Feeds:
Posts
Comments

By Ryan West

In a 25-minute-long speech billed as a “rebuttal” to President Obama’s inaugural address, Governor Bobby Jindal unleashed his plan to rebrand the GOP. While Jindal’s plan to reshape the GOP embraces “competing for every single vote” and “rejecting identity politics”, I think it’s critical to see the distinction between Jindal’s national rhetoric and his performance as Louisiana’s governor.

Across the country, pundits have embraced Jindal for his enthusiasm to “speak truth to GOP power.” The New York Times praised Jindal’s speech for recognizing “the urgent need to make the party more welcoming to a broader cross-section of Americans, particularly women, Hispanics and blacks.” Politico called it “a version of Ronald Reagan’s ‘New Federalism’ on steroids.” CNN jumped on the Jindal bandwagon by stating Jindal “further positioned himself as a forward-looking voice among the Republicans thought to have their eye on a White House bid in 2016.” However, the national praise that Jindal received does not match the reality of the disastrous effect his policies have taken on Louisiana’s families.

In his speech to the national Republicans, Jindal mocked the budget-cutting focus of the GOP. “By obsessing with zeroes on the budget spreadsheet, we send a not-so-subtle signal that the focus of our country is on the phony economy of Washington, instead of the real economy out here in Charlotte, and Shreveport (La.), and Cheyenne (Wyo.).” Yet, when you truly look at his actions, Jindal only mocks himself given his unrelenting focus on budget cuts in Louisiana.

He stated, “We must not become the party of austerity.” Meanwhile back home in Louisiana, his efforts of austerity are eliminating services for the mentally ill, cutting services for disabled children and only creating a panic in families in need of help.

One day before his big speech, Jindal was forced to reverse himself on what is one of his ugliest policy decisions: cutting Medicaid funding for hospice care. This reversal is not due to the outrage from the people of Louisiana but due to negative spotlight he received on the national level.

Yet as Jindal stated, “we as Republicans have to accept that government number crunching – even conservative number crunching – is not the answer to our nation’s problems,” other cruel budget cuts in Louisiana are set to stand – cuts to battered women’s shelter programs, to higher education, preschool programs, anti-truancy efforts and a range of other efforts to make life better for working people. Governor Jindal has demonstrated a complete disregard to access to health care by dismantling public hospitals with no plan for care for the uninsured, rejecting the expansion of Medicaid and healthcare exchanges and denying 400,000 Louisianans the ability to access quality health care through the Affordable Care Act.

In his latest effort to grab national headlines, Jindal wants to swap the state’s income and corporate tax with a more regressive sales tax. In 2011, Governor Jindal vetoed a 4 cent tax renewal on cigarettes and now in 2013 he wants to eliminate income taxes and raise the cigarette tax by a $1 and add 4 cents on sales taxes.

This “tax swap” will dramatically raise taxes for 80% of Louisianans—the people who work for a living or who are retired on a fixed income trying to maintain some quality to their lives. Meanwhile, Governor Jindal has sponsored corporate tax exemptions of over $4 billion to support big corporations.

Jindal thinks he can help his party. How do you ask? “The first step in getting the voters to like you is to demonstrate that you like them,” that’s about it. He rejects “identity politics.”

Back in the real world, Jindal is the Governor of one of the poorest states in the country where more than 32% of the population are African American. In Louisiana, Governor Jindal has made no effort to work with African American leaders, ministers or even legislators. His personal disdain and disrespect for leaders in his own state is very real. How hypocritical is it to now want to like other ethnic groups. He is only offering the GOP a novel, post-racial approach to equal opportunity- say one thing and do another.

Oh, and then there was this: “We’ve got to stop being the stupid party. I’m serious; it’s time for a new Republican Party that talks like adults.” This is far from his recent actions of demonizing teachers and state employees, while pushing through policies that would teach Louisiana’s youth that at one point in history humans relied on dinosaurs for transportation. Bobby Jindal is the Governor that supports creationism, disdains history and mocks educational leaders.

Clearly, Jindal is going to get credit for the slightest affirmation of the growing diversity of the United States, even if his actions back home don’t match the actions he is touting around the country. The acclaim for Jindal’s speech is an example of bigotry by the mainstream media: “the soft bigotry of low expectations,” to use one of George W. Bush’s few good lines.

Rather than focusing on his image to the national media, the Governor should put his presidential aspirations aside and focus on the problems citizens face every day in Louisiana.

By Stephen Winham

Back when we were first leaked information about Governor Jindal’s tax reform “proposal”, it seemed to actually be a plan, and a relatively simple one, at that – eliminate income taxes and replace them with increased sales taxes. It was hard to see how an increase of only 3 cents in sales tax could replace the lost income tax revenue, but that could be managed by taxing things we don’t currently tax. Even minimizing the effect on the poor seemed possible, if not probable. Many people, including me, did not think it was a good proposal for many reasons, but it was a something that could have been deliberated and given a thumbs up or down by the legislature.

With each subsequent report, the first half of the “plan” (elimination of income taxes) seems to remain firm while the second half (raising sales taxes) becomes less and less settled. Now we hear of a variety of other options to be worked out in meetings with legislators and in consideration of the multitude of studies that have been, and are being done on the subject of tax reform. If the options have become limitless, there is actually no self-reconciling plan and this proposal is essentially the same as the heavily-criticized bills in recent legislative sessions to simply eliminate income taxes with no replacement of the lost revenue.

Governor Jindal has already achieved a major (a cynic might say, the only) goal of this proposal – getting extensive national media coverage for making a bold proposal to fix Louisiana’s budget and economic development problems. The probability that it would do neither, even if it was an actual plan, is irrelevant. The local media have been a little more cautious and balanced in their reporting, but Governor Jindal’s adherents remain steadfast in support of his ideology and can dismiss any negatives as reflective of a liberal bias.
If anything ultimately comes of this, we can only hope the enactments will result in budgetary stability and that the revenue forecasts for the changes will not be overly-optimistic. It is not possible to isolate and evaluate effective, efficient state programs in a constant state of crisis. Nor is it possible for businesses to adequately plan for future growth. Prolonged, avoidable instability is fair to neither our citizens nor our business sector.

Sometimes we miss a good story but with the help of our readers we usually catch up—even if it does take a year—or two.

Normally, we’d let a story this old slide into oblivion and chalk it up as one we missed. But this is just too bizarre not to go back and pick it up, thanks to a reader’s sending the slate.com link to the story our way.

The apparent ignorance of one state senator on the subject of evolution can only be described as surreal while the arrogance of a former state senator can serve to make us thankful she’s not around any longer.

During last year’s legislative session, Baton Rouge native Zack Kopplin, now a student at Rice University, was testifying before a state Senate committee on a bill to allow supplemental materials to be used by teachers in science classrooms.

The bill, SB 374 by Sen. Karen Carter Peterson (D-New Orleans) was just what the creationist legislators did not want because it provided for the teaching of evolution and global warming.

Kopplin, 19, describes himself as a Christian but opposes the teaching of creationism to the exclusion of traditional science. During the hearings, he was testifying about the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA) that allows the teaching of creationism when Sen. Mike Walsworth (R-West Monroe) asked for a specific example of evolution.

Science teacher Darlene Reaves, responding to his request, described an experiment involving E.coli in which different samples were separated, and after several generations, one of the strains mutated and gained the ability to metabolize—an actual demonstration how the bacteria was able to evolve.

That’s when things got a little weird. Walsworth, ever alert for anything that might undermine the holy grail of creationism (if not overly enlightened about the bacterium that causes diarrhea from raw milk, undercooked meat and contaminated water), asked an incredulous question: “They (the E. coli bacteria) evolve into a person?”

Just in case you believe we’re making that up, here is the link to the exchange: http://www.youtube.com/embed/hQObhb3veQA?autoplay=&wmode=transparent

Ignorance on a scale of this magnitude is frightening enough but when that person is one of 39 senators who make laws that affect the rest of us, it’s downright terrifying.

Almost as bad was the haughtiness displayed by then-Sen. Julie Quinn (R-Metairie) during hearings on SB 70 by Peterson in 2011. (Both SB 70 in 2011 and SB 374 in 2012 were identical in calling for the repeal of LSEA and neither passed.)

Kopplin is again testifying when he is interrupted by Quinn. “That wasn’t what I asked,” she said, “and I am an attorney and I listened patiently to all the accolades that everyone has, all the little letters behind their names, doctor, etc. So, as an attorney, I am asking a question and I would like an answer to that question: do you support a law that prohibits the teaching of religion in the classroom?”

(First of all, when you are sitting on a Senate committee, Ms. Quinn, you are not an attorney; you are a state senator, no better or worse than the senator sitting beside you who might be a plumber or a horticulturalist. And your twice referring to yourself as an attorney while disparaging witnesses who went to school far longer than you to earn advanced degrees by referring them as having “little letters behind their names” is beneath contempt.)

Again, she asked Kopplin, “Do you support the promotion of religion in English class?”

Without missing a beat, Kopplin responded, “The Bible is always used in most English classes because it’s a classic piece of literature.”

Quinn throws up her hands at this point, scooting her chair back and shaking her head in apparent condescension as Peterson, seated at the witness table to testify on behalf of her bill, explained, “Promotion would be the key word in response.”

But then Peterson had her own rejoinder that again had Quinn, an ardent proponent of creationism, sneering in good, Christian derision.

“I don’t think Senate Bill 70 deals specifically with creationism in science classes and that’s why you see the plethora of people with ‘little letters behind their names.”

“I wasn’t trying to be disrespectful,” Quinn said somewhat defensively.

“I’m very respectful of over 40 Nobel laureates,” Peterson said. “I’m very respectful of the Association of Biology Teachers.” (Quinn rolls her eyes here and, mouth open, looks at her colleagues on the committee as if asking for help in shutting Peterson up.) “I’m very respectful of the Louisiana Association of Biology Educators,” Peterson continued. “I’m very respectful of the (unintelligible because the committee chairman attempted to cut Peterson off) Science Teachers Association, I’m very respectful of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and I’m respectful of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, as well as American Society for Cell Biology, and the Society for Vertebrae Paleontology and lastly, the American Association for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

“And yes, they have little, medium and big letters behind their names and they’re all suggesting that we repeal the act,” she said.

Here’s the link to their exchange. Watch the body language of Sen. Quinn. http://www.youtube.com/embed/3e2zPfsNe-w?autoplay=&wmode=transparent

Even though Peterson has twice failed to gain passage of her bill, word is she’s going to try again this year.

We can’t wait to watch and listen to the testimony to see which legislator will play the lead buffoon this time.

Okay, campers, this is something a little different than anything we’ve ever done before.

A reader who also happens to be a friend suggested this idea and I promptly told him we were going to plagiarize him.

He didn’t say no, so here goes.

This is a game, a contest, that we’re going to call Name That Road as inspired by the following article in the Baton Rouge Advocate:

http://theadvocate.com/home/4984066-125/new-frothing-bubble-site-found

This is a story about 11 new bubble sites that have been found in the inundated swampland west of the 8.5-acre sinkhole in northern Assumption Parish, including a frothing spot that has been dubbed the “mother of all bubble sites.”

The sites are in an approximate row west of an unnamed oilfield access road extending south from LA. 70 South through the wooded swamp, according to a parish map, The Advocate says.

As you may be aware, we have pointed out on several occasions that Gov. Piyush Jindal has yet to make an appearance at this man-made catastrophe. That’s likely because there are no network television news crews to give him camera face time so he can rattle off a list of things the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOHSEP) has thrown together for him.

It could also be because the entire mess is the result of permits issued by the Department of Natural Resources on his—and Scott Angelle’s—watch.

Be that as it may, we are officially launching an unofficial “Name the Unnamed Oilfield Access Road” contest.

The road, after all, should have a name given the events that have occurred in that area of the state.

Here are a few suggested names:

• Piyush Drive;

• Jindal Junction;

• Brine Boulevard;

• Bubble Boulevard;

• Descension Parish Lane;

• Scott Angelle Ave.;

• In Sink;

• Seismic Matters;

• Bayou Byway;

• DNR Memorial Highway;

• Corne Corner;

• Cornefusion Crossroads;

• Shaky Town;

• Sink Hole;

• Texas Whine.

Now get those suggestions in to LouisianaVoice.

The winner will get 25 free π-yush=3.14 (on a scale of 100) bumper stickers (hey, we can’t sell ‘em, so we may as well give ‘em away) and six special “π-yush says…Do More With Less” business cards (warning: they’re a little risqué but if you have a sense of humor, you’ll want more to pass out).

“I don’t think we have politicians with the guts to ask ’em to pay their fair share. I’ve never seen anyone stand up to the oil companies. We don’t have a congressman who’ll do it. Mary Landrieu won’t do it. David Vitter is Joined at the hip with them. He absolutely won’t do it. You haven’t heard Mr. Jindal say one word about Exxon paying its fair share and you won’t because he’s in their back pocket.”

—Louisiana Public Service Commission Chairman Foster Campbell during an interview on Jim Engster’s show on Baton Rouge public radio station WRKF on Tuesday. Campbell called Jindal’s proposed 3 cent state sales tax increase a bad idea that “won’t work,” and instead, called for a 3 percent processing fee on oil and gas, a move he said would generate $3 billion per year for the state.