Louisiana, from Huey and Earl Long to Jimmie Davis, John McKeithen, and Edwin Edwards, has a well-earned reputation of electing colorful—and controversial—governors. It is, therefore, something of a paradox that the one who would aspire to play on the national stage would be described as a policy wonk with no personality and nothing in common with the others.
While Bobby Jindal is unquestionably intelligent, he, unlike the others, is woefully inadequate in his ability to relate to his constituents on a one-on-one basis or to field hard questions from a skeptical press. To put it bluntly, he simply lacks the skills to relate to the man in the street, forced instead to fall back on his time-worn but well-rehearsed rhetorical philosophy designed to appeal to his ultra-right-wing political base. Jindal perhaps is best described as Ben Stein (the economics teacher in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off) without the charisma.
Even when he does stray from his tightly-controlled script in an effort to draw a laugh, his efforts usually languish. In 2014, he made an appearance at the Gridiron Dinner in Washington and followed that the next night with an address to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) and set up the same joke about Attorney General Eric Holder at both events by saying, “I see Eric Holder is with us…” The problem was Holder was not at CPAC (nor would he ever have been expected to be) and the gag fell embarrassingly flat (cue the chirping crickets).
A good politician, like a good standup comic, always knows his audience. Lyndon Johnson once said he had no use for any politician who, thirty seconds after entering a room, could not tell who was for him and who was against him. Lyndon Johnson would have no use for Jindal. Nor would Edwin Edwards who could always be counted on for a quip appropriate to the crowd or the event. No one but Edwards would, after getting a hug from a nun in Monroe, dare say something like, “Careful, Sister, I don’t want to get into any habits.” Nor could Jindal ever get away with saying (as did Edwards) the only way he could lose an election (against David Duke in 1991) would to be “caught in bed with a dead girl or live boy.”
Instead, when Jindal talks, he comes across as stilted and decidedly wooden, inflexible. He cannot speak off the cuff; everything is rehearsed, which is why every speech sounds like all the others. He is unnatural and exhibits absolutely no understanding—or compassion—for the single working mom, for the working poor unable to afford health care insurance, or for the tax burden of the middle class, a result of his generous tax breaks to business and industry. His limp handshake only serves to underscore his disdain for pressing the flesh (to borrow a term from LBJ).
His railing against Washington and President Barrack Obama is vaguely reminiscent of Robert F. Kennon in his run for a second term as governor in 1963. I spent a day with Kennon in 1983 and he relayed an interesting story to me. He had crisscrossed the state during the ’63 campaign, repeating his familiar slogan: “Send Kennon to Baton Rouge and (President) Kennedy back to Massachusetts.” The slogan caught fire and Kennon surged to the lead in the polls ahead of key rival New Orleans Mayor deLesseps Morrison (that would be “Dellasoups,” to Uncle Earl). Public Service Commissioner John McKeithen, meanwhile, slogged along with his own aw-shucks slogan: “Won’t you he’p me?” Then, on November 22, the eve of the governor’s election, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas and overnight, public opinion was turned on its head. Kennon was out, McKeithen finished second to Morrison and then won in a runoff. “Kennedy’s assassination beat me,” he told me 20 years later.
I also spent an entire day as a young newspaper reporter in 1971 riding with McKeithen near the end of his second term as he toured the LSU agriculture station in Homer in Claiborne Parish prior to an address to the local chamber of commerce that night. The tour was not one of those events where the politician breezes in, shakes a couple of hands and departs, leaving it to his press office to call it a “tour.” Instead, McKeithen, fascinated with innovations at the Ag station, spent the entire day learning about how the station personnel managed to get productive timberland to serve the dual purpose of grazing land for the farm’s cattle. “I’ve never seen cattle graze in timberland,” said McKeithen, himself a cattle rancher.
And during McKeithen’s entire visit at Homer that day, there was not a state trooper security detail anywhere in sight. Not one. Zilch. Jindal, on the other hand, never goes anywhere without a coterie of state police security, even during his presidential run which has taken him out of Louisiana for more than 45 percent of his final years as governor—all at the expense of Louisiana taxpayers.
Even in retirement, John McKeithen kept the common touch. In the late 1980s, I resided next door to his son, Secretary of State Fox McKeithen. The younger McKeithen had a pecan tree in his front yard and on many mornings when I walked outside to retrieve my Baton Rouge Advocate, there would be Big John walking around the yard picking up pecans. Somehow, it’s just impossible to conjure up an image of Bobby Jindal walking around picking up pecans off the ground. He’d almost certainly have a state trooper from his security detail performing that task.
Jimmie Davis not only was an immensely popular singer, but a spellbinding storyteller as well. He told a great one about Edwards. When Davis left office in 1964, he built a new home behind the governor’s mansion. Both the Davis home and the governor’s mansion were across the lake from the State Capitol and Davis said once he was in his back yard “knocking down dirt dauber nests, wasp nests, pulling weeds and killing snakes,” out of the corner of his eye he caught then-Governor Edwards strolling purposely toward the lake. As he watched, he suddenly realized that Edwards was intent on walking to the Capitol…across the lake. “He’s going to try to walk on the lake,” Davis thought. Sure enough, Edwards did indeed begin walking across the lake and made it about halfway before suddenly sinking. “There wasn’t anything I could do,” Davis said, “but walk out there, pull him up out of the water and carry him the rest of the way.”
We can thank Davis, by the way, for the Sunshine Bridge over the Mississippi River at Donaldsonville, for the current governor’s mansion, and for the implementation of civil service as protection of state employees from political patronage.
As a political junkie, I have followed Louisiana’s governors all the way back to Uncle Earl. I vividly remember Earl’s mental breakdown, his commitment to a couple of mental hospitals and his subsequent escapes. I recall his defeat of incumbent U.S. Rep. Harold McSween in 1960 only to die of heart failure ten days later. As a teenager, I read every book about Huey and Earl Long that I could lay my hands on. Rather than cut funding for services, Huey increased the miles of paved highways in Louisiana from 300 to 3,000. Rather than deprive the poor of health care, he built Big Charity Hospital in New Orleans that operated as a teaching hospital for Tulane and LSU medical schools while providing care for the poor. Instead of slashing appropriations for higher education, Huey made LSU a top tier university. Jindal, hell-bent on cutting taxes for industry and the rich, allowed the state’s infrastructure to crumble. He denied Medicaid expansion, thus depriving 300,000 of the state’s poor adequate medical care. Budget cuts under Jindal’s leadership proved disastrous to higher education, forcing tuition increases that were unaffordable to low income students.
But after all is said and done, it was Earl Long who was the real visionary. Jindal beats his chest, refusing to accept Medicaid expansion. He fought Common Core, defiantly boasting that he would not allow Washington or the liberal media to sway him. But even as Mississippi’s Ross Barnett, Alabama’s George Wallace, and Arkansas’ Orville Faubus were pledging “Segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever,” Earl saw the writing on the wall early on and prepared for the future accordingly.
When Orleans Parish legislators approached him in the 1950s about locating a public university in New Orleans, Earl readily agreed—on one condition: the school would be open to whites and blacks alike. Higher education was integrated in Louisiana years before James Meredith entered Ole Miss and before George Wallace stood in the doorway at the University of Alabama. Rather than cutting education, Earl originated the hot lunch program in Louisiana’s public elementary and high schools, providing students affordable lunches—his proudest accomplishment.
Earl refused to take political advantage of the fever-pitch emotions that were boiling over in Baton Rouge over the desegregation fight with the federal government. His most famous confrontation was with Plaquemines Parish political boss Leander Perez, who refused to acknowledge the changing times and attempted to pass sweeping legislation in Baton Rouge to resist the growing tide of desegregation. “What’re you gonna do now, Leander?” Earl shouted at his nemesis at one point. “The feds have the A-bomb!”
Dave Treen, the quintessential Republican, who served as governor from 1980-1984, proposed a $450 million tax on oil and gas to hold the industry accountable for damage to the state’s coastal marshes. The Coastal Wetlands Environmental Levy (CWEL), which he said would place no undue burden on any individual or group, fell twelve votes short of the necessary two-thirds approval in the House after being vehemently opposed by oil and gas interests and the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI).
That stands in stark contrast to Jindal, who, beholden to the oil companies for their financial support of his political campaigns, was in bitter opposition to (and eventually succeeded in killing) a lawsuit against 97 oil and gas companies by the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East (SLFPA-E) seeking to force the companies to restore the state’s damaged wetlands.
These are the personality and philosophical traits sorely lacking in Jindal’s psychological makeup. He cannot champion the working people of Louisiana—or America—in the manner of Huey Long. He could never negotiate the peace between warring factions the way in which Edwin Edwards could get both sides to comprise—and like it. Jindal, with his disconcerting rapid-fire speaking manner, is devoid of the ease with which Jimmie Davis could hold an entire room captive with his homespun humor. His response to Obama’s State of the Union Address in 2009 proved that beyond any doubt. He could never be relaxed after more than five minutes of visiting something as ordinary as an agricultural station in north Louisiana but McKeithen, on the other hand, was right at home. Earl may have had mental issues, but even in his deteriorated emotional state, he stood head and shoulders above Jindal in his ability—and willingness—to do for people what they could not do for themselves.
There does not exist a hole sufficiently deep to bury the differences between Jindal and any one of those six governors. To somehow think he is presidential timber is simply beyond comprehension. He would be wise to consider the human element of leadership over any poll results.
Excellent article!! Thanks for all you do…Libby
This article left me breathless. I lived through the terms of all of these men that contributed so much to the betterment of Louisiana. I am sick of the mess that Jindal and his supporters (they are to blame as much as he is) have made of Louisiana. Thank you for putting all of this out there for others to consider. Let’s just hope they have a few brain cells that can comprehend what has happened and why!
Great article!! Thanks Tom!
Well said Tom!
Memories, memories… I have many of the same memories, Tom. Jindal will be remembered as the worst governor in recent history. All the governors you mention had their faults, but, to a man, they at least did some good for ordinary citizens in Louisiana. I can’t think of one positive legacy from Jindal’s two terms in office. He will leave behind a trail of plunder and destruction.
I wonder how Mike Foster views his protégé` now . . .
Oh I’m sure Foster still likes him just fine. After all, Jindal spent $2 million to build a museum to honor Foster; the only one of its kind in Louisiana despite the rich history of much more illustrious governors our state has to offer. Of course you have to drive to Franklin to see it if anyone is so inclined. I can only wonder what other benefits that Foster’s business interests have enjoyed under Jindal’s reign.
A most insightful discussion. Thank you for this. However, I worry if we will ever again have compassionate leadership not only in Louisiana but all of America.
Through my work I had a lot of contact with Gov. Edwards, who was always charming, even to reporters. Also through my work, I met with governors Treen, Roemer, Foster, Blanco, and McKeithen long after he left the Mansion. What all of them had in common was warmth, animation and an attitude of caring about what others thought. Each of them has/had the ability to make you feel like the most important person in the room while they were speaking with you. Through my work I also met jindal a few times. What struck me about him is the projection of artifice, the limp handshake while looking over you to see what more important people are present, but most disturbing of all was the dead look in his eyes – no soul. He only cares about himself, and how every situation works for him. He is a sociopath.
Thanks for the great article.
Great article, Tom. You have laid out the facts in a clear and concise way.
I began working for the State of Louisiana during Gov. McKeithen’s last term and I retired under Jindal. Believe me, I have seen the good,, the bad and the ugly.
As you have stated, the Governors you mentioned all had big ideas and wanted to improve the lives of LA citizens. Jindal has not had or implemented one improvement in the State, but has practically destroyed everything that these former leaders developed. He has no respect for the state employee who makes the state function. As much as people think state employees are lazy and worthless, they should reflect on how much more difficult life is when sate services are cut and/or eliminated. I have witnessed the destruction of the state infrastructure. One of the best healthcare systems for the poor and uninsured as well as the best sites for medical education is practically destroyed. That’s just one example out of many. I hope our next Governor ( and I hope the voters understand we don’t need another Repblican mouthpiece for Grover Norquist and the Koch brothers), will begin the rebuilding of our beloved state, but I fear this is a task that will take many years to achieve.
Denarys – you are so right in your observations. Your comment should be published widely in the hope that “low information voters” will get the message.
Isn’t it the height of irony that jindal’s mother is a career state employee (unless she has recently retired) , that jindal’s first job was a student worker position at the Dept. of Education, and that he has been a public employee since the age of 24?
Absolutely your best, Tom!!! If this is representative of your forthcoming book, it should be a killer!!!!
Like you and Earthmother, I had contact with all the governors going back to McKeithen (though the only time I ever spoke with him was at LSU football games long after he had been governor – he was the truest of fans and a genuine human being). I found Foster the closest to Jindal in his (lack of) empathy for the unwashed – who included most everybody but him and the rest of the plantation/uberwealthy class in his view.
It is good to see Denarys’ take on recent events as well.
I would only add to what you have said that a photographic memory, of which Jindal is allegedly possessed, does not necessarily equal true genius and he proves that pretty much every day.
Speaking of Foster’s lack of concern for us “little people”. His grandfather signed the charter when our little town was incorporated back in 1899. He was governor when we celebrated our 100 years. So, we invited him to come up to Northwest Louisiana and help us celebrate, explaining his connection through his grandfather’s action. He never replied. Not a word. That spoke volumes about the character of the man.
One of my aunts is a relative of Mike Foster via the Goodwill family in your area. I told him about that and he said he would be interested in contacting her. Did he ever do so? No.
Great Article and sums up what many of us have concluded with Jindal. The smartest person in the room is normally not the best leader rather the person with the most heart. The other governors mentioned had heart, compassion, and the need to help,others. Where is that person and we will have found our next great governor.
Tom,You are telling your age with this article. It is truly sad to put Jindal in the same conversation regarding some of our former governors. There is no comparison. I remember when “Uncle Earl” was admitted to Southeast LA Hospital and he threatened the state troopers to get him out of there. We have had some colorful governors but all of them had compassion for the people of this state. Jindal has NO clue what it means to be compassionate to anyone but himself! Keep up the good work Tom. I appreciate receiving your articles. “Thanks” Rita Adams
A fine, fine piece of writing and reminecsing and, I hope and trust, a preview of your upcoming book.
You have put Jindal in the context of most of our governors of the last fifty years, and it is, of course, very revealing and not at all complimentary.
Really, really good job!
Tom, “Standing Ovation” to you!
I’m not sure why anyone would celebrate any of those fools. They have all contributed to making Louisiana last in the nation in almost every meaningful category. And all of them would sell their mother to win an election.
They weren’t so much celebrated as they were used as a comparison to Jindal’s record. So compared, they become almost saintly.
Well said Tom.
Tom, your anecdote about Jimmie Davis and Edwin had me in stitches. I can easily visualize Edwards plowing forward until he was in over his head. That may have been the first time he was ever in that situation.
Excellent, Tom. Thanks.
WELL SAID, BRAVO!! JINDAL ENDED UP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL PEANUT GALLERY WITH ALL THE OTHER LOSERS WHERE HE BELONGS. HE IS JUST MUGGING FOR HIS NEXT JOB, TRYING TO GRAB ONTO ANYONE’S COATTAILS. HE ISN’T SO SMART AFTER ALL. HOPE HE WILL BE AWAY FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND GOVERNMENT JOBS FOREVER. HE IS A DISGRACE TO LOUISIANA AND LOUISIANA IS SICK OF HIM AND HIS RHETORIC. UNFORTUNATELY, LOUISIANA WILL NEVER RECOUP THE TAXPAYERS DOLLARS HE HAS USED FOR HIS WORLDWIND TRAVELS.
HE IS ALL IN THE NAME OF RELIGION THOUGH.
To me, the reality is that our Republican voters will continue to elect extreme, agenda focused candidates that grovel before Grover Norquist and their far out base. It will be easy for them to say all of our mess if Jindal’s fault and not the fault of their Republican agenda and policies. There has to be an understanding of how he got elected twice and how he got the support to enact almost every single policy whim he thought up. I fear if Democrats don’t organize, field good candidates across the board and vote in huge numbers, we are doomed to continue further down this road to oblivion.
While I agree with your excellent analysis in support of the overall thrust of this post, I strongly disagree with “While Bobby Jindal is unquestionably intelligent, …”.
Stephen Winham wrote “I would only add to what you have said that a photographic memory, of which Jindal is allegedly possessed, does not necessarily equal true genius and he proves that pretty much every day.” I agree with this point and have stated it on several occasions as well.
One of the most blatant examples of his political and innate stupidity is when he criticized the Republican party leadership for being part of the party of stupid. His subsequent actions, like repeatedly raging about Sharia law in England long after Faux News repudiated their prior reporting show that jindal is, in fact, the emperor of the party of stupid. And his supposed intelligence SHOULD be questioned at every opportunity. And I hope this point will be prominent in your book.
TOM————-I thought you might find this article interesting since it was Jindal who reduced the OGB from 500 million to, their claim, of 120 million. This is ridiculous!!!!——————————Rita Adams