Louisiana Voice

The most vile, evil man in America (no, not Donald Trump, but the architect of most of Diaper Don’s malicious, sub-human acts) is now openly advocating the suspension of HABEAS CORPUS, the very bedrock on which the American Republic was founded 250 years ago.

Folks, this is the first step to the complete eradication of freedom. This ain’t a sky is falling scare tactic, it’s all too real. Civil liberties, freedom of speech, press, assembly and yes, even religion, are at stake here.

This is the one outrageous maneuver of many we simply cannot—must not allow to take place. Habeas corpus is the age-old right to force the government to justify, before a judge, why it has locked a person up. It is enshrined in Article I of the Constitution.

Oh, to be sure, what Stephen Miller, that spawn of Satan, is advocating is the suspension of habeas corpus for unauthorized immigrants but don’t think for one nano-second that is just a first step, that it could—and would—be expanded to any other group or person perceived by this bedbug crazy administration to be an enemy of the state.

It is such a horrific idea that an obscure attorney serving as White House secretary, dared to write a SECRET MEMO to Chief of Staff Susie Wiles back on April 29 that said, in carefully-couched lawyerly vernacular, the administration was playing with fire with the very Constitution serving as tinder.

This is way past renaming the Kennedy Center after himself or painting the Reflecting Pool blue or a giant arch or a billion-dollar ballroom or cage fights on the White House lawn or even those “86/47” messages. All those things, irritating as they might be, are nickel and dime stuff compared to this. This is major league tampering with the very foundation of our government and it cannot stand.

Donald Trump’s ego is being fed by this monster Miller and that man knows no restrictions. Ruling vicariously through Trump, Miller will stop at nothing until he has trampled every right we have to vote, eat, think, breathe and speak. He is Hitler without the charm and charisma. He is Idi Amin without the benevolence. He is David Duke without the robe and hood.

But after all that, he must—MUST—be made to understand that he is a mortal man who is required to live by the laws of this country and that his desire to set aside those laws are something that can just never be.

Never.

Read Full Post »

“I (elected or appointed individual) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution and laws of the United States and the constitution and laws of this State; and I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (elected or appointed position), and according to the best of my ability and understanding. So help me God.”

The foregoing is the so-called “loyalty oath” to which all Louisiana State hires or elected officials must fill out—in writing as a condition of employment or elective office.

The second part of the oath reads, “A person may be temporarily employed for fifteen days, and if the above statement is not filed by the fifteenth day, he shall be discharged.”

The loyalty oath has been around since the end of the Civil War and were first adopted by state and federal governments as “test oaths” which the Supreme Court said exceeded a pledge of future loyalty when it struck down the law in 1867. That decision established the principle which continues today: loyalty oaths cannot be used o punish people retroactively for past beliefs or associations. The court considered that a violation of the First Amendment.

With the advent of the Cold War, the most aggressive expansion of loyalty oaths was undertaken with a demand that public employees swear they were not members of the Communist Party or any organization advocating the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. That, it turned out, was called a “negative oath” which led to a wave of litigation with the so-called “affirmative oath,” which ask for a pledge of future support of the Constitution and the law, emerging as the oaths administered today. The difference is that today’s oaths do not typically demand that one disclaim membership in any group.

State Sen. Tony Guarisco of Morgan City attempted in 1986 to scrap the oath because of what he considered as a violation of the First Amendment.

“It never got out of committee,” he remembers. “I was the only ‘yes’ vote. Committee members ridiculed a young LSU professor who was the only person to testify. He testified in favor of the bill.”

The loyalty oath was weaponized as a result of the House Committee on Unamerican Activities, which in turn was spawned by McCarthyism and his Red Scare tactics. Two of the members of the HCUA were from Louisiana: U.S. Reps. Ed Willis of St. Martinville, the committee chair, and F. Edward Hebert of New Orleans.

Since the [State Senate] committee wanted to keep the law in place, I asked the governor’s appointees who required [Senate] confirmation, “Are you now or were you ever…”

One appointee, he said, stormed out of the committee room yelling that Guarisco had called him a communist.

“The loyalty oath is still in effect,” Guarisco said, “but it’s hidden as part of R.S. 42:52 (ed seq) that people such as college professors have to sign.

“Years ago, a young, highly sought-out English professor from another state was recruited by USL (not ULL). He declined to sign the oath and was not hired.”

Guarisco, 87, served in the Louisiana State Senate from 1976-1988. He received his law degree from Loyola University in New Orleans.

First elected in 1975, he sponsored a bill to permit physicians in Louisiana prescribe marijuana for therapeutic treatment of glaucoma and in treatment by chemotherapy. Gov. Edwin Edwards signed his bill into law and the Marijuana Control Board was created to monitor the law but the panel never functioned and was abolished in 1989 by Gov. Bubby Roemer who eliminated many other inactive boards and commissions.

He was an early supporter of the failed Equal Rights Amendment and he created and served as the first Senate parliamentarian, designing a process for confirming gubernatorial appointees. He founded the Endowed Chairs for Eminent Scholars program in higher education and the LSU Endowment for Excellence, pioneered admission standards for LSU, and laws regarding open meetings and public records. He was the lead author on legislation to prevent punitive damages against the press. In 1981, he was the floor manager for the impeachment and removal of state Senator Gaston Gerald of Greenwell Springs, convicted of extortion.

He was succeeded in the State Senate by future Gov. Mike Foster in 1988.

Read Full Post »

“I hate to say it, but loving our country is starting to sound like an abused spouse saying they love their abuser.”

—Actor Robert De Niro, commenting on state of the U.S. under Trump

Read Full Post »

She won’t receive anything approaching the award but the verdict handed down by a Bossier Parish jury in the case of a woman who claimed her late stepfather sexually abused her beginning when she was just four years old, should be a shot across the bow of abusers everywhere.

The jury awarded Pamela Elaine Lockridge $500 million for pain and suffering, $600 million in punitive damages and $585,000 for past and future medical and psychological treatment costs—more than $1.1 billion—an astounding award for any individual who is not a corporate CEO, according to a story in THE GUARDIAN, a British publication that has done a stellar job of tracking child sex abuse cases.

Her lead attorney, former state legislator Ryan Gatti, who admitted that Lockridge’s case was the first he had actually tried in more than a quarter-century of practicing law, said neither he nor Lockridge expected to collect the full award from her stepfather’s estate. Instead, Gatti said he expected to reach an undisclosed settlement.

Should that indeed be the case, there would be no appeal. If no such settlement is reached, it is within the presiding judge’s discretion to reduce the award or the defendants may appeal.

Regardless, the verdict is seen as a warning to future defendants in childhood sex abuse cases that juries are fed up with predators who seek out children for sexual abuse and that smaller verdicts like the $2.4 million in damages awarded last year to a man who sued the Holy Cross Catholic religious order in New Orleans for childhood sexual abuse. Those awards may now be a thing of the past with juries leaning toward larger awards like Lockridge’s.

If you would like to know more about the horrors of child sex trafficking, you may order my latest book, The Dinosaur Club. It’s a historical fiction book about a group of retired newspaper reporters who call themselves The Dinosaurs who stumble upon a child sex-trafficking operation and set out to bring it down. You may order the book from Amazon by clicking on the image below:

Read Full Post »

At least U.S. 3^rd Circuit Court of Appeal Judge (Ret.) Kent Savoie meted out a severe sentence to convicted murderer Demetric Cornell Savoy when he was on a three-judge panel that UPHELD a life imprisonment.

Judge Kent Savoie

That’s in sharp contrast to the sentence he handed down to Misty Roberts, WHO GOT 90 DAYS and a suspended five-year term.

You might remember the story a few weeks back about Roberts, the erstwhile mayor of DeRidder who was caught diddling her son’s 16-year-old friend at a pool party at Roberts’s home. Making matters even worse, the two were busted by two of Roberts’s children and a nephew.

She was CONVICTED in March on two felony counts—carnal knowledge of a juvenile and indecent behavior with a minor—in connection with the 2024 liaison with the underaged boy. She resigned as mayor just days before her arrest for the incident.

Her brother, BRANDON LEE ROBERTS, was sentenced to prison in 2025 after entering a guilty plea to sexually assaulting a girl beginning when she was around 13.

So, how did she get off so lightly? Well, that’s a story in itself.

Savoie was supposedly informed by Roberts’s defense attorney Adam Johnson that hizzoner might be unpopular on social media if he only rendered a suspended sentence. “If you give her a suspended sentence, you’re not going to get as many likes,” Johnson told the judge, casting some doubt as to whom he was representing—Roberts or Savoie.

Savoie, contacted by a Lake Charles TV station, said he had researched how other similar cases were handled in the parish.

Guess he missed that matter involving Brandon Lee Roberts last year.

Just another example of how even-handed justice is in Loozeraner.

Read Full Post »