Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Louisiana ACLU has launched one of the most ambitious PROGRAMS ever to combat police misconduct, harassment and violence in the state, according to an announcement by Nora Ahmed, ACLU of Louisiana legal director.

The initiative, called “Justice Lab: Putting Racist Policing on Trial,” has thus far enlisted the PARTICIPATION of 39 prestigious law firms from 14 states, the District of Columbia and London.

Only Three of the law firms are from Louisiana. They are Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver and Kuchler Polk Weiner of New Orleans, and Kutcher Tygier & Luminais of Metairie. None are from Baton Rouge.

Other cities represented are Miami, Atlanta, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Palo Alto, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Austin, Dallas, Seattle and Columbia, S.C.

Southern University Law Center’s Externship Program and Tulane Law School’s Civil Rights & Federal Practice Clinic are among 18 law schools and clinics from 12 states and the District of Columbia that are taking part in the intensive litigation program.

LSU’s Paul M. Hebert Law School in Baton Rouge and Loyola Law School in New Orleans are conspicuously absent from the list of law schools and clinics from places like Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, New York, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, New Jersey, Ohio and Colorado who have enrolled in the project.

The objective of the campaign is to “unleash a wave of lawsuits intended to hold police accountable for unconstitutional misconduct and (to) stop racially discriminatory policing,” Ahmed said. By focusing intensive efforts on a single state, she said, the initiative hopes to “establish a litigation blueprint for altering police conduct across the country.”

“For centuries, law enforcement officers have brutalized Black communities with near – with justice coming too late or not at all,” said Alanah Odoms Hebert, ACLU of Louisiana executive director. “A dearth of lawsuits challenging these unconstitutional abuses has exacerbated this crisis, compounding the systemic racism that pervades our criminal legal system and allowing these practices to continue unchecked.

“Often, police are only held accountable after we witness gut-wrenching images of people of color being subjected to intense brutality,” she said. “Justice Lab aspires to hold police accountable for every instance of unconstitutional conduct to the extend the law allows.”

She said as efforts continue to fight racism, “Justice Lab will complement these efforts by unleashing a wave of litigation to hold police accountable.”

So, why Louisiana as the target for the pilot program?

Several reasons, really:

Louisiana has the largest ratio of police officers to residents of any state in the US and, perhaps coincidentally, has the highest incarceration rate in a nation that has the highest incarceration rate among civilized nations in the world, thus making Louisiana’s incarceration rate highest in the world.

Louisiana law allows police to expunge any alleged violation of criminal battery and assault involving domestic violence from personnel files if formal complaints are made anonymously or were not substantiated within 12 months, meaning police misconduct goes largely unchecked, making Louisiana a microcosm of the structural flaws that plague the nation’s criminal justice system, Odoms-Hebert said.

Louisiana has a long tradition of abuses of Blacks as evidenced by recent events in IBERIA, JEFFERSON DAVIS, JEFFERSON, ORLEANS and other parishes as well as in municipalities like VILLE PLATTE and HAMMOND.

Victims of unconstitutional police misconduct may not understand how to vindicate their rights, or may not have the financial resources to retain counsel.

That’s why the Louisiana ACLU has rolled out its four-part plan:

First, law firms, law school clinics and local community organizations and activists will be recruited, an effort already well underway.

Second, a social media call will go out for up to 1,000 plaintiffs in Louisiana to come forward and challenge perceived unconstitutional stops and seizures which have occurred over the past nine months.

Third, a police misconduct deterrence campaign will be spearheaded which will encourage the public to record any police encounter they witness involving a police stop.

Fourth, the ALCU and legal volunteers will organize the receipt and dissemination of cases across network participants.

As a culmination of those four steps, law firms will spearhead legal challenges to racially-motivated stops and seizures under the Fourth and 14th Amendments, as well as any other applicable laws.

“If each law firm agrees to take up to 10 legal actions, we can accommodate up to 1,000 cases, Odom-Hebert said.

“We can, and must, do more to stop the police misconduct, harassment and violence that far too often leads to the deaths of innocent people of color,” she said.

“By focusing critical law firm and law school resources on a single state …the ACLU of Louisiana can help establish a litigation blueprint geared toward altering police conduct that every other state in the nation can follow.”

Participating law firms to date are:

  • Akerman, Miami
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Washington D.C.
  • Alston & Bird, Atlanta
  • BakerHostetler, Cleveland
  • Ballard Spahr, Philadelphia
  • Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, New Orleans
  • Boies Schiller Flexner, New York City
  • Cohen & Gresser, New York City and Washington, D.C.
  • Cooley, Palo Alto, Calif.
  • Covington & Burling, New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington, C.C.
  • Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis
  • Durie Tangri, San Francisco
  • Fish & Richardson, Boston
  • Foley Hoag, Boston and New York City
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London
  • Gilbert, Washington, D.C.
  • Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, New York City
  • King & Spalding, Atlanta
  • Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago
  • Kuchler Polk Weiner, New Orleans
  • Kutcher Tygier & Luminais, Metairie
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia
  • Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, Columbia, S.C.
  • Norton Rose Fulbright, New York City, Houston, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C.
  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco
  • Perkins Coie, Seattle
  • Proskauer Rose, New York City
  • Reid Collins & Tsai, New York City, Austin, Dallas, Washington, D.C.
  • Roche Cyrulnik Freedman, New York City, Miami
  • Sidley Austin, Chicago
  • Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York City
  • Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D.C., New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco
  • Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City
  • Susman Godfrey, New York City, Houston, Los Angeles, Seattle
  • Anthony Cecutti, New York City
  • Jennifer R. Louis-Jeune, New York City
  • Venable, Washington, D.C.
  • Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, New York City
  • Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto

Participating legal clinics include:

  • Boston University School of Law’s Clinical and Experiential Programs
  • Cardozo Law’s Civil Rights Clinic, New York City
  • Denver Law’s Civil Rights Clinic
  • Fordham Law School’s Federal Litigation Clinic, New York City
  • Georgetown Law’s Appellate Courts Immersion Clinic, Washington, D.C.
  • Howard University School of Law’s Criminal Justice Clinic, Washington, D.C.
  • New York University School of Law’s Civil Rights Clinic
  • The Ohio State university Moritz College of Law’s Civil Clinic, Columbus, Ohio
  • Penn Law’s Appellate Advocacy Clinic, Philadelphia
  • Penn State Law’s Civil Rights Appellate Clinic, University Park, PA.
  • Seton Hall School of Law’s Center for Social Justice, Orange, N.J.
  • Southern University Law Center’s Externship Program, Baton Rouge
  • Tulane Law School’s Civil Rights & Federal Practice Clinic, New Orleans
  • University of California-Irvine School of Law’s Critical Race Lawyering Civil Rights Clinic
  • University of Georgia School of Law’s Appellate Clinic, Athens, GA.
  • University of Texas Law School’s Supreme Court Clinic, Austin, TX.
  • William & Mary Law School’s Appellate & Supreme Court Clinic, Williamsburg, VA.

78 days to the Nov. 3 election

 

“They want $25 billion — billion — for the post office. Now they need that money in order to have the post office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots. But if they don’t get those two items, that means you can’t have universal mail-in voting.”

—Donald Trump, on why he’s cutting funding for the USPS.

 

“If we don’t make a deal, that means they don’t get the money. That means they can’t have universal mail-in voting; they just can’t have it.”

—Trump, to Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Aug. 13.

 

“This is a repugnant, unbelievable scenario unfolding in front of public eyes. The Postal Service is the one arm of public service that reaches every household and every business every day in America. I believe Trump and the Republicans are playing with fire in trying to disrupt or discredit the Postal Service.”

 

—Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), who chairs a congressional subcommittee with oversight of the USPS.

 

“He is undermining the safest voting method during a pandemic and forcing people to cast a ballot in person. It is reprehensible.”

—Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, speaking about Trump.

 

“I am alarmed. I am disheartened. But no one in America has given up, because people are on to him. They know what he’s doing. Americans, as you can see from their votes in their primaries, would rather put ballots in the mailbox than their families in the hospital.”

—Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who is pushing for a $3.6 billion appropriation to assist states in preparing for the fall elections.

 

“This is not just terrible policy, but it may be illegal under federal law and other state laws as well. A lot of work is being done literally as we speak over the weekend and at nights to try to figure out what Trump and DeJoy are doing, whether they have already violated or are likely to violate any laws and how we can take swift action to try to stop this assault on our democracy.”

—Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring. He has joined fellow attorneys general from Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Washington and North Carolina in opening discussions on how to sue the administration to prevent operational changes or funding lapses that could affect the election. [You may have noticed that Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry is not among them. Obviously, Jeff Landry is unconcerned about the voting rights of Louisianans.]

“I signed directives to give a payroll tax holiday, with the understanding that after the election — on the assumption that it would be victorious for an administration that’s done a great job — we will be ending that tax. We’ll be terminating that tax.”

–Donald Trump, in a White House announcement on Monday. [Folks, he’s talking about the payroll tax (6.2% paid by you and 6.2% paid by your employer that funds Social Security and the 1.45% paid by each of you and your boss to fund Medicare—7.65% total for both programs—if self-employed, you pay the entire amount). That can – and does – mean only thing: Trump aims to terminate Social Security – and Medicare – altogether. Remember where you heard it.]

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trumps-worst-campaign-promise-183331408.html

 

“Congratulations to future Republican Star Marjorie Taylor Greene on a big Congressional primary win in Georgia against a very tough and smart opponent.  Marjorie is strong on everything and never gives up – a real WINNER!”

–Trump tweet, Aug. 12, 2020, congratulating QAnon nut job on her Republican primary win in Georgia’s 14th Congressional District.

 

“Every 10 years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small, crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”

—Michael Ledeen, a key figure in the Iran-Contra scandal and later a member of the George W. Bush White House, who co-authored a book with Michael Flynn. Ledeen’s wife, Barbara, initiated the first proposal to obtain Hilary Clinton’s private emails in December 2015 while a staff member for Sen. Chuck Grassley, one of Donald Trump’s fiercest defenders. (The New Yorker, April 18, 2019). […and we wonder why America is hated in some parts of the world.]

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/in-the-mueller-report-erik-prince-funds-a-covert-effort-to-obtain-clintons-e-mails-from-a-foreign-state

 

“AOC was a poor student … this is not even a smart person, other than she’s got a good line of stuff. I mean, she goes out and she yaps.”

—Trump on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. [Big mistake; classic case of picking on the wrong person.]

 

“Let’s make a deal, Mr. President: You release your college transcript, I’ll release mine, and we’ll see who was the better student. Loser has to fund the Post Office.”

—AOC in response to idiot child Trump. [Not a chance in hell that he’ll take her up on her offer. Even Trump isn’t that stupid.]

 

“What do you think Donald Trump’s nickname for you would be?”

—One of the questions asked of the 11 finalists for selection as Joe Biden’s running mate. […and of course, he will come up with a nickname – like any second-grader on the playground. Isn’t it nice to know that we can look forward to a campaign of real substance and not wasted on such trivial matters as peace, the environment, health care, poverty, human rights and employment?

 

“Not only did you print this birtherism-on-steroids racist crap, Newsweek, but you failed to disclose this guy ran against Harris and lost  AND wrote an article in National Review saying (the) exact opposite about Canadian-born Ted Cruz. When did Newsweek become both racist AND stupid? Of course Ted’s a conservative white male, so TOTALLY different, right?”

—Kurt Eichenwald tweet in response to Newsweek op-ed by John Eastman who questioned Kamala Harris’s eligibility for the office of vice resident. [The Newsweek op-ed was just the opening salvos, folks. There will be many more examples in the next 80 days that will disclose just how pathetically racist and misogynistic the Republican Party, at its very core, really is.]

 

“Nasty.”

—Trump, on Kamala Harris.

“Nasty.”

—Trump, on Hillary Clinton.

“Nasty.”

—Trump, on Nancy Pelosi.

“I wish her well.”

—Trump, on Jeffrey Epstein girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell.

 

 

 

 

“The closest thing is, uh, in 1917, they say, uh, the great – the great pandemic and it certainly was a terrible thing where they lost anywhere from 50 to 100 million people. Probably ended the Second World War; all the soldiers were sick.”

–Trump, in White House press briefing, Aug. 10, 2020. [But we took all the airports at Fort McHenry in that Revolutionary War.]

 

[For more than two centuries], “the United States has stirred a very wide range of feelings in the rest of the world: love and hatred, fear and hope, envy and contempt, awe and anger. But there is one emotion that has never been directed towards the U.S. until now: pity.

“COVID-19 didn’t lay America low; it simply revealed what had long been forsaken. As the crisis unfolded, with another American dying every minute of every day, a country that once turned out fighter planes by the hour could not manage to produce the paper masks or cotton swabs essential for tracking the disease. The nation that defeated smallpox and polio, and led the world for generations in medical innovation and discovery, was reduced to a laughing stock as a buffoon of a president advocated the use of household disinfectants as a treatment for a disease that intellectually he could not begin to understand.”

–Anthropologist Wade Davis, writing in Rolling Stone.

 

“Mr. President, after three and a half years, do you regret at all, all the lying you’ve done to the American people?”

Trump looked confused. “What?” he asked.

“All the lying. All the dishonesties,” 

“That who has done?”

“You have done,”

–Exchange between HuffPost’s S.V. Dáte and Donald Trump at Aug. 13 press briefing before Trump paused and then called on another reporter without answering. [Disrespect for the president? No more than the disrespect he’s shown for the American people. It’s long past time when the media should hold him accountable for more than 20,000 lies he’s told since taking office. And yes, we should respect the office of the president but the one occupying the office is only a person – like the rest of us – and is accountable to us and is owed no automatic allegiance or fealty.]

 

“I heard it today that [Harris] doesn’t meet the requirements. And, by the way, the lawyer that wrote that piece is a very highly qualified, very talented lawyer. I have no idea if that’s right. I would have assumed the Democrats would have checked that out.”

— Donald Trump, in remarks to reporters, Aug. 13, 2020. [(Sigh) Here we go again with Trump and his birther rumors. To paraphrase Mr. T, I almost pity the fool.