Having laid off about all the personnel he can, after cutting higher education and health care to the bone, and after selling all the state property he can and privatizing state agencies and hospitals to benefit political allies, Gov. Bobby Jindal has finally turned to his only recourse in making even deeper cuts in the state budget to cover an ever-widening deficit: state contracts.
Meanwhile, LouisianaVoice has learned that a Jindal “policy advisor” recently appointed as an Assistant Secretary at the Department of Environmental Quality will remain in that post only about nine months before enrolling in law school.
Chance McNeely, who has served as a $65,000-a-year policy analyst for the governor’s office since last March, began in his new position of Assistant Secretary for Environmental Compliance this month but is already making plans to leave.
Jindal, you may recall, has issued two hiring freezes and two expenditure reductions and even issued a directive last April that “no agency use employee transfers, promotions, reallocations or the creation of new positions in such a manner as to exceed a ceiling” imposed by the administration.
State Treasurer John Kennedy and others have been calling on the governor to cut contract expenses across the board as a means of saving money for the state but those calls have largely been ignored by Jindal who no doubt will now claim this decision as his own.
The state issued 3,576 contracts or contract amendments in Fiscal Year 2014 (July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014) totaling a little more than $3.6 billion, according to figures provided by the Office of Contractual Review.
The Office of Group Benefits accounted for 17 contracts totaling nearly $1.5 billion, the most of any state agency. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana has a $1.1 billion contract to administer the health benefits program for state employees, retirees and dependents, which accounts for most of that $1.5 billion figure.
The governor’s office, through the Division of Administration, was second highest with 807 contracts or amendments costing more than $744.2 million.
The Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH) normally has the highest amount of active contracts in terms of value at any given time, but the 730 contracts/amendments approved by DHH during Fy-14 accounted for $454.9 million, third highest among state agencies.
In fiscal 2007 (July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007), the year before Jindal took office, there were 6,621 active contracts totaling $3.3 billion, up from the $2 billion in contracts during the 2005-06 (FY-07) fiscal year because of hurricanes Katrina and Rita that year. The next year’s total increased to $4.72 billion. Jindal took office in January of 2008, halfway through that fiscal year. In and to $5 billion in FY-2008-09. The number of contracts decreased from 7,286 to 6,781 that year but the cumulative amount of those contracts increased to $5 billion.
The number of state contracts continued to decline through the 2013-14 fiscal year but they increased to a high of $6.55 billion in 2011-12 even though the actual number of contracts continued to decrease to fewer than 4,800.
Across the board cuts will most likely not work as some state contracts necessarily must remain intact. Those would include contracts funded in whole or part by federal dollars in such areas as highway construction, Medicaid benefits and community development projects.
But in many other contracts it will be interesting to see if the cuts will be carried out since many of the contractors are major contributors to the campaigns of Jindal and other state politicians.
Jeez, how will the administration decide which contracts to cut?
Those contractors who don’t pony up with campaign cash are the obvious candidates.
Then there are those who give only token contributions to the governor’s political campaigns. Cuts, yes, but perhaps not so much.
But those who open up their wallets and bank accounts? No way. Gotta dance with who brung you (apologies to the late University of Texas coach Darrell Royal).
A random check by LouisianaVoice turned up 26 companies with state contracts totaling nearly $1.4 billion which, either through the companies themselves or through corporate representatives, have combined to pour more than $283,000 into one or more of Jindal’s state campaigns. That means that for every dollar contributed, the donor receives a contract of nearly $4,947. A 10 percent net profit on those contracts would mean a bottom line return of $495 for every dollar contributed—a nice investment by anyone’s standards.
Having said that, let’s take a look at some major contractors, the amount of their contracts and their campaign contributions (in parenthesis) to Jindal:
- CSRS, Inc.: $5 million ($10,000);
- DB Sysgraph, Inc.: $1.2 million ($5,000);
- United Healthcare: $14.86 million ($20,000);
- Coastal Estuary Services: $18.87 million ($18,000);
- Vantage Health Plan: $45 million ($11,000);
- Louisiana Health Service (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana): $1.1 billion ($7,500);
- Alvarez & Marsal: $7.4 million ($5,000);
- Acadian Ambulance: $4.3 million (13 contracts) ($15,000);
- Van Meter & Associates: $8.7 million ($17,500);
- Fitzgerald Contractors: $655,400 ($2,500);
- Global Data Systems: $1.74 million ($5,000);
- Sides & Associates: $4.4 million ($6,000);
- GCR, Inc.: $10 million ($2,000);
- GCI Technologies & Solutions: $32.5 million ($5,000);
- SAS Institute, Inc.: $630,000 ($6,000);
- Hammerman & Gainer, LLC: $67 million ($20,000);
- Rodel, Parson, Koch, Blanche, Balhoff & McCollister: $3.7 million ($26,500);
- CH2M Hill: $3 million ($13,500);
- Burk-Kleinpeter, Inc.: $7 million ($17,500);
- CDM Smith, Inc.: $6 million (two contracts) ($2,500);
- Eustis Engineering Services: $3 million ($1,000);
- Sigma Consulting: $3 million ($21,250);
- MWH Americas, Inc.: $3 million ($5,000);
- McGlinchey, Stafford, PLLC: $2.8 million ($17,000);
- Faircloth, Melton & Keiser, LLC: $4.1 million ($19,000);
- Adams & Reese, LLP: $1.33 million ($3,350);
In addition to the contributions to Jindal, four contractors also contributed to the Louisiana Republican Party: DB Sysgraph ($5,000), GCR, Inc. ($6,000), CGI Technologies and Solutions ($5,000), and Blue Cross/Blue Shield ($2,000). Blue Cross also contributed $15,500 to Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon and $2,500 to Speaker of the House Chuck Kleckley (R-Lake Charles).
Vantage Health also contributed $10,000 to Donelon and $3,500 to Kleckley and United Health Care contributed $3,000 to Kleckley.
Another firm, Hunt-Guillot of Ruston, held a three-year, $20 million contract to perform grant management activities in connection to hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Gustav and Ike. That contract expired last June 30. Hunt-Guillot also held a five-month, $3 million contract in 2011 for additional grant management of recovery projects related to Katrina and Rita.
Hunt-Guillot made two contributions totaling $4,750 to Jindal’s campaign in 2007. Additionally, Hunt-Guillot principal Trot Hunt made two contributions of $2,500 each to Jindal during his 2007 campaign for governor.
And Jindal made a $5,000 campaign contribution to Hunt-Guillot principal Jay Guillot during his successful run for the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education in 2011, campaign finance records show.
As the vise tightens around Jindal, who is striving desperately to hold things together until he leaves town a year from now in his quest for the presidency, hard decisions will have to be made. He can’t keep firing employees and he’s run out of state property to sell.
After seven years, it may be in Jindal’s final year that the legislature finally stands up to his amateurish manner of handling the state’s finances. Speaker Kleckley, heretofore one of Jindal’s staunchest allies in the House, has come out publicly in opposition to any additional cuts to higher education. The Public Service Commission earlier refused to surrender its automobile fleet to Jindal who wanted to sell them at auction. It’ll be interesting to see who will be the next to grow a pair.
Jindal is rarely in the state these days and when he is, he is too busy taking potshots at President Obama and planning prayer meetings when he should be minding the store and doing the job to which he was twice elected. There is more than ample evidence by now that Jindal is having trouble holding things together by remote control.
To continue on his course of self-promotion at the expense of four million Louisiana citizens is the worst kind of duplicity and deceit and he most certainly deserves his near certain future of political obscurity.
So, Faircloth and crew get $4.1 million to take body slam after body slam in court for Jindal. Then we have the involuntary contracts, such as having to pay Mike Fawer $300,000+ for Painter’s defense. Then we have the Greenstein matter wherein Judge Kelley ruled on 12/15/14 that a simple deposition Unglesby sought to conduct and the State of Louisiana was fighting could transpire as scheduled. I want to be CLEAR what Judge Kelley said: “There’s NOTHING to appeal in this matter. The matter is clear, and I want it reflected in the record that the Court deems this matter very clear.” Nevertheless, Jindal and crew sought an immediate stay of Judge Kelley’s ruling. My attorney said the mere man-hours entailed in the filings for the stay likely cost $30,000 due to the man-hours crammed into an incredibly short period of time (they came with the filings already pre-drafted for when the ruling went against them). So the State of Louisiana files the stay the same day. The result? As Judge Kelley said, the matter was clear, and the First Circuit quickly said if could find no error in the ruling: http://www.auctioneer-la.org/JIndal_Writ_Denied.pdf.
So there’s yet another $30,000 flushed down the toilet. Then we have all the LSP cronyism and nepotism: http://www.lspripoff.com/act14.htm. Then there’s the Hammerman and Gainer contracts (which don’t include local contracts). Throw in things like the Hebert discrimination lawsuit defense, all the other deadhead jobs Jindal created for his political allies, and you have more fat and bloat than anyone can dream possible. Hence, with the oil price fall, the excesses all get exposed.
Jindal came into office with sky high expectations from many Louisiana citizens. History will record him as likely one of the biggest fiascos Louisiana voters have ever experienced. Because of the mess he’ll leave behind, expectations are exceedingly low for his successor no matter who it is. Let’s just hope there may be a pleasant surprise to the upside, but it’s not even clear how to go about cleaning up some of the legacy messes he will have left behind.
Great post, Tom, especially the last sentence!!!
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds…[Emerson]
Apparently the same is true of large minds like our governor’s.
Congratulations on the first published account I have seen that makes any attempt to clearly break down professional services contracts so that people can begin to understand where they are and for what purposes. Maybe the MSM has made such an effort and I just missed it.
It is hard to understand why there have not been more extensive hearings on these contracts so the public (and legislators paying attention) could clearly understand what this huge amount of money is going for. Few things would be easier to investigate than the merits of each of these contracts. It would take time, but it’s certainly not rocket science. It will be interesting to see what contracts are cut. Legislators should, at the very least, demand the cuts be explicit rather than general.
IF legislators start to show a little courage, it will be for political reasons just like everything they have done up to now. They are consistent. I wish I could believe Speaker Kleckley’s published opinion yesterday was anything other than an orchestrated CMA political move, blessed by the governor, but I find it hard to not think that way.
Governor Jindal is, no doubt, using the prayer meeting extravaganzas in which he is so prominently featured to ask for divine guidance on how best to blame everything bad that has happened in Louisiana under his leadership on President Obama.
Tom, what about the contributions to http://jindalfoundation.org/
Sent from my iPad
>
Very good point. I have addressed these in previous posts but perhaps it is time to revisit. Thanks.
I wonder if he would try and dodge the national media the way he has ignored the local and state media when it comes to answering questions?
lets not forget too that jindal came into office inheriting what was an enviable economic situation compared to many states. besides the good sense of the stelly tax plan in place, there was also an ongoing bonanza of private insurance money as well as federal spending in the wake of katrina,rita, and gustav.
now just broken shards of every state piggy bank
Three little publicized aspects of Jindal’s budgetary incompetence:
1. State Workers Tax – Withholding 4% step increases for 4 years cost the average $40,000/year state worker or teacher about $7000 last year on top of their state income tax. Lots of state workers have missed 5 step increases and we will not get one next year either. Under the new OGB plans we will also be paying a lot more for our health care so the state can pay less.
2. Deferred capital spending – The state has bought few computers in the last 6 years and has done the least they could get away with in routine maintenance of state properties. This is a huge amount of money that will have to be spent after he is gone so we can continue doing more with less.
3. Delaying repayments of fraudulent Federal reimbursement – The federal government has finally halted the prepayment of rent by the privatized public health hospitals in a effort to increase federal Medicaid payments. When the appeals fail, we will have to repay $100’s of millions after Jindal has moved on.
And oh by the way, another part of point 1: What are the ethics of stealing from modestly compensated state workers and teachers so bazillion dollar corporations can have their state taxes reduced 70% or more.
Keep up the good work, Tom!!!
One State Worker – one comment here – people refer to Jindal’s “incompetence” in handling the state budget. Incompetence means that one makes a mess of things because they do not know what they are doing. Jindal and his henchmen and -women know exactly what they are and have been doing. They have bled Louisiana government dry and treated state employees as beneath contempt, all to enrich their out of state cronies and in-state donors. All by design. No incompetence here. Jindal has done exactly what he said he was going to do – “right size government” according to his own fantasy and turn it into a treasure trove for his friends.
Correction: I used the word incompetence at the start of the last post. The following three points are all INTENTIONAL implementations of conservative budget philosophies.
What could be considered incompetent is following these “give away state assets to the rich” ideologies to the point that he is truly unable to balance the budget.
Reblogged this on The Daily Kingfish and commented:
Everyone step right up and get your state contracts before they’re gone!
[…] long histories of internationalization. A more realistic hope might be a cut to state contracts, which amount to several billion dollars each year. Many are necessary, of course. But could others be cut enough to make up the projected […]