A lot of attention is being given to events in Washington, Minneapolis and that’s good. We should be aware of what’s taking place in our government and in law enforcement.
But we would be wise to also keep tabs on events in Louisiana and actions by our state elected officials.
We would do well to begin with Dustin Granger, owner of the Dustin Granger for Louisiana web blog, who recently posed the not-so-rhetorical question: “Why in hell are we giving our sensitive voting data and private Social Security numbers to the Department of Justice?”
That seems to be a fair question to which no one has as yet provided a satisfactory answer.
Granger correctly pointed out that other states had refused to provide the data but Louisiana literally over itself in complying, a step Granger describes as reckless.
Think this is an overreaction or a case of paranoia? Well, let’s turn our attention to the state of Maine where ICE is beginning to make its presence felt. There are reports of a STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICER being detained by ICE agents who terrified the officer’s pregnant wife and left the officer’s vehicle idling in the street.
In another report, ICE agents approached an elderly woman who had driven closest to the officers. They first spoke with her and then proceeded to FIRE PROJECTILES at her vehicle. The projectiles, assumed to be paintballs, were fired at other cars in a Home Depot parking log and in another instance, ICE agents began photographing a woman who was driving near them. Asked why they were taking photos of her, an agent replied, “We’re compiling a data base. You’re now a domestic terrorist.”
Okay, Maine and Minneapolis are a long way from Louisiana but if you think for one moment it can’t—wone—happen here, you’re deluding yourself into a false sense of security.
This country is under siege, folks, and our governor is fiddling as we burn.

Even as a new just-released reveals Louisiana ranks DEAD-LAST in the health of its citizens but first in the U.S. for chlamydia (a sexually-transmitted infection: I didn’t know, either) and second in Gonorrhea, (Interestingly, 9 of the 10 lowest-ranking states in those health rankings were red states while 9 of the 10 healthiest states were blue states) our governor has busied himself writing an opinion piece for NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE extolling the virtues of dog-killer Kristi Noem as Secretary of Homeland Security at the same time others are demanding her resignation or impeachment.
Jeff Landry has also found ample time to serve as Cankle Ankles Trump’s special envoy to Greenland (whatever that’s supposed to mean) even though the Louisiana Constitution clearly says he is forbidden to hold another position concurrent to his term as governor. Meanwhile, Landry’s tough-on-crime reforms are resulting in UNPRECIDENTED COST INCREASES because prisoners are remaining in jail longer as a result of the governor’s stricter parole policies.
In Squeaky Toy Landry’s first year as governor and supposedly under his stellar leadership, the Louisiana legislature in May 2024, passed the Community Air Monitoring Reliability Act (CAMRA) which PROHIBITED local groups from lodging allegations of air quality violations through the use of their commercial sensors. Violations were subjected to a fine of up to $33,000 per day.
This appeared to be an especially egregious action to stymie local citizen participation in the monitoring of air quality around Louisiana’s hundreds of petro-chemical plants, particularly those along the Mississippi River between Baton Rouge and New Orleans. After all, what citizens group can afford fines of $33,000 per day when the only real concern is the ability to breathe freely?
It’s anybody’s guess as to how much campaign money was poured into legislators’ coffers by the petro-chemical interests in the months leading up to the passage of that law that all but gives the plants carte blanche to spew noxious fumes without fear of punishment.
Discover more from Louisiana Voice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


The fact the state legislature would make law punishing citizens who monitor air quality is proof positive of how poor our air quality is and how corrupt our legislators are. But neither are revelations. Just more of the same for Louisianans.
Not saying that environmental condition are the best in Louisiana and CAMRA is overbearing, environmental measuring/observation is an exact science. There are recognized environmental methods used to monitor hazards (air/water/soil). However, you have to use the same method for a one-to-one correlation. If the federal government requires emmisions be measured with Method 1 and a group conducts its own testing with Method 3 you CANNOT compare the two results directly and there may be no way to ever correlate those 2 distinct results. Add to this mix Method 1 may cost $1000 per sample to run and Method 2 costs $50 per sample. CAMRA requires environmental sampling used in cases to be the method required by the authorizing agency (i.e., EPA, LDEQ, TOSCA, etc.). Should state and federal agencies figure a way to address community concerns – Yes. Will/Can this always occur – No.. 30 yr state environmental professional.
But at least those readings could prompt at least a cursory investigation to see if the concerns are warranted–rather than ignoring them. And a $33,000 penalty for each offense seems a bit severe, to say the least.
That these plants are emitting pollution is hardly open to challenge and they do affect respiratory functions.
Yes, I agree the penalty is very wrong AND more investigations need to be conducted. However, you can’t use the wrong data to support court action/sanctions. I struggled many years conducting investigations, proved violations and “deals” were made by the powers that be that I was unable to stomach. A solution, elect people that do their duty to protect people and the environment
Oh, I was not suggesting court action based on potentially incorrect data–just that reports might spur DEQ officials, for example, to at least check on verification or debunking of data, not simply outlaw them.
And as for electing more dedicated, honest people, that’s next to impossible with the influence of campaign money from the special interests.
Strictly my opinion, but I think Citizens United should be reversed in its entirety and then the state should follow suit by disallowing ANY corporate money into the election process.