To paraphrase Ronald Reagan: here they go again.
The expenditure of public funds, under the law, is supposed to be just that: public.
But trying to pry an accounting of legal costs associated with the state’s defense of 4th Judicial District law clerk Allyson Campbell has proved to be somewhat problematic, to say the least, for a north Louisiana publication.
The Ouachita Citizen in West Monroe is the only newspaper willing to take on the powers that be and so far, it has encountered a huge stone wall.
[The unwillingness of the Monroe News-Star to involve itself in the fight for the public’s right to know may be attributed to two factors: (1) it’s a Gannett publication which in and of itself, lends itself to mediocrity, and (2) Campbell once worked part time as something of a gossip columnist for the paper. Of course, it didn’t hurt that her father was an executive with Regions Bank and is married to the daughter of influential attorney Billy Boles, or that Campbell is the sister of Catherine Creed of the prominent Monroe law firm of Creed and Creed. Got all that? If not, here’s a LINK to one of our earlier stories about Campbell.]
But back to the latest developments in this ongoing saga. The Citizen made a by-the-books public records REQUEST of the Division of Administration (DOA) in which it sought an accounting of legal costs in defending Campbell in a lawsuit brought against her by Stanley Palowsky, III, for damages incurred when she “spoliated, concealed, removed, destroyed, shredded, withheld, and/or improperly handled” his petition for damages against a former business partner.
It seems that some 52 writ applications went missing for more than a year only to be found in Campbell’s office where, incredibly and inexplicably, she was using them as an end table in her office.
So, how DOA respond to the Citizen’s request? Basically, it said attorney’s bills for legal services were exempt from production under an exception pertaining to pending claims.
That’s debatable. Yes, in ongoing litigation, communications between attorney and client are definitely privileged. But a simple accounting of expenditures for legal representation has nothing to legal strategy or negotiations. It’s an expenditure, pure and simple, and should be available as a public record.
The Citizen, in its story, pointed out that Christian Creed, Catherine Creed’s husband and law partner, contributed $5,000 to Attorney General Jeff Landry’s campaign in November 2015.
But more significantly, LouisianaVoice combed through campaign reports and found that Christian Creed, Catherine Creed, and the Creed Law Firm were quite active in their support of other candidates.
Gov. John Bel Edwards was the beneficiary of $25,000 in contributions from both Catherine and Christian Creed over the three-year period of 2015-2107, and Commissioner of Administration Jay Dardenne received $2,000 in contributions from Christian Creed in 2013 and 2014.
Attorney Scott Sternberg of New Orleans is representing the Citizen and by letter dated August 27, gave DOA until today (August 30) to comply with the request.
Great feature! I’ll be very intrigued to see DOA’s response to the demand letter. Why? Because I got the exact same run-around when I sought to verify figures I’ve obtained regarding the taxpayer defense costs pertaining to Murphy Painter v. OIG and Corey delaHoussaye v. OIG, to wit:
Original request and DOA’s generic response: http://www.laboards-commissions.com/DOA_Generic.jpg
DOA’s follow-up response and my reply back indicating I am perfectly willing to merely accept the invoices with EVERYTHING but the cost figures redacted: http://www.laboards-commissions.com/DOA_Up_Yours1r.jpg
DOA’s follow-up response to my proposal for everything but the cost figures to be redacted: http://www.laboards-commissions.com/DOA_Up_Yours2.jpg
I’m REALLY glad the Ouachita Citizen has challenged DOA’s denial and, if they end up getting their records, mine better follow in short order!!
Are we so naive as to think that “public records” actually mean public records? Where does it say in our Civics courses that we probably will have to go to court to obtain public records? By gosh….there ought to be a law that makes records public on official demand. Sigh!
There is. It’s called R.S. 44:1 et seq., aka Louisiana’s Public Records Act.
I realize this, Tom. I was being snarky. But, why are folks that officially make the request being forced to go to court to enforce this? As I said, we are too trusting and seem to be letting agencies get away with forcing this legal action to gain public records? Or, am I reading this all wrong? First thing that comes to mind is “What are they trying to hide?”