Feeds:
Posts
Comments

“The Coca-Cola Company has elected to discontinue its membership with the American Legislative Exchange Council. Our involvement with ALEC was focused on efforts to oppose discriminatory food and beverae taxes, not on issues that have no direct bearing on our business.”

–Coca-Cola spokesperson Dian Garza Ciarlante, on explaining Coke’s decision to pull its ALEC membership on the heels of a similar decision by PepsiCo. Kraft Foods later became the third company to opt out. ALEC opponents say their next target is Wal-Mart.

Only minutes after posting this story, LouisianaVoice learned that Kraft Foods has become the third company to withdraw its membership and financial support from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has suffered a double hit with the decisions by PepsiCo and Coca Cola to drop their membership in the shadowy organization that has become the fourth branch of government in Republican states.

At the same time, Gov. Bobby Jindal, one of ALEC’s more enthusiastic proponents, and Onmessage, Inc., an Alexandria, Virginia, political consulting firm, appear to be joined at the hip.

Not only did Jindal pay Onmessage more than $1.3 million in fees since 2007, but immediately following his re-election last October, his Chief of Staff Timmy Teepell left to go to work for Onmessage.

ALEC is widely known for working with legislators from across the country to draft legislation for lawmakers to pass back in their home states.

Moreover, scores of corporate members of ALEC have poured thousands of dollars into the campaign coffers of Louisiana candidates. Those include candidates for the legislature, the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, as well as to Jindal himself.

Corporate members of ALEC include Koch Industries, ExxonMobil, Bayer Corp., GlaxoSmithKline, Wal-Mart Corp., Johnson & Johnson, Altria, Chevron, Shell, Dow, ConocoPhillips, TimeWarner, Eli Lily, Walgreen, AT&T, Reynolds American, PhRMA, Corrections Corporation of America, UnitedHealthcare, Visa, FedEx, UPS, Wackenhut (a private prison company), Kraft Foods and BP, among others.

Besides contributing generously to state campaigns, ALEC pushes its agenda calling for privatization of prisons, Medicaid, state health care benefits, and “reforms” to public education and state employee retirement benefits. Those reforms include charter schools, vouchers, abolishment of teacher tenure and virtual schools for education and a drastic reduction of retirement benefits from public employees.

To that end, thanks to strategically placed campaign contributions, ALEC has succeeded beyond all expectations in the area of public education in Louisiana and Jindal’s retirement reforms agenda will be tested next week when the legislature takes those matters up.

Wal-Mart, ExxonMobil and other giant corporations might believe they are immune to sporadic boycotts but when people use their wallets as weapons, retailers listen. Never think that they don’t. If you don’t believe that, you need only reflect back to the recent campaign that began with a single protester whose crusade went viral and which ultimately caused the giant Bank of America to abandon its monthly $5 debit card fee.

The folks who do much of their shopping at Wal-Mart are the Joe Sixpack types, the very ones most victimized by ALEC policies. They are the people just like us: blue collar whites, minorities and working stiffs who are being asked to work more—if they haven’t already lost their jobs—while earning less as they see rare salary increases eaten up by rising gasoline prices, increases in health insurance premiums, college tuition and food costs.

But Jindal is not stupid. He got to be governor and then solidified his base by being sly, duplicitous and ambitious. To use an old cliché, he knows better than to put all his eggs in one basket.

Take, for instance, Onmessage, Inc., of Alexandria, VA.

Jindal signed on late with Onmessage. He didn’t use the firm in his 2003 campaign for governor and he lost to Kathleen Blanco. Since 2007, however, his campaign has shelled out a whopping $1.3 million to the firm and now Teepell has joined Onmessage to manage its Southern Office—in Baton Rouge, no less. Moreover, one of Onmessage’s partners ghost-wrote Jindal’s riveting book Leadership and Crisis.

One of the first clients to sign on with Teepell was Republican Congressman Bill Cassidy who appears to be gearing up for a challenge to U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, Louisiana’s only statewide elected Democrat.

But Onmessage is not without its problems.

In January, Onmessage paid the state of New Hampshire 15,000 for violating the state’s stringent anti-push polling statutes.

Push polling is an interactive marketing technique involving the use of loaded questions in a supposedly, but in reality far from objective telephone opinion poll during a political campaign on behalf of one candidate in an effort to turn voters against an opponent.

LouisianaVoice has been monitoring key votes by those legislators who have been the recipients of campaign contributions from ALEC member corporations and from Jindal.

We pledge to continue publicizing those votes with reminders of who got what from whom. It may get boring, it may be tiresome to many and it may even turn some readers off. But few nails were ever driven home with a single blow of the hammer. We will keep repeating the message until our readers can recite the numbers in their sleep. Perhaps our readers will pass the information along to non-readers via Facebook or by whatever means available.

Onmessage and ALEC certainly have.

“We’re against discrimination, but we don’t believe in special protections or rights.”

–Gov. Bobby Jindal’s press secretary Frank Collins, defending Senate Bill 217 by State Sen. A.G. Crowe (R-Slidell), which would allow charter schools to refuse to admit students on the basis of their ability to speak English, their sexual orientation or other unspecified factors.

The Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee has approved by a 5-1 vote Senate Bill 217 by State Sen. A.G. Crowe (R-Slidell) which would allow charter schools to refuse to admit students on the basis of their ability to speak English, their sexual orientation or other unspecified factors.

In what must qualify as one of the more asinine comments coming out of the current session, Crowe said the intent of his bill is to prevent bans by executive branch agencies and local governments on discrimination against characteristics not listed in state law as a condition for private companies to do business with their agencies.

Wait. What? Is Sen. A.G. Crowe really advocating a return to Jim Crow?

Apparently so and so are four of the remaining six members. Sen. Dan Martiny (R-Metairie) was not around for the final vote.

Voting in favor, besides committee Chairman Crowe were Sens. Bob Kostelka (R-Monroe), Barrow Peacock (R-Bossier City), Neil Riser (R-Columbia), and Ronnie Johns (R-Lake Charles).

Of the six Republicans on the committee, only Peacock received no significant campaign contributions from either Gov. Bobby Jindal’s campaign or from corporations affiliated with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

ALEC is an organization which denies it is a lobbyist, but, headed by Koch Industries, it includes dozens of large national and multi-national corporations who meet with state legislators on a regular basis to draft legislation for state lawmakers to take back home with them for enactment.

Invariably those laws favor corporate tax breaks and cuts to state employee benefits. ALEC also promotes widespread privatization of heretofore public services and advocates school vouchers and private and charter schools over traditional public schools.

It’s really amazing what a little largesse in the right places can do.

Crowe, Kostelka, Riser, Johns and Martiny each received $2,500 from Jindal’s campaign fund in 2011 and the same five received numerous campaign contributions from ALEC-affiliated corporations.
Perhaps Jindal and some of those corporations should demand a pro rata rebate from Martiny for his failure to vote on the bill.

The state Department of Education contracts with those seeking charter schools were the chief examples cited during testimony for Senate Bill 217. Gov. Bobby Jindal did not respond to requests for comment about calls to unilaterally strip the anti-discriminatory language from the department’s contract criteria.

Sen. Ed Murray, the only committee member to vote no on the measure, said the possibility of SB217 becoming law and negating the anti-discriminatory prohibitions in charter school contracts is “really scary.”

Is it really true that Sen. Murray is the only member of the committee to understand that?

“I can’t believe that at the same time we as a Legislature are passing bills that .… allow charter schools to deny admission based solely on a child’s ability to speak English well enough or play basketball well enough,” Murray said.

“The focus is really simple,” Crowe said. “It says stick to the law.”

State law currently forbids discrimination on the basis of race, religion, national ancestry, age, sex or disability but the Department of Education has expanded that to include sex ethnicity, sexual orientation, athletic performance and special need proficiency in the English language or in a foreign language.

Leslie Ellison, of New Orleans, testified she refused to sign a charter school contract with the Department of Education because it required her company to not discriminate against gays, as well as other criteria not listed in state law. She said the department does not have the right to insert its own opinions into a state contract.

Louisiana Family Forum head Gene Mills a message was being sent for Jindal to strip the provision from his Education Department’s contract criteria. Louisiana Family Forum is a coalition of religious groups that lobby the legislature on issues such as teen abstinence and other social issues.

Neither Jindal nor State Superintendent of Education John White responded to requests for comment about the policy but Jindal press secretary Frank Collins said, “We’re against discrimination, but we don’t believe in special protections or rights.”

Education Department spokesperson Rene Greer said the charter authorization provision was under review by the department.

Someone whose name is long since forgotten once said you get what you pay for and apparently ALEC and Jindal are getting their money’s worth from Louisiana legislators they bought…er, supported.

“I do not believe we should punish people for working, and certainly do not believe teachers and state workers in Louisiana should be singled out for penalty.”

“These men and women (state employees) work incredibly hard to ensure a bright future for our state and our children.”

“I strongly believe that we must support these workers in their efforts.”

“Any statements to the contrary are simply false.”

–Campaign promises made by Gov. Bobby Jindal in a 2007 campaign brochure.