Feeds:
Posts
Comments

It’s not enough that the Republican Governors Association (RGA) has MISCONSTRUED one of our stories about disaster relief in an effort to make Gov. John Bel Edwards look as ineffective as possible.

The RGA ran similar misleading ads in the recent Mississippi gubernatorial election campaign.

And they always seem to pop up at the very end of a campaign, too late for the other side to respond.

And to be sure, both sides are generally equally guilty of such tactics.

Now, an 11th hour TV ad features a grizzled old guy wearing a Vietnam Veteran’s cap ranting about how Edwards has disgraced West Point and the military in general and veterans in particular.

There are several not-so-subtle problems with the ad, however, telltale signs that might cause one to question the ad’s validity:

  • First of all, the “Vietnam vet” talking into the camera is just a little too slick in reciting his lines.
  • It’s almost as if his lines were rehearsed. He skillfully places just the right emphasis on just the right catch-phrases.
  • He comes off not as a genuine veteran, but more like an…actor—certainly not some typical Vietnam veteran one might encounter out for a morning stroll.
  • You notice he never gives his name. It would be helpful to know who this “veteran” is.
  • And that Vietnam Veteran cap? It looks just a little too crisp, too clean, too, well…new.

In the white-hot world of Louisiana political campaigns, there is usually no level to which a candidate is not willing to stoop.

In some quarters, that might be considered STOLEN VALOR.

Of course, the RGA could dispel that suspicion by simply identifying the speaker in the ad.

There was an interesting contrast between Donald Trump’s visits to Monroe on Nov. 4 and Bossier City 10 days later.

In Monroe, Trump endorsed challenger Robert Mills in a state senate race 100 miles to the west, as reported by, among others, THE HAYRIDE, one of the state’s principal cheerleaders for Eddie Rispone and Trump. (That was the same rally, by the way, in which Secretary of State Kyle Ardoin violated state law that prohibits the secretary of state from participating in any partisan campaign other than for his own election by ENDORSING Rispone for governor.)

Mills is seeking to unseat incumbent Ryan Gatti in Senate District 36, which encompasses all of Webster Parish and parts of Bienville, Bossier and Claiborne parishes. Both men are Republicans but Gatti has offended the Republican hierarchy with his non-partisan voting record in the House and by supporting some of the programs of Gov. John Bel Edwards, a Democrat.

Around the same time that Trump was endorsing Mills in that Monroe appearance, Monroe radio personality Moon Griffon got Gatti squarely in his crosshairs, posting on FACEBOOK a copy of an invitation issued by Gatti for a luncheon hosted at his home at which Edwards would be the “special guest.”

Griffon, falling in line with Trump, Rispone, and The Hayride, obediently LAMBASTED Gatti on his radio show (to listen, go to the 10-minute mark of the link).

So far, so good. Everyone is in lockstep. Trump, Rispone, Griffon, The Hayride, U.S. Sen. John Kennedy, U.S. Rep. Mike Johnson, LABI (Mills actually sat on the board of NORTH-PAC, one of LABI’s four directional political action committees).

Until last night, that is. When Trump appeared in Bossier Thursday night, he was smack dab in the middle of District 36 and in the perfect position to again throw his support behind Mills.

In fact, The Hayride on Monday of this week said, “It’ll get even worse when Trump repeats the (Monroe) performance in Bossier City Thursday, at which (time) the president will repeat his endorsement of Mills over Gatti inside of District 36 itself.”

Except he didn’t.

Conspicuously absent in Trump’s Bossier City rally last night was any mention of Mills.

None. Zip. Nada.

Could Ashley Madison have played a role in Trump’s decision not to call for the election of Mills?

LouisianaVoice on Oct. 31 had a STORY that Mills’s name had appeared on the Ashley Madison web page, the online dating service designed specifically for married people seeking a discreet extra-marital affair.

Oops.

So much for the presidential endorsement on the candidate’s home turf.

The absurdity of it all has prompted one lifelong Republican to observe, “This is the craziest election I’ve ever seen. Mike Johnson is behind all of it. (He’s a) fake Christian conservative hatchet man. I just voted for my first Democrat ever.”

 

I had no sooner posted my story of earlier today when I received a text from a friend asking me what was up with what he described as an Eddie Rispone “hit piece” against Gov. John Bel Edwards.

Pleading ignorance, I asked what he was talking about. He said it was an ad that’s running that features a LouisianaVoice story—obviously something that would reflect badly on Edwards.

So, I captured the 30-second ad which opens with aerial footage of the devastating 2016 flood that ravaged southeast Louisiana.

The ad, which says Edwards was caught “flat-footed” (Not really too unbelievable since the victims, yours truly included, were also caught flat-footed and had little time to try and save anything), quickly cuts to a legislative hearing in which Edwards is grilled by a grandstanding lawmaker (more interested in making a political point than in helping victims) who demanded to know how many people were displaced.

Click HERE to see the ad.

The legislator, seizing the opportunity to cast Edwards in as bad a light as possible, when told by Edwards that he didn’t have a clue how many people were impacted, asked, “You’re that clueless?”

That was patently unfair and at its very best, a cheap shot by a snotty-nosed political opportunist.

That was bad enough, but at the 12-second point of the ad, the ad, purchased by the Republican Governors Association PAC flashed a huge headline superimposed over an image of Edwards as he testified.

The headline read: “Flood Recovery Government Contracts Provide Riches to Consultants.”

The source of the headline: a LouisianaVoice story dated March 7, 2018.

I went to our archives and pulled up the story. Here is the LINK.

As you can see, the actual headline reads: “Hurricane, flood recovery government contracts provide riches to consultants, little else but frustration to victims.”

The ad conveniently deletes the words “Hurricane” and “little else but frustration to victims.”

That’s because the story, while citing a $15,000 campaign contribution to Edwards by IEM, which subsequently landed a $308 million contract, concentrated more on administrative costs and the frustrations flood victims encountered with FEMA. Frustrations with things like knowing that of the $1.3 billion appropriated for reconstruction, only $207 million had actually been allocated 19 months after the flood. And today, after another 19 months, little has changed.

And while I’m still smarting over the lack of progress in disbursing recovery funds now three years-plus after the flood, IEM could hardly be classified as a political crony of Edwards, its owner’s $15,000 contribution notwithstanding. Bobby Jindal, Rispone’s mentor, after all, received far more than that from the principals of the Baton Rouge Business Report and its publisher landed a spot on the LSU Board of Supervisors and on the Superdome Board. Likewise, Jindal also appointed Lee Mallet to the LSU Board after receiving more than $150,000 in contributions from Mallett’s family and businesses.

Compared to those contributions, IEM’s $15,000 would hardly classify it as what the ad describes as a”top campaign donor.”

But back to my story of March 7, 2018. The thrust of that story was the contracts awarded for recovery from Katrina and the ensuing fraud. And the main point made regarding flood recovery was not the contract to one firm, which the ad misleadingly said failed, but the ineptness of FEMA which threw up roadblock after roadblock to recovery.

But the main point here is how a candidate, or those working on his behalf, can take a half-truth and turn it into a campaign issue.

It’s done at every level of politics and no one should be surprised at the practice and everyone should cast a jaundiced eye at all such campaign rhetoric although frankly, I firmly believe that despite the expenditure of the millions of dollars on ads in the waning days of the campaign, no more than a dozen or so votes have been changed. Despite those who claim to be undecided in the polls, I believe voters made their decisions weeks ago.

 

LouisianaVoice’s October fundraiser is over, but we continue to offer a signed copy of my latest book Louisiana’s Rogue Sheriffs: A Culture of Corruption to anyone who contributes $100 or more.

This 355-page book paints a comprehensive picture of how sheriffs, the most powerful person in any parish, can—and do—abuse the powers vested in them. Instead of adhering to their oath of office in which they pledge to carry out the duties of their office in accordance with the laws of Louisiana and the Louisiana State Constitution, many sheriffs put profits over the public, giving priorities to filling jails with state prisoners—for pay—and in some cases, becoming involved in drugs, theft, prostitution, and gambling.

It begins with the 1951 New Orleans congressional hearings on organized crime by U.S. Sen. Estes Kefauver of Tennessee. That hearing revealed the active involvement in gambling, prostitution, and smuggling by the sheriffs of four Louisiana parishes.

It also includes accounts of:

  • A sheriff indicted by a federal grand jury for physical and mental abuse of prisoners, only to be acquitted, though several of his deputies were convicted and sentenced to prison;
  • A sitting sheriff sentenced to federal prison following his conviction of drug trafficking;
  • A former sheriff said to have been a bag man for Carlos Marcello;
  • A defeated sheriff who planted a bomb that blew off the foot of his successor;
  • A sheriff who conspired with the local district attorney to wrongly convict a national rodeo star of murder;
  • A sheriff whose office was leasing a marina for $1700 per month who, when the BP spill occurred, sub-let the marina to BP for staging its recovery efforts for a mind-boggling $1.7 million per month—paid to his department.

Those are only a few of the stories contained in this book. Traditionally, Louisiana citizens pay far too little attention to the actions of their sheriffs because, truth be told, they answer to no one—not Congress, not the president, not the governor, not to the legislature.

Former Jefferson Parish Sheriff Harry Lee, once rumored to be considering a run for governor, responded, “Why would I want to be governor when I can be king?” No truer words were ever spoken in describing the powers entrusted to Louisiana sheriffs.

You can order the book by clicking on the oval yellow BUTTON in the column to the upper right of this post.

The button looks like this: Donate Button with Credit Cards

But don’t click on this image; it won’t work. Click on the button to the upper right.

If you can’t spring for a $100 contribution, you may still purchase a copy of the book for $30 (Amazon’s price is $35).

Be sure to provide your mailing address so I can get your book shipped out immediately.

It’s been a long time since an election in Louisiana has featured the level of accusations and misleading ads.

Like four years.

It was in 2015 when then State Rep. John Bel Edwards rolled out his “Prostitutes over Patriots” ad to taint U.S. Sen. David Vitter in the latter’s attempt to succeed the controversial Bobby Jindal to the state’s governor’s mansion next to Capitol Lake.

That ad was a reminder of Vitter’s embarrassing scandal over his skipping a vote to honor 28 soldiers killed in action in favor of taking a call from a PROSTITUTES.

That ad eclipsed Vitter’s attempt to smear Edwards for his visit to a black nightclub that featured semi-nude dancers.

In an ugly sidebar, Jefferson Parish Sheriff Newell Normand, a Republican who succeeded the colorful—and controversial—Harry Lee, got involved in the race, first by endorsing Edwards and then by collaring an apparent campaign mole attempting to record a session of Edwards supporters at a coffee claque.

Ugly indeed. Worthy of Earl Long.

Fast forward to 2019 and little has changed.

Both candidates, incumbent Gov. Edwards, a Democrat, and Republican challenger Eddie Rispone have unloaded a spate of attack ads against each other that have Louisiana voters suffering severe cases of campaign fatigue. If possible, the barrage is worse even than the avalanche of lawyer ads that seem to obscure local newscasts.

Edwards convinced black leaders in New Orleans to remove an ad comparing Rispone to David Duke, prompting Rispone to accuse Edwards of playing the race card, accusing Edwards’ family of racism because his ancestors were slave owners.

Ugly.

Even Donald Trump has inserted himself into the governor’s race, appearing at rallies over the state and charging that Edwards is pro-abortion and anti-2nd Amendment.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Edwards broke with his own party to support and sign into law one of the harshest anti-abortion laws in the nation—the constitutionality of which will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. And Edwards, himself a hunter, is a strong advocate of the 2nd Amendment.

Rispone has fashioned himself as a “jobs creator,” but Edwards ads point out that he has a record of outsourcing jobs to foreign workers who subsequently sued him over benefits. And as for the jobs Rispone says he “created,” Edwards has noted that Rispone’s company has received millions of dollars in tax exemptions for businesses that created precious few jobs.

Rispone has an ad attacking Edwards as being “too liberal for Louisiana” that inserts Edwards responding to the hypothetical “how liberal is John Bel Edwards,” saying “That’s a stupid question.”

Problem is, the Edwards comment is taken out of context. The remark was in response to Rispone’s debate question about New Orleans being a sanctuary city—which, in fact, was an uninformed question, much like Rispone’s claim that the State Constitution contained 400 pages just on the state tax code.

Ugly.

The Edwards campaign features an ad that shows Rispone introducing then-Gov. Bobby Jindal at some function (we don’t know what, but it does appear authentic). His introduction is interspersed with negative news headlines about major budget cuts and budgetary shortfalls that occurred during Jindal’s eight years. Rispone can be heard congratulating Jindal on “a great job.”

The end concludes with a warning that we can’t go back to the Jindal years.

Recently, Secretary of State KYLE ARDOIN apparently violated a state prohibition against him (or any secretary of state) from participating in any partisan election other than his own—because as secretary of state, he is in charge of impartially overseeing all elections in the state—when he appeared in a Trump rally in Monroe and endorsed Rispone.

Ugly.

A Rispone ad inaccurately accused one of Edwards’ supporters, a West Point roommate, of landing a STATE CONTRACT worth up to $65 million. The facts revealed that while Murray Starkel did bid on the coastal restoration contract, neither his firm nor any of the other three bidders received the contract. The ad was subsequently pulled.

A Rispone ad attacking Edwards’ MILITARY RECORD was particularly ugly, especially in light of the fact that Rispone’s primary benefactor, Baton Rouge businessman Lane Grigsby, DROPPED OUT of West Point.

And while Rispone appears satisfied to attack Edwards vis TV ads, he seems reluctant to face Edwards face to face, one on one, other than the formal debates to which he committed earlier. But he was a NO SHOW at a Baton Rouge Area Chamber forum as well as a Baton Rouge Press Club debate, prompting one observer to speculate that he didn’t get Grigsby’s permission to attend.

And while Rispone offers no hard solutions to any of the state’s problems other than to say he is a “jobs creator,” Edwards can—and does—boast that he took over a state wallowing in eight consecutive years of budgetary deficits of the Jindal administration to produce a $300 million budget surplus.

Rispone’s most effective ad features his daughter Dena extolling his family values, his faith and the fact that he is not only a wonderful father, but a “good man.” It’s easily the least offensive ad that either candidate has rolled out, even more effective than the image of Edwards driving down the road in his pickup truck with his arm draped around his wife’s shoulder. That ad may have been genuine, but I couldn’t help but feel it appeared contrived, posed. Rispone’s daughter, by contrast, was about as sincere as any ad in the entire festering campaign and, looking directly into the camera, she comes across as a truly loving daughter. Nothing about it seems rehearsed.

Rispone, however, all but negates that ad with another in which he opens by saying Louisiana is the best state in the nation but immediately clicks off a multitude of poor rankings that causes one to question his claim of our being the “best” state.

There can be no denying there are lingering problems that are so entrenched from decades of back room politics that put lawmakers’ personal gain of the state’s best interests.

In 2018, Louisiana had an unemployment rate of 4.9 percent, fourth-highest in the nation, and a poverty rate of 18.6 percent, the nation’s third-highest.

There are those who are not as enamored as Rispone’s daughter. And the skeptics include at least two elected Republicans.

One, a state senator, cautioned, “If you think Jindal was bad, just wait until you see what happens if Rispone is elected.”

Another, a parish official, said Rispone would bring back former commissioners of administration Kristi Nichols and Angelle Davis from “political oblivion” to work in his administration.

Those two, and others Republicans with similar opinions, will be targeted by the State Republican Party as RINOs (Republicans in Name Only).

Regardless, the citizens of Louisiana will breathe a sigh of relief when this circus is over.

Political campaigns in Louisiana can wear even the most resilient observer down to his or her last nerve.

Ugly.