Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Remember last year’s incredible fiasco precipitated by Gov. Piyush Jindal when he spurned that $80.6 million Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) grant to provide high speed broadband internet to rural areas of Louisiana?

Well, it’s back—perhaps to bite him in the gluteus maximus.

State Superintendent of Education John White has released a report that shows Louisiana public school students and teachers are lacking the technology to enter the digital age.

The Louisiana Technology Footprint report discusses technology guidelines that provide a snapshot of the current state of digital readiness of school districts and campuses in the state.

Louisiana Believes, the highly-touted plan by the department includes, among other goals, one for all schools to be digital-ready by 2014-2015.

The report provides districts with an initial footprint picture of network, bandwidth and device requirements need to fully implement online assessments by the 2014-2015 school year and full digital readiness thereafter.

“Data and technology specifications…indicate school campuses in Louisiana have 197,898 devices available for online testing but only 67,038 (33.9 percent) met new device standards,” the report says.

Only five districts—Ascension, City of Bogalusa, Red River, St. James and FirstLine Schools of New Orleans—meet the minimum device readiness requirements and only two—Ascension and St. James—meet both device and network readiness guidelines for online testing, it said.

It was last Oct. 26 that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division (NOAA) issued its final termination letter for the grant after repeated efforts to get the state to comply with its request for additional information.

The project, which LouisianaVoice learned was opposed by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), would have created 900 miles of cable over 21 rural parishes in Louisiana and would have supported several Louisiana universities with expanded optical fiber networking capacity.

That could have complimented the Board of Regents’ $20 million Louisiana Optical Network Initiative (LONI) project, designed to extend high-speed networking capabilities in the state.

But Jindal, whose wife’s charitable foundation received considerable funding from AT&T, apparently preferred that the project be carried out by private companies—such as…oh, say AT&T, for example.

The governor refused to re-apply for the grant because what he termed a “heavy-handed approach from the federal government that would have undermined and taken over private business.”

U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu call Jindal’s stated reason “hogwash.” She said the grant would not have interfered with private enterprise and in fact, would have granted money for private companies to lay the cable. “We weren’t trying to create a government broadband system,” she said.

Almost a year before the final rejection of the grant, ALEC, at its annual meeting in San Diego in August of 2010, passed a resolution opposing initiatives targeted at providing universally accessible broadband service because of “the unnecessary, burdensome and economically harmful regulation of broadband internet service companies, including the providers of the infrastructure that supports and enables internet services…”

Looks like someone forgot to tell White about Jindal’s opposition to expanded availability to that evil internet.

In fact, White, in his report, encourages school districts to join a statewide consortium that will aid in consolidated purchasing and contracts as well as providing technology services and support.

Wonder who’ll get the contract to form that consortium?

The news coming out of the Department of Education just keeps getting worse.

Like $7.8 million worse.

Even as the Louisiana Department of Education and State Superintendent John White hunker down in efforts to deny the release of public information that might shine a less than favorable light on Gov. Bobby Jindal’s education reform package, LouisianaVoice has learned that the Recovery School District (RSD) in New Orleans may be as much as $6.6 million in arrears on payments to an Illinois company contracted to provide transportation services to RSD students.

The company contracted to provide transportation services has submitted a bill of $7.8 million, of which $6.6 million is said to be nearly a year past due. Transportation costs are factored into the annual allocation to local school systems, leaving unanswered the disposition of the RSD’s appropriation for that purpose.

White was the RSD superintendent during much of that time, being promoted to state superintendent last January one month before Jones Walker sent the letter.

Additionally, a New Orleans television station recently aired a story that showed RSD’s $10.5 million contract with Durham School Services is costing the district up to three times as much per student for transportation of RSD students as in some other parts of the country.

LouisianaVoice has learned that Durham has retained the services of the politically-connect Jones Walker Law Firm of New Orleans and that Jones Walker attorney Michael DePetrillo in February sent a letter of demand to the Louisiana Department of Education (DOE) and RSD for payment of $7.8 million, of which $6,568,694 was said to be past due. The last payment made to the company was on September 20, 2011, and the past due amount is now said to be $6.6 million.

DePetrillo did not return a call to his office.

Former RSD Superintendent Paul Vallas said he inherited a “terrible” bus transportation system when he was hired in 2007 and he promptly hired Durham which, in the 2008-09 school year bused 7,500 children. For the school year just completed, only 5,700 children were transported by Durham, placing the cost at $1,800 per student.

That was the same Paul Vallas, of course, who took some three dozen personal trips to Chicago in a state vehicle and on one of those trips, wrecked the vehicle. His boss at the time, Paul Pastorek (White’s predecessor), said he didn’t realize the use of the state vehicle for personal out-of-state trips–including one during which he announced on a local television station that he planned to run for mayor of Chicago–was wrong.

The Hinds County (Jackson) Mississippi School District contracts with Durham to bus 4,000 students at a cost of $3.6 million, or $900 per student—half of what the RSD-NO pays, or is contracted to pay. Indianapolis also contracts with Durham, as does Memphis. In Indianapolis Durham transports 28,000 under a $15 million contract ($535 per student) and in Memphis, it buses 35,000 students at a contract price of $18 million ($514 per student).

In addition to its $10.5 million contract with Durham, RSD-NO also has a $500,000-a-year contract with Transpar Group of Memphis to design bus routes and to provide oversight.

Transpar, a Missouri company, worked with Vallas when he was chief of schools in Chicago and questions arose then about inflated contracts with the company.

Transpar, in addition to receiving $500,000 a year to draw up bus routes and to provide oversight, also is housed in the RSD New Orleans offices.

School officials in Memphis, Indianapolis and Hinds County, Mississippi, said oversight and route planning is either handled in-house or worked out with Durham and that the additional services of a company like Transpar are not needed.

In retaining Jones Walker, Durham sent signals that it is serious about obtaining payment of funds due the company. Jones Walker is a major player in Louisiana political circles. The firm itself contributed at least $22,000 to Jindal and Paul Cabon of Washington, D.C., the firm’s Director of Governmental Relations, and his wife Susan also contributed more than $28,000 to Jindal. Various other law partners also contributed between $500 and $1,000 each to the governor.

Jones Walker was also the firm retained by the Sabine River Authority in its aborted attempt to sell 600,000 acre-feet (196 billion gallons) of water from the Toledo Bend Reservoir to a group of investors that included Donald T. “Boysie” Bollinger of Lockport.

The controversy over the money Durham says it is owed by RSD raises an even bigger question about the state’s Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) funding for the Recovery School District.

Transportation costs are factored into the MFP appropriation for each school district, meaning the state appropriated funds to be used for the transportation of students in the RSD.

LouisianaVoice has submitted public records requests to DOE in an attempt to ascertain what happened to the funds appropriated to RSD for transportation and why those funds were not used to pay the Durham contract.

CNS previously requested copies of applications for education voucher/scholarships received by the department. DOE denied that request, saying that the applications were in the “pre-decisional status.”

No such exception for public records exists under the state’s public records statute.

The governor’s office does have an exemption that qualifies as part of his “deliberative process.” That exemption provision prevents disclosure of records that are intra-office communications of the governor, relate to the deliberative process of the governor, relate to the governor’s schedule or security (or that of his family), or contain “pre-decisional” advice and recommendations to the governor concerning the budget—none of which qualifies under the reason invoked by DOE.

“You must be an employee of the Office of Student Financial Assistance in order to be considered for this position.”

–one of the requirements of applicants for a new position at the Louisiana Office of Student Financial Assistance (LOSFA) that pays up to $76,000 per year. The position was posted only days after 58 employees were laid off by LOSFA in an administration privatization move.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Pursuant to our public records request of Wednesday, July 11, LOSFA informs us that the number of positions eliminated was actually 58–not 47 as first reported. The number 47 was based on earlier figures released by LOSFA. We have updated the numbers accordingly.

LouisianaVoice was the first to break the news of the 58 classified employees were to be laid off, effective June 30, at the Louisiana Office of Student Financial Assistance (LOSFA).

Now that that messy little item has been taken care of and those 58 employees are gone, LOSFA is advertising on the state’s civil service web page for a new job opening that will pay up to $76,000 per year.

The opening is for the position of Procurement Director 1 and the salary range is $3,023 to $6,361 per month, or $36,276 to $76,332 per year.

But none of the recently laid off employees need apply; the civil service announcement is quite specific in saying the new position is promotional only. “You must be an employee of the Office of Student Financial Assistance in order to be considered for this position,” the announcement says—in bold lettering.

Interpretation: Someone in the LOSFA is about to receive a promotion and a sizable pay bump.

LOSFA, besides serving as the guarantor for student loans, also supports the state’s TOPS and START programs, the Early Start Program, the Rockefeller State Wildlife Scholarship, the State Matching Funds Grant, Go Grant, Chafee Education Training Voucher Program, the Volunteer Firemen’s Tuition Reimbursement Program, John R. Justice Student Loan Repayment Program, Financial Literacy for You (FLY) and College Knowledge.

The 58 employees lost their jobs because of the privatization of LOSFA and at the time that LouisianaVoice first learned of the layoff plan, agency Executive Director Melanie Amrhein promised us she would inform us who in the office would be retained.

She never got back to us, but we learned through other sources that three unclassified employees, each making approximately $100,000 per year, would not lose their jobs. Those were, besides Amrhein, Deputy Executive Director Sujuan Boutté, Assistant Executive Director for Fiscal and Administrative Affairs Jack Hart and Assistant Executive Director for Marketing and Outreach David Roberts.

The agency justified its layoff plan to the Department of Civil Service in April by saying:

• A reduction of overhead was necessary to maintain support of state programs;

• An attrition of staff leads to ineffective administration and further strain on generating revenue;

• Contracting services will potentially result in higher performance on portfolio while allowing the agency to retain a higher net income with reduced overhead;

• The timeline provides an orderly conversion from in-house functions to managed contractor operation;

• Adversely-affected employees will be given time to fine new employment.

(Just not with us, the justification might have added.)

So, just what will the new Procurement Director 1 be doing?

According to the civil service position announcement, the lucky person will “direct and coordinate all aspects of a procurement program for a small agency in the central procurement office or satellite field facility.”

That’s a pretty ambiguous description at best although the announcement does go on to say that the new person will be responsible “for approving emergency acquisitions of commodities,” although it’s just not clear what “commodities” LOSFA will be acquiring.

Around 2 p.m. on Wednesday, we attempted to contact Amrhein, Boutte, Roberts and Hart as well as LOSFA general counsel George Eldredge but no one answered either of the five phones.

The new position is administrative in nature, but with all those 47 employees now gone, who will this new Procurement Director 1direct/administer?

But wait! We get further clarification in the job description. It seems that whoever is promoted to this position will “establish goals and objectives and monitor performance to improve efficiency for the procurement process of the department” and will also “assist agency staff by providing data for establishment of goals and objectives.”

Well, that certainly clears up a lot of questions relative to the overall merits of privatization (read: layoffs) and it certainly is consistent with the administration’s rock solid policy of transparency and accountability.

Just try explaining that to 58 former employees.

“I actually support funding for teaching the fundamentals of America’s Founding Fathers’ religion, which is Christianity, in public schools or private schools. I liked the idea of giving parents the option of sending their children to a public school or a Christian school. We need to insure that it does not open the door to fund radical Islam schools. There are a thousand Muslim schools that have sprung up recently. I do not support using public funds for teaching Islam anywhere here in Louisiana.”

–State Rep. Valerie Hodges (R-Denham Springs), on having second thoughts about her vote in favor of House Bill 976, Gov. Piyush Jindal’s school voucher bill, that he subsequently signed into law as Act 2.