Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for April, 2012

Remember how during his first term of office, Gov. Piyush Jindal hop-scotched all over north Louisiana in that state helicopter to witness his Christian faith at all those Protestant churches from Shongaloo to Dry Prong, from Farmerville to Plaucheville, from Winnfield to Winnsboro?

Sorta gave you a warm fuzzy to see the leader of the state professing his love for his fellow man—unless, of course, you offend him by doing something really audacious, like thinking for yourself or formulating an opinion of your own.

That seems to be where the trouble begins and Christian charity abruptly ends.

After what we’ve seen in four years-plus of this governor, what administrator would ever be bold enough to give a straight answer to a legislative committee?

Let’s review:

• January 2008—The echo of his first oath of office had barely died out when it was learned that Jindal was being fined $2,500 for failure to disclose more than $118,000 in direct mail expenses the Louisiana Republican Party made on his behalf.

He subsequently pushed through a bill that literally gutted the Ethics Board by transferring power to an ethics adjudicatory panel, prompting the resignations of all but one member, including Ethics Administrator Richard Sherburne who resigned in protest on June 26, 2008.

Not that Jindal holds a grudge or anything, but a whole four years later, ethics board Chairman Frank Simoneaux of Baton Rouge was mysteriously snubbed for a second term on the board after he had been critical of interaction between the ethics board and the ethics adjudicatory panel to which Jindal had orchestrated the power transfer in 2008.

• March 26, 2008—Jim Champagne, executive director of the Louisiana Highway Safety Commission, was fired barely two months into Jindal’s first term. His sin? He opposed Piyush’s campaign promise to repeal the motorcycle helmet law.

• May of 2008—Jindal successfully fights for repeal of Stelly tax plan which has cost the state about $300 million per year in revenue.

• September 15, 2008—Ann Williamson, Secretary of the Department of Social Services, is forced out after criticism of shelter conditions following Hurricane Gustav and problems with a post-storm food stamp program.

In what would be a prophetic utterance, Jindal promised more changes “sooner rather than later.”

• 2009—It’s learned that Jindal has appointed more than 200 campaign contributors who donated more than $784,000 to his election campaign in 2007 and 2008 to positions in state government. Jindal sought to prevent the divulging of the information by helping to kill a bill that would have required him to disclose the names of campaign contributors appointed to government posts.

• May of 2009—Jindal opposes and eventually succeeds in killing House Bill 169 which would have extended the Public Records Act to the governor’s office. Jindal, aka Mr. Transparency, said the bill would violate executive privilege.

• May of 2009—Republican Party Chairman Roger Villere is called upon to resign after he sent a public records request to a Republican legislative leader who was critical of Jindal. This act would be repeated in 2012.

• June of 2009—Board of Elementary and Secondary Education member Tammie McDaniel, was asked by Jindal to resign because she didn’t agree with some of the administration’s public education policies. She resisted until Feb. 11, 2010, when she finally acquiesced.

• August 21, 2009—Despite backing for the project from businessmen, Gov. Jindal rejects federal stimulus funds to construct a light rail system between New Orleans and Baton Rouge.

• October 1, 2009—Melody Teague, a Social Services grant reviewer, testified in opposition to Jindal’s plan to streamline government during legislative hearings. She was fired the following day, ostensibly not for her testimony but for her overall job performance. She appealed and got her job back six months later.

• February 5, 2010—Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) Secretary William Ankner fell on his own sword when he resigned after Coastal Bridge Co. filed a lawsuit against the state after Boh Bros. Construction Co., with a high bid and the longest time for completion, was nevertheless awarded a $60 million contract to widen a stretch of I-10 in Baton Rouge.

Robert S. Boh, one of the company’s owners, and the company itself combined to contribute $11,000 to Gov. Jindal’s gubernatorial campaigns between 2003 and 2011.

Coastal Bridge, meanwhile, contributed $5,000 to Jindal’s campaign between 2003 and 2010. Perhaps Coastal felt it was entitled to at least half the work.

• August 13, 2010—Gov. Jindal demands the resignation of State Alcohol and Tobacco Control Secretary Murphy Painter after Painter twice refused to comply with directives from the governor’s office to issue a permit to SMG, the New Orleans Superdome management company, that would allow Budweiser to erect at large tent and signage in Champions Square.

Budweiser had offered $300,000 to the Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District to sponsor the tent for tailgating parties at Saints home games. Painter, who said SMG never addressed compliance requirements of his office, was not only fired, but was subjected to sexual harassment and stalking charges. Nearly two years later, however, criminal proceedings still have not been initiated against Painter.

• April 15, 2011—Melody Teague’s husband, Tommy Teague, was canned as director of the Office of Group Benefits (OGB) despite the fact he had taken the agency from a $30 million deficit to a $500 million surplus in a scant five years. The problem was he didn’t jump on board the administration’s privatization plan quickly enough. His successor, Scott Kipper, lasted six weeks before leaving in disgust.

At issue was the $49,999.99 Chaffe Report on the advantages and pitfalls of the proposed OGB privatization. At first, Jindal refused to release the report to a legislative committee but eventually it was “leaked” to the media. Trouble is, the administration had said the report was received on May 25, 2011, but was confidential. The “leaked” copy was signed off on by the administration on June 7, two week after it said it received the report. Moreover, none of the pages of the report were date stamped, which is strictly against policy. This cast doubt on the validity of the “leaked” report and led to speculation that there may have been two versions of the Chaffe report.

• May 2011—Department of Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein refused to divulge to a legislative committee who the winning bidder was on a $300 million contract with his agency. It was learned later that the winning bid came from a firm for whom Greenstein once worked and despite his denials that he had discussed the bid with his old company, emails subpoenaed by the committee indicated otherwise.

• October 19, 2011—Gov. Jindal refuses to apply for a federal grant that could have meant $60 million in early childhood education funding for Louisiana.

• October 27, 2011—Bryan Jeansonne, law partner of State Republican Executive Director Jason Dore sends emails to parish school superintendents throughout the state making a public records request of all emails between the superintendents and school employees.

• October 27, 2011—It was learned that the state lost an $80 million federal grant to expand the reach of broadband Internet to rural and poor areas of the state. Jindal rejected the grant after a political contributor was forced to resign from the Board of Regents when it was revealed he had a contract with the Regents for a high speed fiber optics internet project. Jindal said he felt the job could be done by the private sector. It was also learned that AT&T, a Jindal supporter, had opposed the grant.

• February 1, 2012—Larry Dorsey, administrator of University Medical Center (UMC) in Lafayette, acting no doubt on orders from above, sent an email to his employees that they were not to attend a rally in protest of the elimination of 130 positions at the hospital, whether they were “on or off the clock.” Dorsey said that violation of his directive may result in disciplinary action.

Civil Service rules clearly allow state employees, particularly those “off the clock” to attend protests, carry signs and sign petitions.

• Also on February 1, 2012—The Civil Service Board rejected a proposal by DHH Center for Health Care Innovation and Technology chief Carol Steckel to abolish 69 information technology (IT) positions and to fire the employees because of inadequate documentation to justify the layoff.

Problem was, the IT employees had already been informed by teleconference that they would lose their jobs and upon returning to their work stations they found they were locked out of their computers. Because of the Civil Service Board’s action, they were reinstated but in a retaliatory measure because some had complained to LouisianaVoice, all annual leave applications by the employees were rejected.

• February 8, 2012—LSU Systems President John Lombardi obediently sent an email to his administrators to ask that they not complain about the proposed elimination of 2,837 positions in higher education. “…the administration does not think it helpful to have complicated or difficult or contentious higher education initiatives brought before the legislature,” he said, adding that the administration would appreciate it if higher ed officials recognize that the budget “gives higher ed special treatment and thank the administration for their attention and concern for higher ed.”

In theory, Lombardi was toeing the line and complying with the governor’s request that higher ed officials thank him for his benevolence. In reality, Jindal was dangling a carrot in the form of a promise of $100 million for higher ed should Jindal’s retirement package pass.

• March 6, 2012—Mary Manuel, executive director of the Office of Elderly Affairs, testified that she was never informed of Jindal’s intent to transfer her agency from the governor’s office to DHH. The following day she was fired. She said she was summoned to testify by Rep. John Berthelot (R-Gonzales). Berthelot, as expected, threw her under the bus by never coming to her defense.

• March 6, 2012—Rep. Harold Richie (D-Bogalusa), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, voted against a tax rebate for those who donate money for scholarships to private and parochial schools, a bill being pushed by Jindal. The next day he was stripped of his vice chairmanship of the House Committee on Insurance by House Speaker Chuck Kleckley (R-Lake Charles). Committee Chairman Greg Cromer (R-Slidell) was not informed of the action beforehand nor did he have a voice in naming Richie’s replacement.

• March 14, 2012—State Rep. Nancy Landry (R-Lafayette), in a transparent effort to out teachers who took off work to protest the administration’s education bills, made a motion for all those speaking for or against the bills to tell their names, where they are from and whom they represent (normal procedure) to also inform the committee if they were present before the committee on annual or sick leave—something that committee member John Bel Edwards (D-Amite) pointed out was unprecedented.

Even when it was determined the committee could not refuse testimony if speakers refused to divulge that information, Landry proceeded to push her silly, petulant, toothless motion through and sure enough, when Gov. Jindal testified, he neglected to inform the committee if he was on annual or sick leave.

• March 26, 2012—As the debate raged over the administration’s attempt to force state employees to work longer and pay more for drastically reduced retirement benefits, Gov. Jindal was quietly buying back 2.2 years of time in order to enhance his own state retirement.

• April 25, 2012—Sen. Daniel Martiny (R-Metairie) proved that a hack is not always a taxi as he fought a bill by Sen. Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge) which would have prevented legislators from leaving the House or Senate and taking six-figure political jobs in order to boost their state retirement.

Even as the administration was still trying to come up with a way to rape state employees of their retirement benefits, Martiny went into a snit against Claitor’s bill—possibly because he was one of a handful qualified to take advantage of the loophole.

The bill was defeated even as it became known that former legislators had been appointed to lucrative jobs for which they possessed few, if any, qualifications. Cases in point included Noble Ellington of Winnsboro, appointed to the second position in the Department of Insurance at $150,000 per year; Jane Smith of Bossier City, appointed to position of Deputy Secretary in the Department of Revenue at $107,500 per year; Troy Hebert of Jeanerette, appointed Commissioner of the Louisiana Alcohol and Tobacco Control Board at $107,500 per year; Kay Katz of Monroe, named member of the Louisiana Tax Commission at $56,000 per year; Nick Gautreaux of Meaux, named Commissioner of the Office of Motor Vehicles at $107,000; Tank Powell and M. J. “Mert” Smiley, both named to the pardon board at $36,000 per year—Smiley to serve only until he takes office as Ascension Parish tax assessor; former St. Tammany Parish President Kevin Davis, named Director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness at $165,000, and former St. Bernard Parish President Craig Taffaro, new Director of Hazard Mitigation and Recovery at $150,000 per year.

• April 27, 2012—The LSU Board of Supervisors, knuckling under to the Gestapo tactics of Gov. Jindal, fires LSU system President John Lombardi. Two days before, Lombardi told the House Education Committee it was attempting to fix a problem that does not exist with a bill that would allow the state’s higher education boards to vary the state funding formula for college campuses by up to 5 percent. It was a bill favored by Jindal.

Lombardi has never been known for his diplomacy and the one cardinal sin one does not commit in Louisiana is upstaging Piyush.

One must now wonder if the governor may now withdraw that offer of $100 million he promised to higher ed from the savings he’d anticipated from his retirement reform.

It would seem now that it would be practically impossible to attract qualified candidates for Lombardi’s position. What university administrator with any intelligence would even entertain the thought of coming into this politically-charged atmosphere? It’s a dead-end job at best, rife with political land mines.

For that matter, what agency director of department head would dare give a candid account of his agency or department at this stage of the game? Heads roll far too easily for anyone to speak openly. The ambivalence was palpable just last week when cabinet secretaries testified about the future of their agencies.

Department of Transportation and Development Secretary Sherri LeBas, asked if her department was likely to lose engineers or truck drivers to the administration’s proposed retirement changes, said “It’s really hard to say.”

Really? The Louisiana State Employees Retirement System (LASERS) knows. They would tell the secretary that employees are lined up to get retirement counseling prior to Jindal’s retirement changes being adopted—changes that the Legislative Auditor and LASERS each say are unconstitutional. That’s because LASERS is beyond the reach of a vindictive Jindal.

State Police Col. Mike Edmonson, ever the political/social climber, said legislators should not worry about the number of employees in the Department of Public Safety who might retire because if necessary, he would work traffic accidents. “Public safety is my number one priority,” he said. Yeah, right. That and photo ops with Jindal.

Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Lane Carson (a former legislator who moved into his secure state job) said he would defer to his finance manager.

His agency’s undersecretary, Tom Burbank, said he is waiting to see the outcome of the final retirement legislation before taking the time to assess the situation.

LASERS has projected as many as 21 percent of all state civil service employees are eligible for retirement.

That’s candor you won’t find from an appointed state employee.

Thanks to Piyush’s ongoing reign of terror.

Read Full Post »

“People are going from the Legislature to other branches of government and spiking their retirement benefits.”

–Sen. Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge) speaking in support of his Senate Bill 727 which would have prohibited lawmakers from leaving the legislature for high-paying state jobs and joining the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS) to boost their retirement incomes–particularly at a time when the administration is trying to gut retirement benefits for rank and file state employees.

“We have a bad reputation in this state as legislators and public officials because we keep filing bills like this and telling people we are crooks.”

–Sen. Dan Martiny (R-Metairie), in a snit as he spoke out against Claitor’s bill, possibly because it might one day adversely impact his own retirement. The Senate defeated Claitor’s bill, thus doing nothing to dispel Martiny’s perception of legislative ideals.

Read Full Post »

Even as the administration pushes back floor debate on Gov. Piyush Jindal’s retirement reform for state workers, the full Senate on Wednesday made sure that its members were protected.

While thousands of state employees faced the uncertainty of their careers and retirement years, 35 members of the upper chamber, led by Sen. Daniel Martiny, a self righteous Metairie Republican, flipped a collective bird at state civil service workers in particular and Louisiana citizens in general.

And worst of all, Martiny had the unmitigated gall to accuse a Senate colleague of grandstanding.

Pot, meet Kettle. Kettle, Pot.

The furor was over Senate Bill 727 by Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge), which would have barred a few members of the Senate and a couple of former members from membership in the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS).

The legislature passed a law a few years back prohibiting members of the House and Senate from joining LASERS but the law “grandfathered in” those legislators who were already LASERS members.

Martiny is one of those. The others are Sharon Weston Broome and Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb, both Baton Rouge Democrats, Ed Murray (D-New Orleans) and John Smith (R-Leesville).

Claitor’s bill also would have provided that any legislator who is presently a member of LASERS as of June 30, 2012, may retain accrued service credit but that those members “on and after July 1, 2012, be ineligible to be a member of the system” and that employee and employer contributions would cease as of July 1.

Had the bill passed, it would have adversely affected two formers members of the legislature—former Rep. Noble Ellington (R-Winnsboro) and former Sen. Troy Hebert (D-Jeanerette).

Ellington, the immediate past national president of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), did not seek re-election last fall after 24 years in the legislature. He was promptly hired to the number-two job in the Department of Insurance at $150,000 even though Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon said at the time of his hiring that Ellington had virtually no experience in insurance.

Hebert was hired by Jindal to head the Louisiana Alcohol and Tobacco Control Board at $107,800.

Their higher salaries stand to have a significantly positive impact on their retirement incomes—at a time when Jindal is attempting to rip the heart out of state employees’ retirement by making them pay more and to work longer to qualify for fewer benefits.

Claitor said legislative pay ranges from $30,000 to $38,000 per year but now that Ellington’s retirement can be based at least partially on his higher salary, he stands to reap much greater benefits.

Martiny, with a flair for the obvious—and the dramatic—pouted and then ranted in arguing against Claitor’s bill.

In short, he threw a hissy fit.

Of course, being one of the five senators who are still members of LASERS, he had no dog in that hunt; nothing self-serving there by the good senator.

No retirement reform for legislators either—just for state civil service employees. Screw the employees but take care of our own.
Can you say “double standard?”

Ellington and Hebert “are doing the job,” he said of the two former legislators-cum-unclassified fat cats.

How would he know what kind of job Ellington is doing? For that matter, what does he know about Hebert’s job performance? Has he seen their personnel performance evaluations?

Could it possibly be that he would lavish such praise because all three are current or former members of ALEC?

ALEC is a tight fraternity comprised mostly of Republican legislators from across the U.S., but there are a few Democrat members as well, including fellow senators Francis Thompson of Delhi, David Heitmeier of New Orleans, Elbert Guillory of Opelousas, and Ben Nevers of Bogalusa.

In fact, no fewer than 16 of the 39 members of the Louisiana State Senate are members of ALEC.

They include Senate President John Alario (R-Westwego), Robert Adley (R-Benton), Norbert Chabert (R-Houma), A.G. Crowe (R-Pearl River), Heitmeier, Gerald Long (R-Natchitoches), Martiny, Dan Morrish (R-Jennings), Nevers Neil Riser (R-Columbia), Thompson, Mike Walsworth (R-West Monroe), and Mack “Bodi” White (R-Central).

To a person, they were among the 35 senators who effectively defeated Claitor’s bill by returning it to the calendar where bills go to die.

Only two joined Claitor in voting against killing the bill. They were Karen Carter Peterson (D-New Orleans) and Jody Amedee (R-Gonzales).

We would never say that ALEC money may have influenced the vote but consider this: thirteen of the 35 senators who voted to kill the bill received a combined $239,600 from ALEC member corporations and when you add the $65,000 received by Ellington while he was in office, that total jumps to $304,600.

Perhaps there’s no connection between the vote and the ALEC corporations but certainly is peculiar how ALEC beneficiaries all tend to vote together on controversial issues.

Here’s the breakdown on contributions by ALEC:

• Alario—$14,500;

• Adley—$49,900;

• Chabert—$7,000;

• Crowe—$3,000;

• Heitmeier—$8,000;

• Long—$26,000;

• Martiny—$36,000;

• Morrish—$5,500;

• Riser—$7,000;

• Thompson—$8,000;

• Walsworth—$9,000;

• White—$8,500;

• Guillory—$45,200.

“We have a bad reputation in this state as legislators and public officials because we keep filing bills like this and telling people we are crooks,” Martiny said during floor debate. “It’s sad when we have to grandstand on one another.”

Well, Senator, we never said you were a crook. Those are your words.

As for our description of your performance, however, arrogant, idiotic, duplicitous, hypocritical, embarrassing buffoonery does come to mind.

And yes, it indeed is sad when you grandstand.

Because we are watching.

Read Full Post »

“It looks like we just give sort of a blank check to the Department of Economic Development, and it doesn’t come from their money. It comes from the treasury.”

–State Rep. John Schroder (R-Covington), in questioning whether sufficient accountability and reporting was being required of the Louisiana Office of Economic Development in its push for even more corporate tax breaks even as it was announced that the state would have to cut another $215 million in expenditures this year.

Read Full Post »

It’s long past the time when the people of Louisiana should get their collective heads out of the sand and take an objective, educated look at the state’s budgetary crisis.

The Revenue Estimating Conference Tuesday announced that the state must slash expenses by another $210 million because of drops in anticipated revenue.

The Revenue Estimating Conference, comprised of LSU economist Jim Richardson, House Speaker Chuck Kleckley (R-Lake Charles), Commissioner of Administration Paul Rainwater and Senate President John Alario (R-Westwego), monitors state expenses and revenues on an ongoing basis.

On Tuesday, the four heard a presentation from Greg Albrecht, chief economist for the Legislative Fiscal Office. The news was bleak and the four officials dropped the revenue forecast for the coming year by $304 million.

But it’s not as if no one could see this train wreck coming.

Much like the tribulations currently being visited upon the New Orleans Saints, the state’s fiscal woes are 100 percent self-inflicted.

As the Ol’ Perfesser, former New York Yankees manager Casey Stengel, would say if he were still with us: “You can look it up.”

We did.

And while it come as a surprise to members of the House and Senate, the information from the Louisiana Department of Revenue is right there in a little known but readily available publication entitled Tax Exemption Budget 2011-2012.

The real puzzle is why no one else has bothered to ferret out this data. Why go to the expense and bother to publish it if no one in a decision-making position is even going to bother to read it?

But before we get into that report, let’s take a quick look back to May of 2008, four months after Gov. Bobby Jindal took office.

The state at that time was flush with money, thanks to federal funds dumped into the state to aid in the recovery from the devastation of hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Never content to grapple with fiscal prudency, legislative leaders and Jindal conducted a series of backroom discussions—as usual, out of eyesight and earshot of the public. Jindal emerged, beaming, to announce the good news: the highly regarded Stelly Tax Plan was being scrapped.

The bill, Senate Bill 87 by Sen. B.L. “Buddy” Shaw (R-Shreveport), rolled state income tax rates back to 2002 levels in January of 2009.

Jindal trumpeted that the bill would save single filers as much as $500 a year and joint filers $1,000.

What the governor did not say—but Albrecht did—was that single filers would have to make as much as $90,000 per year to reap the $500 savings and joint filers would have to make more than $150,000 to save the maximum $1,000.

With a median household income of $43,733 in Louisiana in 2008, the Stelly repeal, while obviously a welcome break for the wealthy, was of no benefit whatever to middle- and low-income Louisianans.

Albrecht also said the total cost to the state treasury would be about $300 million per year, beginning in the 2009-2010 budget cycle.

Perhaps at this point it’s worth reiterating the most recent loss of revenue as projected by the Revenue Estimating Conference: $304 million.

Now to the Revenue Department’s Tax Exemption Budget.

The document is a mind-numbing 409 pages but one does not have to examine every page to see what has happened in Louisiana over the past few years.

In fact, pages 6 and 17 pretty much tell the story.

Page 17 provides a year-by-year summary of revenue losses from various tax exemptions granted by the state. The exemptions include corporate and individual income taxes, sales taxes and severance taxes, among others.

The combined four-year total for all tax exemptions shows that the state has lost a little more than $18 billion since the 2008-2009 fiscal year, which began on July 1, 2008, six months after Jindal took office.

Much has been made by the administration of the unfunded accrued liability (UAL) of the state’s four retirement plans.

That combined UAL? $18.3 billion.

The breakdown shows a four-year loss of $5.6 billion in corporate income tax exemptions and another $5.6 billion in sales tax exemptions. Individual income tax exemptions account for an additional $4.2 billion and severance tax exemptions were another $1.5 billion.

Page 6, however, was the most revealing in that it illustrates the disparity between the corporate income taxes paid and the sales and income taxes paid by individuals in Louisiana in Fiscal Year 2010-2011.

• Corporate income taxes—$198 million;

• Estimated corporate income tax exemptions—$1.46 billion;

• Total potential collections—$1.58 billion;

• Percentage of corporate income tax loss—88.1 percent.

The state was not nearly so generous with individuals.

• Total sales tax collections—$2.67 billion;

• Estimated sales tax exemptions—$1.39 billion;

• Total potential sales tax collections—$4.06 billion;

• Percentage of sales tax loss—34.3 percent.

Sales taxes, of course, are paid by everyone. Even the poorest of the poor pay the same sales tax rates as the most wealthy, making sales taxes one of the most unfair.

Individual income tax collections were no kinder.

• Total individual income tax collections—$2.39 billion;

• Total individual income tax exemptions—$1.13 billion;

• Total potential individual income tax collections—$3.52 billion;

• Percentage of individual income tax loss—32.1 percent.

To recap, the state collects only 11.9 percent of the potential corporate income taxes while exempting the remainder.

With sales and individual income tax, however, collections were 65.7 percent and 67.9 percent, respectively.

With this administration, the solution such an uneven playing field is obvious: more corporate tax breaks.

Jindal is pushing a package of bills that will award new tax breaks to businesses that are considering relocating or expanding into Louisiana.

And of course, the House overwhelming approved all three bills even though the Legislative Fiscal Office estimated the state could lose millions of dollars in tax income.

But Rep. Joel Robideaux (R-Lafayette) said the cuts would generate more tax dollars for Louisiana than the breaks will cost the state in lost revenue.

One bill, approved by a vote of 86-9 will give a payroll tax cut of between 6 percent and 15 percent for creating high-paying jobs with health care benefits. The question that was never asked was, where are the lower-paying jobs?

A 25 percent rebate over five years on relocation costs for companies moving corporate headquarters to Louisiana was approved by a vote of 81-13.

Finally, a bill calling for a different way to calculate state corporate income and franchise taxes, thereby lessening tax payments for participants, passed unanimously, 100-0.

So, while Jindal’s Deputy Chief of Staff Kristy Nichols testifies in favor of gutting retirement benefits for state employees, lamenting, “We’re drowning in debt,” her boss keeps on keeping on with lucrative tax breaks for his corporate friends, many of them campaign donors.

The rest of you?

May 15 is the deadline for paying your “fair share” in state income taxes.

Don’t be late. The state needs the revenue.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »