So STEVE SCALISE says he would vote in favor of IMPEACHMENT of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
Isn’t that special? Especially considering House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) went on record opposing such a move and even though Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) subsequently announced he was TABLING his efforts to impeach Rosenstein.
Maybe Scalise was just having a little problem with premature calculation of his re-election odds in a district that elects the likes of David Duke, Bobby Jindal and….Steve Scalise.
Maybe that’s why Tammy Savoie has decided to challenge him in this fall’s elections.
Or maybe it was because Scalise was one of Louisiana’s five Republican representatives who cast a big, fat NO vote to funding election security.
That’s right. Every single Republican House member from Louisiana voted against HOUSE RESOLUTION 6147 last Thursday. In fact, of the 235 Republicans in the House, 232 voted against funding for election security against Russian hacking. The remaining three just didn’t vote. Of 193 Democrats in the House, 182 voted in favor with 11 not voting.
Scalise is most likely in lock-step with the Republican Party that thinks the Mueller investigation has gone on too long and cost too much.
Let’s COMPARE.
Since Nixon was elected in 1968, Republicans have held the White House for 28 years and Democrats for 20. During the Republicans’ 28 years, there were 120 criminal indictments, 89 criminal convictions, and 34 prison sentences in the Executive Branch.
During the Democrats’ 20 years, there were three criminal indictments, one criminal conviction, and one prison sentence.
Even more telling is the COST COMPARISON of the various presidential investigations.
For all the hand-wringing and gnashing of teeth Republicans are doing about the escalating cost of the Russia probe, it’s interesting to note the costs of presidential investigations:
- Nixon: $47.1 million;
- Carter: $1.2 million;
- Reagan: $81.1 million;
- George H.W. Bush: $.65 million;
- Clinton: $83.3 million;
- George W. Bush: $3 million;
- Trump: $17 million (revised from the $6.8 given in the link above).
And those figures don’t even include the $30 million or so spent on investigating Benghazi or Hillary Clinton’s emails—a 789-day investigation (Mueller’s probe is just over a year old to date) that produced zero indictments. And don’t forget this investigation was carried out by a Republican-majority Congress.
Is Hillary Clinton clean? Is she spotless? I doubt it. I’m not particularly fond of her or her husband but when you combine the investigations of Bill and Hillary ($111 million) and you get one criminal conviction, it comes off as a bit whiny of Republicans to piss and moan about the Russia investigation.
In fact, Trump has spent more than FOUR TIMES AS MUCH on his golfing trips ($80 million to $90 million) to Mar-a-Lago as Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller has on the Russia investigation.
Scalise appears to have chosen to ignore that fact and that makes him look a tad petty.
Of course, Trump’s aides defend the expenditures by saying the president is working while there. That being the case, why doesn’t he just stay in Washington and work? Of course, if he did that, his properties couldn’t make a profit from the staff members, Secret Service agents and media that accompany him to Mar-a-Lago.
And Scalise is front and center in his defense of Trump and his condemnation of Mueller and Rosenstein.
And perhaps that is why Tammy Savoie is offering the voters of Congressional District 1.
A native of Jefferson Parish, she enlisted in the Louisiana Air National Guard in 1978 while studying psychology at the University of New Orleans.
As a single mother with a baby on her hip and a Ph.D. in her pocket, she went on active duty as an Air Force psychologist in 1984, treating service members and their families at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama.
She served as Chief of Psychological Services at Kadena AFB in Okinawa, Japan in 1999, where she created drug abuse and prevention programs. As Mental Health Flight Commander at Laughlin AFB, Dr. Savoie formed the first-ever Critical Incident Stress Team, coordinating the city’s emergency response teams, Border Patrol, and base agencies to provide crisis intervention services.
She was appointed Deputy Commander of the Air Force’s research office in London in 2008 and in 2011, she was deployed to Afghanistan to improve mental health services for U.S. troops. She traveled throughout the Middle East as the Chief of International health.
She retired as a lieutenant colonel in 2016 after a 22-year career with the Air Force. A resident of St. Tammany Parish, she now provides mental health services to veterans and to the Red Cross. She also is an adjunct professor at the Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
In making her formal announcement upon qualifying to run last week, she said she is running on a platform of campaign finance reform. She said she is not accepting any PAC money in her campaign, preferring to running a grass-roots campaign.
“I will not put partisan politics above the interest of the citizens of the First Congressional District,” she said. She said she wants to close gun legislation loopholes that currently allow easy access to guns.
She also said she will work for salary equity for women and for other women’s rights issues and for a reduction in the infant mortality rate.
“I believe all Americans should have a right to health care,” she said. “Steve Scalise is happy to vote to knock 23 million Americans out of health care.
“We are hurting economically in Louisiana,” she said. Scalise voted against increasing the minimum wage not once, but twice. He has demonstrated his indifference to the interests of the people of Louisiana. He has voted against bills to reduce violence against women. He is against collective bargaining and he supports President Trump’s tariffs that will hurt Louisiana’s farmers.
“Donald Trump is no fan of American institutions. He supports a regime that has infiltrated our electoral process.
“Steve Scalise is complicit in Trump’s programs. He has sold our country to the highest bidder. He has not kept the executive branch in check.
“I will not give in to the corporate powers that control the Republican Party,” she said.
Savoie said her campaign will target the Independent and Democratic voters of the district, who she said outnumber Republicans.
WOW! I wish I could vote for Savoie! She sounds like a real winner. I do plan to contribute to her campaign!
Well I’m in Scalise’s district and she’ll have my vote. However, the way the district is drawn Scalise is back in, but perhaps we can give him a scare.
Imagine the message that a Savoie victory over Scalise would send to the Republicans. Please keep us posted as to her campaign.
The endgame for Scalise and other powerful members of Congress supporting everything the President and his party do is unclear, but its direction is certainly not consistent with my vision for our country and its people. I continue to be amazed and baffled by this – as I have to imagine people in other countries have been until irreversible changes occurred – and, even afterward.
Interesting, i am glad Scalise has a legitimate challenger,but I am sure our gerrymandered districts will put him back in….never have quite understood how that is figured to be democratic…. it’s rigging!
Yes. My Rep lives at the other end of the state and never acknowledges my correspondence
“Or maybe it was because Scalise was one of Louisiana’s five Republican representatives who cast a big, fat NO vote to funding election security.
That’s right. Every single Republican House member from Louisiana voted against HOUSE RESOLUTION 6147 last Thursday. In fact, of the 235 Republicans in the House, 232 voted against funding for election security against Russian hacking. The remaining three just didn’t vote. Of 193 Democrats in the House, 182 voted in favor with 11 not voting.”
Any member of congress who voted AGAINST funding to secure our election process and voter registration records (several states have notified voters that their information has been compromised) should be investigated immediately for complicity with the Russians in interfering with our elections. No true American colludes with a foreign adversary to steal elections. I cannot shout it louder. Having traitors in congress doesn’t just boggle the imagination, it should alarm every single American who likes to speak English. Allow such people to continue as members of congress, and say das vedanya to the USA as we know it. This is serious, y’all.
Earthmother: I agree with you. However, the folks around me just do not seem to be aware of voting details or the implications of their representatives’ votes. Perhaps our local newspapers could do a better job of a weekly rundown of votes of we should figure out some way to give this info out locally. These very serious votes just seem to go under our radar. Plus the fact that Trump and Republicans have tried to destroy confidence in broad news media. We have a real problem with uninformed voters.
I met Ms. Savoie and impressed. She can win but may take two times. The La. Republicans are loaded with dark and real cash, and are communication experts playing to our fears, ignorance and prejudices. They should be worried when Manafort caves and points fingers at the Republican party operatives, Trump floats and Manafort lives. It does no good to contact your Sen. or Rep, you will get a form letter that will make you laugh. ron thompson
Steve, you must be smoking rope. Not with you on this.
V.J.