Feeds:
Posts
Comments

            Legislators have been working themselves into an emotional lather over the past several months in efforts to abolish what they mistakenly refer to as “automatic” 4 percent merit increases for state civil service employees. Lost in all the rhetoric, however, was another “automatic” increase that quietly kicked in last October 1—legislators’ per diem payments.

            With no debate and no vote, and even as the speechifying over state classified employee pay raises was ongoing, all 144 legislators’ daily allowance jumped $14 a day, from $145 to $159 for each day they meet in the Capitol. That’s because legislators several years ago passed a bill that ties their per diem rate to rates paid federal employees, making the legislators’ per diem increases truly automatic.  And that includes days they don’t even meet—37 days for each of the 144 House members and 39 Senate members—during this year’s 85-day session. That obscure law, however, could end if Rep. Jerome Richard (I-Thibodaux) has his way.

            With the administration anticipating a deficit of $319 million this year, House members showed no qualms about accepting the per diem payments for 12 Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays, plus Memorial Day—days during which both chambers are empty. For House members, that’s $611,832 in per diem payments for days that members are gone and for the Senate, the tab comes to $229,437 for a total payment of $841,269 for all 144 legislators for 37 days in absentia—43 percent of the 85-day session. Factoring in lower per diem rates for prior years and shorter, 60-day sessions in odd-numbered years, that still comes to about $6.5 million in payments over the last 15 years for days during which only the laughter of children and the sounds of tourists reverberate in the otherwise empty Capitol rotunda.

            The classic quotation by Everett Dirksen, the late U.S. Senator from Illinois, somehow seems appropriate for the Louisiana Legislature today: “A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.” And we’re not even talking about special sessions.

            Legislators bemoan the fact that they are paid only $16,800 per year. But $159 per diem for an 85-day session adds another $22,896. Each legislator also receives an un-vouchered $6,000 per year expense allowance, up to $1,500 per month in other vouchered expenses (that’s $63,696 for a part time job, which is more than the average state civil service employee makes in his or her full time job). Add to that perks that include a laptop computer for the Capitol, a desktop computer for his or her district office, high-speed internet service, up to three telephones for each legislator’s district office, and up to $3,000 per month for the salary of a legislative aide. Additionally, Legislators serving on or before Jan. 1, 1997, or who were already participating in a public retirement system at that time, also are eligible for retirement benefits of 3.5 percent of the member’s annual salary for each year of service. State civil service employees receive 2.5 percent of their annual salaries.

            Richard, who represents Lafourche Parish, introduced HB 1390 on Tuesday that would divorce legislators’ per diem from the federal rate by freezing the daily payments at $159 in light of the anticipated fiscal shortfall facing the state. As of Tuesday, his bill had not been received a committee referral.

            Civil service employees will have their salaries frozen, effective July 1 after lawmakers railed against what some perceived as automatic 4 percent merit increases for state classified employees. The term automatic, however, is somewhat misleading. Merit, or step, increases are given based on job performance. If an employee fails to attain certain goals, there is no merit increase. Moreover, once a classified employee maxes out on his or her step increases, there are no more increases available under civil service unless that employee receives a promotion or changes jobs. There have been no cost of living (COL) increases for state workers since 2007. The last COL prior to that was during the Edwards administration.

            That hasn’t stopped lawmakers like District 77 Rep. John M. Schroder, Sr. (R-Covington) who has led a vendetta-like campaign against state classified employees. He has authored no less than six separate bills dealing with state civil service, none of which would appear to be favorable to state workers. All six of his bills were referred to the House and Governmental Affairs Committee.

            HB 752 would grant the legislature sole authority to provide for pay increases for state employees and state elected officials. The bill would include employees of joint state and parochial agency or joint state and municipal agency, “regardless of the source of the funds used to pay for such employment.”

            HB 753 would abolish the State Civil Service Commission and the Department of State Civil Service, effective Jan. 9, 2012. Though Schroder is proposing the abolishment of civil service, his bill offers no alternative that would protect state government from returning to the spoils system of political patronage. Civil service currently protects employees from being required to campaign for or contribute to political candidates as a condition of keeping their jobs. Without civil service, some fear a return of the “deduct box” of the Huey Long era.

            HB 754 would prohibit pay increases to state employees when there is a budget deficit, subject to a fine of up to $500 or imprisonment for up to six month, or both.

            HB 755 would require the legislature to determine prior to each fiscal year if pay increases may be granted to state employees and if so, the manner and amount of the increase. This bill would be a radical departure from allowing supervisors and managers to evaluate employees’ work performance and to make decisions on merit increases. Schroder’s bill does not explain how the legislature would be qualified to evaluate job performance of 60,000 individual state employees.

            House bills 752, 753, 754, and 755 are all proposed constitutional amendments and would have to be voted on in the Nov. 2 statewide election.

            HB 757 would require that certain employee reports be sent to the Department of State Civil Service, the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate. The reports would include employees’ names, addresses, positions, dates and place of employment, hours of work, and salaries.

            Perhaps the most ominous bill, however, is HB 1296, which would require employees to use annual, compensatory, or unpaid leave for official holidays. Official state holidays include New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday, Mardi Gras, Good Friday, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans’ Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, Inauguration Day once every four years in the city of Baton Rouge, and General Election Day every two years.

            Particularly galling to state employees are the 9 percent per diem increase for legislators and the $159 per diem paid lawmakers for three days per week that the House and Senate do not meet during the 85-day session while at the same time halting 4 percent merit increases and also considering a bill to take paid holidays away from workers.

            It was Schroder who initially raised the issue of “automatic” merit increases for state employees last year with House Speaker Jim Tucker quickly joining in the effort to thwart the increases. Many felt that Schroder and Tucker were simply doing Gov. Bobby Jindal’s bidding in attacking the civil service merit increases. The governor has mostly remained above the fray even while allowing six legislators sitting on his Commission on Streamlining Government to collect more than $17,000 in per diem payments during their consideration of ways to reduce government spending. Four private sector members of the commission received no payments though Barry Erwin, president of the Council for a Better Louisiana, did say, “We did get certificates to hang on the wall.”

            Give State Rep. John Schroder (R-Abita Springs) credit: once he got the idea that picking on state employees was popular with the general public, he has stopped at nothing to offer up State Civil Service as a sacrifice at the Altar of Bobby Jindal.

            Schroder was successful at obtaining committee approval of HB-1478 (originally HB-1296) which would mandate that state employees not be paid for up to 11 legal holidays. Legislators, however, will not be required to forfeit their pay for 37 days of the regular 85-day legislative session during which they do not meet.

            In its original wording, HB-1296 stipulated that state employees would simply be required to take annual or accrued leave time for legal holidays. Somewhere along the way, however, someone must have realized that scenario presented no savings to the state since employees would receive pay whether they worked or took annual leave. Accordingly, the bill was amended to force employees to take legal holidays without pay.

            The bill, which was changed to HB-1478, was approved without objection by the House and Governmental Affairs Committee and now goes to the House floor for approval.

            Schroder was subjected to a flurry of emails from outraged state employees after his original bill calling for employees to take leave for holidays became public. He repeatedly refused to answer specific questions, saying things like, “(I’m) not sure what games you are playing, but I don’t have the time. You have no idea what’s going on and it’s clear you have an agenda slanted to the unproductive side. Keep spewing your anger across the state. In the end, I am working to solve problems and those willing to learn and listen can contribute right along as we work to make La. a better state.”

            On another occasion, when a writer asked why he did not address questions directed to him, Schroder responded simply, “God bless you.”

            One of those questions asked if Schroder had accepted a $14 increase in per diem payments (from $145 to $159) that went into effect on Oct. 1, 2009, a 9 percent increase at a time when Schroder was leading the efforts to abolish what he called “automatic” 4 percent merit increases for state workers. Merit increases for state employees are not automatic and in fact, once an employee receives all the step increases allowed for that pay grade, there are no more increases unless the employee takes another job or is promoted to a higher pay grade.

            Another question which Schroder refused to answer was whether or not he had accepted the $159 per diem for the 37 days (12 Fridays, 12 Saturdays, 12 Sundays, and Memorial Day) during which neither the House nor the Senate convenes. The per diem for those 37 days comes to $5,883 per legislator, or $847,152 for all 144 members. Memorial Day is one of the holidays for which state employees would receive no pay next year if HB-1478 becomes law.

            Schroder was also asked, but again refused to answer, if he was the primary author of HB-753, which would abolish the State Civil Service Commission and the Department of State Civil Service, effective Jan. 9, 2012. That bill, which calls for a constitutional amendment to be decided at the Nov. 2 statewide election, would dissolve the only avenue available to state employees to address grievances. State Civil Service prohibits state classified employees from contributing to or participating in political campaigns on behalf of any candidate. One of the reasons for the existence of civil service is for the protection of state employees. In the days of the old spoils system, employees were beholden to those elected officials and it spawned what is known as the “deduct box” more commonly associated with the administration of Huey Long.

            Seventy-one years ago, LSU President James Monroe Smith revealed to then-Gov. Richard Leche that he had illegally invested—and lost—more than half a million dollars of university funds in the stock market. For that transgression, and others, Smith was carted off to federal prison.

            Thirty-three years ago Josh Bursh who, at the time was the odds-on favorite to succeed Ralph Jones as president of Grambling State University, was convicted of misappropriating $26,000 in GSU Foundation funds and spent two years in prison.

            More recently, a state audit revealed that GSU officials lost $1 million investing in the stock market. By investing $2.6 million of funds that legally could only be used for university facilities—physical plant—GSU violated two state laws, the audit report says.

            For the third consecutive year the university failed to compile an accurate annual fiscal report and overstated or understated cash flows by as much as $89 million. The audit also cited continuing problems with athletic department contracts and for movable property accountability.

            But the real revelation was when Tom Cole, director of financial audits for the Legislative Auditor’s Office, said, “None of this was serious enough for use to send for prosecution.” Perhaps not, but Daarel Burnette left his position as Vice President of Finance and Administration on July 21. There was no immediate word if he resigned voluntarily or under pressure, or was simply fired. Leon Sanders, who served as Burnette’s assistant, has been named as his interim replacement.

            GSU President Frank G. Pogue concurred with virtually all the audit’s findings, which, among other things, said the university failed to correct poor accounting practices, including being unable to account for movable property and for not signing game contracts with all athletic opponents, shortcomings also noted in prior year audits.

            Even as area media were saying that Pogue was unavailable for comment, the GSU president was releasing an “open letter to the campus community” that addressed news reports on the latest poor audit. While acknowledging that GSU “ is undergoing major financial challenges, however, not to the extent that we are negligent in being good stewards of the public’s trust.”

            Pogue said that while the audit was for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, “the stocks were purchased by the university between 2000 and 2004.” Pogue became GSU’s eighth president only last month. He had been serving as interim president since last December. Horace Judson, who left last October, was GSU president during the time period covered by the audit.

            “It is my belief that the corrective actions submitted in response to the legislative auditor’s findings are appropriate and that they ensure the fiscal operations at Grambling State University are consistent with the law,” Pogue said in his June 30 letter.

            “Our priority is to move Grambling State University forward and that includes ensuring that this university makes fiscally sound decisions in spending and investing public resources. We have established an inclusive strategic planning process to assist us with these efforts. We are committed to holding ourselves and this institution to a higher standard of moral and ethical accountability while ensuring that we are good stewards of the public’s trust.

            “It is the goal of this administration to maintain a spirit of transparency and open communication with the campus community, especially when faced with potentially damaging news,” he said.

            Cole said the improper stock investment, made with $2.6 million in plant funds that can legally be used only on university facilities, “was through an oversight and not properly monitoring their investments.” Pogue, in his letter, did not address the question why funds clearly earmarked for campus physical plant were used for stock market investment.

            “They are making efforts to improve the control structure at Grambling,” he said.

            Grambling has been “making efforts” to correct glaring audit deficiencies for more than 40 years, mostly to no avail. The legislative auditor’s office, on the heels of the Josh Bursh debacle, was so desperate to clean up the fiscal mess at the university that it installed one of its own auditors on the campus to oversee financial operations. That effort, however, failed as GSU continued to pile up negative audit reports year after year.

            Stay tuned for annual updates.

            The 2010 regular legislative session stumbled to a finish this week with the usual bickering over budget cuts for education and public health and appropriations for legislators’ home districts. Only this year the cuts were deeper in an effort to offset as much as $300 million in deficits which caused the local pork projects to be even more questionable.

            Even as state property was being sold off, agencies privatized, education and health care budgets slashed, and merit increases for state classified employees frozen (because the raises would cost the state $20 million), lawmakers managed to tack on $33 million in amendments to HB-76 to fund pet projects in their districts.

Otherwise known as the ancillary fund, or the Supplemental Appropriations Bill, HB-76 passed both houses without a negative vote, passing 88-0 in the House with 15 absentees, and 37-0 in the Senate with two members not present.

            Those not voting included Reps. James Armes (D-Leesville), Gordon Dove (R-Houma), Noble Ellington (D-Winnsboro), Rickey Hardy (D-Lafayette), Lowell Hazel (R-Pineville), Nita Hutter (R-Chalmette), Chuck Kleckley (R-Lake Charles), John LaBruzzo (R-Metairie), Bernard LeBas (D-Ville Platte), Nick Monica (R-LaPlace), Kevin Pearson (R-Slidell), Erich Ponti (R-Baton Rouge), Gary Smith (D-Norco), Ricky Templet (R-Gretna), and Ernest Wooton (R-Belle Chasse), and Sens. Daniel Martiny (R-Baton Rouge), and Joe McPherson (D-Baton Rouge).

            HB-76, with the $33 million in amendments, includes but is not limited to the following appropriations:

  • Nearly $1.5 million on 50 parish councils on aging;
  • More than $3.75 million for municipalities and parishes for unspecific purposes;
  • Eddie Robinson Museum in Grambling ($20,000);
  • Festival and cultural activities ($40,000);
  • Louisiana Council on the Social Status of Black Boys and Men ($100,000);
  • Greenwell Springs Road Economic Development District ($100,000);
  • Louisiana Political Hall of Fame and Museum in Winnfield ($150,000);
  • Arts Program for decentralized arts ($750,000);
  • Jefferson Performing Arts Society ($210,000);
  • Jefferson Parish Human Services Authority ($255,000);
  • Livingston Parish for economic development studies for a parish airport ($25,000);
  • Vernon Parish Police Jury for fairground cattle fences ($20,000);
  • Tioga High School in Rapides Parish ($20,000);
  • Ouachita Parish for rehabilitation of J.S. Clark Cemetery ($30,000);
  • Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans ($100,000);
  • Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans, Foster Grandparents program ($40,000);
  • East New Orleans Neighborhood Advisory Commission ($70,000);
  • Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Department’s Cops and Clergy Program ($25,000);
  • Tipitina’s Foundation in New Orleans ($10,000);
  • Construction of an animal shelter in St. Charles Parish ($250,000);
  • Animal shelter operations, St. Charles Parish ($50,000);
  • Construction of an emergency operations center in St. Charles Parish ($100,000);
  • St. Charles Parish Hospital for emergency room equipment ($175,000);
  • Gretna Fest ($200,000);
  • Heritage Festival in Gretna ($10,000);
  • Baton Rouge park improvements ($100,000);
  • Terrebonne Parish regional military museum ($20,000);
  • Farmers’ and Fishermens’ Market in Westwego ($100,000);
  • Westwego Performing Arts Center ($250,000);
  • Northeast Louisiana Delta African American Heritage Museum ($5,000);
  • New Orleans for workforce development, cultural, and enrichment programs ($300,000);
  • Renovation of high school gym in Marksville into a community center ($200,000);
  • New Orleans recreational and cultural activities ($75,000);
  • Le Petit Theatre du Vieux Carre in New Orleans ($25,000);
  • Louisiana Center Against Poverty, Lake Providence ($150,000);
  • City of Alexandria for health care related to sickle cell anemia ($35,000);
  • North Iberville Community Center ($50,000);
  • DeRidder Area Ministerial Alliance for God’s Food Box ($15,000);
  • Doyle High School in Livingston for band equipment ($10,000);

            The appropriations for municipalities and parishes, for the most part, were approved with little or no explanation or justification other than for “infrastructure improvements.”

            Other appropriations amended into HB-76 by legislators were for police and sheriff’s departments, local fire departments, voluntary fire departments, parks, libraries, water and sewer systems, airports, parks, road repair and construction, and non-profit entities.

            Foot health awareness was given a full month. Safe boating got a week, but “sex has consequences” received only a single day at the Louisiana Legislature this year.

            That’s the way much of the recently concluded legislative session went this year. Out of 2300 bills filed by lawmakers, 541, or nearly a quarter of those dealt with resolutions of condolences, congratulations, observance, and requests of state agencies, Congress, and President Obama. Another 159 were actual bills addressing such critical state issues as the approval of vanity license plates, guns in church, barring senior citizens from running for public office, and, among other things, reprisals against a state district attorney’s office.

            In all, no less than 30 percent of the bills filed dealt with what some might call frivolous legislation, including 45 resolutions of congratulations for athletes and athletic teams, 86 official offers of condolences, 60 specially-designated days, 13 weeks, and six designation of full months of recognition.

            Bills were introduced this year to:

  • Waive enforcement of building codes for church camps;
  • Name bridges;
  • Designate the tea cake as the official state cookie;
  • Exclude medical malpractice coverage to doctors who perform elective abortions;
  • Prohibit the legalization of an illegal activity, i.e. prostitution;
  • Change the name of the Louisiana State Garden Society to the Louisiana Garden Club Federation, Inc.
  • Split the 16th Judicial District into three districts, prohibit the 16th JDC district attorney and assistant district attorneys from performing private practice work for local governments that are represented by the DA’s office;
  • Prohibits an assistant DA in the 16th JDC from succeeding the district attorney should the latter resign;
  • Prohibit health insurance providers from including abortion in any health care coverage;
  • Creates voluntary drug testing and psychiatric evaluation for legislators and statewide elected officials;
  • Prohibit firearms from being brought onto property of the New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board but to allow guns in church;
  • Make it illegal to sell urine or adulterants to circumvent drug screening tests.
  • Freeze legislators’ per diem for two years (failed by two votes);
  • Freeze pay raises for state civil service employees (passed);
  • Abolish civil service (failed);
  • Force state civil service employees to take leave without pay on state holidays (failed).

But the 2010 session did not consist of all work and no play; lawmakers were quick to address the really critical business, including the 541 resolutions that:

  • Congratulated a minister for serving seven years at his church;
  • Congratulated a couple for 37 years of marriage;
  • Commended an individual for his selection as an inductee into the Louisiana Political Hall of Fame and another for his selection to the Louisiana Sports Hall of fame;
  • Commended lobbyists upon their retirements;
  • Recognized athletic teams for their accomplishments;
  • Expressed condolences for the deaths of individuals;
  • Requested a study decorum in the House chambers;
  • Commemorated special days, weeks, and months for various organizations, including the annual “Former State Legislator Recognition Day.”

All in a day’s work or in the case of the Louisiana Legislature, all in 85 per diem days’ work.

Oh, in case you’re wondering about Foot Health Awareness Month? That’s in April.