Feeds:
Posts
Comments

You’ve got to hand it to the Boy Blunder: he’s got more brass than a New Orleans second line band.

For the third straight year, beginning with 2010 when he attempted to abolish Civil Service by proxy through his lapdog Rep. John Schroder (R-Covington), Gov. Piyush Jindal has issued a proclamation of State Employee Recognition Day.

SERW_-_2012_Governor’s_Proclamation

This year it’s Wednesday, May 9.

Yippee.

Commissioner of Administration Paul Rainwater even sent out an email giving all Division of Administration (DOA) employees permission to wear jeans that day.

Double yippee.

Rainwater wears jeans every day that he’s not involved in meetings or testifying before the legislature. Even then, he most often changes back to jeans when he’s finished.

State employees, who have had no pay raises for three years, with the privatization of their group medical benefits almost a certainty and their being in imminent danger of having retirement benefits shredded by Jindal lackeys in the House (Rep. Kevin Pearson, R-Slidell and Sen. Elbert Guillory, D-Opelousas), must really feel special with this latest proclamation.

Hey, it even has the gold seal of the State of Louisiana.

Copies of the proclamation were not sent to individual employees, however; it was simply sent out in a mass email – in color, so recipients could see that the seal was really gold. Every employee got one, even those that Jindal doesn’t particularly appreciate—all 50,000 thousand or so of them.

It’s a curious thing how Jindal can even bring himself to go along with National Public Employee Appreciation Day. The very notion reeks with hypocrisy and is nothing more than just another slap in the collective faces of public employees he unquestionably holds in utter contempt—a feeling that is almost certainly reciprocal.

But in spite of the bitter irony, it is amusing to see someone, even for a fleeting moment, try to put on a sincere face when announcing Public Employee Appreciation Day. The image of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (form whom Jindal campaigned and who is the subject of a statewide recall effort) offers a priceless image as he issued his proclamation:

http://www.avclub.com/madison/articles/walker-announces-state-employee-appreciation-day-o,55674/

For those who have an affinity for the inane, there are the following suggestions from the national employee appreciation group designed to make happy:

• Create a bingo card of 16 blocks. In each block print humorous or interesting personal facts about each team member;

• Invite all employees to participate in a paper airplane throwing competition;

• Hold team mock elections to recognize key employees for positive attributes;

• Distribute five coins to employees who in turn distribute their coins to co-workers throughout the day as a form of recognition whenever they observe co-workers being helpful or doing a great job. At the end of the day the employee with the most coins wins prizes and public recognition.

No jokes, folks. These are actual serious suggestions to give you that warm fuzzy. In that same vein, Piyush, in his proclamation, says:

• Louisiana’s state employees contribute significantly to the well-being and quality of life for all citizens of our state; and

• Louisiana’s state employees preserve public safety and the health of our citizens; protect our clean air and water; care for less fortunate members of society; rehabilitate and counsel people in need; preserve our economic well-being by attracting and supporting commerce; build and maintain our highways, schools and other infrastructure; administer justice; protect citizens’ rights; care for victims of crimes; inspect our food; license our vehicles; help educate our children; make astounding advances in medicine, science and technology; and handle a host of other essential duties the public entrusts to them; and

• The dedicated individual strive daily7 to perform their jobs with professionalism and integrity in order to improve the lives of our citizens; and

• State government is more responsive, innovative, and effective because outstanding employees produce excellent work products.

There’s more but you get the idea. Some people have it and some people don’t. Piyush is full of it.

And as lagniappe, just in case you missed it, CNN.com carried a lengthy story on-line by writer David Frum on Wednesday speculating that Piyush just might be back on the short list for Mitt Romney’s vice presidential running mate. In language that may be a bit over the heads of us ignorant Louisianians, Frum described the potential choice of an Asian running mate like Jindal as “a doozy.”

The best part of the story was the photo that accompanied the article. It’s a shot of Piyush, obviously posing for the camera as he surveys the scene during the infamous BP oil spill. He’s probably envisioning where he wants to place his ill-fated berms. The only thing missing from this ridiculous Gen. George S. Pattonesque pose are the .45 caliber revolvers that would be strapped around his waist but for the fact they kept falling down past his hips.

Frum, writing as someone about as detached from reality as Jindal himself, further described Piyush as someone with “a brilliant policy mind with an inspirational life story who has run an effective government in corruption-tainted Louisiana (Frum obviously has not run a check on Jindal’s campaign contributions). He can talk data with Romney and credibly sit at the kitchen tables of the struggling middle class.”

Wait. What?

When has he ever sat at any table with anyone from the “struggling middle class?”

Appearances at Protestant churches in Dry Prong and Punkin Center don’t count.

But don’t take our word for it. Here is the link to Frum’s story:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/02/opinion/frum-vice-president-rubio-jindal/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Occasionally, we like to run essays or commentaries by guest columnists. The following parody was written by a state employee who, for reasons easy to comprehend given the current outbreak of Sudden Teaugeing Syndrome (STS) in state government, has chosen the alias of Louis Jordan, a ’30s and ’40s jazz artist of whom our guest writer is a fan.

(Ring, Ring, Ring!)

Employee Smith: Hello.

Agent Nichols: Hello, Mr. Smith. This is Agent Nichols calling on behalf of Bayou State Bank. Do you have a few minutes to discuss your home mortgage with me?

Employee Smith: Actually Ms. Nichols, I’m kind of busy right now. In fact, I’m an employee of Bayou State Bank, and as I’m sure you know we in the tax division have been asked to do more with less. And since this is tax season, I’m kind of swamped. Can you make this quick?

Agent Nichols: I can certainly make this quick Mr. Smith. But first, I just wanted to let you know that we at B.S. Bank we really appreciate all your hard work and dedication. In fact, May 9 is Employee Appreciation Day and you’re allowed to wear jeans to work.

Employee Smith: Thanks Ms. Nichols. What’s up?

Agent Nichols: I was calling to let you know that you qualify for our mortgage modification program!

Employee Smith: Really? Thank goodness! My wife and I have always paid our mortgage payments timely, so I never looked into anything like this. But this is great news, because we’ve been struggling lately. Gas prices have gone up. Our health insurance premiums keep getting higher. And as you know, B.S. Bank hasn’t given us raises in a few years. This really couldn’t come at a better time.

Agent Nichols: Actually Mr. Smith, we over here in the administration division just got a raise.

Employee Smith: Umm…Ok. Thanks for rubbing it in.

Agent Nichols: Anyways, it will just take a few minutes to go over the details of how we will be modifying your mortgage. First thing we will be doing is raising your interest rate from 8% to 11%.

Employee Smith: Wait…What? You’re raising my interest rate? Did I misunderstand you?

Agent Nichols: No Mr. Smith, I didn’t stutter. In addition to raising your interest rate by 3%, we will also be requiring you to make payments on your loan for an additional 10 years.

Employee Smith: Is this some kind of joke? Is this a prank call? Is this Kellie Rasberry from Kidd Kraddick in the Morning?

Agent Nichols: No Mr. Smith, I assure you this is the real Ms. Nichols and I’m serious. We feel that these modifications will help B.S. Bank maintain long-term financial stability. As you are aware, we have gotten ourselves into a precarious position. Prior to CEO Bobby’s tenure, the B.S. Bank decided to expand its operations to other areas of the state. This created a need for additional capital. In addition, we have made some bad investment decisions, the market has not been doing so well, and years ago we decided not to make necessary payments to fund future obligations. And to top it all off, CEO Bobby decided it would make good business sense to loan all new corporations however much money they needed to finance their operations at a super low interest rate of 2%. All of these factors have put us in jeopardy of defaulting on our own loans. For these reasons we feel it is necessary to raise revenue and reduce our long-term obligations.

Employee Smith: I’m so confused. What does any of this have to do with me?

Agent Nichols: What is there to be confused about Mr. Smith? The reality is that we feel the employees of our bank should finance our debt by having the terms of their personal mortgages involuntarily adjusted.

Employee Smith: So is this something that you are doing for all employees of B.S. Bank? Because there is no way that the employees of the identity protection division will go along with this. Not to mention the outrage it will cause with employees of the customer education division.

Agent Nichols: Honestly, CEO Bobby is not really concerned about what his employees think. He just fired the head of the reverse mortgage division for disagreeing with him. But since you asked, he feels that the employees of identity protection division are entitled to full ownership of their homes before you because of the unique nature of their job. And he just got finished outsourcing a large part of the customer education department to India, so he doesn’t want to piss them off anymore than he already has.

Employee Smith: This is ridiculous. Are you sure this is the real Ms. Nichols, because none of this makes sense? I signed a contract with B.S. Bank years ago, stating that if I paid my mortgage for 30 years, at an interest rate of 8%, I would own the title to my home. How can you change the terms of our agreement halfway through the terms of our contract? Is this legal?

Agent Nichols: Again, I assure you this is the real Ms. Nichols. And we feel there is firm legal precedence to unilaterally impose this mortgage modification program on our employees. We have based our legal analysis on regulations enacted by the First Bank of the United States.

Employee Smith: Ms. Nichols, the First Bank of the United States ceased to exist in 1811.

(silence)

Employee Smith: Hello, are you still there?

Agent Nichols: Yes, I’m still here. I guess we didn’t think of that.

Employee Smith: It sounds like you didn’t think of a lot of things. Didn’t the Bank of Uncle Sam recently reduce mortgage rates by 2% for all of its customers to help them out? Didn’t CEO Bobby support that? And I thought CEO Bobby was a proponent of low interest rates?

Agent Nichols: Yes, Yes, and Yes. But that isn’t relevant to this discussion. Honestly, CEO Bobby really wants to be the CEO of the Bank of Uncle Sam, and he thinks enacting this loan modification program will help him achieve that goal.

Employee Smith: I could care less about CEO Bobby’s future plans. I am just trying to live my life as simply as possible. All I want to do is raise my kids, love my wife, walk my dog, be involved in my community, and one day own my home. Is that too much to ask? There is no way that the Board of Directors will go along with this. Has CEO Bobby contacted Chairman Chuck for his opinion?

Agent Nichols: Chairman Chuck is a member of the American Bankers Exchange Council (ABEC), and ABEC is a proponent of the mortgage modification programs. In truth, ABEC is the organization that is spear heading these programs nationwide. We feel that we have the support of the entire Board of Directors of Bayou State Bank. Actually, the Committee on Mortgage Modification just recently approved our plan.

Employee Smith: I can’t believe the entire Board will go along with something so blatantly inequitable, unfair, illegal, and discriminatory. I have faith that they will reign in CEO Bobby’s arrogant behavior. But I have to be honest Ms. Smith; I’m really questioning my loyalty to B.S. Bank. If I would have known how you treated your employees and customers, I would have never applied for a mortgage with B.S. Bank, much less sought employment here.

Agent Nichols: I’m sorry you feel that way Mr. Smith. Just please remember that we really do appreciate all of your hard work and dedication. However, you can always sell your house and move.

Employee Smith: Is that what this is really about? Are you trying to force me out of my home? Please remember that it is not just a building that provides shelter to me and my family. It is my home, and it is the only home I know. We are members of the local church, our kids go to school in the area, we love our neighbors, and we are completely vested in the community. There has to be another way.

Agent Nichols: I’m sorry Mr. Smith, but CEO Bobby has decided that this is the way it is going to be. You really don’t have many options. You can either accept our terms or you can sell your house and move. Have a good day. And remember, we are watching you.

(click)

Employee Smith: Wait…What the heck just happened?

Remember how during his first term of office, Gov. Piyush Jindal hop-scotched all over north Louisiana in that state helicopter to witness his Christian faith at all those Protestant churches from Shongaloo to Dry Prong, from Farmerville to Plaucheville, from Winnfield to Winnsboro?

Sorta gave you a warm fuzzy to see the leader of the state professing his love for his fellow man—unless, of course, you offend him by doing something really audacious, like thinking for yourself or formulating an opinion of your own.

That seems to be where the trouble begins and Christian charity abruptly ends.

After what we’ve seen in four years-plus of this governor, what administrator would ever be bold enough to give a straight answer to a legislative committee?

Let’s review:

• January 2008—The echo of his first oath of office had barely died out when it was learned that Jindal was being fined $2,500 for failure to disclose more than $118,000 in direct mail expenses the Louisiana Republican Party made on his behalf.

He subsequently pushed through a bill that literally gutted the Ethics Board by transferring power to an ethics adjudicatory panel, prompting the resignations of all but one member, including Ethics Administrator Richard Sherburne who resigned in protest on June 26, 2008.

Not that Jindal holds a grudge or anything, but a whole four years later, ethics board Chairman Frank Simoneaux of Baton Rouge was mysteriously snubbed for a second term on the board after he had been critical of interaction between the ethics board and the ethics adjudicatory panel to which Jindal had orchestrated the power transfer in 2008.

• March 26, 2008—Jim Champagne, executive director of the Louisiana Highway Safety Commission, was fired barely two months into Jindal’s first term. His sin? He opposed Piyush’s campaign promise to repeal the motorcycle helmet law.

• May of 2008—Jindal successfully fights for repeal of Stelly tax plan which has cost the state about $300 million per year in revenue.

• September 15, 2008—Ann Williamson, Secretary of the Department of Social Services, is forced out after criticism of shelter conditions following Hurricane Gustav and problems with a post-storm food stamp program.

In what would be a prophetic utterance, Jindal promised more changes “sooner rather than later.”

• 2009—It’s learned that Jindal has appointed more than 200 campaign contributors who donated more than $784,000 to his election campaign in 2007 and 2008 to positions in state government. Jindal sought to prevent the divulging of the information by helping to kill a bill that would have required him to disclose the names of campaign contributors appointed to government posts.

• May of 2009—Jindal opposes and eventually succeeds in killing House Bill 169 which would have extended the Public Records Act to the governor’s office. Jindal, aka Mr. Transparency, said the bill would violate executive privilege.

• May of 2009—Republican Party Chairman Roger Villere is called upon to resign after he sent a public records request to a Republican legislative leader who was critical of Jindal. This act would be repeated in 2012.

• June of 2009—Board of Elementary and Secondary Education member Tammie McDaniel, was asked by Jindal to resign because she didn’t agree with some of the administration’s public education policies. She resisted until Feb. 11, 2010, when she finally acquiesced.

• August 21, 2009—Despite backing for the project from businessmen, Gov. Jindal rejects federal stimulus funds to construct a light rail system between New Orleans and Baton Rouge.

• October 1, 2009—Melody Teague, a Social Services grant reviewer, testified in opposition to Jindal’s plan to streamline government during legislative hearings. She was fired the following day, ostensibly not for her testimony but for her overall job performance. She appealed and got her job back six months later.

• February 5, 2010—Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) Secretary William Ankner fell on his own sword when he resigned after Coastal Bridge Co. filed a lawsuit against the state after Boh Bros. Construction Co., with a high bid and the longest time for completion, was nevertheless awarded a $60 million contract to widen a stretch of I-10 in Baton Rouge.

Robert S. Boh, one of the company’s owners, and the company itself combined to contribute $11,000 to Gov. Jindal’s gubernatorial campaigns between 2003 and 2011.

Coastal Bridge, meanwhile, contributed $5,000 to Jindal’s campaign between 2003 and 2010. Perhaps Coastal felt it was entitled to at least half the work.

• August 13, 2010—Gov. Jindal demands the resignation of State Alcohol and Tobacco Control Secretary Murphy Painter after Painter twice refused to comply with directives from the governor’s office to issue a permit to SMG, the New Orleans Superdome management company, that would allow Budweiser to erect at large tent and signage in Champions Square.

Budweiser had offered $300,000 to the Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District to sponsor the tent for tailgating parties at Saints home games. Painter, who said SMG never addressed compliance requirements of his office, was not only fired, but was subjected to sexual harassment and stalking charges. Nearly two years later, however, criminal proceedings still have not been initiated against Painter.

• April 15, 2011—Melody Teague’s husband, Tommy Teague, was canned as director of the Office of Group Benefits (OGB) despite the fact he had taken the agency from a $30 million deficit to a $500 million surplus in a scant five years. The problem was he didn’t jump on board the administration’s privatization plan quickly enough. His successor, Scott Kipper, lasted six weeks before leaving in disgust.

At issue was the $49,999.99 Chaffe Report on the advantages and pitfalls of the proposed OGB privatization. At first, Jindal refused to release the report to a legislative committee but eventually it was “leaked” to the media. Trouble is, the administration had said the report was received on May 25, 2011, but was confidential. The “leaked” copy was signed off on by the administration on June 7, two week after it said it received the report. Moreover, none of the pages of the report were date stamped, which is strictly against policy. This cast doubt on the validity of the “leaked” report and led to speculation that there may have been two versions of the Chaffe report.

• May 2011—Department of Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein refused to divulge to a legislative committee who the winning bidder was on a $300 million contract with his agency. It was learned later that the winning bid came from a firm for whom Greenstein once worked and despite his denials that he had discussed the bid with his old company, emails subpoenaed by the committee indicated otherwise.

• October 19, 2011—Gov. Jindal refuses to apply for a federal grant that could have meant $60 million in early childhood education funding for Louisiana.

• October 27, 2011—Bryan Jeansonne, law partner of State Republican Executive Director Jason Dore sends emails to parish school superintendents throughout the state making a public records request of all emails between the superintendents and school employees.

• October 27, 2011—It was learned that the state lost an $80 million federal grant to expand the reach of broadband Internet to rural and poor areas of the state. Jindal rejected the grant after a political contributor was forced to resign from the Board of Regents when it was revealed he had a contract with the Regents for a high speed fiber optics internet project. Jindal said he felt the job could be done by the private sector. It was also learned that AT&T, a Jindal supporter, had opposed the grant.

• February 1, 2012—Larry Dorsey, administrator of University Medical Center (UMC) in Lafayette, acting no doubt on orders from above, sent an email to his employees that they were not to attend a rally in protest of the elimination of 130 positions at the hospital, whether they were “on or off the clock.” Dorsey said that violation of his directive may result in disciplinary action.

Civil Service rules clearly allow state employees, particularly those “off the clock” to attend protests, carry signs and sign petitions.

• Also on February 1, 2012—The Civil Service Board rejected a proposal by DHH Center for Health Care Innovation and Technology chief Carol Steckel to abolish 69 information technology (IT) positions and to fire the employees because of inadequate documentation to justify the layoff.

Problem was, the IT employees had already been informed by teleconference that they would lose their jobs and upon returning to their work stations they found they were locked out of their computers. Because of the Civil Service Board’s action, they were reinstated but in a retaliatory measure because some had complained to LouisianaVoice, all annual leave applications by the employees were rejected.

• February 8, 2012—LSU Systems President John Lombardi obediently sent an email to his administrators to ask that they not complain about the proposed elimination of 2,837 positions in higher education. “…the administration does not think it helpful to have complicated or difficult or contentious higher education initiatives brought before the legislature,” he said, adding that the administration would appreciate it if higher ed officials recognize that the budget “gives higher ed special treatment and thank the administration for their attention and concern for higher ed.”

In theory, Lombardi was toeing the line and complying with the governor’s request that higher ed officials thank him for his benevolence. In reality, Jindal was dangling a carrot in the form of a promise of $100 million for higher ed should Jindal’s retirement package pass.

• March 6, 2012—Mary Manuel, executive director of the Office of Elderly Affairs, testified that she was never informed of Jindal’s intent to transfer her agency from the governor’s office to DHH. The following day she was fired. She said she was summoned to testify by Rep. John Berthelot (R-Gonzales). Berthelot, as expected, threw her under the bus by never coming to her defense.

• March 6, 2012—Rep. Harold Richie (D-Bogalusa), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, voted against a tax rebate for those who donate money for scholarships to private and parochial schools, a bill being pushed by Jindal. The next day he was stripped of his vice chairmanship of the House Committee on Insurance by House Speaker Chuck Kleckley (R-Lake Charles). Committee Chairman Greg Cromer (R-Slidell) was not informed of the action beforehand nor did he have a voice in naming Richie’s replacement.

• March 14, 2012—State Rep. Nancy Landry (R-Lafayette), in a transparent effort to out teachers who took off work to protest the administration’s education bills, made a motion for all those speaking for or against the bills to tell their names, where they are from and whom they represent (normal procedure) to also inform the committee if they were present before the committee on annual or sick leave—something that committee member John Bel Edwards (D-Amite) pointed out was unprecedented.

Even when it was determined the committee could not refuse testimony if speakers refused to divulge that information, Landry proceeded to push her silly, petulant, toothless motion through and sure enough, when Gov. Jindal testified, he neglected to inform the committee if he was on annual or sick leave.

• March 26, 2012—As the debate raged over the administration’s attempt to force state employees to work longer and pay more for drastically reduced retirement benefits, Gov. Jindal was quietly buying back 2.2 years of time in order to enhance his own state retirement.

• April 25, 2012—Sen. Daniel Martiny (R-Metairie) proved that a hack is not always a taxi as he fought a bill by Sen. Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge) which would have prevented legislators from leaving the House or Senate and taking six-figure political jobs in order to boost their state retirement.

Even as the administration was still trying to come up with a way to rape state employees of their retirement benefits, Martiny went into a snit against Claitor’s bill—possibly because he was one of a handful qualified to take advantage of the loophole.

The bill was defeated even as it became known that former legislators had been appointed to lucrative jobs for which they possessed few, if any, qualifications. Cases in point included Noble Ellington of Winnsboro, appointed to the second position in the Department of Insurance at $150,000 per year; Jane Smith of Bossier City, appointed to position of Deputy Secretary in the Department of Revenue at $107,500 per year; Troy Hebert of Jeanerette, appointed Commissioner of the Louisiana Alcohol and Tobacco Control Board at $107,500 per year; Kay Katz of Monroe, named member of the Louisiana Tax Commission at $56,000 per year; Nick Gautreaux of Meaux, named Commissioner of the Office of Motor Vehicles at $107,000; Tank Powell and M. J. “Mert” Smiley, both named to the pardon board at $36,000 per year—Smiley to serve only until he takes office as Ascension Parish tax assessor; former St. Tammany Parish President Kevin Davis, named Director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness at $165,000, and former St. Bernard Parish President Craig Taffaro, new Director of Hazard Mitigation and Recovery at $150,000 per year.

• April 27, 2012—The LSU Board of Supervisors, knuckling under to the Gestapo tactics of Gov. Jindal, fires LSU system President John Lombardi. Two days before, Lombardi told the House Education Committee it was attempting to fix a problem that does not exist with a bill that would allow the state’s higher education boards to vary the state funding formula for college campuses by up to 5 percent. It was a bill favored by Jindal.

Lombardi has never been known for his diplomacy and the one cardinal sin one does not commit in Louisiana is upstaging Piyush.

One must now wonder if the governor may now withdraw that offer of $100 million he promised to higher ed from the savings he’d anticipated from his retirement reform.

It would seem now that it would be practically impossible to attract qualified candidates for Lombardi’s position. What university administrator with any intelligence would even entertain the thought of coming into this politically-charged atmosphere? It’s a dead-end job at best, rife with political land mines.

For that matter, what agency director of department head would dare give a candid account of his agency or department at this stage of the game? Heads roll far too easily for anyone to speak openly. The ambivalence was palpable just last week when cabinet secretaries testified about the future of their agencies.

Department of Transportation and Development Secretary Sherri LeBas, asked if her department was likely to lose engineers or truck drivers to the administration’s proposed retirement changes, said “It’s really hard to say.”

Really? The Louisiana State Employees Retirement System (LASERS) knows. They would tell the secretary that employees are lined up to get retirement counseling prior to Jindal’s retirement changes being adopted—changes that the Legislative Auditor and LASERS each say are unconstitutional. That’s because LASERS is beyond the reach of a vindictive Jindal.

State Police Col. Mike Edmonson, ever the political/social climber, said legislators should not worry about the number of employees in the Department of Public Safety who might retire because if necessary, he would work traffic accidents. “Public safety is my number one priority,” he said. Yeah, right. That and photo ops with Jindal.

Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Lane Carson (a former legislator who moved into his secure state job) said he would defer to his finance manager.

His agency’s undersecretary, Tom Burbank, said he is waiting to see the outcome of the final retirement legislation before taking the time to assess the situation.

LASERS has projected as many as 21 percent of all state civil service employees are eligible for retirement.

That’s candor you won’t find from an appointed state employee.

Thanks to Piyush’s ongoing reign of terror.

“People are going from the Legislature to other branches of government and spiking their retirement benefits.”

–Sen. Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge) speaking in support of his Senate Bill 727 which would have prohibited lawmakers from leaving the legislature for high-paying state jobs and joining the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS) to boost their retirement incomes–particularly at a time when the administration is trying to gut retirement benefits for rank and file state employees.

“We have a bad reputation in this state as legislators and public officials because we keep filing bills like this and telling people we are crooks.”

–Sen. Dan Martiny (R-Metairie), in a snit as he spoke out against Claitor’s bill, possibly because it might one day adversely impact his own retirement. The Senate defeated Claitor’s bill, thus doing nothing to dispel Martiny’s perception of legislative ideals.

Even as the administration pushes back floor debate on Gov. Piyush Jindal’s retirement reform for state workers, the full Senate on Wednesday made sure that its members were protected.

While thousands of state employees faced the uncertainty of their careers and retirement years, 35 members of the upper chamber, led by Sen. Daniel Martiny, a self righteous Metairie Republican, flipped a collective bird at state civil service workers in particular and Louisiana citizens in general.

And worst of all, Martiny had the unmitigated gall to accuse a Senate colleague of grandstanding.

Pot, meet Kettle. Kettle, Pot.

The furor was over Senate Bill 727 by Dan Claitor (R-Baton Rouge), which would have barred a few members of the Senate and a couple of former members from membership in the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS).

The legislature passed a law a few years back prohibiting members of the House and Senate from joining LASERS but the law “grandfathered in” those legislators who were already LASERS members.

Martiny is one of those. The others are Sharon Weston Broome and Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb, both Baton Rouge Democrats, Ed Murray (D-New Orleans) and John Smith (R-Leesville).

Claitor’s bill also would have provided that any legislator who is presently a member of LASERS as of June 30, 2012, may retain accrued service credit but that those members “on and after July 1, 2012, be ineligible to be a member of the system” and that employee and employer contributions would cease as of July 1.

Had the bill passed, it would have adversely affected two formers members of the legislature—former Rep. Noble Ellington (R-Winnsboro) and former Sen. Troy Hebert (D-Jeanerette).

Ellington, the immediate past national president of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), did not seek re-election last fall after 24 years in the legislature. He was promptly hired to the number-two job in the Department of Insurance at $150,000 even though Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon said at the time of his hiring that Ellington had virtually no experience in insurance.

Hebert was hired by Jindal to head the Louisiana Alcohol and Tobacco Control Board at $107,800.

Their higher salaries stand to have a significantly positive impact on their retirement incomes—at a time when Jindal is attempting to rip the heart out of state employees’ retirement by making them pay more and to work longer to qualify for fewer benefits.

Claitor said legislative pay ranges from $30,000 to $38,000 per year but now that Ellington’s retirement can be based at least partially on his higher salary, he stands to reap much greater benefits.

Martiny, with a flair for the obvious—and the dramatic—pouted and then ranted in arguing against Claitor’s bill.

In short, he threw a hissy fit.

Of course, being one of the five senators who are still members of LASERS, he had no dog in that hunt; nothing self-serving there by the good senator.

No retirement reform for legislators either—just for state civil service employees. Screw the employees but take care of our own.
Can you say “double standard?”

Ellington and Hebert “are doing the job,” he said of the two former legislators-cum-unclassified fat cats.

How would he know what kind of job Ellington is doing? For that matter, what does he know about Hebert’s job performance? Has he seen their personnel performance evaluations?

Could it possibly be that he would lavish such praise because all three are current or former members of ALEC?

ALEC is a tight fraternity comprised mostly of Republican legislators from across the U.S., but there are a few Democrat members as well, including fellow senators Francis Thompson of Delhi, David Heitmeier of New Orleans, Elbert Guillory of Opelousas, and Ben Nevers of Bogalusa.

In fact, no fewer than 16 of the 39 members of the Louisiana State Senate are members of ALEC.

They include Senate President John Alario (R-Westwego), Robert Adley (R-Benton), Norbert Chabert (R-Houma), A.G. Crowe (R-Pearl River), Heitmeier, Gerald Long (R-Natchitoches), Martiny, Dan Morrish (R-Jennings), Nevers Neil Riser (R-Columbia), Thompson, Mike Walsworth (R-West Monroe), and Mack “Bodi” White (R-Central).

To a person, they were among the 35 senators who effectively defeated Claitor’s bill by returning it to the calendar where bills go to die.

Only two joined Claitor in voting against killing the bill. They were Karen Carter Peterson (D-New Orleans) and Jody Amedee (R-Gonzales).

We would never say that ALEC money may have influenced the vote but consider this: thirteen of the 35 senators who voted to kill the bill received a combined $239,600 from ALEC member corporations and when you add the $65,000 received by Ellington while he was in office, that total jumps to $304,600.

Perhaps there’s no connection between the vote and the ALEC corporations but certainly is peculiar how ALEC beneficiaries all tend to vote together on controversial issues.

Here’s the breakdown on contributions by ALEC:

• Alario—$14,500;

• Adley—$49,900;

• Chabert—$7,000;

• Crowe—$3,000;

• Heitmeier—$8,000;

• Long—$26,000;

• Martiny—$36,000;

• Morrish—$5,500;

• Riser—$7,000;

• Thompson—$8,000;

• Walsworth—$9,000;

• White—$8,500;

• Guillory—$45,200.

“We have a bad reputation in this state as legislators and public officials because we keep filing bills like this and telling people we are crooks,” Martiny said during floor debate. “It’s sad when we have to grandstand on one another.”

Well, Senator, we never said you were a crook. Those are your words.

As for our description of your performance, however, arrogant, idiotic, duplicitous, hypocritical, embarrassing buffoonery does come to mind.

And yes, it indeed is sad when you grandstand.

Because we are watching.