Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Governor’s Office’ Category

The Washington Post was one of the few members of the media to cover a large, mostly unnoticed march on the White House by 5,000 teachers from all over the country on Saturday.

One of the organizers of the march was Katherine McBride Cox, a native of Ruston and a 1961 graduate of Ruston High School.

She recently retired after 35 years as an educator in Arizona where she served as a classroom teacher and a principal at the elementary and high school levels. As a teacher, she developed a nationally-recognized career education program for fifth and sixth graders called Window on the World.

For eight years, she taught a self-contained class for gifted students and later worked with at-risk middle school students. She also has served as an instructional coach for other teachers.

She shares her experiences as a school principal under No Child Left Behind on her website In the Trenches (www.inthetrencheswithschoolreform.com/).

Actor Matt Damon, whose mother was a teacher, was a featured speaker for the event. “This is has been a horrible decade for teachers,” he told the marchers. But even his appearance failed to attract media attention hoped for by organizers.

If the teachers’ march was largely ignored by the national media, it is somewhat understandable, considering the worldwide attention given to the national debt crisis and the accompanying gridlock that has gripped Washington.

The event was simply a victim of bad timing through no fault of the organizers, but that by no means diminishes the importance of the march.

The Washington Post, which did provide coverage of the event, featured a photo of marchers that would seem to bring the entire issue into focus. Featured prominently in the photo was a marcher carrying a sign that read, “Stop ALEC Now.”

ALEC is the acronym for the American Legislative Exchange Council. It is an organization of conservative legislators and business leaders who have formulated a lengthy laundry list of legislation on issues ranging from immigration to health care to deregulation of industry to union-busting to prison privatization to school vouchers and charter schools.

The organization is holding its national conference in New Orleans all this week and a new list of proposed legislation is almost certain to emerge after approval of ALEC’s corporate-dominated board which is represented by such companies as Koch Industries, AT&T, Wal-Mart, State Farm Insurance, Kraft, Johnson & Johnson, and Eli Lilly.

Gov. Bobby Jindal, the darling of the Republican Party until his disastrous response to President Obama’s State of the Union address in 2010, will be the guest speaker at the ALEC plenary lunch on Wednesday at 11:30 a.m.

It would be a mistake, however, for the media to concentrate on Jindal’s address and ignore events that take place behind the scenes. That’s where the delegates will get down and dirty with their legislative proposals and Jindal almost certainly will be paying close attention.

Typical of ALEC platforms is the attempt in 2010 by Rep. John Schroder of Abita Springs who introduced four separate bills aimed at abolishing the state’s civil service system. The effort failed but cropped up later that year when Wisconsin Governor-elect Scott Walker initiated efforts to abolish state employee and teacher unions.

A quick history lesson: Since 1950, the percentage of the U.S. work force represented by organized labor has dropped from 32 percent to 11.9 percent in 2010. Last year, there were 7.9 million public sector union members compared to only 7.4 million in the private sector, despite the fact that corporate America employees five times the number of wage-earners.

Because of the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs by American industry, there are fewer of those jobs left in this country. Outsourcing has cost this country literally millions of well-paying manufacturing jobs. Of course, not all jobs are outsourced overseas. In 1993, American Airlines decided to contract out its ticket counter jobs. The result was employees who were making $40,000 annually suddenly found themselves with a new employer who offered them their old jobs at $16,000 per year.

All organized labor has done for this country is to give American workers (blue-collar and white-collar alike) the eight-hour work day, the 40-hour work week, mandatory breaks, job safety, grievance procedures, minimum wages, workers comp, pensions, health care, paid sick days, vacation days, holidays, and an end to child labor.

None of that matters to ALEC, however.

Profit-driven to the core, ALEC and its corporate supporters have turned their full attention to unconditional support of charter schools and vouchers. As if in lock-step, Republican administrations across the country have cloned each other’s agendas and cloed ranks in attempts to dismantle public education in favor of more and more charter schools.

Cutting funding is one of the favorite methods of crippling public education. Transportation of private school students to and from school, for example, was once funded by the state. This year that responsibility was transferred to local school boards, already financially strapped after Jindal pulled federal funding intended for the local systems.

In Louisiana, public schools have state-mandated, uniform reasons for which a student may be expelled from school. Under those standards, a student may be expelled from a public school for only the most egregious transgression. With charter schools, those reasons vary from school to school. Lafayette Academy charter school, for example, can expel students for sleeping in class, failing to report to the office as directed, disobeying a teacher, cheating, lying or any other “disruptive, disrespectful or disobedient” conduct.

Abramson Charter School in New Orleans, which recently had its charter revoked, could expel students for not being in assigned seats before the tardy bell rings, not bringing pencils or books to class, or for not raising hands before talking.

Other charter schools may “disenroll” a student for being tardy five times or for not maintaining a 2.0 grade point average.

While public schools find it virtually impossible to expel students, the double standard between public and charter schools allows charter schools to rid themselves of the lower-performing students and thus to improve standardized test scores. This gives an unfair advantage to charter schools by creating an unlevel playing field that allows the charters to artificially inflate grades on standardized tests, the holy grail of No Child Left Behind.

Jindal has taken up the ALEC banner in his efforts to promote charter schools and to privatize state government agencies. His efforts are certain to intensify if he is re-elected in October and can carry his Republican majority in both the House and Senate over into his second administration. Those who cheer those efforts would do well to little consider the long-term effects of reducing state services through privatization.

Not that we’re making comparisons, but before these efforts are encouraged too enthusiastically, we should remember this: On May 2, 1933, in a brazen move to consolidate his political power, Adolf Hitler outlawed trade unions in Nazi Germany as a precursor to eliminating all opposition groups.

Certainly, Jindal should be astute enough to see that his agenda is not necessarily the best course of action for the state. The sale of prisons, for example, would be a move to obtain one-time revenue for recurring expenses, something to which he voiced his opposition when running for governor.

The privatization of the Office of Group Benefits would mean turning the most fiscally-responsible, most efficiently-run agency in state government over to a private entity whose only possible motive would be profit which necessarily must translate to higher premiums or benefit cutbacks. That’s the wrong reason to sacrifice the livelihoods of 149 dedicated state employees.

It’s also as wrong as wrong can possibly be to turn one’s back on the best interest of the state in favor of personal ambition.

Read Full Post »

BATON ROUGE (CNS)—One of the primary forces behind the systematic elimination of public schools, the privatization of government, and the widespread implementation of the Milton Friedman school of economic principles is the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

The organization, founded in 1973 by conservative activists, ALEC has drafted a list of radical legislation it plans to propose in Republican-controlled states in an apparent effort to duplicate the so-called “shock doctrine” forced on countries in South and Central America in the 1980s and 1990s with disastrous results.

Louisiana Legislator Rep. Noble Ellington (R-Winnsboro) last December said, “Never has the time been so right” to plan the radical reshaping of policies in the states. His remarks were made at a gathering of conservative legislators in Washington on the heels of the midterm elections that saw Republicans seize majorities in both legislative chambers and governorships in 21 states.

The event was the “States and Nation Policy Summit” and it featured such heavy hitters as Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

Calling itself “the nation’s largest non-partisan, individual public-private membership association of state legislators, ALEC will hold its 2011 annual meeting, “Solutions for the States,” in New Orleans for six days, beginning Monday at the Marriott.

Charter schools are one of the organization’s main showcases, so the timing of the annual meeting couldn’t be worse, given the ongoing investigations of two charter schools in New Orleans and Baton Rouge into allegations of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, and cheating.

The highlight for attendees, of course, will be the appearance of free market wunderkind Gov. Bobby Jindal who will be the featured speaker at the organization’s plenary lunch on Wednesday at 11:30 a.m.

ALEC’s proposed legislation must first meet the approval of corporate donors who have veto power over language contained in the legislation which in turn, is developed by secretive task forces out of the view and scrutiny of the public.

The task forces cover every imaginable issue from education to health policy, from union-busting to privatization of schools and government, from global warming to industry deregulation.

ALEC’s agenda tracks the agenda of the late economist Milton Friedman who sent his disciples into Brazil, Venezuela, Chile, Poland, Russia, China, Indonesia, and several other countries in the wake of natural or man-made disasters to institute privatization of government programs and industries before the citizens could recoup their senses.

Friedman specialized in earthquakes, revolutions, and tsunamis, moving in and instituting radical change in economic and political policies. That pattern was followed with the public school system in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans with many formerly public schools now being operated by corporate-run charters.

Invariably, when Friedman’s economists moved in, the chasm between the super rich and the super poor grew ever wider as unemployment soared when jobs disappeared, people lost their homes, and inflation made local currency worthless. It was then that U.S. corporations moved in and purchased state-owned mines and manufacturing plants for pennies on the dollar.

In 2007, ALEC made its most ambitious and strategic push for privatization of education with its publication, School Choice and State Constitutions, which proposed a list of programs tailored to each state.

ALEC’s 2010 Report Card on American Education challenged members to “transform the system, don’t tweak it.”

After what has occurred with the Abramson Science and Technology Charter School in New Orleans earlier this month and now the ongoing revelations at Kenilworth Science and Technology School in Baton Rouge, someone needs to tweak something. The State Department of Education has already pulled Abramson’s charter and now Kenilworth is under investigation.

Both schools are operated by Pelican Educational Foundation which has ties to a Turkish-run, Houston-based firm, Atlas Texas Construction and Trading and Atlas vice president Inci Akpinar.

Louisiana Department of Education investigator Folwell Dunbar, who investigated complaints against Abramson last year, reported that Akpinar attempted to bribe him in an effort to smooth over problems at the school but nothing was done until a year later when the state auditor began an investigation.

Only then did the Department of Education take decisive action by revoking Abramson’s charter—and firing both Dunbar and his supervisor, Jacob Landry.

Apparently ALEC’s 2010 Report Card on American Education has its own definition of transformation: shoot the messenger.

Read Full Post »

Bundling: In politics, the term refers to the convoluted practice of combining many small contributions from individuals and political action committees (PACs) into one large contribution that are then funneled to a candidate through a “conduit,” generally a corporate executive or a lobbyist who, of course, expects something in return.

In more familiar personal injury attorney parlance, that would be known as a “runner,” a practice widely frowned upon and one which has cost some attorneys their licenses to practice law. In the almost anything goes rules of politics, bundling exists on the dark fringes of ethical practices yet remains legal, legal being a relative term at best.

Many political candidates now participate in bundling but sometimes it can backfire as in the case of textile importer-fugitive Norman Hsu who bundled $800,000 in contributions for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign.

And in the case of Gov. Bobby Jindal, who claims to have donated to a charity a $1,000 contribution from the Louisiana Chitimacha Indian Tribe that was bundled by an associate of former House Majority Leader Tom Delay (R-Texas), bundling at best, would seem to block transparency and at worst, raise serious ethics questions.

Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations require that whenever a corporate executive or lobbyist physically touches a bundled contribution and delivers money to a campaign the bundler, as well as the original contributor, must be publicly disclosed in the campaign’s FEC reports. If the bundler does not come into physical contact with the checks, he/she is not required to be disclosed to the public as the conduit source of the contribution. It’s not clear as to how physical contact is monitored.

One way to recognize bundling is when several employees of a company or members of a PAC, in efforts to get around limitations on giving, pool their contributions which then show up more often than not as identical amounts on the same dates or on dates that are clustered together.

Plainly and simply, bundling is employed as a method to circumvent campaign finance laws and some do it better than others.

Take Tony Rudy, for example.

Rudy once headed up an influence-peddling organization called the Alexander Strategy Group and through that firm, he pulled in tens of thousands of dollars in the 2004 and 2005 election cycles on behalf of Jindal from such donors as UPS, Eli Lilly, Bellsouth, R.J. Reynolds (ever wonder why Jindal vetoed the 4-cent cigarette tax renewal?), Microsoft, Fannie Mae, Koch Industries, Dupont, AstraZeneca (a biopharmaceutical company), the National Auto Dealers Association, the Property Casualty Insurers Association, the American Bankers Association, and Amgen (biotechnology and pharmaceutical company).

Not only was bundling done on a wholesale basis on Jindal’s behalf, but identical contributions by individuals and committees, many on the same dates totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars, routinely appeared in separate reports filed by candidate Jindal, the Committee to Re-elect Bobby Jindal, and Friends of Bobby Jindal, Inc. Contributions ranged from $500 to $5,000.

That’s six separate reports on which the same contributors from Rudy’s exclusive client list appeared.

Other former clients of Alexander Strategy Group included Time Warner, Freddie Mac, Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, AT&T, Blackwater USA, and Enron.

Alexander Strategy Group was one of Washington’s premier lobbying operations before it was shut down in January of 2006 after its ties to DeLay and another powerful lobbyist, Jack Abramoff, became known.

Rudy, a former aide to DeLay, worked for Abramoff before joining Alexander Strategy Group. Rudy’s wife also ran a political consulting firm that received $50,000 in exchange for services Rudy performed while working for DeLay. Delay was indicted in 2005 on money-laundering charges. Abramoff pleaded guilty in early January of 2006 to fraud and conspiracy charges.

One of Abramoff’s clients was the Chitimacha Indian Tribe of Louisiana that contributed at least $1,000 to Jindal who since has claimed to have given that money to charity.

He said the same thing nearly two years ago, however, about $10,000 in campaign contributions from Florida attorney Scott Rothstein, recently convicted in a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme.

Jindal press secretary Kyle Plotkin said Rothstein’s contribution would be given to a victim’s compensation fun “once one is created.” That was in November of 2009 but a check of Jindal campaign expenditures has revealed no such donation.

Besides clients of Alexander Strategy Group, other contributors that appeared on more than one of the Jindal contributor lists included Goldman Sachs, BP Corp., ExxonMobil, CH2M Hill, Chevron, Hospital Corp. of America, Northrop Grumman, Entergy, Citigroup, BlueCross/Blue Shield, Albemarle, Wal-Mart, Lorillard Tobacco, Pfizer, and others.

Read Full Post »

“Legislators will have to give full financial disclosure. There will be no exceptions and no loopholes.”

“I will have a high standard for performance and a zero-tolerance for ethical lapses by my administrative appointments.”

Gov. Bobby Jindal, on his insistence on transparency and compliance with ethics regulations, some time before he paid a $2,500 ethics fine after then campaign chief and now Jindal Chief of Staff Timmy Teepell “forgot” to report an expenditure of $118,265 that the Republican Party of Louisiana spent on direct mail on Jindal’s behalf in June of 2007.

Read Full Post »

“If you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas.” It’s a proverb almost as old as civilization itself but it’s just as applicable today as it ever was.

Just ask Gov. Bobby Jindal.

That would be the same Bobby Jindal who routinely hops a state helicopter to some rural north Louisiana town to give adoring protestant church members a testimonial of his faith, all while adding to his growing list of potential donors.

It’s the same Bobby Jindal who promised transparency in an “open and accountable administration” and who loves to boast of his many reforms to supporters in states other than Louisiana.

It’s the same Bobby Jindal who four years ago published a campaign brochure attesting to his undying devotion to state employees but who today is doing everything possible to fire state employees, sell state offices and facilities, abolish Civil Service, and pull public education down brick by brick with his obsession over charter schools.

It would also be the same Bobby Jindal whose congressional committee the Federal Elections Commission refuses to shut down because of Jindal’s failures to respond to several Requests for Additional Information (RFAI) issued way back in 2006. His committee responded to the RFAIs regarding contributor identities, but five years later, reportedly chooses to ignore questions about illegal contributions.

It’s also the same Bobby Jindal who accepted $22,500 in five contributions from four different gambling, er gaming interests between July 2007 and January of this year. Those contributions were from Redman Gaming of Louisiana ($5,000) and Pelican Bingo Distributors ($5,000), both of the same address in Kenner, Nicky Nichols ($5,000) of Nichols Bingo Distributors, Coulon Consultants ($5,000), and Tim Coulon Campaign, Inc. ($2,500). Coulon is the former Jefferson Parish president who is registered as an officer in the now-defunct CWC Gaming.

And finally, it’s the same Bobby Jindal who two years ago promised to give $10,000 he received from a Florida attorney recently convicted in a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to an unnamed victim’s compensation fund.

Only hours before Tim Tebow and his Florida Gators defeated LSU, 51-21 in October of 2008, Jindal attended one of his infamous out-of-state fundraisers, co-hosted by Scott Rothstein, at the time a prominent Fort Lauderdale attorney who, in June of 2010, was sentenced to 50 years in federal prison.

First reports said Rothstein contributed $5,000 to Jindal and his law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, ponied up another $5,000. A quick check by LouisianaVoice, however, revealed that Kim Rothstein of the same address as Scott Rothstein gave another $5,000.

When news stories revealed the Rothstein contributions to Jindal, which were until now reported at only $10,000, Jindal, through mouthpiece, er press secretary Kyle Plotkin, magnanimously announced that the $10,000 from Rothstein and his law firm would be given to a victim’s compensation fund “once one is created.”

Certainly, Jindal’s campaign finance committee, which must fill out and submit reports of all contributions, must have known that the Scott and Kim Rothstein contributions came from the same address. Still, Jindal pledged to return only the $10,000 that was revealed in news reports.

So why didn’t Jindal take it upon himself, through Plotkin, of course (Jindal never seems willing to answer direct questions) to correct the figure and say he would donate the entire $15,000 to a victim’s compensation fund “once one is created.”

That was in November of 2009. A check of expenditures by Jindal’s campaign revealed 33 separate expenditures totaling $396,300 but nothing to any victim’s compensation fund.

Nada.

Zilch.

We did find that of the 33 expenditures, 26 were spent on out-of-state companies and of the seven payments to Louisiana firms, one was to the Republican Party of Louisiana ($10,934).

But nothing to any victim’s compensation fund.

Nil.

Zero.

Could it be that our transparent and accountable governor is not entirely trustworthy or that he’s not good for his word?

One would think that in nearly two years, Jindal could find a victim’s compensation fund that could use the $10,000. Or would that be $15,000?

Apparently not if the governor is placed on the honor system.

Nevertheless, here’s a victim’s compensation fund the governor might consider as a potential recipient:

Crime Victims Reparations Board
Commission on Law Enforcement
1885 Wooddale Blvd., Suite 708
Baton Rouge, LA. 70806
225-925-4437.

Here’s another worthy organization:

St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
262 Danny Thomas Place
Memphis, TN. 38105
800-822-6344

They’re waiting to hear from you, Governor.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »