Feeds:
Posts
Comments

By Ken Booth

Guest Commentator

Employees at the Monroe Veterans’ Home were rushed into recalling a mysterious incident five years ago this month at the Home which has until now remained undisclosed. Two employees were called upon to sign affidavits about the unusual episode that occurred on August 10, 2012. Their affidavits were signed only this Tuesday (Aug. 1).

This, following my public records request issued on August 1 to the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs in Baton Rouge for a work order to a West Monroe security firm to remove and replace the hard drive from the Monroe Veterans Home’s security set-up.

Documents from the security firm show the work was requested by Ken Houston, the former Home administrator who abruptly ‘retired’ last week.

The signed employee affidavits stated it was Houston who on that day asked them to “open the door to the telephone room” presumably to allow the security technician access to the hard-drive in question, before shooing the maintenance worker away, telling him he didn’t need help and “I’ll take it from here.”

An invoice detailing the security company’s work issued to the NELA Home indicates it charged a total of $281 for the job, which included $218 for a new hard-drive.

What happened to the hard-drive which was replaced is not known. In fact, none of this was known until last Tuesday when our records request startled employees at the Veterans Home, some of whom had no knowledge themselves this had ever happened.

Why Houston may have wanted that hard-drive removed and replaced is not known. Why this was done outside the knowledge of other Home officials is also unknown.

However, this is not the first time matters which might be considered curious in nature at the Home have been hidden away out of public view.

You may recall that it was in August of just last year that agents from the office of Louisiana Inspector General and auditors from the Office of Legislative Auditor were digging into allegations of alleged mistreatment of Home residents which also, ironically, dated back to 2012.

Those allegations were documented and filed with the Secretary of the Dept. in Baton Rouge but somehow escaped being publicly disclosed until July of last year when an anonymous letter, slipped under the door of Congressman Abraham, triggered action by LDVA Secretary Joey Strickland to investigate why all of those allegations had never seen the light of day.

At the time, James Ken Houston was administrator at the Monroe Veterans Home. Tommy Shoemaker was the assistant administrator.

Amid the renewed probe, Shoemaker was arrested and charged with felony theft of $9000 from a 69-year-old resident of the Home, Roland J. Matheny. Matheny is now deceased. His family is said to be seeking restitution.

Now we know that computer system hard drive was removed and for some reason replaced about a week before Shoemaker and Vets Home accountant Misti Dawn Westbrook both signed a check in the amount of $9000 from the fiduciary account of Mr. Matheny ostensibly to pre-pay for his burial. Those expenses were never paid. The money was deposited into Matheny’s private account at Progressive Bank but on August 6, four days before the hard-drive was replaced, about $2000 was paid to an Orchard Bank credit card account in the name of Thomas W. Shoemaker.

In addition, bank records show a number of ATM cash withdrawals from Matheny’s account totaling about $3200 as well as another $1200 in retail purchases made on Matheny’s ATM card.

We could find no written authorization by Matheny for Shoemaker to make these withdrawals from his Progressive Bank account.

Ken Houston, then administrator, imposed a one pay period reduction in Shoemaker’s salary from $2,076 to $1,453 bi-weekly.

Fast-forward to last week when James Ken Houston abruptly “retired” from his job at the NELA Veterans Home. Ironically, his swift departure announcement came within 24 hours to the very day five years ago Shoemaker and Westbrook signed that $9000 check.

—Ken Booth, now residing in Arizona, is retired from KNOE-TV in Monroe, where he worked for many years as a highly-respected investigative reporter.

“I certainly take responsibility for the fact that these documents, these notices, were labeled a subpoena under our administration […] It was improper, it was incorrect for us to label those notices as a subpoena, that was incorrect. That was improper, and I take responsibility for that.”

—Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro, in an April 27 interview with New Orleans WWL-TV. Curiously, he never said the practice was a mistake or that he was genuinely sorry.

 

If you ever decide to step out of your routine and launch a search for the poster child for corruption within the Louisiana justice system, you might wish to begin your search in New Orleans.

It will be a short but successful search. Guaranteed.

Without delving too far into Orleans Parish’s sordid history, there was the removal of U.S. District Judge G. THOMAS PORTEOUS JR. by the U.S. Senate in 2010 and four more judges got themselves caught up in the FBI OPERATION WRINKLED ROBE in adjacent Jefferson Parish back in 2003.

Corrupt judges are bad enough but after three straight administration changes, it appears the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office still can’t get its act together.

The most egregious was the late Harry Connick, Sr., HARRY CONNICK, SR., who earned a well-deserved national reputation for consistently withhold exculpatory evidence that would have exonerated defendants he sent to Angola for extended prison terms—one of whom spent 18 years on death row before the discovery of withheld evidence finally freed him.

He was followed by the derby-wearing Eddie Jordan, who previously served on the federal prosecuting team that won a conviction of former Gov. Edwin Edwards.

The first hint that things were a bit askew was when Jordan, a black, began handing out pink slips to white employees who saw red and sued in federal court, ultimately winning a major reverse discrimination DECISION in 2005. That, along with a somewhat bizarre story of a robbery suspect who showed up at Jordan’s HOME in October 2007, finally forced him to RESIGN from office only a week later.

Then, on July 14, LouisianaVoice received this otherwise benign press release from Department of Public Safety and Corrections Secretary James M. LeBlanc:

Louisiana Justice Hall of Fame Announces 2017 Honorees

Inductees to be honored today during ceremonies

BATON ROUGE, La. –  Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections Secretary James M. Le Blanc, Louisiana State Penitentiary Warden Darrell Vannoy, and the Louisiana State Penitentiary Museum Foundation are proud to announce the following highly distinguished individuals as 2017 inductees to the Louisiana Justice Hall of Fame:

  • The Honorable Dennis R. Bagneris, Sr., 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge, Retired, New Orleans
  • The Honorable Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, New Orleans
  • The Honorable Jimmy N Dimos, 4th Judicial District Judge, Retired, Monroe
  • Sheriff Marlin N. Gusman, Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office
  • Major General Bennett C. Landreneau, Retired, Alexandria
  • The Honorable Marc H. Morial, President & CEO of The National Urban League
  • Sheriff Newell Norman, Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office
  • Rabbi Arnold S. Task, Alexandria

The new inductees will be honored and inducted into the Hall of Fame today during ceremonies at the Louisiana State Penitentiary Museum and at LSU’s Lod Cook Alumni Center. The Louisiana State Penitentiary Museum is proud home to the Louisiana Justice Hall of Fame.

Okay, what’s wrong with that, you ask?

Not much except that the Southern Poverty Law Center has just filed a 61-page official COMPLAINT against Cannizzaro with the Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel in Baton Rouge following an excellent series of investigative stories in The Lens, a non-profit New Orleans watchdog online news service.

The basis for the complaint—and of The Lens stories—was the routine issuance of non-legal subpoenas intended to intimidate subjects to report to the district attorney’s office to answer questions by prosecutors. Those subpoenaed were not necessarily suspected of any wrongdoing.

The fake subpoenas were not signed by a judge, a requirement under law to make the subpoena legal and enforceable. Instead, they were issued as ploys to intimidate those served into coming into the DA’s office.

http://thelensnola.org/2017/04/28/woman-who-got-fake-subpoena-from-orleans-parish-da-said-she-was-told-she-could-be-jailed-if-she-ignored-it/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/06/14/new-orleans-prosecutor-used-fake-subpoena-to-seek-arrest-warrant-for-victim-of-alleged-domestic-violence/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/05/03/will-prosecutors-who-sent-fake-subpoenas-face-any-consequences/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/05/05/da-we-cant-say-how-often-fake-subpoenas-are-used-and-its-too-hard-to-look/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/05/12/orleans-parish-da-sued-over-refusal-to-turn-over-witness-subpoenas-real-and-fake/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/05/15/the-lens-is-suing-orleans-parish-da-leon-cannizzaro-to-force-him-to-turn-over-fake-subpoenas/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/05/19/notices-sent-to-witnesses-on-north-shore-werent-called-subpoenas-but-they-looked-real-enough/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/06/14/new-orleans-prosecutor-used-fake-subpoena-to-seek-arrest-warrant-for-victim-of-alleged-domestic-violence/

http://thelensnola.org/2017/05/22/defense-attorney-asks-judge-to-force-orleans-parish-district-attorney-to-disclose-whether-it-used-fake-subpoenas-in-home-invasion-case/

On July 11, an Orleans Parish JUDGE ordered the DA’s office to provide the ACLU complete records related to its use of fake subpoenas.

But apparently, the practice has bled over into adjacent JEFFERSON PARISH, where fake subpoenas are also reportedly being issued.

So while Donald Stumped and his shrinking army of unquestioning loyalists fret and fume over so-called fake news, there is the very real issue of fake subpoenas being used by those charged with upholding the Constitution of the United States to trample on the rights of its citizens.

Leon Cannizzaro attended and graduated from law school. We know that because you must be a licensed attorney to be a district attorney.

By virtue of that law degree (a juris doctorate, we assume), he is fully aware that a subpoena, to be legal, must be issued by a court, i.e., signed by a judge.

He also must be aware that the actions of his office, for which he must take full responsibility, were blatantly illegal, unconstitutional, unethical and immoral—and that the practice casts a long shadow of doubt as to the credibility and legal ethics of yet another Orleans Parish district attorney.

Unless, of course, he was absent on subpoena and/or legal ethics days.

The Southern Poverty Law Center said it best in its complaint in such a succinct manner that it bears repeating:

  • Subpoenas are, by definition, orders issued by a court.
  • By law, district attorneys may only seek to have subpoenas issued with court authorization.
  • The Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office routinely lied about individuals’ obligation to speak to district attorneys and the penalties for failing to do so.
  • The District Attorney’s Office now acknowledges ethical violations but continues to resist transparency and the voluntarily (sic) regulation of this practice.

The bogus subpoenas carry a bold-face notice that says, “A fine and imprisonment may be imposed for failure to obey this notice.”

We can’t help but wonder what the penalty for badgering, intimidation, misrepresentation, and lying by an officer of the court might be.

But congratulations for that Justice Hall of Fame thingy.

One of my main criticisms of local TV news is that it is almost always reactive, rarely proactive.

Before I do my own reactive story, I should explain that the preference in TV news seems to be to wait until something occurs elsewhere and then do a “what if” piece applied to the local viewing area.

An example I like to use is that of the deadly earthquake that struck San Francisco during the 1989 World Series pre-game. The very next day, a local TV station led its newscast with “what if” a quake hit Baton Rouge.

There has been some improvement over the ensuing years with sporadic stories about our disappearing coastline, infrastructure and our high incarceration rate (but oddly enough, nothing on the money poured into political campaigns because TV thrives off political advertising).

Having said all that, following is my (sort of) reactive story.

Just last Wednesday (July 26), a ride called the Fire Ball COLLAPSED at the Ohio State Fair, killing an 18-year-old Marine Corps enlistee.

In 2011, two teenagers were INJURED when a ride called the Zipper, malfunctioned in St. Helena Parish only hours after it had passed inspection. A year later, a four-year-old was critically INJURED in a kiddie ride at the Shreveport State Fair. Browning blamed that accident on another child and on the fact that the operator of the ride failed to “de-energize” the ride after the accident.

That raises the obvious question of who is responsible for the inspection of carnival rides in Louisiana.

The answer is the Louisiana Office of State Fire Marshal (LOSFM).

That’s the same office responsible for inspections of boilers, nursing homes, jails, schools, hospitals, and other public buildings.

And therein lie the problems of adequate inspections, problems of potential disasters and problems of major legal liability on the part of the State of Louisiana.

That’s because of a bad combination of political influence and improper training of inspectors and investigators by the LOSFM. It’s a combination that can spell trouble as was the case of that amusement ride accident in St. Helena Parish, although one former employee did damn with faint praise in explaining some of the mitigating factors leading up to current conditions at LOSFM.

The mother of those two teens injured in the amusement ride accident in St. Helena initially sued the ride operator but subsequently added the LOSFM as a DEFENDANT after the Metropolitan Crime Commission in New Orleans accused Fire Marshal Butch Browning of concealing details about missing safety equipment in his report on the accident.

Likewise, a report by the Louisiana INSPECTOR GENERAL was harsh in its criticism of oversights and inadequate inspection by LOSFM.

Browning resigned but returned after a State Police investigation no wrongdoing and that LOSFM was not responsible for full mechanical inspections but only for a cursory safety inspection to ensure the ride was not in proximity to electrical lines and trees. It didn’t hurt, of course, that Browning and then-State Police Superintendent Mike Edmonson were close friends and both were recipients of unwavering support from the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association.

But even the cursory safety inspections are suspect because of the manner in which inspectors and investigators are certified, according to sources within LOSFM.

That’s because amusement ride inspectors are not exclusively amusement ride inspectors. Nor or boiler inspectors only boiler inspectors. Neither or jail inspectors, hospital inspectors, school inspectors, nursing home inspectors limited to just those structures.

Allow me to hasten to point out this is not to be considered an indictment of the men and women in the field who are trying to do their jobs under difficult circumstances. But if you are an inspector for LOSFM, you inspect everything, whether or not you are qualified to do so. You are certified by LOSFM through courses taught at LSU.

In fact, inspectors may even be required to conduct investigations even though they lack the perquisite training required for national certification as a Certified Fire & Explosion Investigator (CFEI) by the National Fire Academy (NFA).

Previously, to become a certified investigator, one was required to attend a national three-week course and to investigate a minimum of 300 fires under the direct supervision of a seasoned, certified investigator

Because of budgetary constraints which will be discussed in later posts, LOSFM stopped sending personnel to national classes several years ago. Instead, they attend in-house training and are given LSU certification after a two-week course.

Sources told LouisianaVoice that hospital inspections require federal certification. “Only about half our inspectors have that certification,” the source, who requested anonymity for obvious reasons, said. “Some of our inspectors who are not certified are inspecting hospitals.”

The same source said that boiler inspections likewise require special certification but LOSFM inspectors are conducting inspections without certification.

“We have inspectors inspecting carnival rides without the proper certification,” the LOSFM insider said.

The LOSFM employee the fire marshal’s office has purchased dogs trained in explosives but they are not certified because the office has no ordinance in place for explosive disposal. The cost for dogs trained to sniff explosives was estimated as high as $15,000.

The same source said the fire marshal’s office “is letting jails skate” on inspections. That sentiment was echoed by Rafael Goyeneche, III, President of the Metropolitan Crime Commission, a New Orleans-area watchdog agency.

“Browning was Edmonson’s man and Edmonson was the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association man,” Goyeneche said. “Does that create the potential for problems? Absolutely. The Fire Marshal is supposed to be independent and if deficiencies are found, they should be properly addressed, no matter who the offender might be.

“You can’t tell me the former Orleans Parish Prison, just as an example, was actually in compliance with the fire codes all those years,” he added.

One example of the political influence was reported by LouisianaVoice nearly three years ago.

In that story, found HERE, we pointed out that the Ruston building inspector refused to approve the construction of the New Living Word School because of flagrant building code violations.

He refused, that is, until Richard Gallot, a member of the school’s governing board who just happened to be a state senator at the time and a colleague of State Rep. Francis Thompson, father of Brant Thompson, second in command at LOSFM, entered the picture.

Suddenly all those deficiencies and procedural violations disappeared when Browning became involved. Browning even went so far as to issue an amended approval letter giving the school the okay to proceed with the construction of classrooms in the upper floor—permission that had not even been requested.

A former employee of had this to say about conditions at LFSFM:

In my opinion, the training offered or provided SFM deputies is not inadequate as it relates to on-line courses or classroom instruction. As I recall they are required to obtain more today than when I received my training. My issue with the training has always been the lack of supervised field training by an experienced investigator and the fact their attention is divided between investigations, inspections and every dog and pony show that comes around the corner.

It also bothered me that there were investigations being conducted before the investigator achieved Certified Fire & Explosion Investigator (CFEI) status. With CFEI status, you are typically qualified in a courtroom as an “expert witness” meaning you were an expert in your field and you were allowed to give your opinion in addition to stating the facts. Not that they can’t be qualified as an expert with the training they now receive but a CFEI is generally more accepted.

In the days of old, investigators were classified as Arson I, Arson II or Arson III. As an Arson I investigator, you were required to have a least one year investigating fires full time. During that time, you were receiving training from the Supervisor of Arson or an Arson II or III. You were provided your own tools and assigned your own response area and were required to assist investigators in other areas just for the fire scene experience.

Also during that time, you would learn firsthand, a little of everything investigators do:

  • Communicate with people;
  • Examine and document fire scenes;
  • Collect, package and submit evidence of all types;
  • Conduct and document interviews and interrogations;
  • Secure arrest warrants, search warrants, warrants for phone records;
  • Report writing, etc.

During this time, you were also encouraged to observe proceedings in the courtroom to prepare you for your own upcoming cases. You would likely attend the National Fire Academy (NFA) for the two-week Fire Investigator class but due to limited space this would more likely be during your second year.

Once you had successfully completed that course, you could be promoted to Arson II. At this level, you would spend substantially more time on your own, honing your new skills but still under relatively close supervision. Most SFM investigators had prior law enforcement experience so less supervision was required for those aspects of the investigation. Also during this period, you would take a National Association of Fire Investigators (NAFI) test to get your CFEI status. This test was mailed to the SFMO and proxy-supervised. At one time, NFA allowed the Supervisor to proxy the test but that was later changed to someone qualified at another agency.

Once you achieved CFEI status you could be promoted to Arson III and for the most part you were on your own and confident to work alone. Continuing education was obtained in the form of educational seminars provided by the Louisiana Chapter of NAFI.

When Butch (Browning) and Brant (Thompson) arrived at the SFMO, it was determined that we would not be getting the additional investigators desperately needed and would likely lose positions instead because of budget cuts. In an effort to remedy this, “Cross-training” was implemented and it was the beginning of the end. With “the sign of the cross” by Butch and Brant, and not much more, deputies who had done nothing but inspections in the past were deemed “investigators.”

Most were forced by intimidation or made by promise of pie in the sky, to attend the POST (Peace Officer Standards and Training Council) academy. They were within days, dispatched to fire scenes with little or no training, no equipment to examine the scene with, and quite frankly not a clue. It was not pretty. Eventually they would get equipped somewhat and receive some training but it was a slow process.

Fast forward to present day:

It is my understanding and belief that new hires are required to take quite a few on-line basic courses in fire investigations almost immediately upon being hired. They also attend a two-week course at JESTC (Joint Emergency Services Training Center), sponsored by the SFMO and sanctioned by the NFA. Modules of the course were presented by an array of folks from various agencies as well as other SFM deputies. 

It is my understanding that now in most if not all areas of the state, supervised field training is provided but maybe not at the levels it should be. As I see it, the biggest problems remaining are splitting deputies’ time between investigations and inspections and forcing people to conduct investigations when they have no desire to do such.

There are no longer Arson I, II or III designations. Since Butch took over, job titles have changed at least twice. First it was to be more in alignment with the fire departments (Lieutenants, Captains, Dist. Chiefs, Assistant Chief’s, etc.), Most recently it appears it was changed to be more aligned with a police department. (Corporals, Lieutenants, Captains, Majors, etc.). To my knowledge, any SFM Deputy who is POST Certified is an investigator and nearly all uniformed personnel are POST Certified.

Like the fortunes of Willie Stark, the fictionalized Huey Long in Warren Penn’s All the King’s Men, a tragic explosion, fire, or carnival ride accident could change the political landscape. People will be hurt or killed and those who sat by and allowed standards to slip, looked the other way as deficiencies go unchecked, and generally took short cuts with the lives and safety of the citizenry, will one day find themselves the defendants in civil and criminal proceedings and the elected officials who allowed it to happen will have to answer to the voters.

As Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, political blogs, and talk radio have proliferated to such a point that it’s becoming impossible to make sense of all the rhetoric as each tries to be heard over all the others.

Who are we to believe?

  • Those who claim climate change is a hoax or those who insist it is very real and already well past a critical point?
  • Those who insist that the free market is the best course for our economy or those who see a growing abyss between the 1 percent the rest of us?
  • Do corporate tax breaks and incentives really create jobs or do they just put the tax burden on the backs of a shrinking middle class?
  • Those who oppose an increase in the minimum wage and those who point out that worker pay has been relatively stagnant for nearly 40 years?
  • Those who seem to put repeal of Obamacare a top priority, even over the health of their constituents or those who point out that we are the only advanced country in the world without universal health care?
  • Those who favor corporate profits or those who are critical of the lack of job creation and increased productivity?
  • Elected officials who continue to subsidize fossil fuels and who receive millions of dollars in campaign contributions from oil and gas interests or those who push for alternative, cheaper fuel?
  • Do we listen to the saber-rattlers who want ever-growing defense budgets or do we listen to those who say we need to place more emphasis on education and infrastructure?
  • Do we continue to allow voter ID laws whose proponents say are to prevent voter fraud or do hear the cries of those who say the laws are subterfuge for disqualifying certain blocs of voters, namely blacks?
  • Elected officials who favor the special interests or those who stand on principle and continue to represent their constituents?

You get the drift. As a nation, we’re coming apart at the seams with everyone pulling in different directions. It’s a disturbing trend and is certainly not conducive to progress.

As a special service offered of LouisianaVoice, we implore you, our readers, to take 22 minutes out of your schedule to watch the Charlie Rose interview Jeremy Grantham, Chief Investment Strategist at GMO as they discuss the global economy and the future of capitalism in sane, rational, understated tones. You can watch the entire video by clicking HERE.

The only reason we’re doing this is because it’s important.