If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.
That’s the approach of State Rep. Blake Miguez (R-Erath) who has pre-filed House Bill 20 again this year after seeing the bill vetoed by Gov. John Bel Edwards last year
The bill, which passed the legislature in the 2020 special session mostly on a party-line vote, would have blocked millions of dollars in grants to local election officials through a nonprofit supported by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
A state district court helped keep Attorney Gen. Jeff Landry’s losing streak intact last October with a RULING that likewise thwarted attempts at halting funds from the nonprofit Center for Tech and Civic Life which said it was offering the grants to help local leaders conduct elections during the coronavirus pandemic.
Somehow, in the minds of Miguez, Landry and their ilk, dark money in support of a candidate or party is just fine but non-partisan funding to assist officials in conducting elections somehow throws the entire democratic process into crisis mode.
Zuckerberg funded the grants with a $300 million donation to the nonprofit and followed up with an additional $100 million.
Local officials across the state applied for nearly $8 million in grant money after being informed of the availability of the funds by Secretary of State Kyle Ardoin. Parish clerks and voter registrars said they would use the money for personal protective gear and wages for workers staffing voting sites for longer hours.
As a stark illustration of how Repugnantcans think as a herd as opposed to individually, Ardoin initially encouraged grant applications by local officials but as soon the Repugnantcan Party and Landry voiced opposition, he quickly switched positions.
Landry maintained in his lawsuit that private money going to public entities to run elections would have a “corrosive influence.” The suit named as defendants the Center for Tech and Civic Life and Dawn Cole, a lobbyist who helped connect local officials to the grant money.
The Center for Tech and Civic Life called such lawsuits “frivolous” and attorneys for Cole said the lawsuit’s allegations were “little more than unfounded statements suggesting that the nonprofit corporations are somehow attempting to taint the election process” and that Landry’s claims were “nothing more than a scare tactic aimed at preventing local election officials from gaining additional funding to assist with the workload, increased voter turnout and added burdens posed by COVID-19.”
So now, Miguez is back with HOUSE BILL 20 because Repugnantcans somehow fear that outside help in holding elections might encourage participation by more people, people they can’t control – something the National Repugnantcan Party has openly admitted it dreads more than anything else.
It’s not that the Repugnantcans don’t want outside money going into elections; the dark money that is poured into both parties’ campaigns is ample evidence of that. In fact, I’m still receiving solicitations from the National Repugnantcan Party every single day in my email in-box and for nearly three months after the election, I was getting up to 20 email solicitations per day from the Trump organization (I still don’t know how I, of all people, got on their mailing lists).
So, its evident that the Repugs are not against money in elections; they just don’t want money going to aid in holding election when they can’t control the purse strings.
All you have to do is look at the vote last year on Miguez’s HB51 to see how the vote was split along party lines. The final vote in the Senate was 25-11 in favor with all 25 votes cast by Republicans. Only one Republican, Sen. Rogers Pope of Denham Springs, voted nay. It was the same in the House with only one Democrat, Francis Thompson of Delhi, being among the 66 votes in favor while all 28 negative votes were cast by Democrats.
The bottom line for Miguez and his Repugnantcan cohorts is if private funds are being used for non-partisan purposes, it must be stopped. Only money designated for a particular political party, preferably dark money, is welcome.
Partisan campaign contributions are democracy at work to people like Landry and Miguez. Non-partisan financial support of the electoral process, however, means the sky is falling.
Interesting, in view of the fact that Landry is quite put out by the provisions in the 1.9 trillion covid relief bill that prohibit local officials from using the extra federal income to offset local expenses and reduce local taxes. What a hypocrite!
Tom, how can one get in contact with you? As a member of the press club I would have expected to have run into you, but am not aware of ever being in a meeting together. With Covid closing meetings, I even went as far as to send a letter to the address the Sectary of state has, but it was returned. If you feel so inclined my email is attached, Thanks Remi DeLouche
Now, Tom, you know all too well that Zuckerberg character is trying to use his money to put implants in us all for his own benefit and that of the democracks. How’s he doing it? Hell, I don’t know, what am I, a rocket scientist or something? Or is it Bill Gates through his big bucks put into human services (heh, heh, we know what that means, don’t we?) money? Warren Buffet? That commie illegitimate, George Soros? We know what we know…arg, arg, arg…where am I, anyhow?
Seriously though, this piece proves several things, among them: 1. The Commissioner of Elections should be a classified state employee. 2. Dark money should be eliminated in its entirety. 3. Being an elected official means serving oneself and if the citizens receive any benefit it is a happy coincidence.
Correct me if I am wrong, isn’t the commissioner of elections head of the election division within the SOS office? So you would have to change the law to provide that the election division shall be headed by a classified employee. That would be in contrast to every other division head in state government. As all of them are appointed. I can’t think of any division heads that are classified.
Clifford, as Ron Thompson points out below the Commissioner of Elections was once a elected official and had his own department (Jerry Fowler was the last one). That office was subsequently combined with the Secretary of State – not a bad idea functionally, but now the commissioner is directly under the control of the Secretary of State. It would really be good if the commissioner of elections was independent and free from influence by another elected official. Since that is impossible under the present circumstances, making it a classified position would be the only way I know to provide some independence from political influence by the Secretary of State. In lieu of that, I guess the law could be changed to provide protection.
Current law: “B. The commissioner of elections shall be appointed by the secretary of state subject to Senate confirmation. He shall serve at the pleasure of the secretary of state at a salary fixed by the secretary of state, which salary shall not exceed the amount approved for such position by the legislature while in session. The commissioner of elections shall have the same qualifications as required for statewide elected officials. He shall have such responsibilities and perform such duties as shall be prescribed by the secretary of state.” [R. S. 18:18]
The current commissioner of elections happens to be a woman and an exceptionally well-qualified one with 35+ years of experience. She requires no supervision by the Secretary of State to fulfill her job of providing fair, free elections.
Just my opinion.
e.g. https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/03/17/stimulus-lawsuit-gop-ohio-attorney-general/
Remember Jerry Fowler, son of Mutt I think, got canned for his gambling habit and donations from his suppliers but ran a great shop no election fraud. Legislature moved it back to SOS (Earl and Mr. Martin didn’t get along) and then the Republicans used it naturally to raise money for their own politics. Agree with Mr. Winham. Nothing ever changes just the characters. Who am I??? ron thompson still trying to learn