Louisiana Voice

The Livingston Parish Library controversy continues to fester, thanks to the influence of outsiders who apparently consider the local folks too dense to grasp an issue as basic as the First Amendment and so feel they must do our thinking for us.

And apparently, there are certain Livingston Parish leaders who willingly and eagerly drink that Kool-Aid, even to the point of attacking a good and decent person like Amanda Jones whose one sin was to speak up against censorship and book banning.

All that aside, the Livingston Parish Council, in a 5-4 vote on Thursday removed every member of the parish library board, though two of the members were promptly reappointed.

The latest brouhaha arose after the now former library board gutted the parish library BUDGET, cutting or reducing several key programs, even down to slicing funds for building maintenance.

One of the most puzzling comments to come out of Thursday’s three-hour meeting was uttered by council member Erin Sandefur who said with a straight face, “In no way was the budget cut to defund or harm the library in any way.”

Funny she should say that when the original library board shakeup did not occur until one Michael Lundsford of Lafayette and his organization, Citizens for a New Louisiana, stuck their noses into the machinations of the local library and deemed all things inappropriate.

That would seem to indicate that there is an element of leadership that doesn’t lead at all, but merely parrots the platitudes and banalities of others so often that we get an echo chamber of “witch hunts,” “fake news,” “stop the steal,” “drain the swamp” and of course, “MAGA.”

Show me just one of the catch-phrases being bandied around that wasn’t first spoon-fed to the masses.

But Sandefur went a step farther, saying, “There’s been propaganda and untruth stated in public that is the radical left way…”

Wait. What? Radical left?

Lady, let me give you a quick history lesson about the “radical left.”

The “radical left,” as you call it, pulled this country out of an awful depression after a Republican president put us there in the first place.

The “radical left” is responsible for the 40-hour work week.

The “radical left” is responsible for paid vacation for workers.

The “radical left,” largely through the efforts of organized labor, is responsible for your having medical and retirement benefits.

The “radical left” is responsible for our being able to count on Social Security and Medicare in our golden years.

The “radical left” is responsible for the implementation of workplace safety regulations.

The “radical left” is responsible for worker’s compensation to help you survive if you’re injured on the job.

The “radical left” is responsible for the inspection of food to ensure you won’t be serving spoiled or diseased meat to your family.

And Ms. Sandefur, if you remember nothing else, remember this: the “radical left” is responsible for women’s suffrage, which gave women the right to vote which in turn led directly to your being able to seek and win the seat on the Livingston Parish Council which you now hold.

So, what can we thank the “right” for?

Basically, we can thank the “right” for continuing to lavish tax breaks on the corporations and the very rich individuals so that the middle class can bear the burden of taxation and so that we can continue to complain about “welfare queens.”

We can thank the “right” for elimination of the Fairness Doctrine, which opened the doors to idiots like Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson.

We can thank the “right” for wave after wave of deregulation which led directly to the 2008 collapse of several major Wall Street banks, subprime mortgages, predatory lending, etc.

We can thank the “right” for the ever-increasing income disparity between the very wealthy and those who actually produce that wealth, the workers.

Worst of all, we will most probably one day be able to thank the “right” for the complete erosion of rights and benefits that will be systematically yanked from our grasp, leaving a “right” ruling oligarchy.

And, if we study our history, perhaps one day we’ll look back and ask, “Did all this really start over a library?”

(Full disclosure: To put my rant into proper perspective, it might be useful to know that I spent more than 40 years as a Republican, voting for such candidates as Goldwater, Nixon, Reagan, Ford and the first Bush. It was a governor named Jindal and a clown named Limbaugh who pushed me away from the “radical right.”)

It’s literally been years, no, decades, in the making but it finally passed in a Congress that seemed so divided that nothing could, other than finger-pointing and sham investigations, ever be accomplished.

But occasionally, they get it right, even if it takes a while.

Even Foghorn Leghorn Kennedy and Clay Higgins were on board for this one. It doesn’t get any more bipartisan than to see Higgins, Mike Johnson, Steve Scalise and Troy Carter vote alike on the same issue.

I am, of course, talking about House Resolution 82 that has been kicking around for years without ever being brought up for a vote despite at one time having enough co-sponsors to override a presidential veto should it have been necessary.

Passage of the bill will repeal both the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO). The WEP, enacted in 1983, reduced Social Security benefits of workers who received government pensions not covered by Social Security. The GPO, enacted in 1977, reduced benefits for spouses, widows and widowers whose spouses received public sector pensions.

H.R. 82’s passage is of a monumental for Louisiana’s state employees who also worked in the private sector and for school teachers whose spouses likewise worked in the private sector and paid into Social Security.

State employees who also logged time in the private sector heretofore were penalized by an offset to their Social Security benefits. With the passage of H.R. 82, that will no longer be the case.

Teachers, school bus drivers and cafeteria workers were perhaps the most penalized of all. A school employee whose spouse who paid into Social Security while working in the private sector for decades, was ineligible to draw survivor benefits upon the spouse’s death. That, too, has now changed for the better.

Louisiana’s senior U.S. Sen., Bill Cassidy, said his former high school civics teacher was unjustly penalized because she spent her life as a public school teacher. “When her husband, who had worked at an Exxon refinery, passed away…her Social Security was cut to a fraction because she had worked in the public sector as a teacher,” he said, adding that she would have received better benefits in retirement “if she had never worked at all.”

Passage of the bill will increase benefits for more than 70,000 people in Louisiana and for more than 2 million Americans overall.

H.R. 82 was first introduced in 2005 and even though a number of House members signed on as co-sponsors sufficient to override any potential presidential veto, the bill inexplicably was never brought to a House floor vote, leading many observers to believe it was all just for show.

The bill passed overwhelmingly in the House, by a 327-75 vote on Nov. 12 and likewise passed the Senate on Dec. 20 by a 76-20 vote.

The Retired State Employees Association (RESA) and the Louisiana Retired Teachers Association (LRTA) have been lobbying for years for passage of H.R. 82.

LRTA Executive Director Rodney Watson specifically cited U.S. Rep. Garret Graves for helping the resolution’s passage, saying, “This epic two-year journey was championed by Congressman Garrett (sic) Graves whom we owe a tremendous debt of gratitude!

“I want to thank Janis Hernandez (LRTA Federal Legislative Chair) for her relentless efforts at participating and keeping the ball rolling on this project. We have shared many day and night, weekday and weekend conversations on reacting to a political volleyball that could have killed this bill at any point during the legislative process.”

Watson said that during his 10 years as executive director of LRTA, “we have moved from state resolutions, to proposed statute that gained little steam, to a full-blown bipartisan effort that will finally compensate millions of Americans who have suffered financially for years.”

He said that last-minute “shenanigans” to tack amendments onto the bill “that would have slowed the process to kill it, failed. Attaching H.R. 82 in its original form to the budget bill at the last minute was an act of genius and could have easily failed if it had not been for the bipartisan support built by the advocacy of our membership and organizations nationwide.”

Frank Jobert, legislative affairs director for the Retired State Employees Association (RSEA), was equally appreciative of the bill’s final passage after what he described as a 30-year effort.

“First of all, on behalf of RSEA and myself, congratulations to all government employees/retirees, who will finally receive the Social Security benefits they earned and deserve. Passage of H.R. 82 by Rep. Garret Graves, (R-District 6-LA) author of the “Social Security Fairness Act of 2023,” was long overdue and was a complete team effort. No one individual can take credit for the success of this bill, as it was a totally united group throughout the state of Louisiana. The bill is expected to be signed at 9:00 AM CST by President Biden on Monday, January 6, 2025 at The White House.

“The entire Louisiana Congressional Delegation (House and Senate): the leadership, House Speaker Mike Johnson, Rep. Steve Scalise (House Majority Leader) unanimously voted for passage of HR 82. We were also encouraged by the leadership of Speaker Pro Temp, Rep. Mike Johnson, (District 27-Pineville) who organized and coordinated the Louisiana Retirement Systems and Retiree Associations throughout Louisiana and the rest of the United States. 

 “It was a battle that began approximately 30 years ago (my first exposure to the problem was in 1994 as a member of the LASERS Board of Trustees). It seemed that every year for the last 30 years, someone from Louisiana or one of the other states would introduce legislation to repeal the WEP and/or GPO. We were led to believe that the legislation would never pass because of the cost to the Social Security System. But I was always encouraged by the fact that it was bi-partisan legislation that impacted about 15 states, some of which were large and very populated states, such as, California, Texas, Ohio, Massachusetts, and of course, Louisiana, etc.

“I never gave up hope that we would get some relief at some point, whether partial of full repeal. In spite of “failure” year after year, we never said NEVER. The stars were finally aligned this last session of the 118th Congress and with the help of Senate President Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and the aforementioned Louisiana Senate and House delegations, and bipartisan (Democrat and Republican), we crossed the finish line with a victory. Hopefully, our Louisiana government employees and/or retirees will see relief and the added benefits to their Social Security checks in the not-too-distant future!

“Thanks again to all who participated in this democratic process, we fought the good fight and are now victorious!!”

Father Hecker is dead but the problems of the Catholic Church live on.

Lawrence Hecker, who received a life sentence just this past Dec. 18 (one week before Christmas) died in prison on Dec. 27 (two days after Christmas) after serving only 11 days after pleading guilty to sexually abusing altar boys decades ago.

Beginning with the very first court case, back in 1984 in Lafayette, Louisiana, involving sexual abuse of pre-teen altar boys by priests and continuing through the 2002 scandal in Boston through today, the church has paid out more than $5 billion (with a “B”) on some 20,000 claims against about 7000 Catholic priests – and each of those numbers continues to grow as more money is paid to more victims of more priests with each passing day.

The ugly truth is that Catholic boarding schools, with the blessings of the U.S. government, ripped thousands of Native American children from their homes from 1828 to 1970 and institutionalized them in efforts to “Americanize” them (do you get the irony of “Americanizing” Native Americans?) to the white man’s culture. It doesn’t take a math wizard to see that the U.S. government was sanctioning family separations long before the words “border crisis” were in vogue.

One such school was the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Pennsylvania. Sports fans may recognize Carlisle as the alma mater of Olympic hero Jim Thorpe. He was one of the lucky ones. Over their 142-year history, more than 3100 Native American children died at the Catholic-run boarding schools.

Fast forward to today and we see Catholic dioceses all over the landscape declaring bankruptcy over the myriad sexual abuse claims. One of those is the Diocese of New Orleans where 550 victims have submitted a $1 billion (again, with a “B”) demand. Others include the Oakland Diocese which has been accused of illegally transferring $106 million in assets just before declaring bankruptcy; Buffalo, where the presiding judge has issued a decision to allow 17 new “test cases” to MOVE FORWARD, which will allow the litigation to determine liability and damages.

In reaction to that, the presiding judge in the New Orleans bankruptcy, Meredith Grabill, has indicated she will call the Buffalo judge for consultation. That can only mean she is considering allowing more of the New Orleans cases to go to trial.

One disturbing development there, however, is Grabill’s indication that she intended to “destroy” SEALED INFORMATION received by the court because the case-related information was so protected and inviolable that the court’s gag order could not be lifted under any circumstances. Never mind the fact that destruction of court records is highly unorthodox.

It might well be a stretch to do so, but it just seems that the timing was really bad for LSU to enter into a contract with Our Lady of the Lake, a Catholic-run hospital, to assume the contract for administering health care, including OB-GYN care, to LSU students.

Nor does it seem appropriate that all meetings at the LSU Student Health Center now begin with forced prayer, especially in light of the First Amendment which says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…”

In fact, the former director of LSU’s Student Health Center, Julie Hupperich, has filed a LAWSUIT against the LSU Board of Supervisors on that point and others, according to Louisiana Illuminator, an online news service.

Hupperich alleges that non-medical personnel were able to access medical and mental health records of students which she said is a violation of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPAA), a privacy law that protects patients’ health information from disclosure to unauthorized recipients.

Even more revealing of OLOL’s motives behind the takeover, Hupperich said: the recovery of funds OLOL has donated to LSU in the past. She says in her petition that LSU Vice President of Finance and Administration Kimberly Lewis confided in her that OLOL was interested in “recouping” its multi-million-dollar contribution to the university through operation of the health center. Sounds like a little quid pro quo there to me.

She also alleges that health center employees are required to adhere to the “Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services and Catholic Social Teachings” in order to keep their jobs, which she claims also violates the First Amendment’s prohibition against a state-sponsored religion.

Agreeing to those policies limits health center employees in their ability to “provide complete birth control, gynecological, suicide prevention, mental health and sexual transition counseling and services,” Hupperich says in her lawsuit. 

The health center is only allowed to prescribe birth control to students in certain non-emergency cases, Hupperich alleges, and mental health providers must limit their counseling on suicide to advising that suicide is a “mortal sin,” she said. 

The pledge also requires providers to agree that life begins at conception and that “abortion is never permitted,” Louisiana Illuminator quotes the lawsuit as alleging.

The Louisiana Illuminator also said on Aug. 31, 2022, that when the partnership between LSU and OLOL was approved, Lewis assured the LSU Board of Supervisors that there would be NO CHANGES in the availability of gynecological and reproductive healthcare and that those responsibilities would not be turned over to OLOL “Because of the Lake’s relationship as a Catholic organization,” she said at the time, “we know that there are some differences, and we don’t want our students to not have access to all services they currently have.”

That distinction was even put in writing in the cooperative agreement between LSU and OLOL.

Now, two-and-one-half-years into the agreement, OLOL and the Catholic Church have apparently lain waste to any agreement not to disturb the status quo insofar as health care at LSU is concerned.

Instead, at a time when logic would dictate that its leaders should devote their time and energy to addressing a growing crisis that literally threatens to consume the church. It seems to be counter-productive to instead focus on such things as forced adherence to a religious belief as a condition of employment, denying critical health care and the clawback of funds donated to the university. The latter smacks of quid pro quo and would seem to render the term donation meaningless. It completely guts the very spirit of charitable giving – and most certainly sends the signal that any future giving will likewise have strings attached.