Slip and fall lawsuits don’t normally grab the media’s attention because they’re as common as those lawyer ads that give local TV news programs a reason to exist.
(And speaking of lawyer ads, we really have some beauties on the Baton Rouge stations. While the joke at one time was that TV news existed only to keep the lawyer ads from bumping together, that’s no longer a valid observation. Today, it’s not unusual to have three different lawyer ads back-to-back-to-back during local news programs. We have one with a talking dog that’s especially bad and another features a lawyer hiking in the woods – in wing-tip shoes. And the ones with paid shills giving testimonies about how much they got in their lawsuit but they fail to tell us how much of that so-called award went to attorney’s fees, expert costs, court costs, court reporter costs, etc.)
Oh, yes, slip and fall lawsuits. There was one in Hammond where a family was walking in a large chain store and Mama slipped and fell. And wouldn’t you know, Junior just happened to be recording the whole thing on his video camera – just in case Mama fell, I suppose. It took only a nano-second for that lawsuit to get thrown out.
But there’s an unusual slip and fall case pending in federal court in Lafayette that might bear closer scrutiny because of an existing policy of the defendant that makes the chain a target for future similar litigation.
Plaintiff Sharon Blanchard is suing Circle K convenience store after she slipped on standing water inside a story in Youngsville on Sept. 3, 2018, and struck her head and coccyx (tailbone), resulting in “traumatic brain injury, post traumatic headaches, multi-level lumbar disc injuries requiring surgery and psychological/emotional injuries.
Nothing out of the ordinary for such a lawsuit so far.
But then there’s the deposition of Circle K employee Corey Crochet on De. 1, 2020, that could conceivably attract more slip and fall cases like ants to a picnic. Shoot, it could even produce a class-action slip and fall action. Now a class-action slip and fall suit would truly be unique.
So, what did Crochet say in his deposition that would make it so… well, convenient to join in the fun of suing your friendly neighborhood Circle K store?
Besides Blanchard’s claim that Crochet knew of the accumulated water at the store entrance, Crochet’s testimony “detailed Circle K policy of not using mats or rugs at entrance areas and of his own personal experience of concern for the slippery condition of the floor at the store entrance,” the court noted.
Blanchard attempted unsuccessfully to amend Circle K Regional Director of Operations Olajuwan Alexander into her lawsuit as a defendant because, Blanchard says, Alexander was the “policymaker who implemented an oral policy of removing floor mats from stores within his region beginning in 2018.
“The uncontested evidence before this Court [is] that Alexander was tasked by Circle K with implementing a policy regarding the use of floor mats in stores within his region,” U.S. District Judge Patrick J. Hanna ruled. “Alexander determined that the use of floor mats, which often became warped, torn or otherwise unserviceable, created a trip hazard for guests and orally directed stores within his region to cease using mats for this reason. As an alternative, Alexander directed that stores would display ‘wet floor’ warning signs and periodically wet and dry mop floors on rainy days to mitigate slip and fall hazards,” Hanna wrote.
Though Blanchard’s attempt to amend Crochet and Alexander into her litigation as defendants wad denied, Judge Hanna said his denial would have no effect on her claim against Circle K.
Unfortunately or fortunately I can remember a time when attorneys first started advertising and soliciting for clients who had been in car accidents. So many people were aghast that lawyers would stoop so low. Like so many other things today, what was once considered in bad taste has become the norm. These attorneys back then were referred to as ambulance chasers. I suppose the money got so big they all jumped into the cesspool.
Hello,
The article could easily be read from two different points of view. Could you please tell me your exact point of view on the case. Just curious.
Thank you for your time
The point was that Circle K management seems to be inviting litigation by refusing to place floor mats in the doorways of its stores to alleviate slipper conditions. I was not advocating litigation, just questioning the decision by Circle K to not provide the door mats.
Are you familiar with any other cases similar to this one after reading case online very interesting. Due to lack of rugs and no wet signs nor anything around puddle of water to warn customers Circle K sounds like they do not have the customers’ best interest in mind. Also, the Crochet employer stating his concern – doesn’t that point to a breach on Circle k for providing a safety to customers?
The defendant and manager can’t be personally held liable although Circle K can – right?
Question- If a plaintiff requestS security videos and liable party destroys footage are there any repercussions or and is this seen as destroying evidence.
Do u know what laws are regulations which details where signs should be placed and how many?
Are there any information regarding stores must have commercial mats present?
It’s obvious they removed mats due to a claim against them for trip and fall.
Commercial mats are designed in a way to not slip and move and also the sides are designed to hold mat in place. I would think a store of that magnitude would not have torn are ripped rugs – you can have a company come out weekly or buy one at Home Depot!!
If liable party states there was a wet sign up prior to accident although plaintiff and customer (witness) states there were no signs at time of accident and a sign magically appears after accident – wouldn’t you think the store would provide evidence proving this to be true?
Most cases settle out of court to avoid time and high expenses . After what I read this one may have the jurors siding with plaintiff – they may resonate with injured party after all they are also customers of these convenience stores.
Hopefully places that service customers will reconsider the need of mats and proper protocol for placing wet signs. Just maybe they can avoid another person from falling.
I remember there was a time not long ago when people had morals and values. People were accountable and valued humanity.
How can a negligent party deny any responsibility for negatively affecting a person’s life forever and be ok with that. Wow they have lost there way?
Looking forward to hear your thoughts
Thanks