And there are delegates to woo in Iowa and those folks up there are God-fearing Christian who will take up his banner and follow him when they see what he’s done down there in Louisiana. Just you wait. He’s gonna bust through to 2, maybe even 3 percent in the presidential sweepstakes polls yet.

If you don’t believe it, just ask his core constituency—those Duck Dynasty people. They’re the ones who believe Jindal would be a great president, gays are abnormal human beings, and that blacks were happy picking cotton.

Seriously, though, the man is a total disgrace.

Read Full Post »

Our friend C.B. Forgotston, who follows the legislature relentlessly, alerted us to this little tidbit this morning that illustrates just how far the legislature is willing to go to absolve itself of any responsibility in the current fiscal mess in which the state currently finds itself.

Year after year, when stinging budget cuts are imposed on higher education and health care, the same cry goes up from the citizenry: “Why are only higher ed and health care subjected to repeated budget cuts? Why aren’t other agencies made to share the pain?”

And year after year, the same response from legislators: “Because under the State Constitution, those are the only areas that can be cut.

“Our hands are tied,” they wail in unison.

Not so, says Forgotston, who once was a staff attorney for the legislature.

Of the $30 Billion in the current state budget, $3.9 Billion or only 13 percent is constitutionally-protected, he says.

Of the dedicated funds:

  • $3.3 Billion (85 percent of the constitutionally-dedicated funds) funds public elementary and secondary education’s Minimum Foundation Program (“MFP”) which is approved by the leges.
  • $318 Million (9 percent) pays the annual debt service on state borrowing (bonds).
  • $115 Million (3 percent) pays the supplemental pay for municipal policemen, firemen and deputy sheriffs.

What’s not protected?

            Of the $30 Billion budget, Forgotston says 87 percent is not constitutionally-protected. That includes:

  • NGOs (non-governmental organizations) and other local pork barrel projects in the Operating and Capital Outlay budgets.

The constitutional scapegoat

            The constitution is a convenient scapegoat for the governor and the legislators’ lack of political courage to set priorities,” he said, “especially, since none of them appear to have ever read the document.”

No matter. On Monday, they had a chance to do something about it and they didn’t.

They punted.

And the vote wasn’t even close.

The Senate Finance Committee deferred, by an 8-2 vote, Senate Bill 196 by State Sen. Jean Paul Morrell (D-New Orleans) which would have placed a constitutional amendment before Louisiana voters that would have repealed the constitutionally-imposed dedications. SB 196 TEXT

The Legislative Fiscal Notes, which accompany any bill dealing with fiscal matters, says there would be “no anticipated direct material effect on governmental expenditures.”

The fiscal notes also said, “Due to the elimination of approximately 20 constitutional funds and the requirement that the revenue source of such funds now flow into the State General Fund (SGF), the SGF will have approximately a statutorily dedicated fund balance transfer of approximately $3.9 billion in FY 16 and annual SGF revenue flow of approximately $730 million per year.” SB 196 FISCAL NOTES

Morrell lectured committee members as he testified on behalf of his bill, saying, “We fixed higher ed but not health care. We have too many ‘not me’s’ coming before you to defend their programs.

“If you kill this bill,” he cautioned members, “you’re saying to your constituents not only that your hands are tied but that you like your hands to be tied.”

Which is precisely what they did on motion from Sen. Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge).

Before the vote on Claitor’s motion, Sen. Fred Mills (R-St. Martinville) offered a substitute motion to approve the bill, sending it to the Senate floor. Only Sen. Bodi White (R-Central) voted with Mills in favor of the bill. Those voting against approval were committee Chairman Jack Donahue (R-Mandeville), committee Vice-Chairman Norbert Chabert (R-Houma), members Bret Allain (R-Franklin), Sherri Smith Buffington (R-Shreveport), Claitor, Ronnie Johns (R-Lake Charles), Eric LaFleur (D-Ville Platte), Edwin Murray (D-New Orleans), and Greg Tarver (D-Shreveport).

As an unspoken acknowledgement of the committee’s concern over a possible veto by Bobby Jindal, a fretful White went so far as to suggest to Morrell that he might get a more favorable consideration of his bill if he waited until next year “when we have a new governor.”

So, bottom line, it appears that legislators remain unwilling to confront a lame duck, largely absentee governor despite his abysmal approval ratings by Louisiana voters.

Something is wrong with this herd mentality, folks.

This is not the time to wait for a “new governor.” This is the time for bold, decisive action that says to Jindal, “We damned well dare you to veto this or we’ll throw it back in your face with a veto session like this state—or any other state—has never seen. We will bring the attention of the national media down upon your delusional head.”

Instead, they choose to wait.

Again.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »