Without belaboring the obvious, several things are simultaneously clear—and puzzling—about the sordid little spittle-swapping episode involving Fifth District Congressman Vance McAllister and his married aide Melissa Peacock, wife of one of McAllister’s erstwhile close friends:
- Elected on Nov. 16 and sworn in on Nov. 21, it took him only a month and two days—Dec. 23—to get busted in his own office by his own security camera. That has to eclipse any record for infidelity by U.S. Sen. David Vitter and shows that McAllister is dumber than a duck.
- While some deep smooching doesn’t begin to compare to Vitter’s pillow talk with prostitutes, McAllister has pretty much been deep-sixed in his re-election bid while Vitter somehow remains the odds-on favorite to become Louisiana’s next governor. Vitter’s romps were in the abstract, only written about, while McAllister’s indiscretion was caught on video for all to see in its fuzzy, grainy quality—which only served to make the whole affair a little seamier and a bit more distasteful.
- Because the video of McAllister and Peacock was taken inside McAllister’s Monroe office, this obviously was an inside job.
- As pointed out by political analyst Bob Mann, the most aggressive Louisiana journalist today (Lamar White) is a college student living in Texas. Shame on the rest of us. http://cenlamar.com/2014/04/08/why-the-real-scandal-isnt-congressman-vance-mcallisters-philandering/
All of which raises several equally obvious questions, to wit:
- How was it that The Ouachita Citizen was chosen to break the story on its web page? Citizen Publisher Sam Hanna, Jr., said the video was sent anonymously to his office. But why not the much larger-circulation Monroe News-Star where the story would have received much wider circulation?
- Why did the anonymous video donor wait more than three months to send the package to Hanna?
- Was this video shot from a surveillance camera or a cellphone positioned for the sole purpose of entrapping McAllister?
- Were any federal laws broken by the person or persons who made the video and/or removed it from the office of a U.S. congressman?
- Who would stand to gain the most from shooting the video—and releasing it at this particular point in time?
Taking the last question first, the most obvious answer would be a potential Democrat positioning himself to run against McAllister next fall. But how would such a person have access to McAllister’s office to either plant or remove the video? And how would that person know of the supposed relationship between McAllister and Peacock?
There is some speculation that the fingerprints of Timmy Teepell, the OnMessage guru of Gov. Bobby Jindal, were all over this little operation. Jindal, after all, supported State Sen. Neil Riser to succeed former Congressman Rodney Alexander who was appointed by Jindal to head the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs. McAllister has embraced—sort of—the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) that must surely have rankled the Jindalites who have been adamantly opposed to Obamacare since day one.
McAllister retained several of Alexander’s staff members, including Alexander’s former Chief of Staff Adam Terry who admitted he was “crushed” and “pained” that his former boss retired halfway through his term and did not anoint him as heir-apparent, choosing instead to endorse State Sen. Neil Riser. Terry is now McAllister’s chief of staff and some observers say he has never taken his eye off the brass ring—the goal of one day occupying Alexander’s old House seat.
Throwing a monkey wrench into all the speculative machinery is McAllister’s minister who points the finger at McAllister’s Monroe District Officer manager Leah Gordon, also a former member of Alexander’s staff.
The minister, Danny Chance, claimed that Gordon said she was going to take the video to State Sen. Mike Walsworth (R-West Monroe), a Jindal ally, and to Jonathan Johnson, who previously worked for Alexander. Both men campaigned for Riser and both have denied any involvement with the video’s release. Gordon also has denied Chance’s allegation.
Chance made his claim to the Monroe News-Star. http://www.thenewsstar.com/article/20140408/NEWS01/304080023/Pastor-says-McAllister-staffer-leaked-video
It would appear, as reported by White on cenlarmar.com, that the footage was obtained by the strategic placement of a cellphone camera directed at the office’s surveillance video monitor, a tactic that would have required careful planning and forethought. Left unanswered, however, is how the perpetrator knew that McAllister and Peacock would pause at the exact spot where the camera would catch them in their amorous embrace. And knowing that a cellphone can video only for short durations, the timing here for starting the recording is key.
Speaking of which, if one watches the video closely, there are a couple of suggestions of a staged act; as the couple reaches the strategic spot for the video, it appears that it is Peacock who makes the first subtle move toward McAllister, not vice-versa. Not that this in any way excuses McAllister for his stupidity or for his lack of judgment, but it all seems just a bit too contrived to be purely coincidental.
To the question of whether or not any laws were broken, the answer is quite clear: it is a felony to bug a federal office. Period.
As for why the video was leaked to The Ouachita Citizen, suffice it to say that Hanna, in his publication, endorsed Riser in last fall’s election and has made no secret of his opposition to Obamacare and by association, McAllister.
And the timing of its release should be obvious: it’s an election year in Louisiana.
One other question remains: how are the Robertsons over at Duck Dynasty, who actively promote an image of family and church above all else and who endorsed and campaigned for McAllister, going to handle this latest PR gaffe?



“One other question remains: how are the Robertsons over at Duck Dynasty, who actively promote an image of family and church above all else and who endorsed and campaigned for McAllister, going to handle this latest PR gaffe?”
Isn’t it obvious – they are going to pray on it.
This story is fascinating and has the makings of a Grisham novel.
I admit to not being a die hard fan, but what bits and pieces I have seen or heard about there seems to be numerous references to, at least the elder Robertson’s, episodes of misspent youth which may or may not include lascivious or other types of immoral or acts of infidelity because they never really say so but…..I would suspect that they would be of the live and let live/forgive inclination.
Tom you gave us a lot to ponder. Thank you. Hopefully the truth will set someone free!!!
Why do you say a Democratic challenger has the most to gain from making this expose? So do Republicans. Neil Riser would be my top suspect.
Also, only a cursory review shows that there are 6 security cameras at the location where the images of the dalliance occurred. Therefore, these images were not captured by a phone camera. They were almost certainly captured by one of 6 video surveillance cameras used in the system at McAllister offices.
I said that and then immediately discounted any Democrat because no Democrat would have access to the cameras. I said Democrat because I, as anyone would, suspect that the Democrats would love to have this seat back. Of course a potential Republican opponent has just as much to gain. Riser, of course, would be one but so would a current staffer with aspirations of running for McAllister’s seat. Basically, there is no shortage of possible suspects or those who stand to gain by this.
There are a lot of facts to be gone through and many theories to be winnowed out before we get to the bottom of this and your suspicions are certainly as valid as mine—or anyone else’s.
As for the six security cameras, you will also notice that the video bounces as if someone starts out videoing all six monitors and then zooms in on the crucial one—most probably the result of someone taking a video of the monitors either with a video camera or a cellphone. Most likely, the person who did this pulled the video up from the security system’s archives, found the date and time he/she wanted and proceeded to record video of the monitors’ playback.
One thing I believe we can all agree on: this was no happenstance whereby someone stumbled upon this video by accident and no matter who did it, it’s very probably that laws—federal laws—were broken.
The point sticking in my craw: he is asking the public and the press to leave it alone for his family’s sake, yet he will not get off the public stage.
Representative Mcallister would have had to gone beyond the thresholds established by Edwin Edwards for this to have much travel time and give Riser or anyone else with which to drool. The attempted coverups are damnation, but the mea culpa along with Swaggartean pleas for forgiveness will work in Louisiana almost every time. Macallister returns to Washington unopposed if he can appear to have repented of his error(appearances being the main staple of politicians). Foiled again Fearless Fosdick!
What would really make it a Grisham novel would be this: If Peacock’s husband Heath decided to run against McCalister in the Republican primary. I think that would make it a great story. To get the guy you called friend who ruined your marriage. Would that not be poetic justice? I am a Democrat and I would donate to Heath Peacock’s campaign for the pleasure of losing this loser in our government. Heck, if McCalister wants to run against Vitter for Governor, so be it. We are talking about Louisiana folks; standards can’t get any lower. Oh, maybe New Jersey makes it a tie.
Reblogged this on The Daily Kingfish and commented:
More on Vance