So, the question of the day is: how responsive is the administration of one Jeff Landry to the public’s right to know about how our state government conducts its business?
For the answer to that, we need only refer to a single public records request made by LouisianaVoice back on Sept. 3.
On that date, the following public records request was submitted to the Louisiana Office of Economic Development (LED):
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2026 4:11 PM
Subject: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
Under the Louisiana Public Records Act § 44:1 et seq., I am requesting the opportunity to review all copies of public records that include:
Any and all Nondisclosure Agreements executed, signed or otherwise agreed to by the following elected and/or appointed officials for the Parish of Livingston and Watson, Louisiana, from January 1, 2020 through September 3, 2026:
A list of 30 names was included in that request. Here is the initial response from the LED:
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 at 11:22 AM
To: Tom Aswell <louisianavoice@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
Good morning:
The official records custodian for Louisiana Economic Development (“LED”) received your Public Records Request (“PRR”) on September 3, 2026, at 4:11 p.m.
LED estimates that its search for records that may be responsive to your request, along with any necessary review, segregation, examination, redaction, and processing, will be completed by November 3, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. If records that may be responsive to your request are identified and become available for production before that time, LED will make them available as soon as practicable.
If responsive records are identified for production, LED’s standard copying fee of $0.25 per page may apply. At this time, we are unable to estimate any costs associated with your request. If responsive records are identified for production, you will be notified of any applicable copying costs before the records are provided. You may also inspect any responsive
records made available for inspection at no cost.
Thank you for reaching out to LED.
Monica Craig-Champagne
Strategic Communications Project Manager
Louisiana Economic Development
Now, in case you might be unfamiliar with the Louisiana Public Records statute (L.R.S. 44:2 et seq), the law clearly and unequivocally says that the custodian of the records “shall” provide any public record not exempt immediately or inform the requestor as to when the record will become available “within three working days.”
Nevertheless, giving LED the benefit of the doubt, I did not object to their arbitrary timetable.
But as that deadline approached, I received the following email from Ms. Champagne at 7:27 a.m. on Oct. 26:
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2026 7:27 AM
To: louisianavoice@outlook.com
Subject: Re: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
Dear Requestor:
Apologies for the delay. Please be advised that despite our diligent efforts, we are still in the process of collecting, segregating, and reviewing records that may be responsive to your request. We estimate that any records we may deem responsive to your request should be available by December 30, 2026 by 5:00 p.m.
Best Regards,
Monica Craig-Champagne
Strategic Communications Project Manager
Louisiana Economic Development
Dec. 30? Why, that’s four months after I submitted my original request. So, 17 minutes later, at 7:44 I responded:
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2026 7:44 AM
To: Emma.Wagner@la.gov
Subject: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
This is totally unacceptable. I will come to LED to review the files myself. State law says you are required to make them available on demand. I fully intend to have that law enforced. You are stalling, attempting to wait me out and I simply won’t have it. The alternative is litigation against the department and the custodian of the record(s).
Tom Aswell
louisiana-public-records-act.pdf
I also included the above link to the state’s public records law as well as a copy and paste of applicable sections of the statute:
What is a public body? A government agency, branch, office, department, board, commission, committee, subcommittee or other governing authority at the state, parish or local level. Private corporations that perform a governmental function may also be considered public bodies. 2. What is a public record? Any document that is created, used or kept to perform the business of a public body, regardless of physical format. Public records include books, papers, letters, maps, pictures, drawings, photographs and recordings. They also include information stored electronically, such as in e-mail and databases. 3. How do I see (examine) a public record? At no cost, you can examine any public record in the office where it is kept during regular working hours. Special permission may be needed to allow you to see a record in a different place or at a different time. The person responsible for keeping the record can make reasonable rules to make sure that you do not destroy, damage or alter a record while you are examining it. (However, only Louisiana residents can seek records from the governor’s office and must provide ID.) • The law calls the person in charge of releasing or protecting records the “custodian.” The person in charge of any public body is automatically a records custodian, but the responsibility can also be granted to other employees who handle records. Most public bodies name only a few people to handle all public records requests. • The custodian may ask for your name and age before showing you a public record. Also, the custodian may ask you to sign a list so he or she can keep track of who has seen or copied a certain record. The custodian can ask questions about the specific records being sought if unable to determine what records are requested. 4. How do I get a copy of a public record? You may ask for a public record in any manner—over the phone or in person, by email or in a letter. To protect your right to sue in case of a dispute, you should always request records in writing and date your request.
The following day, Oct. 27, at 10:09 a.m., I received this:
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2026 10:09 AM
To: louisianavoice@outlook.com
Subject: Re: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
Dear Requestor:
After a diligent search and review of the agency’s records in regards to your September 3, 2026, Public Records Request, the agency has determined that it does not possess any records responsive to your request at this time.
Accordingly, the agency considers this request closed.
Thank you for reaching out to LED.
Monica Craig-Champagne
Strategic Communications Project Manager
Louisiana Economic Development
Amazing, right? Was it my threat of litigation or did LED just happen to magically come up with the information that it did not possess any records responsive to my request?
I suppose we’ll never know the answer to that but I do know one thing for certain:
At least one of the persons on my list of 30 did, in fact, sign an NDA, LED’s denial notwithstanding. So, on the face of it, it would seem someone at the agency took it upon themselves to simply concoct a “non-response” response to my request in order to prevent possible litigation—without actually ascertaining who had signed an NDA.
This is an example of how this administration responds to public records requests. And remember, when Jeff Landry was attorney general, he actually sued a reporter for the Baton Rouge Advocate who had the temerity to make a public records request and later, it was that same Landry as governor who convinced the Repugnantcan legislature to water down the state’s public records laws.
Discover more from Louisiana Voice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


In MAGAland the law does not apply to DJT or any Republican loyal to him. While the Supreme Court might agree on DJT, they certainly should not on his minions.